Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Shifting Tides

Validated Project

Following an explosive month of volatile price action, Bitcoin is consolidating above the on-chain cost-basis of several cohorts. Despite a -6.2% pullback to a weekly low of $22.6k, the average BTC holder is now holding an unrealized profit, with several macro scale on-chain indicators suggesting turning of the market tides is potentially underway.

In this edition, we shall explore this from the lens of spending activity in response to the recent price uptick, considering a wide cross section of the market. The goal is to identify emerging behavioral patterns to gauge shifting macro tides. We shall also investigate whether the incentive to sell is starting to overpower the opportunity cost of HODLing (and how we can identify this shift), as well as the relationship between mature and new participants, as capital begins to change hands.

A Return to Profitability

We shall begin our investigation by analyzing the realized profits locked in by the market during the most recent cycle. We can see a explosion in profit taking after Oct 2020 in response to extraordinary monetary policy. This can be seen to diminish dramatically since the peak in Jan 2021, detoxing over the following two years back to 2020 levels.

An recent resurgence in realized profits can be observed in response to recent price action, however, it remains muted in response to the exuberance experienced throughout the 2021-22 cycle.

The losses realized by the market over this same time-frame started to expand after Jan 2021, reaching an initial peak on the May 2021 sell-off (A Bear of Historic Proportions).

However, it can be seen that the present level of realized losses has declined towards the cycle baseline of around $200M/day, with an overall contraction in loss profile barring explicit capitulation events (e.g. LUNA / FTX).

Taking ratio between Realized Profits and Losses, we can identify structural changes in dominance between the two. Following the collapse in price action after the Nov 2021 ATH, a regime dominated by losses ensued, driving the Realized P/L Ratio below 1, with increasing severity with each subsequent capitulation in price action.

Nevertheless, we can observe the first sustained period of profitability since the Apr 2022 exit liquidity event, suggesting initial signs of a change in profitability regime.

🔔Alert Idea:Realized P/L Ratio (7D-EMA) falling back below 1.0 would indicate a large increase in realized loss dominance, indicating increased spending by investors holding coins with a higher cost basis.

The Bitcoin Sell-Side Risk Ratio is a metric we can use compare the magnitude of total realized profit and loss as a percentage of the Realized Cap (a measure of network valuation).

From this lens, the combined volume of realized profit and loss remains relatively small compared to the asset size. This indicates that magnitude of spending events remains marginal in scale, especially relative to the euphoria experienced during the bull market, and the FTX capitulation event.

Overall, this suggests that in aggregate, most coins that are on the move were acquired relatively close to the current spot price, and thus are not locking in a large ‘realized’ payload.

Back in the Green

Net Unrealized Profit/ Loss Ratio (NUPL) shows that the recent rally has launched the spot price of Bitcoin above the average acquisition price of the wider market. This puts the market back into a regime of unrealized profit, where the average holder is back in the green.

Comparing the duration of negative NUPL across all past bear markets, we observe a historical similarity between our current cycle (166-days) and the 2011-12 (157-days) and 2018-19 (134-Days) bear markets. The 2015-16 bear market remains a standout with respect to bear market duration, experiencing a regime of unrealized loss nearly twice as long as the runner up (2022-23 cycle).

The ratio between the total unrealized profit held by the market and its yearly average can then  provide a macro scale indicator for a recovering market.

The recent surge in price action has rallied above several aggregate on-chain cost-basis models, resulting in a significant improvement in the market financial position. This momentum metric is now approaching an the equilibrium break point and bears similarity to the recoveries from the 2015 and 2018 bear market years.

Confirmed breakouts above this equilibrium point have historically coincided with a transition in macro market structure. We also note that the length of time elapsed below this equilibrium point has been similar across major bear markets.

Variants of the SOPR (Spent Output Profit Ratio) metric can be used to inspect the aggregate profit multiple locked in by a variety of market cohorts on any given day.

For the Short-Term Holder cohort 🔴, it can be seen that STH-SOPR is now trading above a value of 1.0 on a sustained basis, displaying the first burst of profit taking since March 2022. This reflects the large volume of coins acquired at lower prices over recent months.

The wider market 🔵 has also seen a return to profitable spending, recovering after a very deep and extended period of heavy losses.

Assessing the Long-Term Holder cohort, we can observe a persistent regime of sustained losses since the LUNA collapse. Despite this cohort continuing to take losses over the last 9 months, there are initial signs of a recovery, with a potential uptrend in LTH-SOPR starting to form.

A Shift in Character

The Adjusted Reserve Risk metric can be used to contextualize the behavior of the HODLer class. This cyclical oscillator quantifies the balance between the aggregate incentive to sell, and the actual expenditure of long dormant coins.

  • Higher values indicate both price, and HODLer spending is elevated.
  • Lower values indicate both price, and HODLer spending is declining.

A structural change in the trend appears to be underway, as this oscillator continues to approach its equilibrium position (with 55% of all trading days below the current value). This suggests that the opportunity cost of HODLing is decreasing whilst the incentive to sell is increasing.

Previous break-outs above this equilibrium position have historically denoted a transition from a regime HODLing, to one of increasing profit realization, and a rotation of capital from older bear market accumulators, back towards newer investors and speculators.

We can add weight to this thesis of capital rotation by inspecting the Realized Cap HODL Waves. Here we have isolated for coins held for 3 months or less, and note two key observations:

  • The percentage of wealth held by newer holders is increasing, albeit marginally. Since this is a binary system, this indicates that wealth must be transferring from older hands to newer ones.
  • The depth of this inflection point is very much in line with historical precedence.

Subsequently, we can employ the Realized HODL Ratio to further supplement the above observation. This metric compares this balance of wealth held between between 1-week and 1y-2y old coins, producing a macro scale oscillator.

  • Higher values indicate a disproportionate wealth held by new buyers and speculators.
  • Lower values indicate a disproportionate wealth held by long-term, higher conviction HODLers.

When assessing the Realized HODL Ratio, both the rate of change and the trend direction are generally of greater importance than the absolute value. Currently, we are witnessing a rounding bottom structure forming, suggesting a net transfer of wealth is taking place, as well as the trend beginning to transition to the upside.

With this as context, we can introduce a new variation of the RHODL ratio, which compares the wealth held by single-cycle Long-Term Holders (6m-2y) to the youngest Short-Term Holders (1d-3m). This seeks to evaluate the capital rotation turning point across cycle transitions.

Wealth can only leave the 6m-2y cohort by either maturation into a more senior age band, or via the spending of coins, resetting the age of the coin entirely. Currently, we can see a large and sharp inflection point in this RHODL Ratio variant, suggesting a significant and sudden rotation of capital from last cycle’s Long-Term Holders to a new cohort of buyers.

This market phenomena has been strikingly consistent across prior bear markets, with large inflections in capital rotation signalling a significant change in market character and structure.

Summary and Conclusions

After an extended and savage bear market, marred by consecutive deleveraging events, there are signs that full detox of exuberance has taken place, and a cyclical transition may be underway. Usually these periods are punctuated by a sharp change in aggregate profit and loss dominance, which appears to be taking place.

However, this trend remains young, both from the lens of duration, and of magnitude of realized profit and loss relative to the market size. As previously discussed in the WoC#45, the rotation of capital from Long-Term Holders to the Short-Term Holder cohort has been a persistent trend over the last 12-months. This is elegantly reflected in the growing wealth held by the Short-Term Holder cohort, absorbing coins from their Long-Term Holder counterparts who continue to distribute (generally at a loss).

It appears that the market is within a transitional phase, evolving from the late stages of a bear to the beginning of a new cycle. With past cycles as a guide, the road ahead remains an arduous one, with key examples being 2015, and 2019. These transitional periods historically been characterized by an extended macro sideways market, littered with local volatile moves, usually in both directions.

Disclaimer: This report does not provide any investment advice. All data is provided for information and educational purposes only. No investment decision shall be based on the information provided here and you are solely responsible for your own investment decisions.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Yushu Technology's IPO Review Scheduled for June 1

    On May 25, it was announced that the Listing Review Committee of the Shanghai Stock Exchange will hold its 31st meeting of 2026 on June 1, 2026, to review the initial public offering of Yushu Technology Co., Ltd.

  • 【AI.Claw Foundation Fully Acquires DexFV, Simultaneously Rebrands and Launches Flagship Perp-DEX DexSK, with Comprehensive Migration of Assets and Network Structure to SuperStrike】

    May 25, 2026 — According to official sources, AI.Claw Foundation announced that it has completed the full acquisition of the on-chain capital market infrastructure DexFV, and has simultaneously rebranded it as DexSK, aiming to establish it as the flagship Perp-DEX product within the AI.Claw Foundation ecosystem. Together with Strikebit.ai, SuperStrike, and other ecosystem components, it will comprehensively initiate the strategic convergence of the Web3 + AI Super Agent Financial Ecosystem.

  • Astarter locks in the DeFAI liquidation layer, occupying a critical position in emerging categories that remains unfilled by competitors

    With the rapid rise of the DeFAI (Decentralized Finance x Autonomous AI Execution) category in 2026, Astarter has secured the "clearing layer" position within this space, which remains unclaimed by competitors. Astarter is a decentralized AI + DeFi (DeFAI) infrastructure built for Web4, designed to create an economic system executable by AI, enabling autonomous AI agents to independently perform on-chain trading execution, strategy optimization, and real-time data processing. Industry comparative analysis reveals that the first three layers of the AI Agent economic architecture are already occupied by leading projects such as Olas, Virtuals, and Fetch.ai, leaving the "clearing layer" long vacant. Astarter, with its operational DeFi stack of four products since 2021, stands as one of the few publicly recognized projects to claim this position.

  • Central Bank's Open Market Operations Net Withdrawal of 243 Billion Yuan Today

    On May 25, the People's Bank of China conducted a 258 billion yuan 7-day reverse repo operation today, with a bidding amount of 258 billion yuan and a winning amount of 258 billion yuan, at an operation rate of 1.40%, unchanged from before. Due to the maturity of 500 billion yuan in 1-year Medium-term Lending Facility (MLF) and 10 billion yuan in 7-day reverse repos today, there was a net withdrawal of 243 billion yuan.

  • Nikkei 225 Index Surpasses 65,000 Points

    On May 25, the Nikkei 225 index surpassed 65,000 points, setting a new historical high with an intraday increase of 2.64%.

  • Nikkei 225 Index Surpasses 64,000 Points, Sets Historical Record

    The Nikkei 225 Index has surpassed 64,000 points for the first time, setting a historical record, with an intraday increase of over 1%.

  • BTC Surpasses $77,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $77,000, currently priced at $77,012.01, with a 24-hour increase of 0.43%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Iranian Official: Management of the Strait of Hormuz Will Not Return to Pre-War Status

    On May 25, local time May 24, Rezaei, spokesperson for Iran's National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, stated that the management of the Strait of Hormuz will not return to its pre-war status. He also mentioned that the strait is currently under Iranian control, and after the end of the state of war, Iran can facilitate the passage of vessels. Rezaei further stated that Iran has not negotiated with the United States regarding its enriched uranium stockpile and will never back down from its current position; the U.S. has no choice but to accept Iran's conditions.

  • Trump: US-Iran Agreement 'Not Fully Negotiated Yet'

    On May 25, U.S. President Trump stated on the 24th that the agreement between the United States and Iran is 'not fully negotiated yet,' accusing some uninformed individuals of 'unfounded criticism.' Trump posted on social media, saying, 'If I reach an agreement with Iran, it will be a good and appropriate agreement.' 'No one has seen it or knows its contents. It is not fully negotiated yet. So don't listen to those losers who criticize something they don't understand at all.' According to U.S. media reports, although the draft of the agreement has not been made public, some individuals in the U.S. have criticized it fiercely, claiming it actually undermines the goals set by the Trump administration. White House officials told the media that it will take 'a few more days' to finalize the agreement between the U.S. and Iran. (Xinhua News Agency)

  • Vitalik: Ethereum Foundation is Not the Central Manager of the ETH Ecosystem, Future Development Will Shift to 'Small and Long-term' Approach

    On May 25, Ethereum founder Vitalik shared his views on the future development direction of the Ethereum Foundation in a post on the X platform. He emphasized that this is just his personal opinion. The board does not consist solely of him, and he does not have more special powers than other board members. Aya Miyaguchi is leading most of the execution work for this transformation, while his own involvement is more focused on technical issues. The board is currently expanding, and his influence within the organization will continue to decline in the future, which, frankly, is what he hopes to see. By 2025, the Ethereum Foundation has made significant improvements in its execution capabilities. Many issues have been resolved, and the foundation continues to benefit from greater efficiency and a stronger focus on specific goals. However, as these issues were addressed, he began to care more about another concern: he often sees people saying, 'Vitalik has always talked about Ethereum needing to be decentralized, having privacy, and becoming a shelter technology, but why do the actions of the Ethereum Foundation not reflect these ideals?' Of course, there are those who hold completely different views. Some do not feel there is a crisis at all, but rather believe that the Ethereum Foundation has finally begun to take execution and business development seriously, and the next focus should be to continue along this path faster and stronger. Vitalik believes that this difference essentially reflects varying sensitivities to different types of criticism, and he is more easily hurt by criticisms regarding deviations from values. Vitalik stated that the Ethereum Foundation should not be 'the center of Ethereum,' but rather 'a node with clear responsibilities, existing alongside other nodes.' In the past, they have always said this, but many people in the ecosystem, including some within the foundation, hoped the foundation would become a true center. Now, they are taking concrete actions to ensure the foundation becomes the latter. This is particularly important because the Ethereum Foundation is essentially a resource-limited and organizationally limited entity. The foundation currently holds only about 0.16% of all ETH, which is even lower than many large ETH holders; whereas many other blockchain projects' 'central foundations' typically control 10%-50% of their tokens. The current Ethereum Foundation has decided to use its remaining resources to pursue 'long-term viability' rather than continuous expansion (which also means they will sell less ETH). The foundation will focus on those things that are crucial for Ethereum to become a censorship-resistant, control-resistant, open, private, and secure system, but that no one else would do if the foundation does not. This means they must make difficult choices. Some projects and individuals they highly respect may no longer belong to the foundation's system in the future. In fact, if they want important tasks to attract external capital, it may be necessary to keep some talented individuals, influential public figures, and those who share the mission and CROPS philosophy outside the foundation. This also means that the Ethereum Foundation will take a clearer and more principled stance on a cultural level.