Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

A Framework for Measuring Crypto Risk

Validated Media

The crypto investing industry needs a framework for measuring risk.

By “risk” I don’t mean whether a crypto investment is volatile; I mean whether it could collapse entirely.

For example, most would say bitcoin and Ethereum are less risky than a crypto startup. Most would say Tether and USDC (backed by dollars) are less risky than Dai (backed by crypto).

The question for you: What are the risk factors that make you stay away from a crypto investment?

Is it an anonymous founder? A sketchy business model? Forked code?

Here are my warning flags — I’d love to hear yours.

Building a Crypto Risk Model

What we have in mind is something like our Blockchain Investor Scorecard, which was published back in 2018, and has stood the test of time. It’s the scorecard we use for all our crypto ratings, and it really works.

Every question gets a rating from 1 to 5, then you average them up.

While the scorecard has some questions that measure risk (like the team integrity, above), it really measures the strength of the underlying crypto “company.”

It measures potential reward. But how can we measure potential risk?

Specifically, I’m thinking of the crypto companies that have collapsed this year; you know who they are (that last link is a particularly great read).

Could we have seen this coming? Obviously, most didn’t. But could we get better at spotting Jenga towers before they collapse?

I believe we can. Here are a few questions we might ask of any crypto investment: the first steps toward a rigorous framework of measuring risk.

Team Risk

Is the team anonymous?

Anonymous teams are less accountable.

Does the team have a meaningful track record in crypto (“10,000 hours”)? Experienced teams are less risky than novices.

Is there information asymmetry?

Does the team have information you don’t, or is everything on-chain?

Does the team demonstrate scrupulous honesty and integrity?

Are there red flags, yellow flags, or potential conflicts of interest?

Are the leader(s) self-promoters on Twitter?

Large Twitter presences can signal they’re primarily looking out for themselves.

Regulatory Risk

Are investors buying the token, hoping the price will go up?

Forget any claims of “decentralization”: does it smell like a security?

Is the company headquartered in a jurisdiction without clear crypto regulation?

Small, crypto-friendly countries are better than large, unfriendly ones (U.S., China, etc.)

Does the company lead a specific niche of crypto (stablecoins, lending, etc.)?

Category leaders are more likely to be targeted by regulators, especially in the U.S.

Financial Risk

Is the company well-capitalized?

Do they have enough operating cash on hand, and is it liquid (e.g., stablecoins)?

Can you easily explain the company’s business model?

Do you understand how they make money, and can you describe it to others?

Is there an element of “continually increasing returns”?

Do they promise investors, either implicitly or explicitly, that number go up?

Does the company warn regularly about risks?

Do they make it a practice of pointing out potential downsides?

Have other credible investors raised warning flags?

Have you searched for alternate points of view and investigated their concerns?

Smart Contract Risk

Have their smart contracts been audited by a reputable firm?

Are the results publicly available?

Is there a public forum or repository for reporting bugs or issues?

Can you easily find it from their website or Github?

Has the company demonstrated responsiveness to reported issues?

Do they have a track record of responding decisively, or is it radio silence?

Has the company survived stress tests?

Has it held up during one or more market downturns, hacks, or other crises?

Does it rely on cross-chain bridges?

Historically, bridges between blockchains are honeypots for hackers.

Traction Risk

How many active users does the project have?

There’s some safety in numbers. More users generally = more responsibility.

How many followers do they have on social media (Twitter and/or Reddit)?

The court of public opinion can help with public accountability.

Is the project listed on major crypto exchanges?

Big companies want to protect their investors, which provides further safety.

Financial Metrics

What is the expected return?

What is the standard deviation?

What is the Sharpe Ratio?

These can be compared across crypto projects for benchmarking.

Behavioral Risk

Perhaps the most important question is your own integrity. Just as criminals are likely to hang out with other criminals, shady investors are likely to be attracted to shady investments.

I would put this into a category of its own, but since most people think they’re pretty good — even when their behavior isn’t — I’m not sure how reliable it will be. If nothing else, it’s a reminder that our own karma plays a part, too.

The Blockchain Risk Scorecard

Our plan is to put these questions into a new scorecard — call it the Blockchain Risk Scorecard — that we can use alongside our Blockchain Investor Scorecard.

Since risk and reward go hand in hand, our hope is these two tools will provide our crypto investing community even better confidence in our top picks.

Are there any items you’d add? Remove? Change? Let me know, and I’ll share the best feedback in next week’s column.

Go ahead, message me. There’s no risk.

Get Sir John’s crypto investing column every Friday in our Bitcoin Market Journal investor newsletter.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • HYPE Surges Over 10% in a Day, Currently Priced at $71.569

    On June 16, market data showed that HYPE surged over 10% in a single day, currently priced at $71.569. Previously, there were reports that Arthur Hayes allegedly bought back 47,000 HYPE tokens.

  • DeepSeek Reportedly Completes Over $7 Billion Financing

    On June 16, according to The Information, DeepSeek has completed over $7 billion in financing, with this round valuing the company at over $50 billion.

  • Reserve Bank of Australia Holds Rates Steady

    On June 16, the Reserve Bank of Australia kept the interest rate unchanged at 4.35%, in line with market expectations, following three consecutive meetings of rate hikes.

  • Nikkei 225 Index Surpasses 70,000 Points for the First Time

    The Nikkei 225 Index has surpassed 70,000 points for the first time, reaching a historic high with a cumulative increase of 39% this year.

  • Goldman Sachs: Expects Fed to Maintain Interest Rates in June Meeting, Low Likelihood of Rate Hike

    On June 16, Goldman Sachs released a research report indicating that the most significant change in economic data since the last FOMC meeting is a substantial rebound in employment growth, putting the labor market on a more stable path. This has shifted the market's focus to whether inflation has reached a level severe enough to warrant a rate hike. However, Goldman Sachs believes the likelihood of a rate increase is low. The firm points out that, on one hand, the Fed has historically not raised rates due to oil price shocks, and on the other hand, the current environment reduces the chances of a self-reinforcing high inflation triggered by oil price shocks. That said, some concerning signs have emerged; if inflation expectations or the breadth of high-inflation categories show a significant increase, the likelihood of a rate hike will rise. Goldman Sachs anticipates that during the first June meeting under the new chair, the FOMC is likely to keep the federal funds rate unchanged and remove previous forward guidance that hinted at a rate cut. The firm expects the meeting statement will only remove the phrase regarding the 'extent and timing of additional adjustments' related to the federal funds rate.

  • Hikvision Raises Hard Drive Prices Effective July 1, Sources Indicate Over 50% Cost Increase in Q3

    On June 16, it was reported that Hikvision has recently issued a price adjustment notice to its distributors, stating that the prices of its hard drive products will be increased starting July 1 of this year. Additionally, before July 1, other products under Hikvision will also undergo a price increase. This hard drive price adjustment primarily targets the distributor channel. In light of the current situation of significant supply and price fluctuations, Hikvision has advised distributors to quickly lock in orders and prices. This is not the first time Hikvision has adjusted prices, nor is it an isolated incident. According to informed sources, the main reason for this price adjustment is the sustained squeeze effect caused by the explosive growth in AI demand. The procurement costs for hard drives continue to rise, with the factory cost quotes for Q3 increasing by over 50% compared to Q2 of this year. Given the current market conditions, there is a possibility of continued price increases in the near future.

  • Bank of Japan Adjusts Bond Purchase Plan for July to September

    On June 16, the Bank of Japan announced plans to purchase 355 billion yen of 1 to 3-year Japanese government bonds twice a month from July to September (previously three times a month for 255 billion yen). The plan includes purchasing 320 billion yen of 3 to 5-year Japanese government bonds twice a month (previously three times a month for 230 billion yen). Additionally, the bank will buy 335 billion yen of 5 to 10-year Japanese government bonds twice a month (previously three times a month for 240 billion yen). It also plans to purchase 100 billion yen of 10 to 25-year Japanese government bonds twice a month (previously three times a month for 80 billion yen). Lastly, the plan includes purchasing 75 billion yen of ultra-long-term (remaining maturity of over 25 years) Japanese government bonds twice a month (previously twice a month for 75 billion yen).

  • Bank of Japan: Prepared to Modify Bond Purchase Reduction Plan if Necessary in Future Policy Meetings

    On June 16, the Bank of Japan stated that it will respond flexibly if long-term interest rates rise rapidly, such as by increasing the purchase of Japanese government bonds and implementing fixed-rate bond purchase operations. It is prepared to modify the bond purchase reduction plan in future policy meetings if necessary.

  • Bank of Japan: Need to Pay Special Attention to Future Developments in the Middle East and Their Impact on Financial Markets, Economy, and Prices

    On June 16, the Bank of Japan stated that it is currently necessary to pay special attention to the future developments in the Middle East and their impact on financial markets, foreign exchange markets, the economy, and prices. It is essential to monitor global demand related to artificial intelligence and the future fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and their effects on the Japanese economy and prices.

  • Bank of Japan: Accommodative Financial Environment Expected to Persist After Policy Rate Adjustment

    On June 16, the Bank of Japan stated that it expects the accommodative financial environment to continue after the adjustment of the policy rate, providing strong support for economic activities.