Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Chain Research — How Can Blockchain Technology Be Applied to Chain of Custody?

Validated Project

The legal system was designed as a tool used to achieve justice and protect the rights of its citizens. But too often, this system is slow to adapt to the changing needs of society, leaving many without recourse and denied of their rights. The failure of the legal system to recognize and implement necessary reforms leaves an imperishable mark on the lives of individuals throughout the nation.

While the criminal justice system serves an essential obligation for society as a whole, it’s important to acknowledge its flaws. A recent study revealed that out of the 2.3 million people serving time in prison, 11,500 of those individuals are innocent of a crime they did not commit.

Even more alarming is the fact that every year, an average of over two people per day are wrongfully convicted and sentenced to jail time. Although this number seems trivial, it is important to address that every wrongful conviction represents not only a grave injustice to the innocent, but also a missed opportunity to bring the true perpetrator to justice.

The legal system is a long-standing institution that cannot be easily reformed overnight. Nevertheless, making small adjustments in how forensic evidence is handled can significantly aid in the battle against wrongful convictions. A significant issue in the justice system is the improper management of crucial forensic evidence, particularly in the chain of custody.

The chain of custody procedure is a critical element of handling crime scene evidence, from the moment it is collected until it is presented in a court of law. It involves multiple handovers of the evidence, with interested parties logging the evidence in and out of storage and creating a paper trail to record its movements. However, this process is susceptible to multiple human-errors, and defense attorneys have the ability to challenge the integrity of the evidence.

Chain of custody errors can occur during any moment of evidence management, and can include several different mistakes. For example, a contaminated crime scene may occur if law enforcement fails to properly secure it, which could lead to evidence being contaminated by people who are not authorized to handle it. Law enforcement may also fail to properly document evidence, including where it was found and who it was found on, which could cause confusion or misidentification of the evidence. Improper handling and storage of evidence are other potential mistakes that can occur.

The integrity of the chain of custody is crucial in ensuring that the evidence presented in court is reliable and untainted. Any errors in the chain of custody can seriously compromise a defendant’s right to a fair trial, as it may result in the admission of unreliable or tampered evidence. If such errors are identified in a case, an attorney may file a motion to suppress the flawed evidence, preventing it from being used in the courtroom. In some cases, even minor chain of custody issues can be presented to the jury to consider when determining a defendant’s guilt.

Lack of adherence to proper procedures in the chain of custody can lead to wrongful convictions or even acquittals. This can have devastating consequences for both the accused and the justice system as a whole. In order to prevent chain of custody errors and maintain the fairness of the legal system, it’s essential to establish and enforce clear guidelines for the handling and preservation of evidence. Failure to do so can erode public trust in the justice system, and compromise the rights of those who find themselves entangled in it.

However, with the rapid adoption of emerging technologies, the implementation of blockchain could potentially address these issues by creating and tracking unique evidence tokens for each piece of data that is collected. These tokens can be stored and audited on a public or private blockchain, providing transparency, immutability, and traceability to the chain of custody process.

How can blockchain technology verify the authenticity of evidence?

Blockchain technology is a decentralized digital ledger that records transactions in a secure and tamper-proof manner. The decentralized technology can be utilized to maintain the integrity of the evidence in various ways. To start, blockchain can create an immutable and transparent chain of custody for evidence by recording every transfer of custody. Each transfer is verified and recorded by the network of nodes, making it almost impossible to alter the records without being detected. The tamper-proof nature of blockchain ensures that the original source of the evidence can be traced with complete transparency.

Secondly, blockchain’s cryptographic security provides an extra layer of protection against data manipulation. Blockchain utilizes a complex algorithm to encrypt the data and authenticate the transaction. Again, each transaction is verified by a network of nodes, and once it is recorded, it becomes a permanent part of the blockchain network. Any attempt to alter or manipulate the data is detected and rejected by the network, ensuring the integrity of the evidence.

Finally, blockchain technology can provide real-time access to information linked to the chain of custody. This means that authorized parties can access the chain of custody records at any time, making it easier to manage and track the evidence throughout the legal process. This can save time and resources while ensuring the integrity of the evidence at trial.

What are the limitations of implementing blockchain technology in the legal system?

As with any new technology, there are challenges and limitations associated with implementing blockchain for chain of custody in the legal system. Here are some of the key obstacles that must be considered before blockchain can become a viable solution for chain of custody:

I. Technical barriers:

Blockchain is a complex technology that requires a considerable amount of technical expertise to implement successfully. This can pose a challenge for legal organizations that may not have the necessary technical skills or resources to deploy and maintain the technology.

II. Regulatory and legal issues:

The regulatory and legal framework is another critical barrier to the implementation of blockchain technology. The legal industry is highly regulated, and the use of new technology must comply with existing regulations. This can create a significant challenge for organizations that want to implement blockchain technology, as there may be a lack of clear guidance or uncertainty regarding how the technology can be applied within the legal framework. This challenge is compounded by the fact that blockchain technology is still relatively new, and there is limited case law and precedent around its use.

III. Resistance to change:

The legal industry is known to be conservative and slow to adopt new technologies. Many legal professionals are hesitant to adopt new technology, and there may be resistance to change from those who are comfortable with traditional methods of chain of custody. This resistance can pose a significant challenge for organizations that want to implement blockchain technology.

Advocating for Justice and Innovation with REFORM

With over 11,500 innocent people incarcerated and more than two wrongful convictions per day, small strides towards the proper management of forensic evidence, especially in the chain of custody, can have a significant impact on thousands of lives.

Although the implementation of blockchain technology in the legal system may take years, organizations like the Innocence Project and REFORM Alliance are actively advocating for exonerations and sentencing reform programs in the U.S.A. The REFORM Alliance collaborates with policymakers to achieve evidence-based reforms and meaningful change in the criminal justice system.

Chain Gives is a blockchain-based relief organization that is committed to aiding social justice and humanitarian causes. Chain Gives is determined to bring hope and equality to those who have been adversely affected by the criminal justice system through their long-standing solidarity and support for the REFORM Alliance. To learn more about Chain Gives, and their mission to create an ethical and more connected world, visit www.chain.com/company/chain-gives.

About Chain

Chain is a blockchain infrastructure solution company that has been on a mission to enable a smarter and more connected economy since 2014. Chain offers builders in the Web3 industry services that help streamline the process of developing, and maintaining their blockchain infrastructures. Chain implements a SaaS model for its products that addresses the complexities of overall blockchain management. Chain offers a variety of products such as Ledger, Cloud, and NFTs as a service. Companies who choose to utilize Chain’s services will be able to free up resources for developers and cut costs so that clients can focus on their own products and customer experience. 

Read more: https://medium.com/@chaininc/chain-research-how-can-blockchain-technology-be-applied-to-chain-of-custody-429f294ad3ef

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Brookings Research: U.S. AI Infrastructure Investment Averages 3.63% of GDP, Three Times the Internet Boom

    On October 12, according to Wall Street Insights, Professor Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh of Columbia Business School pointed out in a recent paper from the Brookings Institution that the total investment in AI data center construction in the U.S. from 2025 to 2032 is expected to reach $10.3 trillion, averaging about 3.63% of GDP. This is 1.6 times the peak period of railroad construction from 1870 to 1890 and more than three times that of the internet and fiber optic boom. The construction cost for each 100-megawatt AI training facility is approximately $4.1 billion, with about two-thirds allocated for IT equipment. In terms of financing, Meta's Hyperion data center project, valued at around $30 billion, carries $27 billion in debt, resulting in a project-level debt-to-asset ratio of 90%. However, due to the debt being held within joint ventures and special purpose vehicles, it has not been included in Meta's balance sheet. Currently, approximately $1.4 trillion in debt is allocated for such structures, with about $700 billion to $800 billion held by banks. While he did not assert that AI has formed a bubble, he believes that off-balance-sheet financing makes it difficult for the market to see the complete economic responsibility.

  • Kremlin: Prepared to Suspend Strikes on Ukraine Election Day

    According to TASS, the Kremlin stated that it is prepared to suspend strike actions on Ukraine's election day.

  • Xinhua Media: Conducting Suspension Review

    On October 12, Xinhua Media announced that the company had reached the upper limit of its stock price for a total of 10 trading days from September 21, 2026, to October 12, 2026. The company will conduct a suspension review regarding stock trading fluctuations starting from October 13.

  • S&P 500 Futures Erase Early Gains

    On October 12, Dow Jones futures rose by 0.03%, S&P 500 futures increased by 0.01%, while Nasdaq 100 futures fell by 0.23%.

  • He Lifeng Meets Apple CEO Tim Cook

    On October 12, He Lifeng, a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China and Vice Premier of the State Council, met with Tim Cook, the Executive Chairman of Apple Inc., in the Great Hall of the People. He Lifeng stated that implementing the consensus reached by the leaders of the two countries and building a 'constructive and strategically stable relationship based on respect, fairness, and equality' is beneficial for the stability and development of both nations and the global economy, providing multinational companies with stable expectations and a favorable business environment. He welcomed technology companies from all countries, including Apple, to continue deepening mutually beneficial cooperation with China and to share in the opportunities of China's modernization. Cook expressed that Apple is confident in its long-term development in China and will serve as a communication bridge for the business community, contributing more to the stable and healthy development of Sino-U.S. economic and trade relations. (Xinhua News Agency)

  • U.S. Q3 Earnings Season Begins: Will Profit Growth Match Valuations?

    On October 12, the U.S. Q3 earnings season will kick off. Wall Street expects S&P 500 companies to report year-on-year profit growth of about 29%–31%, with approximately two-thirds of this growth coming from tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta. The market's focus has shifted from 'whether profits will grow' to 'whether growth can match valuations.' Investors are paying attention to three key points: whether AI capital expenditures can be converted into revenue and profits, whether AI demand can spread to more industries, and whether companies are beginning to feel the impact of rising financing costs. Currently, the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds has risen above 5%, with high interest rates continuing to suppress valuations. Major banks will be the first to release earnings reports, providing signals on credit demand, credit quality, and interest rate trends. The biggest risk is that profit expectations are already fully priced in, and only significant positive surprises can drive valuation expansion; otherwise, high oil prices, high yields, and uncertainties in AI return cycles may lead to greater volatility. Earnings report schedule (Eastern Time): October 13 before the market opens: JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, Citigroup; October 14: Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, BlackRock, ASML; October 15: TSMC; late October: Tesla on October 21, Microsoft and Alphabet on October 27, Meta on October 28, Apple and Amazon on October 29 after market close, and Nvidia around November 17; cryptocurrency companies Coinbase and Strategy on October 29, and mining companies Marathon and Riot from late October to early November.

  • Hong Kong Stock Exchange Collaborates with S&P Dow Jones Indices to Launch Co-Branded Index

    The Hong Kong Stock Exchange has announced a collaboration with S&P Dow Jones Indices to develop and launch the S&P 500 Hong Kong Stock Exchange Technology 100 Index. This index aims to measure the performance of leading companies listed in the United States as well as the largest technology companies by market capitalization listed in Hong Kong. The index is approximately 60% allocated to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange Technology 100 Index and 40% to the S&P 500 Index, with weights adjusted quarterly.

  • LeCun et al. Propose H-JEPA Hierarchical World Model for End-to-End Learning in Visual Planning

    On October 12, according to an arXiv paper, researchers Wancong Zhang, Basile Terver, Michael Rabbat, Yann LeCun, and Randall Balestriero proposed H-JEPA, an end-to-end training scheme for a hierarchical action-conditioned JEPA world model, where each layer predicts further into the future within its learned latent space. Planning is conducted top-down: the top layer optimizes the goal, and each layer's predictions become sub-goals for the layer below. When factors in the data evolve at separate time scales, higher layers discard rapid, unpredictable details while retaining slower, task-relevant states. In four simulated navigation and manipulation environments, hierarchical planning outperformed flat JEPA; in the Visual AntMaze task, a three-layer structure increased the success rate from 18% to 73%, while requiring less computational power for planning. Ablation experiments indicate that the gains come from both temporal decomposition and high-level goal representation. Under inverse dynamics supervision, this method can be scaled to real robot videos in DROID.

  • Anthropic Bans 11.4 Million Accounts in Six Months, 42000 Appeals Overturned

    On October 12, Anthropic's transparency report updated on July 23 revealed that a total of 11.4 million accounts were banned in the first half of 2026. This is significantly higher than the 1.45 million accounts banned in the second half of 2025, marking an increase of approximately 7.9 times. The statistics cover all of Anthropic's products and services without distinguishing between Claude chat and developer products. During the same period, 398,000 appeals against account bans were received, of which 42,000 resulted in overturned decisions. Based on these figures, the number of overturned bans accounts for approximately 10.6% of the total appeals. Anthropic stated that accounts may be banned for violating usage policies, terms of service, or regional support policies.

  • 2026 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences Announced

    On October 12, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences announced that Robert E. Hall and Michael Woodford have been awarded the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences. They are recognized for developing new macroeconomic models that significantly enhance the ability to implement effective stabilization policies. Based on these models, timely fiscal and monetary policy measures can reduce the peaks and troughs of the economy. Robert E. Hall and Michael Woodford received this year's award for demonstrating how to reconstruct economic models to revitalize stabilization policies. Instead of building models based on statistical relationships among macroeconomic variables such as inflation, production, and consumption, they opted to establish a foundation based on microeconomic principles. This includes understanding how the overall behavior of households and businesses influences the economy. Robert E. Hall was born in 1943 in Palo Alto, California, and earned his Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1967. He is a professor at Stanford University in California. Michael Woodford was born in 1955 in Chicopee, Massachusetts, and earned his Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1983. He is a professor at Columbia University in New York.