From coindesk By Jesus Rodriguez|Edited by Benjamin Schiller

The artificial intelligence (AI) world was taken by storm a few days ago with the release of DeepSeek-R1, an open-source reasoning model that matches the performance of top foundation models while claiming to have been built using a remarkably low training budget and novel post-training techniques. The release of DeepSeek-R1 not only challenged the conventional wisdom surrounding the scaling laws of foundation models – which traditionally favor massive training budgets – but did so in the most active area of research in the field: reasoning.

The open-weights (as opposed to open-source) nature of the release made the model readily accessible to the AI community, leading to a surge of clones within hours. Moreover, DeepSeek-R1 left its mark on the ongoing AI race between China and the United States, reinforcing what has been increasingly evident: Chinese models are of exceptionally high quality and fully capable of driving innovation with original ideas.

The artificial intelligence (AI) world was taken by storm a few days ago with the release of DeepSeek-R1, an open-source reasoning model that matches the performance of top foundation models while claiming to have been built using a remarkably low training budget and novel post-training techniques. The release of DeepSeek-R1 not only challenged the conventional wisdom surrounding the scaling laws of foundation models – which traditionally favor massive training budgets – but did so in the most active area of research in the field: reasoning.

The open-weights (as opposed to open-source) nature of the release made the model readily accessible to the AI community, leading to a surge of clones within hours. Moreover, DeepSeek-R1 left its mark on the ongoing AI race between China and the United States, reinforcing what has been increasingly evident: Chinese models are of exceptionally high quality and fully capable of driving innovation with original ideas.

Inside DeepSeek-R1

DeepSeek-R1 was the result of introducing incremental innovations into a well-established pretraining framework for foundation models. In broad terms, DeepSeek-R1 follows the same training methodology as most high-profile foundation models. This approach consists of three key steps:

Most major foundation models – including those developed by OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic – adhere to this same general process. At a high level, DeepSeek-R1’s training procedure does not appear significantly different. ButHowever, rather than pretraining a base model from scratch, R1 leveraged the base model of its predecessor, DeepSeek-v3-base, which boasts an impressive 617 billion parameters.

In essence, DeepSeek-R1 is the result of applying SFT to DeepSeek-v3-base with a large-scale reasoning dataset. The real innovation lies in the construction of these reasoning datasets, which are notoriously difficult to build.

First Step: DeepSeek-R1-Zero

One of the most important aspects of DeepSeek-R1 is that the process did not produce just a single model but two. Perhaps the most significant innovation of DeepSeek-R1 was the creation of an intermediate model called R1-Zero, which is specialized in reasoning tasks. This model was trained almost entirely using reinforcement learning, with minimal reliance on labeled data.

Reinforcement learning is a technique in which a model is rewarded for generating correct answers, enabling it to generalize knowledge over time.

R1-Zero is quite impressive, as it was able to match GPT-o1 in reasoning tasks. However, the model struggled with more general tasks such as question-answering and readability. That said, the purpose of R1-Zero was never to create a generalist model but rather to demonstrate it is possible to achieve state-of-the-art reasoning capabilities using reinforcement learning alone – even if the model does not perform well in other areas.

Second-Step: DeepSeek-R1

DeepSeek-R1 was designed to be a general-purpose model that excels at reasoning, meaning it needed to outperform R1-Zero. To achieve this, DeepSeek started once again with its v3 model, but this time, it fine-tuned it on a small reasoning dataset.

As mentioned earlier, reasoning datasets are difficult to produce. This is where R1-Zero played a crucial role. The intermediate model was used to generate a synthetic reasoning dataset, which was then used to fine-tune DeepSeek v3. This process resulted in another intermediate reasoning model, which was subsequently put through an extensive reinforcement learning phase using a dataset of 600,000 samples, also generated by R1-Zero. The final outcome of this process was DeepSeek-R1.

While I have omitted several technical details of the R1 pretraining process, here are the two main takeaways:

As a result, DeepSeek-R1 emerged as a model that matched the reasoning capabilities of GPT-o1 while being built using a simpler and likely significantly cheaper pretraining process.

Everyone agrees that R1 marks an important milestone in the history of generative AI, one that is likely to reshape the way foundation models are developed. When it comes to Web3, it will be interesting to explore how R1 influences the evolving landscape of Web3-AI.

DeepSeek-R1 and Web3-AI

Until now, Web3 has struggled to establish compelling use cases that clearly add value to the creation and utilization of foundation models. To some extent, the traditional workflow for pretraining foundation models appears to be the antithesis of Web3 architectures. However, despite being in its early stages, the release of DeepSeek-R1 has highlighted several opportunities that could naturally align with Web3-AI architectures.

1) Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuning Networks

As a result, DeepSeek-R1 emerged as a model that matched the reasoning capabilities of GPT-o1 while being built using a simpler and likely significantly cheaper pretraining process.

Everyone agrees that R1 marks an important milestone in the history of generative AI, one that is likely to reshape the way foundation models are developed. When it comes to Web3, it will be interesting to explore how R1 influences the evolving landscape of Web3-AI.

DeepSeek-R1 and Web3-AI

Until now, Web3 has struggled to establish compelling use cases that clearly add value to the creation and utilization of foundation models. To some extent, the traditional workflow for pretraining foundation models appears to be the antithesis of Web3 architectures. However, despite being in its early stages, the release of DeepSeek-R1 has highlighted several opportunities that could naturally align with Web3-AI architectures.

1) Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuning Networks

4) Reasoning Data Provenance

One of the defining features of reasoning models is their ability to generate reasoning traces for a given task. DeepSeek-R1 makes these traces available as part of its inference output, reinforcing the importance of provenance and traceability for reasoning tasks. The internet today primarily operates on outputs, with little visibility into the intermediate steps that lead to those results. Web3 presents an opportunity to track and verify each reasoning step, potentially creating a "new internet of reasoning" where transparency and verifiability become the norm.

Web3-AI Has a Chance in the Post-R1 Reasoning Era

The release of DeepSeek-R1 has marked a turning point in the evolution of generative AI. By combining clever innovations with established pretraining paradigms, it has challenged traditional AI workflows and opened a new era in reasoning-focused AI. Unlike many previous foundation models, DeepSeek-R1 introduces elements that bring generative AI closer to Web3.

Key aspects of R1 – synthetic reasoning datasets, more parallelizable training and the growing need for traceability – align naturally with Web3 principles. While Web3-AI has struggled to gain meaningful traction, this new post-R1 reasoning era may present the best opportunity yet for Web3 to play a more significant role in the future of AI.

Note: The views expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinDesk, Inc. or its owners and affiliates.