Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

A Framework for Measuring Crypto Risk

Validated Media

The crypto investing industry needs a framework for measuring risk.

By “risk” I don’t mean whether a crypto investment is volatile; I mean whether it could collapse entirely.

For example, most would say bitcoin and Ethereum are less risky than a crypto startup. Most would say Tether and USDC (backed by dollars) are less risky than Dai (backed by crypto).

The question for you: What are the risk factors that make you stay away from a crypto investment?

Is it an anonymous founder? A sketchy business model? Forked code?

Here are my warning flags — I’d love to hear yours.

Building a Crypto Risk Model

What we have in mind is something like our Blockchain Investor Scorecard, which was published back in 2018, and has stood the test of time. It’s the scorecard we use for all our crypto ratings, and it really works.

Every question gets a rating from 1 to 5, then you average them up.

While the scorecard has some questions that measure risk (like the team integrity, above), it really measures the strength of the underlying crypto “company.”

It measures potential reward. But how can we measure potential risk?

Specifically, I’m thinking of the crypto companies that have collapsed this year; you know who they are (that last link is a particularly great read).

Could we have seen this coming? Obviously, most didn’t. But could we get better at spotting Jenga towers before they collapse?

I believe we can. Here are a few questions we might ask of any crypto investment: the first steps toward a rigorous framework of measuring risk.

Team Risk

Is the team anonymous?

Anonymous teams are less accountable.

Does the team have a meaningful track record in crypto (“10,000 hours”)? Experienced teams are less risky than novices.

Is there information asymmetry?

Does the team have information you don’t, or is everything on-chain?

Does the team demonstrate scrupulous honesty and integrity?

Are there red flags, yellow flags, or potential conflicts of interest?

Are the leader(s) self-promoters on Twitter?

Large Twitter presences can signal they’re primarily looking out for themselves.

Regulatory Risk

Are investors buying the token, hoping the price will go up?

Forget any claims of “decentralization”: does it smell like a security?

Is the company headquartered in a jurisdiction without clear crypto regulation?

Small, crypto-friendly countries are better than large, unfriendly ones (U.S., China, etc.)

Does the company lead a specific niche of crypto (stablecoins, lending, etc.)?

Category leaders are more likely to be targeted by regulators, especially in the U.S.

Financial Risk

Is the company well-capitalized?

Do they have enough operating cash on hand, and is it liquid (e.g., stablecoins)?

Can you easily explain the company’s business model?

Do you understand how they make money, and can you describe it to others?

Is there an element of “continually increasing returns”?

Do they promise investors, either implicitly or explicitly, that number go up?

Does the company warn regularly about risks?

Do they make it a practice of pointing out potential downsides?

Have other credible investors raised warning flags?

Have you searched for alternate points of view and investigated their concerns?

Smart Contract Risk

Have their smart contracts been audited by a reputable firm?

Are the results publicly available?

Is there a public forum or repository for reporting bugs or issues?

Can you easily find it from their website or Github?

Has the company demonstrated responsiveness to reported issues?

Do they have a track record of responding decisively, or is it radio silence?

Has the company survived stress tests?

Has it held up during one or more market downturns, hacks, or other crises?

Does it rely on cross-chain bridges?

Historically, bridges between blockchains are honeypots for hackers.

Traction Risk

How many active users does the project have?

There’s some safety in numbers. More users generally = more responsibility.

How many followers do they have on social media (Twitter and/or Reddit)?

The court of public opinion can help with public accountability.

Is the project listed on major crypto exchanges?

Big companies want to protect their investors, which provides further safety.

Financial Metrics

What is the expected return?

What is the standard deviation?

What is the Sharpe Ratio?

These can be compared across crypto projects for benchmarking.

Behavioral Risk

Perhaps the most important question is your own integrity. Just as criminals are likely to hang out with other criminals, shady investors are likely to be attracted to shady investments.

I would put this into a category of its own, but since most people think they’re pretty good — even when their behavior isn’t — I’m not sure how reliable it will be. If nothing else, it’s a reminder that our own karma plays a part, too.

The Blockchain Risk Scorecard

Our plan is to put these questions into a new scorecard — call it the Blockchain Risk Scorecard — that we can use alongside our Blockchain Investor Scorecard.

Since risk and reward go hand in hand, our hope is these two tools will provide our crypto investing community even better confidence in our top picks.

Are there any items you’d add? Remove? Change? Let me know, and I’ll share the best feedback in next week’s column.

Go ahead, message me. There’s no risk.

Get Sir John’s crypto investing column every Friday in our Bitcoin Market Journal investor newsletter.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Amazon Shares Surge 15.2%, Biggest Gain Since 2012

    On July 31, Amazon shares surged 15.2% to $271.255 per share, marking their biggest gain since 2012, with a total market value of $2.92 trillion.

  • US Treasury Secretary Bessent Vows to Track Down Iranian Assets Globally for Terror Victims

    US Treasury Secretary Bessent said the US will actively track down Iranian assets worldwide to ensure compensation funds for victims of Iran-backed terrorist activities. Bessent stated that the US government's military and economic blockade measures against the Iranian regime will continue and will not be relaxed. (Jinshi)

  • Apple Plunges Nearly 10%, Q4 Revenue Guidance Misses Expectations

    On July 31, Apple (AAPL.US) plunged nearly 10% to $300.33, marking its biggest drop since April 2025. In terms of fundamentals, Apple's third-fiscal-quarter revenue rose approximately 16% year-over-year to $109.42 billion, slightly above analyst expectations. Among the details, product revenue came in at $78.68 billion, beating the expected $77.25 billion. However, services revenue—a key driver of its valuation re-rating in recent years—totaled $30.74 billion, missing the consensus estimate of $31.36 billion. Additionally, Greater China revenue reached $18.82 billion, with year-over-year growth slowing to 22%, also below analysts' forecast of $19.58 billion. During the earnings call, Apple guided fourth-fiscal-quarter revenue growth in the range of 9% to 11%, overall below the 12.1% analysts had expected. CFO Parekh noted that component supply constraints would impact iPhone, Mac, and iPad businesses in the fourth fiscal quarter, with currency fluctuations also constraining growth.

  • Three Fed Officials Back Rate Hike, Hawkish Pressure Builds

    On July 31, three Federal Reserve policymakers said that dissenting votes in favor of a rate hike this week stemmed from stubborn inflationary pressures, highlighting rising internal pressure on Fed Chair Warsh to act. In statements released Friday morning, Hammack and Kashkari said they worry that although the current round of price increases may stem from short-term factors such as President Trump's tariff policies and the Iran war, the inflation situation already warrants Fed action. Logan also joined in, saying that even if inflation cools, if the Fed does not raise rates, inflation is unlikely to fully fall back to the Fed's 2% target; without any policy constraints, inflation could continue to run above target until an unexpected shock occurs. Kashkari said that if inflation remains persistently stubborn, he might support a series of rate hikes, not just a single increase, to prevent inflation from becoming further entrenched. He said: "A series of small policy adjustments may be preferable to waiting for developments to unfold and ultimately having to take more forceful action." Hammack said that if the Fed does not tighten policy, price increases could continue to accelerate. She said: "Inflation has been stubbornly above 2% for more than five years, and I have no confidence that it will return to our target on its own." (Jin Shi)

  • US 10-Year Treasury Yield Rises to 4.7388%, Highest Since January 2025

    On July 31, the US 10-year Treasury yield rose to 4.7388%, the highest level since January 2025.

  • Spot Gold Intraday Decline Widens to 2%, at $4,021.08 per Ounce

    On July 31, spot gold's intraday decline widened to 2%, reported at $4,021.08 per ounce.

  • BTC Falls Below $63,000

    Market数据显示,BTC has fallen below $63,000, currently reported at $62,985.99, with a 24-hour decline of 2.99%. Market volatility is significant, please exercise risk control.

  • Fed's Logan: Leaning Toward 25 Basis Point Rate Hike

    On July 31, Federal Reserve Governor Logan said she leans toward a 25 basis point rate hike, believing inflation has not yet entered a sustainable path back to the Fed's 2% target. Logan stated that taking moderate action now would reduce the risk of needing more aggressive tightening in the future, while emphasizing that the Fed cannot rely on unexpected shocks to achieve its inflation target.

  • Fed's Logan: Taking Modest Actions Now Reduces Likelihood of Needing Stronger Action Later

    On July 31, Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan said that taking modest actions in the near term would reduce the likelihood of needing to take stronger action in the future.

  • Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Erases 5% Gain, Turns Lower

    On July 31, U.S. chip and semiconductor stocks rapidly weakened, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index wiping out a 5% gain and turning lower. Micron Technology, which had risen 6%, is now down 4.2%. SanDisk, which had gained nearly 10%, is now down over 6%. SK Hynix and Seagate Technology, which had risen over 8%, are now down 2%. TSMC, which had gained 4%, is now down nearly 1%.