Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Demystifying Wallets: A Revolutionary dApp User Flow

Validated Project

By Shu Dong and Zihao Chen From Hexlink

Note: This article assumes that you are already familiar with crypto wallets and related concepts

Account Abstraction is a concept which is rapidly gaining popularity in the world of crypto, with numerous wallets nowadays claiming to be AA-compatible and heralding a new era for the wallet ecosystem. In this article, we propose a new dApp user flow that Hexlink is experimenting with, which reveals the potential of AA from our perspective.

What is a wallet

Before we start to discuss Account Abstraction, let us first define what a Wallet is.

Conceptually, a wallet consists of two layers: the identifier (public address) and the authenticator (private key). The identifier layer handles asset management, chain configuration, and name service, while the authenticator layer handles signing and authentication. It is worth noting that authentication can provide a richer context than signing. For example, a wallet can support “Sign in with Ethereum” or “Wallet Connect” for login, where signing is just the last step of the whole process.

A classic wallet model

Among all these components, which is the essence of a wallet?

Interestingly, Web2 users and Web3 developers have different opinions on what the essence of a wallet should be. According to our survey, Web2 users believe that a wallet is more about assets and account management, while Web3 developers believe that the signing and authentication process is the soul of a wallet since it holds the most secret part of it: the private key. It’s difficult to say which one is correct since, in the EOA world, public and private keys are the same thing and derive from each other. However, things change a little bit when it comes to smart contract wallets.

Smart contract wallet as the 1st class citizen

Smart contract wallets have been around for a while, but they have not become the mainstream due to their inability to pay gas for transactions they have triggered. This means they always rely on an EOA with an ETH balance to trigger transactions and pay gas for them. Account Abstraction (EIP-4337) solves this problem by introducing the entry point contract and the bundler service, promoting smart contract wallets as first-class citizens in the blockchain world. There are other good features introduced by AA, such as paymaster and a unified user operation verification interface, but we believe gas payment is the most important one since it fixes the fundamental flaw of the system.

With AA, wallets are being turned into AA compatible smart contract wallets, but many are still following the architecture of the EOA wallet we showed above, which means that they are missing out on the potential brought by account abstraction.

Break down the wallet: the new dApp user flow

With smart contract wallets, there is no longer a binding between the wallet address and the private key. While a smart contract wallet may still have an EOA as its owner, the owner’s key can now be rotated. In this case, does it still make sense to pack these two layers in one wallet app?

Hexlink aims to break down the typical wallet app by splitting it into several different components/layers, making it more flexible and composable. We are proposing a new dApp user flow shown in the diagram below. With this revolutionary user flow, Hexlink is set to provide a seamless Web2 user experience for Web3 apps.

The new dApp user flow introduced by Hexlink

Let’s go through each component:

Name Service Layer

Users should be able to log in to dApps with human-readable names, such as ENS names, instead of raw addresses. Hexlink supports name mappings from email addresses and social accounts handle to smart contract wallet addresses, making it possible for users to log in to dApps directly with such identities.

Instead of inventing a new ID system, email is considered a natural choice for a decentralized identifier since it’s supported by a decentralized communication protocol. Users have been using their emails as their online IDs for Web1 and Web2 (most social media accounts, including Twitter/Facebook, are registered with emails). We believe this will continue to be the case for Web3.

Since a majority of Web2 users do not have wallet addresses, to further reduce the onboarding cost for new users, Hexlink seamlessly transforms email/Google/Twitter users into Web3 users by translating their familiar login identities into corresponding wallet addresses, allowing them to receive cryptocurrency without any need for downloads or sign-ups! The wallet address is unique to the email or social account owner and is verified by the Hexlink Identity Oracle. We are proposing EIP-4972 to standardize this workflow.

Application Layer

Once users have successfully logged in, they will be directed to the application layer. By using the name service, the application can access the user’s wallet address to display information about their assets. Despite most people being unaware, a wallet can be classified as a dApp as it contains a built-in asset/chain management feature. Nevertheless, Hexlink considers this feature as an independent layer and handles it similarly to any other decentralized applications.

In case users want to sign a transaction, instead of linking the wallet to dApps, Hexlink provides support for push mode. In push mode, dApps can simply send the transaction request to an authenticator app for signing. This approach makes the application layer much more straightforward, as it can now focus primarily on its own business logic, without having to concern itself with private key storage and signing.

Authenticator Layer

The authenticator layer could be an authenticator app, similar to Duo, Authy, or Google Authenticator. It holds the user’s private key and is solely responsible for signing transactions. When a request is received from the user, a notification with the details of the request will be popped up and displayed for the user to review and approve. Once the user confirms the transaction, it will be signed and either returned to the dApp or directly submitted on-chain.

The communication between dApps and the authenticator app is standardized by EIP-6662, which by introducing an unified account view for all dApps through the new IAccountMetadata interface. Once the user publishes their authenticator information on-chain, all dApps can access the required information proactively, eliminating the need for the user to share their information with each dApp individually.

Summary

In this article, we explore the potential of Account Abstraction (AA) and its role in shaping the future of blockchain wallets. We provide a comprehensive overview of the various components found in a typical EOA wallet and highlight how smart contract wallets can assist in dividing them into multiple applications.

We then present a new dApp user flow by breaking down the wallet app into three distinct layers: the Name Service Layer, Application Layer, and Authenticator Layer. With this revolutionary user flow, Hexlink offers a seamless Web2 experience for Web3 applications.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • DMDAO Burns Nearly 35,000 Tokens Over the Past 7 Days, Bringing Total DMD Burned to Over 716,000

    On September 3, 2026, the latest on-chain data monitoring showed that from August 28 to September 3, 2026, the DMDAO distributed market-making protocol ecosystem maintained a high and stable level of activity, with a cumulative 34,928.27 DMD burned over the past 7 days.

  • Trump Shares Op-Ed Claiming He is Winning the War Against Iran

    On August 29, U.S. President Trump shared a commentary article from the New York Post on Truth Social on Saturday, which stated that he is winning the war against Iran and should maintain the current strategy. The title of the article Trump shared read: 'Trump is Winning the War Against Iran - Stay the Course.'

  • Morgan Stanley: 2028 as a Key Observation Point for Global Memory Competition Landscape

    On August 29, Morgan Stanley pointed out that the rise of Chinese memory manufacturers should not be viewed merely as a technological catch-up or low-cost substitution; what is truly noteworthy is that their production capacity may gradually become large enough to alter the supply structure of the global memory market. Changxin Technology and Yangtze Memory Technologies are currently entering the mainstream product market and gradually extending into high-profit markets such as HBM, high-end server DRAM, and enterprise SSDs. Morgan Stanley considers 2028 as an important observation point for the global memory competition landscape. From 2026 to 2027, demand for AI servers, capacity crowding of advanced wafers by HBM, import substitution, and the time required for customer certification may absorb most of the new supply from Chinese memory manufacturers. By 2028, as Chinese manufacturers expand production, the additional capacity from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron, which had previously initiated expansions, will also be released. At that time, the supply variables in the global memory market will significantly increase. Morgan Stanley estimates that Changxin's DRAM monthly production capacity will rise from 180,000 wafers in 2025 to 300,000 in 2026, accounting for approximately 13% of global DRAM wafer capacity and about 11% of bit shipments; by 2028, it is expected to further increase to 500,000 wafers, and by 2031, it could reach 800,000 wafers. If the expansion proceeds smoothly, Changxin's global DRAM bit shipment market share could approach 15% by 2030, and it may even have the opportunity to surpass Micron in production capacity around 2028, becoming the third-largest DRAM supplier in the world.

  • US Spot Ethereum ETF Sees Net Inflow of $102.17 Million Yesterday

    On August 29, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Ethereum ETF recorded a net inflow of $102.17 million yesterday.

  • US Spot Ethereum ETF Sees Net Inflow of $102.17 Million

    On August 29, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Ethereum ETF experienced a net inflow of $102.17 million yesterday.

  • US Spot Bitcoin ETF Sees Net Outflow of $201.81 Million

    On August 29, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Bitcoin ETF experienced a net outflow of $201.81 million yesterday.

  • US Spot Bitcoin ETF Sees Net Outflow of $201.81 Million Yesterday

    On August 29, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Bitcoin ETF experienced a net outflow of $201.81 million yesterday.

  • BTC Surpasses $78,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $78,000, currently priced at $78,009.49. The 24-hour decline has narrowed to 3.23%. Due to significant market fluctuations, please ensure proper risk management.

  • BTC Surpasses $78,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $78,000, currently priced at $78,009.49, with a 24-hour decline narrowing to 3.23%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • BTC Briefly Drops Below $77,000

    Market data shows that BTC briefly fell below $77,000, currently reported at $77,694, with a 24-hour decline of 3.3%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.