Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Ethereum's Integrated Era

Validated Project

Any successful blockchain must create a flywheel that looks like this.

  • Economic progress (TVL, price, REV, volume, etc.) must bring awareness and visibility to a chain so that: ⤵️
  • New apps can get funding, new developers can learn the tech, and new users can take advantage of everything we've built to improve their lives, inevitably leading to: ⤵️
  • Innovation, and the improvement of infra and apps to bring efficiency and explore new use cases and architectures. The innovation phase is part of the cycle where coordination is most crucial, but also the phase where natural incentives seem to push teams apart. Innovation leads to Economic progress, and the cycle begins again. 🔃

The problem that  Ethereum has faced is simple – we have broken every part of this flywheel.Note: This article approaches the high level technical roadmap of Ethereum and does not focus on the social layer roadmap. These two must exist together for a full picture.

First, Accept the Problem

New apps, developers, and users are on L2s! Innovation takes place on L2s! And economic progress is shifting towards L2s as well.

This would not be a problem for Ethereum if those L2s fed back into the flywheel themselves, but too often this is not the case.

Where is the root of this break in the flywheel?

Ethereum (circa 2020 onwards) thought scaling with rollups was the only way to scale, and it drastically overestimated how much L2s would contribute back to the broader flywheel of Ethereum.

Rollups were presented as a scaling solution. When compared to sharding, rollups seemed simpler, avoided diluting the security of Ethereum L1, and could even bring better composability. 

But rollups are more than just a scaling architecture, they are an incentives architecture too. A simplified train of logic might look like this:

  1. We need to scale Ethereum.
  2. Some form of sharding is necessary to scale a blockchain with the properties we want.
  3. In protocol execution, sharding is too complex and has other issues.
  4. Thus, rollups are the only way to scale Ethereum.

The first major misstep here, imo, was point #2. Empirically it is blindingly obvious that we were wrong (at least to a degree).   Solana and Monad, for example, have both shown sound scaling roadmaps that do not involve sharding of any form. Meanwhile, many in Ethereum (especially core devs) have shown we can push L1 performance much further than we have today.

Who says Ethereum and Evm is slow?1,2GGas block - 60k txs - 52k tps300MGas block - 14,4k txs - 83k tpsHaving fun with @KurtosisTech and @NethermindEth pic.twitter.com/IVb7AooKGk

— Kamil Chodoła (@ChodoKamil)April 3, 2025

While I am not convinced one chain will ever be enough for everything, I think we pushed to that endgame before pursuing the opportunities for L1 scaling we had.

Point #4 in this line of reasoning also falls short. We failed to correctly evaluate the potential downsides/cons of a rollup-centric roadmap on the network effect flywheel of the L1.

The Ideal Flywheel

I believe we can reframe the network effect flywheel like this:

Instead of drawing network effects away from the flywheel, L2s should accelerate the flow of network effects between each one.

Concretely, that means:

  • Providing nearly unlimited flexible scale as an overflow
  • Pushing customization, specialization, and crazy experimental stuff
  • Onboarding users and developers
  • Growing total REV of the Ethereum ecosystem and the REV of Ethereum L1 itself
  • Staying highly composable with Ethereum

This sort of interaction has the desired effect for Ethereum but also for L2s – a rising tide lifts all boats.

A slide from my talk at Sequencing Day in November 2024

A Firm Foundation

To effectively reboot the flywheel, we need a strong L1. An L1 worth composing with. An ETH worth holding in your treasury. A coordination point for innovation. 

How? The answer couldn't be simpler. Aggressively scale the L1.

simplified roadmap- scale blobs- scale the L1- improve UX (L2 interop + app layer focus)

— joshrudolf.eth (@rudolf6_)April 13, 2025

We start with Innovation at the L1 level.

There are three reasons:

  1. Scaling the L1 increases network effects under the ideal flywheel
  2. Scaling the L1 raises the bar for any L2s to be competitive
  3. Scaling the L1 is useful to L2s! (especially the sort I'll talk about in the next section)

Most people reading this probably understand what scaling the L1 means in practice, but the core is increasing TPS and gas per second while reducing slot times. We must build Ethereum L1 into the strongest network for settlement, yes, but also for execution.

Combined, this is the firm foundation that L2s need.

Bring Rollups Home

As the L1 scales and builds its own network effect, there is no time to waste in optimizing L2s to contribute to the ideal flywheel. 

It is important to balance a couple of things here:

  • Ethereum gave rollups the impression they would be prioritized heavily in Ethereum.
  • Rollups have successfully grown network effects of their own.

Any sort of pivot back to L1 scaling must be careful not to completely alienate major L2s (although some L2s have no good reason to exist anyways, and should absolutely die). 

I propose a simple rollup design:

  • The rollup uses Ethereum for DA. 
  • The rollup uses Ethereum for execution. This means it is a native rollup.
  • The rollup uses Ethereum for sequencing. This means it is a based rollup.
  • The rollup uses ETH as its native gas token.

Rollups designed like this have been called "ultrasound rollups" and "based+native rollups." I have written about them in more detail already!

https://t.co/H3Dljoz3sn

— mteam.eth 🗼 (@mteamisloading)December 3, 2024

Ultrasound rollups are not possible on today's Ethereum. In order to enable the native part, Ethereum would need to hard fork to add a new opcode called the execution engine opcode. Based sequencing also has some practicality problems for now. The things required are all closely related to scaling the L1.

Now, assume for a second we can do this. What do we get?

Ultrasound rollups contribute to the network effect flywheel of Ethereum by maintaining composability and enabling customization. Their combined scale is theoretically very high, and any one ultrasound rollup can crank execution just like MegaETH or RISE. Ultrasound rollups aren't a step backward, they need to be a step forward.

Ultrasound rollups are so synergistic with Ethereum that I think of them as network effect extensions of Ethereum. Solana had the right idea with network extensions, but ultrasound rollups are more than just adding to the capabilities of Ethereum. They are Ethereum's network.

It is possible to transition existing rollups into ultrasound ones. In fact, some teams have already committed to exploring the option further. New rollups and appchains should prioritize this.

A unified Ethereum with Universal Synchronous Composability, bringing insane scale but also infinite expressivity, is absolutely possible with this approach.

In this world, user and developer activity takes place on L1 or a specialized rollup. Valuable and highly contentious state likely remains on L1. Developers build cross-chain applications without needing to pay any attention to the underlying gap between chains. Users experience chain abstraction within the broadened economic zone of Ethereum. 

This is the integrated era of Ethereum.

Many Choices -> Obvious Choice

Ethereum is building premium DA, based rollups are exporting sequencing that we are improving too, and native rollups will provide amazing execution.

Is it still modular if Ethereum provides all the best services?1. Settlement 🟩2. DA 🟨3. Sequencing 🟨4. Execution 🟥Ethereum is building premium DA, based rollups are exporting sequencing that we are improving too, and native rollups will provide amazing execution.

— mteam.eth 🗼 (@mteamisloading)December 1, 2024

The Ethereum L1 bundles core rollup services into the integrated ultrasound rollup. While chains can still be modular (the market is permissionless after all), Ethereum itself provides such important and polished services that any competitor is irrelevant.

Value accrual in the form of fees is simple under this model: Provide the most valuable services, access to the largest synchronous economic zone, the strongest economic security, the most censorship resistance sequencing, the most reliable settlement layer, and the most secure DA.

Narrative falls into place too. "Ethereum is the best" ➡️ Ethereum is the best.

Scale the L1.Bring the rollups home.Integrate everything.And ship it as fast as possible.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • French Finance Committee Approves Amendments on Stablecoin Exchange Tax and Crypto Exit Tax

    On October 10, Decrypt reported that the Finance Committee of the French National Assembly approved two amendments related to cryptocurrency taxation this week: starting January 1, 2027, exchanges of stablecoins regulated under MiCA will be considered taxable sales; and an exit tax will be imposed on taxpayers who have been French tax residents for at least six of the past ten years and have moved abroad with crypto assets totaling over 800,000 euros. On October 9, the committee voted 31 to 3 to reject the budget revenue portion, and the full National Assembly will review based on the government's original text. The amendments will not be automatically included; supporters must reintroduce them during the debate starting on October 13, with a formal vote scheduled for October 20. The related measures have not yet become law. The stablecoin amendment was proposed by Nicolas Sansu, a member of the left-wing GDR party group, along with 16 co-signers, and does not set a new tax rate but aims to include the revenue under France's existing 31.4% flat tax system. The committee also passed an amendment allowing crypto asset losses to be carried forward for ten years to offset future gains.

  • Luxshare Precision: Company and Luxshare Technology Involved in 337 Investigation, Currently in Initial Filing Stage

    On October 10, Luxshare Precision announced that the company and its holding subsidiary, Dongguan Luxshare Technology Co., Ltd., have been listed as respondents in a 337 investigation by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), involving U.S. Patent US 10,903,700. The ITC officially launched the investigation on October 9, 2026, with investigation number 337-TA-1526. The case is currently in the initial filing stage, and no substantial determination has been made regarding the relevant infringement claims. The products involved are in the customer verification stage and have not yet entered mass production.

  • South Korea's Financial Commission: Shareholding Restrictions for Exchange Major Shareholders Not Targeting Specific Companies

    On October 10, Lee Ik-yeon, chairman of the Financial Services Commission of South Korea, stated that the provisions regarding shareholding restrictions for major shareholders of virtual asset exchanges in the ongoing 'Basic Law on Digital Assets' are not aimed at specific individuals or companies. Instead, they are designed to ensure that exchanges, once institutionalized, bear a higher level of public responsibility. Currently, South Korean virtual asset exchanges operate under a system that requires updates every three years, but this will transition to a licensing system after the implementation of the 'Basic Law on Digital Assets.' Lee emphasized that exchanges have infrastructure attributes and must possess public accountability and responsibility commensurate with their status.

  • SVRN Acquires Infrastructure Platform FastNEAR

    On October 10, it was officially announced that NEAR Treasury Company SVRN has acquired the NEAR infrastructure platform FastNEAR. FastNEAR will join SVRN as a wholly-owned subsidiary, with its co-founders Evgeny (Eugene) Kuzyakov and Mike Purvis also joining the SVRN team. The announcement stated that FastNEAR is a high-performance RPC infrastructure provider behind NEAR applications and supports most of the data layer for NEAR, including server clusters for handling network read and write operations, archival infrastructure for storing complete transaction histories, and NEARDATA, a data source for developers to process these historical records.

  • Entropy Acquires Xiaomi Code for 569.98 HYPE, Perpetual Contract Launch Imminent

    On October 10, HIP-3 market deployer Entropy spent 569.98 HYPE to acquire the Xiaomi code, and Entropy may soon launch its perpetual contract.

  • Trump Calls It Incredible Not to Win Nobel Peace Prize

    On October 10, Trump posted on the Truth platform stating that he had "resolved eight wars, with two more about to end or be resolved," and rescued all Israeli hostages, including the last 28 survivors and victims, as well as releasing hundreds of hostages from around the world and sending them home. He also claimed to have "won the Venezuela war, capturing the brutal dictator ruling the country," and prevented Iran, the "number one state sponsor of terrorism," from obtaining nuclear weapons. He wrote that despite doing so much, he did not receive the Nobel Peace Prize, which is "truly incredible."

  • Bernstein Analyzes AI Infrastructure Costs: Up to $39.5 Billion Investment per Gigawatt

    On October 10, Bernstein's research report revealed that the capital expenditure required to build a 1GW data center using different AI accelerator architectures ranges from approximately $34.6 billion to $39.5 billion. Among these, the construction cost of NVIDIA's Vera Rubin architecture is the highest, while OpenAI's self-developed ASIC architecture, Jalapeno, is relatively lower. Bernstein significantly revised its cost expectation for NVIDIA's Rubin NVL72 single rack from $9.1 million to $7.52 million, a reduction of about 17%, primarily reflecting adjustments in expectations for HBM prices and NAND storage capacity. The report also pointed out that the main economic burden of AI data centers is not electricity costs, but rather the substantial capital expenditures and the depreciation they generate.

  • China Securities Regulatory Commission Holds Expert Seminar on Capital Market and Financial Situation

    On October 10, Wu Qing, Secretary of the Party Committee and Chairman of the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), held a seminar in Beijing to engage in in-depth discussions with leaders of listed companies and experts from securities and fund institutions, gathering opinions and suggestions on the current capital market and financial situation. During the seminar, participants unanimously agreed that China's macroeconomic environment is steadily improving, the industrial structure transformation is deepening, and the capital market is operating robustly, with multi-level market functions being effectively utilized. Although facing some risks and challenges, the trend of high-quality development remains unchanged, and there is confidence in economic operations and the capital market. Additionally, the attending experts provided specific suggestions for better promoting the stable and healthy development of the capital market, which mainly include: continuously strengthening the mechanisms for market stability, further broadening the sources, channels, and methods for medium- and long-term funds to enter the market, and developing patient capital; encouraging listed companies with conditions to increase dividend repurchases and improve mechanisms for investor returns and rights protection; optimizing the issuance and listing system to support the development of high-quality enterprises from various types and industries; enhancing trading supervision and strengthening cross-border risk monitoring and response; and researching and reserving more incremental policy tools, among others. Wu Qing expressed that listed companies and industry institutions are important entities in the market and hopes that everyone will actively provide suggestions to jointly build a better capital market, which will better reward investors and contribute positively to the construction of Chinese-style modernization. Relevant officials from the CSRC also participated in the seminar.

  • Changxin Technology's New Breakthrough: 4F² Architecture Products Expected by Year-End

    On October 10, Changxin Memory's 4F² DRAM architecture research and development recently made significant progress. Dr. Cao Kanyu, the company's president, delivered a speech at the Fourth Integrated Chips and Chiplet Conference, providing a comprehensive overview of Changxin Memory's technological explorations and accumulations in DRAM devices, 4F² architecture, and hybrid bonding. He officially announced that a new generation of DDR5 RDIMM products, incorporating these advanced technologies, is expected to be launched by the end of the year.

  • Hyperliquid Whale Holds $32.36 Million Bitcoin Short Position on 10/10 Crash Anniversary

    On October 10, Bitcoin.com reported that a Hyperliquid whale holds a short position of 391.48 BTC, valued at $32.36 million, on the anniversary of the '10/10 Crash.' The average entry price is $82,863.10, utilizing 13x leverage, with an account equity of $7.19 million and a liquidation price of $99,801.20, approximately 20% higher than the current price. Data shows that this address has conducted a total of 4,726 transactions, with perpetual contracts yielding a profit of $952,000 in the past week and a maximum drawdown of 11.03%. As of the time of writing, the short position has an unrealized profit of about $75,500. On October 10, 2025, the crypto market experienced the largest liquidation event in history, clearing over $19.1 billion in leveraged positions. Bitcoin is currently priced at approximately $82,754, down about 34% from its historical peak of $126,080. According to Coinglass, if BTC rises to $85,000, around $3.3 billion in short positions will be at risk. Hyperliquid has approximately 38,040 BTC in open contracts, with this whale accounting for about 1%.