Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

How Zero Knowledge Proof Can Ensure Data Privacy

You’ve probably come across the expressions “if it’s free, you’re the product” or “data is the new oil,” and laughed it off as a silly little saying. The truth is data is the driving force behind nearly all businesses and services. For example, personalized experiences and services, marketing, and a host of other insights and services depend on the volume and quality of data provided to them. Most companies are eager to access data to help understand their customers better, predict customer behavior patterns, and improve the quality of their services.

The traditional space has always been subject to concerns surrounding data and privacy. Privacy advocates have long flagged concerns about how data is stored, how it is accessed, and who has access to it. With the growth of the cryptocurrency and blockchain ecosystem, similar concerns have also arisen in this sector. The public nature of blockchains has introduced several privacy concerns for users regarding safeguarding their personal information. This article will take a closer look at the privacy problem on blockchains and how Zero Knowledge (ZK) proofs can mitigate them.

What Is Data Privacy?

The increase in internet usage has brought the issue of data privacy into the mainstream, with nearly all websites, applications, and social media platforms collecting and storing users’ personal information to provide certain services. However, these platforms and websites often do not have adequate safeguards in place to secure the data collected, resulting in numerous data breaches.

With the growth of blockchain technology and the crypto ecosystem, there have been growing concerns about the privacy of retail and institutional users. These concerns are primarily due to the public nature of blockchains, with most Layer 1 and Layer 2 solutions failing to address these issues. Data privacy refers to the ability of users to determine, at their end, when and how their information is shared with others. It also encompasses the ability of users to dictate to what extent their data is shared. This information can include their names, location, contact information, online behavior, likes, dislikes, transaction details, and more.

Trust, Privacy, And The Blockchain

At present, the cryptocurrency ecosystem is undergoing considerable upheaval following the collapse of major projects such as FTX. However, the underlying technology supporting cryptocurrencies has the potential to revolutionize privacy, trust, and how trust is leveraged. This is critical in the internet age when millions browse and share copious amounts of their personal information to access services and products.

Blockchain technology inherently comes with problems around privacy, thanks to its design. The decentralized nature of blockchains means that nodes processing the transactions or information have access to the blockchain data. For example, the Bitcoin blockchain is publicly available and can be accessed by anyone who wishes to check its transaction history right up to its genesis block. Now, remember, Bitcoin is pseudo-anonymous, which means “[d]ata points which are not directly associated with a specific individual [but where] multiple appearances of [a] person can be linked together.”

Enough pseudo-anonymous data makes it possible to identify individuals behind transactions, which is concerning for blockchain users, and there are several reasons for this. Unlike data that is used by regular applications, which is accessible only to a few, blockchain data can be scrutinized by everyone, which also includes malicious actors and entities that can exploit the information on the blockchain for their gain. Additionally, the immutable nature of the blockchain means that transactions and data will be permanently linked to the individual. This can be done by monitoring communication between nodes. Additionally, crypto wallets can also be analyzed without access to private keys, further complicating matters.

One high-profile example of using blockchain data to track an individual was the investigation and arrest of Ross Ulbricht, the individual behind the infamous “Silk Road” darknet website, which was used for various illegal activities. Law enforcement agencies identified Ulbricht as the individual behind Silk Road, thanks to blockchain data. Furthermore, they could track Bitcoin transactions and determine that a US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agent was laundering BTC connected to Silk Road. In this case, law enforcement agencies were able to track the data available on the blockchain to identify a notorious individual. But imagine if malicious entities could track your data with such ease thanks to the public nature of the blockchain. The results would be devastating.

Introducing Zero Knowledge Proofs

Zero Knowledge Proofs were first talked about by Silvio MicaliShafi Goldwasser, and Charles Rackoff in a paper titled “The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof Systems,” and are considered a fascinating innovation of cryptography that can be utilized in several scenarios. In the case of the blockchain, it can help enable secure and anonymous transactions. Zero Knowledge Proof, also known as Zero Knowledge Protocol, allows one party (the prover) to prove to the opposite party (verifier) that they know a specific value or information (x) without disclosing any information apart from the fact that they know the value or information in question (x). The challenge when it comes to Zero Knowledge Proof is to justify the possession of the information without revealing it or any other additional information. A Zero Knowledge Proof must satisfy the following criteria.

  • Completeness — Let’s assume the statement is true. An honest verifier, correctly and faithfully following the protocol, will be convinced by the information given by the prover who is correctly following protocol.
  • Soundness — Soundness means there should be no way for the prover to falsify any information or falsely convince the verifier. Falsification must be impossible.
  • Zero Knowledge — If the statement by the prover is true, the verifier learns nothing other than the fact that the information is true.

The first two are considered properties of more general interactive proof systems, with the addition of zero knowledge transforming the verification process into a zero-knowledge proof. Due to a small possibility (soundness error) that a malicious prover may convince the verifier of a false statement, zero-knowledge proofs are considered probabilistic proofs rather than deterministic proofs. However, the soundness error can be mitigated to a negligible value.

How Does ZKP Work?

Image Credit

A Zero Knowledge Proof consists of three actions occurring sequentially between participants. These actions are called a witness, a challenge, and a response. Let’s delve a little deeper to understand the role of each action better by assuming there are two participants, A, and B.

Witness — Let’s assume A knows a specific value or information, which also determines a set of questions. These questions can always be answered correctly by A. Initially, A can choose any random question from the set, calculate the proof, and send it to B.

Challenge — After the witness step comes the challenge phase, where B chooses a question from the set and asks A to answer it.

Response — A then calculates the response and sends it back to B. This allows B to determine whether A actually knows the answer.

The process described above can be repeated as many times as required until it is established that A knows the correct answer and the probability of guesses becomes low enough.

Use Cases Of ZKP

ZKP can be applied in several scenarios.

Authentication Systems

Authentication systems have played a crucial role in fostering research in Zero Knowledge Proofs. In these systems, one party wishes to prove its identity to a second party through some secret information. However, it does not wish for the second party to gain any knowledge about this secret information.

Confidentiality

One of the most significant use cases of ZKP comes in transactions that require complete confidentiality. Let’s understand how. Consider a blockchain such as the Bitcoin blockchain. Generally, when a transaction occurs on this blockchain, data related to the transaction is recorded on the blockchain. This means anyone can piece together some amount of information about the transaction by analyzing the data on the blockchain. For the sake of privacy, it is critical to hide some details for specific transactions. ZKP makes it possible to hide details while also ensuring the transaction’s validity by adding them to a new block.

Personal Information

Say you wish to take a loan from a bank. To apply for the loan, you must furnish a host of documentation consisting of a considerable amount of personal information, making it available to third parties. In the case of obtaining a loan from a bank, the only information required by the bank is to know if an individual earns a specific amount enough to repay the loan. ZKP can help banks verify whether an individual earns a predefined minimum amount without revealing any sensitive information to the bank or any third party.

ZKP And Blockchain: The Way Forward

Several projects and cryptocurrencies utilize ZKP, such as ZCash, SmartCash, Zerocash, and ZeroVert. ZKP has mostly been implement via zk-SNARKS and zk-STARKS.. zk-SNARKS was originally developed by ZCash. Most blockchains are pseudo-anonymous, meaning a user’s identity could be traced back to their transactions by studying blockchain data. This information is available to everyone with access to the blockchain and could be exploited by any malicious entity.

Despite the blockchain’s reputation as the pinnacle of cybersecurity, this particular shortcoming is well-known to users. However, ZKP could help patch this vulnerability and ensure complete privacy when it comes to personal information. While ZKP still has quite a few challenges to overcome, it gives users control of their data and privacy, limiting access to third parties, and will play a crucial role in improving privacy when it comes to blockchains.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Fed Chair Nominee Waller: Independence Depends on the Fed Itself

    Fed Chair nominee Waller: I will be independent of Trump's opinions. Trump tends to call for the FOMC to cut interest rates. Independence depends on the Fed itself.

  • Digital Bank Revolut's IPO Valuation Could Reach $200 Billion

    The Financial Times reported, citing anonymous investor sources, that the UK digital bank Revolut plans to seek a valuation of $150 billion to $200 billion in its upcoming IPO, a significant increase from its previous valuation of $75 billion. The company's CEO, Nik Storonsky, also revealed that Revolut is preparing for a new round of secondary share sales in the second half of 2026, with a valuation potentially exceeding $100 billion.

  • ETH Falls Below $2300

    Market data shows that ETH has fallen below $2300, currently priced at $2299.92, with a 24-hour decline of 0.38%. The market is experiencing significant fluctuations, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Trump: Disappointed if New Fed Chair Does Not Cut Interest Rates

    On April 21, U.S. President Trump stated: If the new Federal Reserve Chair does not cut interest rates, I will be disappointed.

  • Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Milley States Readiness to Resume Operations

    On April 21, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley stated that the U.S. is ready to resume operations and can act against Iran at any time. (Axios)

  • Bank of Japan to Maintain Interest Rates in April

    On April 21, according to Nikkei News: The Bank of Japan will maintain interest rates unchanged in April.

  • Iranian Military: Ready to Respond Decisively to 'Enemy's Breach of Promises'

    On April 21, local time, Abdollahi, commander of the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Command of the Iranian Armed Forces, stated that Iran is prepared to respond decisively to the 'enemy's breach of promises.' Abdollahi emphasized that the current Iranian military possesses 'authority, readiness, and comprehensive strategic capabilities.' He noted that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and other defense forces have demonstrated combat capabilities in relevant operations, putting 'Israel and the United States in a difficult and fatigued position,' forcing them to 'seek a ceasefire.' Abdollahi also stressed that the Iranian armed forces maintain a high level of unity with the government and the people under the supreme leader's unified command, and will respond 'decisively, resolutely, and promptly' to any threats and actions. (CCTV News)

  • Another Iranian Oil Tanker Returns to Iran After Breaking US Blockade

    On April 21, according to CCTV News, maritime intelligence company 'TankerTrackers' reported that a tanker belonging to the National Iranian Tanker Company returned to Iran after unloading approximately 2 million barrels of crude oil in Indonesia, crossing the relevant maritime blockade line. The tanker is currently en route to Iran's main oil export hub, Khark Island, and is expected to arrive on April 22 local time. It is reported that the tanker set sail from Iran in late March, heading towards the Riau Islands of Indonesia.

  • White House: US and Iran on the Verge of Reaching an Agreement

    On April 21, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany stated in an interview with Fox News on the evening of the 20th that the United States and Iran are on the "verge of reaching an agreement." McEnany remarked, "The US has never been closer to achieving a truly good deal." However, she did not disclose any information regarding the current status of the negotiations. McEnany noted that even if an agreement is not reached, President Trump has multiple options and is not afraid to utilize these measures. Previous actions have demonstrated that Trump is not just "bluffing."

  • Kelp DAO Attacker Transfers 30,800 ETH to Special Address

    On April 21, news emerged that, according to monitoring by PeckShield, the Kelp DAO attacker transferred 30,800 ETH to a special address starting with 0x00000, possibly indicating a destruction action.