Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

What Is Maximal Extractable Value (MEV)

Validated Individual Expert

MEV is a crypto term used to describe the deliberate reordering, inclusion, or exclusion of transactions when producing a new block (to be added to a blockchain) in order to extract as much profit as possible. Think of it as the extra value squeezed out of a block beyond the standard reward and gas fees by choosing which transactions to include, and in which order.

MEV has most often been associated with the Ethereum network due to its significant decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. The more complex the transactions involved in a block are — for example, smart contracts connected with lending, borrowing, or trading — the more opportunities there will be for block producers to make extra profit (extract maximum value) by deciding to include, omit, or reorder certain transactions.

Defining Maximal Extractable Value (MEV)

When this concept was first introduced, it was mostly associated with the Ethereum network, which used a proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism at the time. As such, miners were the ones with the power to reorder, include, or exclude transactions when producing blocks, and could make these choices to squeeze out extra value.

This led to the term Miner Extractable Value being coined to explain the phenomenon of this extraction of as much extra profit as possible. However, in September 2022, Ethereum finalized The Merge, a technical upgrade that switched the network’s consensus mechanism from PoW to proof-of-stake (PoS).

As such, new blocks on the Ethereum network are no longer created by miners but by validators. PoS systems aren’t immune to MEV, however. Blocks are still being created, so whoever chooses which transactions to include, and in what order, can make decisions that will help them to extract as much money from a block as possible. While the old MEV concept still exists, it is now said to stand for Maximal Extractable Value, since it’s no longer exclusive to miners.

How Does It Work?

Understanding how MEV works requires a basic understanding of the role of block producers (be they miners or validators). They play a crucial role in securing and maintaining blockchain networks, and are responsible for verifying transactions and adding them to the network in the form of blocks. Depending on the specific chain, this process is known either as mining or validation.

Simply put, block producers guarantee the integrity of transactions on the network and ensure it continues to function. Without them, no new data can be added to the chain. Block producers are the ones who collect user transaction data and organize them into blocks to be added to the network chain.

The important thing to note is that it’s up to the block producers which transactions to include in their blocks. Logically, transactions are chosen based on profitability, which means those with the highest fees attached to them will be selected first. This is why users pay higher gas fees (or transaction fees) during busy periods — to ensure their transactions are selected first. If a block producer selects the transactions with the highest fees, they will make a bigger profit. Consequently, transactions with lower fees have to wait longer to be included in a block.

However, there is no rule that dictates transactions must be selected or ordered based on fees. When transactions include more complex information (as they do in smart contract-enabled blockchains), block producers can include, exclude, or reorder transactions so as to make extra profit beyond the standard block rewards and fees.

For example, selecting certain transactions over others and ordering them in a particular way may allow for additional profits due to resultant arbitrage opportunities or on-chain liquidation. This is the essence of MEV: the process of selecting and ordering transactions for further financial gain.

MEV searchers

While it seems like MEV is a strategy that solely benefits block producers, a significant amount of MEV is secured by other participants, known as “searchers”. These participants use MEV-specific operations that analyze network data in search of profitable MEV opportunities.

Searchers typically pay extremely high gas fees to block producers to ensure their profitable MEV transactions and strategies are executed. Rationally, depending on the competition for an MEV opportunity, a block producer can receive gas fees of up to 99.99% of a searcher’s potential profit.

Take decentralized exchange (DEX) arbitrage, for example, where searchers have been known to pay more than 90% of their MEV income in gas fees — they do so as it’s the only way to ensure a profitable arbitrage trade is executed ahead of similar trades.

Top Examples of MEV

Arbitrage, front-running, and liquidation all offer opportunities to searchers and block producers seeking to profit through MEV. Below, we take a closer look at these examples to provide a more detailed understanding of what MEV is and how it works.

Arbitrage

When the price of an asset isn’t consistent across exchanges, there is immediately an arbitrage opportunity. In the crypto space, the same token could be priced differently on two different DEXs. When this is spotted by someone (an arbitrageur), they will move to make a trade to profit from the discrepancy. MEV takes place when a searcher’s bot identifies the pending transaction and inserts their own transaction ahead of it in order to extract the value offered by that arbitrage opportunity.

Front-running

Searchers and block producers can take advantage of their ability to order transactions in a block to front-run a significant buy order that’s still pending in the transaction pool. MEV occurs when a similar buy order is inserted ahead of that trade in order to secure a more favorable price before the large buy order goes through, which would increase the price of that digital asset.

A similar MEV strategy is “sandwiching”, which entails placing a buy order before and a sell order after a specific price-moving transaction, thereby taking advantage of the price pressure from both sides.

Liquidations

DeFi allows users to take out loans against deposited digital assets as collateral. If the market moves and the value of the collateral drops below a certain price, that position is liquidated. The smart contracts involved often pay out a reward or fee to the transaction that triggers the liquidation.

An MEV opportunity exists here for any searcher or block producer running bots to spot this kind of transaction, and who are then able to insert their own liquidation transaction in the block ahead of anyone else, thereby extracting the reward value.

Benefits and Drawbacks of MEV

MEV is a rational strategy as those engaging in it are mainly trying to maximize their profits. Some would argue that it benefits the wider ecosystem by ensuring that inefficiencies are corrected as quickly as possible.

For example, MEV searchers racing to be the first to capture value from arbitrage opportunities results in speedy price corrections across DEXs. Similarly, lending protocols don’t want risky loans going unchecked should collateralization levels become unbalanced, so the MEV liquidation push leads to lenders being repaid as soon as possible.

However, MEV also presents a number of issues that mustn’t be ignored. Some implementations, such as front-running and sandwiching, produce bad outcomes for other users, who are forced to overpay on their trades, suffer from greater slippage, or lose out on value in what is essentially a zero-sum game.

Additionally, MEV searcher activity can lead to higher gas prices and network congestion as they compete to insert their transactions into blocks to capture the resulting value.

On a fundamental level, if the value from reordering transactions in a previous block is greater than the rewards and fees of the next block, MEV could make it economically rational for a block producer to commit to blockchain reorganization. This would then threaten the consensus and integrity of the network.

As the ecosystem continues to rapidly evolve, finding solutions to these MEV-related problems is now a core area of research and development within space.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • A Total of 37,212.18 DMD Permanently Burned Over the Past 7 Days

    July 9, 2026 — According to the latest on-chain data released by DMDAO, a total of 37,212.18 DMD has been permanently burned over the past seven calendar days through the protocol's predefined trading and wealth management burn mechanisms.

  • Whale Transfers 1,133 BTC to Coinbase Prime, Valued at $71.48 Million

    According to Onchain Lens monitoring, a whale transferred 1,133 BTC from Coinbase to Coinbase Prime through an intermediary wallet, valued at $71.48 million.

  • U.S. AI Chip Stocks Decline Before Market Open, Intel Falls Over 3%

    On July 7, U.S. AI chip stocks experienced widespread declines before the market opened. Intel dropped over 3%, while AMD, Qualcomm, and NXP fell more than 2%. TSMC, Broadcom, and Tesla decreased by over 1%, and NVIDIA declined by 0.7%.

  • China's Central Bank Increases Gold Reserves for the 20th Consecutive Month

    As of the end of June, China's gold reserves stood at 75.44 million ounces (approximately 2,346.446 tons), an increase of 480,000 ounces (about 14.93 tons) from the end of May, which reported 74.96 million ounces (approximately 2,331.52 tons). This marks the 20th consecutive month of gold accumulation.

  • China's Foreign Exchange Reserves in June at $341.6262 Billion

    On July 7, China's foreign exchange reserves for June stood at $341.6262 billion, a decrease of $26 billion from the end of May, representing a decline of 0.75%, with expectations set at $343.2 billion.

  • U.S. Storage Stocks Drop Pre-Market, SanDisk and Micron Down Over 4%

    On July 7, U.S. storage concept stocks collectively fell in pre-market trading. Western Digital dropped over 5%, SanDisk and Micron Technology fell over 4%, Seagate Technology declined over 3%, Rambus fell over 2%, and SMI fell over 1%.

  • U.S. Stocks in Optical Communication Sector Drop Pre-Market

    On July 7, stocks in the optical communication sector of the U.S. market collectively fell pre-market. Astera Labs dropped over 4%, while Marvell Technology, Credo Technology, and AXT Inc. fell more than 3%. Tower Semiconductor, MaxLinear, Corning, Applied Optoelectronics, GlobalFoundries, Lumentum, and Qorvo all declined by more than 2%. Coherent, Nokia, Amphenol, and Broadcom dropped over 1%.

  • Pre-market Decline in U.S. Storage Stocks

    In pre-market trading, U.S. storage concept stocks experienced a widespread decline, with Micron Technology falling by 4.8%, SanDisk dropping over 4%, Corning down more than 2%, and Intel decreasing by over 3%.

  • Two Departments: Support for Reinsurance Institutions to Increase Capital and Issue Supplementary Capital Tools

    On July 7, the National Financial Supervision and Administration Bureau and the Shanghai Municipal Government released several measures to accelerate the construction of the Shanghai International Reinsurance Center. Among these measures, they proposed to enhance the quality and efficiency of the reinsurance industry, support reinsurance institutions in increasing capital and expanding shares, and issuing supplementary capital tools to improve the capacity for internal capital accumulation and external capital supplementation, thereby strengthening the reinsurance industry's capabilities. The initiative aims to guide the insurance industry to focus on major national projects, strategic emerging industries, and livelihood security, consolidating insurance and reinsurance underwriting capabilities to enhance risk protection levels. It also supports reinsurance institutions in leveraging their professional technical advantages to assist the insurance industry in reducing risk.

  • Sources: Saudi Arabia Plans to Expand Oil Pipeline to Red Sea, Increasing Capacity by 2 Million Barrels Daily to Bypass Strait of Hormuz

    On July 7, five informed sources revealed that Saudi Arabia is considering expanding the crude oil pipeline capacity to its western coast on the Red Sea, allowing Saudi Arabia and its neighbors to transport more oil without passing through the Strait of Hormuz. This east-west pipeline, built in the early 1980s, has gained strategic importance since the outbreak of the Iran war in February and the disruption of shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. The pipeline can deliver up to 7 million barrels of crude oil per day to the Red Sea port. The CEO of Saudi Aramco stated in May that approximately 2 million barrels are supplied to west coast refineries, while about 5 million barrels are for export. Sources indicate that Saudi Arabia is in preliminary discussions with some neighboring countries regarding the pipeline expansion, aiming to add about 2 million barrels of pipeline capacity per day. It remains unclear whether Aramco's planned expansion involves upgrading existing infrastructure or constructing new pipelines. One source mentioned that the expansion plan also includes a smaller refined oil pipeline. Two sources indicated that the expansion scale could range from 1 million to 2 million barrels per day, with refined oil also being considered. Another source stated that the project would take several years and cost billions of dollars, requiring adjustments to Saudi crude pricing mechanisms.