Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

How Zero Knowledge Proof Can Ensure Data Privacy

You’ve probably come across the expressions “if it’s free, you’re the product” or “data is the new oil,” and laughed it off as a silly little saying. The truth is data is the driving force behind nearly all businesses and services. For example, personalized experiences and services, marketing, and a host of other insights and services depend on the volume and quality of data provided to them. Most companies are eager to access data to help understand their customers better, predict customer behavior patterns, and improve the quality of their services.

The traditional space has always been subject to concerns surrounding data and privacy. Privacy advocates have long flagged concerns about how data is stored, how it is accessed, and who has access to it. With the growth of the cryptocurrency and blockchain ecosystem, similar concerns have also arisen in this sector. The public nature of blockchains has introduced several privacy concerns for users regarding safeguarding their personal information. This article will take a closer look at the privacy problem on blockchains and how Zero Knowledge (ZK) proofs can mitigate them.

What Is Data Privacy?

The increase in internet usage has brought the issue of data privacy into the mainstream, with nearly all websites, applications, and social media platforms collecting and storing users’ personal information to provide certain services. However, these platforms and websites often do not have adequate safeguards in place to secure the data collected, resulting in numerous data breaches.

With the growth of blockchain technology and the crypto ecosystem, there have been growing concerns about the privacy of retail and institutional users. These concerns are primarily due to the public nature of blockchains, with most Layer 1 and Layer 2 solutions failing to address these issues. Data privacy refers to the ability of users to determine, at their end, when and how their information is shared with others. It also encompasses the ability of users to dictate to what extent their data is shared. This information can include their names, location, contact information, online behavior, likes, dislikes, transaction details, and more.

Trust, Privacy, And The Blockchain

At present, the cryptocurrency ecosystem is undergoing considerable upheaval following the collapse of major projects such as FTX. However, the underlying technology supporting cryptocurrencies has the potential to revolutionize privacy, trust, and how trust is leveraged. This is critical in the internet age when millions browse and share copious amounts of their personal information to access services and products.

Blockchain technology inherently comes with problems around privacy, thanks to its design. The decentralized nature of blockchains means that nodes processing the transactions or information have access to the blockchain data. For example, the Bitcoin blockchain is publicly available and can be accessed by anyone who wishes to check its transaction history right up to its genesis block. Now, remember, Bitcoin is pseudo-anonymous, which means “[d]ata points which are not directly associated with a specific individual [but where] multiple appearances of [a] person can be linked together.”

Enough pseudo-anonymous data makes it possible to identify individuals behind transactions, which is concerning for blockchain users, and there are several reasons for this. Unlike data that is used by regular applications, which is accessible only to a few, blockchain data can be scrutinized by everyone, which also includes malicious actors and entities that can exploit the information on the blockchain for their gain. Additionally, the immutable nature of the blockchain means that transactions and data will be permanently linked to the individual. This can be done by monitoring communication between nodes. Additionally, crypto wallets can also be analyzed without access to private keys, further complicating matters.

One high-profile example of using blockchain data to track an individual was the investigation and arrest of Ross Ulbricht, the individual behind the infamous “Silk Road” darknet website, which was used for various illegal activities. Law enforcement agencies identified Ulbricht as the individual behind Silk Road, thanks to blockchain data. Furthermore, they could track Bitcoin transactions and determine that a US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agent was laundering BTC connected to Silk Road. In this case, law enforcement agencies were able to track the data available on the blockchain to identify a notorious individual. But imagine if malicious entities could track your data with such ease thanks to the public nature of the blockchain. The results would be devastating.

Introducing Zero Knowledge Proofs

Zero Knowledge Proofs were first talked about by Silvio Micali, Shafi Goldwasser, and Charles Rackoff in a paper titled “The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof Systems,” and are considered a fascinating innovation of cryptography that can be utilized in several scenarios. In the case of the blockchain, it can help enable secure and anonymous transactions. Zero Knowledge Proof, also known as Zero Knowledge Protocol, allows one party (the prover) to prove to the opposite party (verifier) that they know a specific value or information (x) without disclosing any information apart from the fact that they know the value or information in question (x). The challenge when it comes to Zero Knowledge Proof is to justify the possession of the information without revealing it or any other additional information. A Zero Knowledge Proof must satisfy the following criteria.

  • Completeness — Let’s assume the statement is true. An honest verifier, correctly and faithfully following the protocol, will be convinced by the information given by the prover who is correctly following protocol.
  • Soundness — Soundness means there should be no way for the prover to falsify any information or falsely convince the verifier. Falsification must be impossible.
  • Zero Knowledge — If the statement by the prover is true, the verifier learns nothing other than the fact that the information is true.

The first two are considered properties of more general interactive proof systems, with the addition of zero knowledge transforming the verification process into a zero-knowledge proof. Due to a small possibility (soundness error) that a malicious prover may convince the verifier of a false statement, zero-knowledge proofs are considered probabilistic proofs rather than deterministic proofs. However, the soundness error can be mitigated to a negligible value.

How Does ZKP Work?

Image Credit

A Zero Knowledge Proof consists of three actions occurring sequentially between participants. These actions are called a witness, a challenge, and a response. Let’s delve a little deeper to understand the role of each action better by assuming there are two participants, A, and B.

Witness — Let’s assume A knows a specific value or information, which also determines a set of questions. These questions can always be answered correctly by A. Initially, A can choose any random question from the set, calculate the proof, and send it to B.

Challenge — After the witness step comes the challenge phase, where B chooses a question from the set and asks A to answer it.

Response — A then calculates the response and sends it back to B. This allows B to determine whether A actually knows the answer.

The process described above can be repeated as many times as required until it is established that A knows the correct answer and the probability of guesses becomes low enough.

Use Cases Of ZKP

ZKP can be applied in several scenarios.

Authentication Systems

Authentication systems have played a crucial role in fostering research in Zero Knowledge Proofs. In these systems, one party wishes to prove its identity to a second party through some secret information. However, it does not wish for the second party to gain any knowledge about this secret information.

Confidentiality

One of the most significant use cases of ZKP comes in transactions that require complete confidentiality. Let’s understand how. Consider a blockchain such as the Bitcoin blockchain. Generally, when a transaction occurs on this blockchain, data related to the transaction is recorded on the blockchain. This means anyone can piece together some amount of information about the transaction by analyzing the data on the blockchain. For the sake of privacy, it is critical to hide some details for specific transactions. ZKP makes it possible to hide details while also ensuring the transaction’s validity by adding them to a new block.

Personal Information

Say you wish to take a loan from a bank. To apply for the loan, you must furnish a host of documentation consisting of a considerable amount of personal information, making it available to third parties. In the case of obtaining a loan from a bank, the only information required by the bank is to know if an individual earns a specific amount enough to repay the loan. ZKP can help banks verify whether an individual earns a predefined minimum amount without revealing any sensitive information to the bank or any third party.

ZKP And Blockchain: The Way Forward

Several projects and cryptocurrencies utilize ZKP, such as ZCash, SmartCash, Zerocash, and ZeroVert. ZKP has mostly been implement via zk-SNARKS and zk-STARKS.. zk-SNARKS was originally developed by ZCash. Most blockchains are pseudo-anonymous, meaning a user’s identity could be traced back to their transactions by studying blockchain data. This information is available to everyone with access to the blockchain and could be exploited by any malicious entity.

Despite the blockchain’s reputation as the pinnacle of cybersecurity, this particular shortcoming is well-known to users. However, ZKP could help patch this vulnerability and ensure complete privacy when it comes to personal information. While ZKP still has quite a few challenges to overcome, it gives users control of their data and privacy, limiting access to third parties, and will play a crucial role in improving privacy when it comes to blockchains.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Hong Kong to Launch Second Spot Solana ETF on October 13

    On October 12, according to official news from Solana, Hong Kong will welcome its second spot Solana ETF, the Pando Solana ETF (2831.HK), which is set to be listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on October 13. Solana reported that the global net asset size of spot SOL ETFs currently stands at $1.9 billion, with a cumulative net inflow of $1.61 billion.

  • BTC Surpasses $84,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $84,000, currently priced at $84,004.27, with a 24-hour increase of 1.25%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Ethereum Foundation-Linked Wallet Transfers 4,393 ETH to Kraken Worth $11.13 Million

    On October 12, on-chain analyst Yu Jin reported that 4 hours ago, two wallets associated with the Ethereum Foundation transferred 4,393 ETH (valued at $11.13 million) to the trading platform Kraken. The wallet that sent the ETH today received 59,751 ETH from the Ethereum Foundation wallet 10 years ago, of which 49,751 ETH has been gradually transferred to Kraken over the past decade at an average price of approximately $658.

  • BTC Surpasses $84,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $84,000, currently priced at $84,035.16, with a 24-hour increase of 1.16%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Zelensky Responds to Trump's Russia-Ukraine Ceasefire Statement: Ukraine Will Agree if Russia Accepts Energy Ceasefire

    According to Axios, Ukrainian President Zelensky stated that Trump's ceasefire statement was also a surprise to him. Ukraine will agree if Russia accepts an energy ceasefire.

  • CryptoBillis Ledger Attacker Deposits $3.89 Million in Crypto Assets to Binance

    On October 11, the attacker of CryptoBillis Ledger deposited approximately $3.89 million in crypto assets to Binance over the past two days, including 3.685 million USDT and 615,000 TRX (about $204,000). This attacker had previously stolen over $90 million in crypto assets. (PeckShieldAlert)

  • KillaXBT: BTC May Surge Before Midterm Elections, Drop After, Historical Probability 75% Bearish

    On October 11, Killa (@KillaXBT), a user on X, shared his perspective that the ideal path for BTC is to rise before the midterm elections, establishing a bullish narrative and surpassing previous highs. Following this, he anticipates a pullback post-election, similar to past cycles, but with higher lows instead of new cycle lows. He believes that if there is a decline before the elections, it is more likely to rise towards $95,000 afterward. Citing data, he noted that nearly $2 billion in long positions were just liquidated, with only three weeks until the midterm elections. Historically, in four midterm elections, three have seen bearish trends emerge one to two months after the elections, giving a probability of 75%. He stated that the worst-case scenario would be a price rebound leading into the elections, followed by a reversal that traps the other side before de-risking. He believes that the narrative for one side has already been liquidated, and the current exposure of shorts is higher than that of longs. The author claims to still hold 10x long positions and longs established at 62.6K and 76.4K, with all positions fully allocated and not closed. This represents his personal trading view and is not an objective event.

  • Argentine Central Bank Indicates Cryptocurrencies May Open to Banks

    On October 11, the Argentine Central Bank stated that during Milei's second term, cryptocurrencies may be opened to banks, lifting a ban that has been in place for four years.

  • Trump: Russia and Ukraine Agree to 'Energy Ceasefire'

    On October 11, U.S. President Trump announced that an 'energy ceasefire' has been reached in the Russia-Ukraine war, effective immediately. Both sides have agreed not to disrupt it.

  • CITIC Securities: Hong Kong Stocks' Fundamentals Expected to Have Bottomed Out

    On October 11, CITIC Securities' research report pointed out that for Hong Kong stocks, although the overseas interest rate hike cycle combined with the restart of AI-driven trading continues to pressure liquidity, the fundamental expectations have bottomed out, and the earnings growth expectations for major broad-based indices have begun to be revised upwards. There is a significant divergence in the adjustment of industry earnings expectations, with some specific sectors seeing upward revisions, while industries related to domestic demand still face downward pressure on earnings expectations. The upcoming third-quarter performance will be an important basis for assessing the progress of recovery. The report advises investors to maintain patience with Hong Kong stocks, expecting that short-term dividend strategies will continue to outperform.