Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Should You Self-Custody Your Crypto or Keep It on an Exchange?

The fallout from FTX has had an extraordinary impact on the crypto space. For the past several weeks, rumors and accusations about commingling of funds, safety of customer assets, allegations of fraud and contagion effects have dominated headlines, as well as sending the prices of most major coins tumbling. While FTX clients are left wondering if they will ever see their assets again, other crypto investors may be wondering if their coins are actually safe.

A Question of Custody

When an investor buys cryptocurrency today in the United States, they have two main choices to store their assets — to self-custody the crypto, which is referred to as a hard or cold wallet, or to keep the assets on an exchange*, also referred to as a hot wallet.

Self-Custody: If an investor chooses to self-custody their coins, they are typically held in physical storage devices, such as flash drives or hard disk drives that store private keys, tokens, or cryptocurrencies. By securing coins on a private wallet, the crypto is effectively taken out of circulation as they are held under password-protected encryption.

However, the reverse effect of having crypto kept safely away is the lack of instant liquidity. In times of high volatility, investors would need immediate access to their crypto. When timing is an issue those few minutes connecting and uploading your cold wallet could cost money.

There is also the risk of the device or password to the device being lost or stolen. The amount investors have lost due to misplaced passwords or lost/disposed hard drives varies, with some accounts placing it at nearly 10% of the bitcoin “mined to date.”

Exchange: As broker-dealers are not yet allowed to custody crypto for retail clients, coins cannot be held in an investor’s existing brokerage account. They can, however, remain at the exchange where the coins were purchased, i.e., Coinbase, Binance, or Crypto.com.

Hot wallets have a number of benefits, including ease of use. If you purchase your coins on an exchange, keeping them on that exchange is simple — after executing the trade, the exchange holds the funds. And hot wallets provide the benefit of transaction ease — you can easily transfer your coins in and out, liquidate, or purchase additional coins. Crypto exchanges also provide up-to-date valuations on holdings.

Institutional investors do have another option. The Office of the Comptroller (OCC) — the bank regulator in the United States — granted banks the authority to custody crypto back in 2020, under former President Trump appointee Brian Brooks. However, acting Comptroller Michael J. Hsu has been more cautious in his approach. In November 2021, the OCC stated that banks needed “adequate controls in place,” before engaging in crypto activities.

Despite this, BNYMellon, the oldest bank in the United States, became the first to offer custody services of bitcoin and ether to institutional clients, alongside their traditional investments. And other major institutional firms are also considering offering crypto custody services to their institutional clients, including Nasdaq, which recently applied to the New York Department of Financial Services to offer crypto custody.

Impact of the Crypto Winter and FTX

The risks of holding your crypto on exchanges have never been more obvious than in the past few months. Recent volatility has seen assets leaving exchanges at a rapid clip. Even prior to the FTX meltdown over 34,000 bitcoin moved off exchanges on September 30, 2022, according to analysis firm Santiment.

The below chart shows the amount of money that has been leaving centralized exchanges, while funds into decentralized exchanges, is growing, as the threats of cyber attacks or exchanges failing loom.

Frozen Assets: The collapse of FTX prompted a historic withdrawal of coins off exchanges. According to Glassnode, 72,900 bitcoin left exchanges during the week of November 7, 2022, and withdrawals were not limited to bitcoin, as ethereum saw similar, significant movements.

Representatives of FTX have indicated that large amounts of cryptoassets had been stolen from the exchange. Combined with the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing and reports of hacking make it unlikely that investor assets will be fully recovered.

Cyber Attacks: Beginning with the infamous Mt. Gox attack in 2014, billions of dollars have been hacked from major exchanges. While crypto transactions on the blockchain are pseudo-anonymous, they are also irreversible; crypto also lacks a centralized authority. In 2021, there were over 20 hacks where victims lost at least $10 million in securities, according to a report by Chainalysis, and earlier this year, Crypto.com was hit by hackers for $30 million of stolen bitcoin and ether.

Other Options

Crypto Wallets are web-based applications that allow investors to store, send and receive virtual currencies. While ease of use is a benefit with a mobile wallet, the risk of cybercrime and the loss of key information may still be an issue. Many crypto exchanges, such as Coinbase, have also started offering custodial wallets as an option for their customers.

A decentralized exchange, or DEX, offers protection against the viability of the exchange where coins are held. These decentralized exchanges allow investors to conduct their trades, and are ultimately responsible for their trades, settlements and safe-keeping of coins or tokens. Users can trade tokens directly with each other using blockchain-based smart contracts instead of passing funds through an intermediary or central authority.

Tax Implications of Moving to a Private Wallet

If an investor moves assets off exchange, it generally does not create a taxable event. Jack R. Brister, EA, MBA, TEP, Managing Member and Founder of International Wealth Tax Advisers, said, “Moving coins between wallets is not a taxable event — whether it is to a private wallet or to another exchange.” However, Mr. Brister advises that if the platform an investor is moving assets to does not take a particular instrument (i.e. an account holding XRP and the exchange will only hold bitcoin), and an investor needs to sell assets to then reinvest into that platform, that would constitute a taxable event.

Looking Ahead: More Regulation or Self-Custody?

The crypto space saw increased acceptance in 2022, prompting global governments to look closer at regulations—given the failure of FTX, the question of custody will be further highlighted. While private unregistered funds targeting accredited investors and qualified purchasers are able to access custody services at certain banks, as of yet, retail investors do not have that option. However, Fidelity Investments is getting ready to launch a retail crypto trading platform and has opened up a wait list for retail investors.

Ultimately, where an investor puts their crypto depends on where they deem most appropriate — potentially storing a certain amount with an exchange frequently used, storing currency that is considered a long-term allocation on a hardware wallet and then using a mobile or desktop wallet for more speculative purchases. Investors typically have multiple accounts for their traditional finance investments, why shouldn’t it be the same for crypto investments?

* U.S. citizens should check if the particular exchange they are viewing is available in their residing state.

This content is for educational purposes only. It does not constitute trading advice. Past performance does not indicate future results. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose. The author of this article may hold assets mentioned in this article.

If you found this content engaging, and have an interest in commissioning content of your own, check out Quantum Economics’ Analysis on Demand service.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Iranian Official: US Provocation on Strait of Hormuz is a Reactive Response

    According to IRNA, Hussein Nushabadi, the Director General of the Iranian Foreign Ministry's Parliamentary and Legal Affairs Department, stated in an interview that Washington's controversial claims regarding control over the Strait of Hormuz are primarily driven by domestic political needs and are a reactive response to Iran's demonstrated strength and strategic actions in this waterway. He noted that the baseless assertions made by the US President regarding the Strait of Hormuz do not align with international shipping regulations or the relevant provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Nushabadi also pointed out that Iran possesses political and military dominance over the Strait of Hormuz, a vital lifeline for global energy and economy, making it a powerful lever and strategic trump card in responding to external threats.

  • Jensen Huang Collaborates with Wall Street Giants to Support AI Computing Market

    On August 15, a rare scene unfolded as Jensen Huang joined forces with six major Wall Street asset management giants to endorse the idea of establishing AI computing as an independent asset class. Analysts believe this reflects Huang's commitment to the concept of token economics, marking a shift in the AI boom from a technological competition to a capital competition. However, the latest plan has raised concerns among investors regarding 'circular financing' and debt risks. In response to these doubts, Huang personally stepped in to reassure the market, stating that Nvidia may provide a residual value support mechanism of up to 25% for individual investment projects and will carefully evaluate each project. Following this, market sentiment showed slight improvement. (CCTV Finance)

  • DJI Added to 'Blacklist', US Court Orders Rehearing

    On August 15, according to the Russian Satellite News Agency, the U.S. Court of Appeals recently ruled that a lower court must rehear the case regarding the inclusion of Chinese drone manufacturer DJI on the Pentagon's 'Chinese Military Industrial Enterprises' blacklist, stating that the previous ruling was based on non-confidential information and contained flaws. The report indicated that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals pointed out that the lower court's conclusion that DJI 'contributes to China's defense industrial base' was erroneous, as it relied solely on publicly available information. The court has mandated that during the rehearing, the lower court may review classified documents and decide whether to uphold the Department of Defense's designation based on that information.

  • Iran Claims Undisputed Ownership of Strait of Hormuz

    On August 15, according to CCTV International News, Iran's Chief Justice Ejei stated today that the absurd remarks made by the U.S. President regarding the Strait of Hormuz are entirely based on his personal delusions. In the real world, the true owner and dominant power of this important international waterway is Iran. Ejei emphasized that Iran has proven militarily that the Strait of Hormuz is an inseparable part of Iranian territory and sovereignty.

  • US Spot Bitcoin ETF Sees Net Outflow of $56.2 Million Yesterday

    On August 15, according to data monitored by Farside Investors, the US spot Bitcoin ETF experienced a net outflow of $56.2 million yesterday.

  • No Net Inflow or Outflow for US Spot Ethereum ETF Yesterday

    On August 15, according to monitoring data from Farside Investors, there was no net inflow or outflow for the US spot Ethereum ETF yesterday.

  • Charles Schwab: Low Probability of CLARITY Act Passing Before U.S. Midterm Elections

    On August 15, Charles Schwab stated in its 'Weekly Trader Market Outlook' that as of the time of writing, the Bitwise Top 10 Large Cap Crypto Index has fallen 3% since last Friday; Bitcoin has dropped 3% during the same period, while Ethereum is down 2%. Bitcoin continues to exhibit characteristics of a low-correlation asset, with limited impact on its price from the CPI and PPI data released this week. Last week, the U.S. Senate entered its summer recess without voting on the CLARITY Act. Although the final debate vote for the bill is scheduled for September 14, the probability of it passing before the midterm elections remains low.

  • Sources: Trump to Attend Closed-Door Meeting with Crypto Executives at the White House

    On August 15, sources revealed that U.S. President Trump is expected to attend a White House meeting held by the newly established Innovation Committee on Wednesday. The committee consists of executives from the crypto industry as well as leaders from prediction markets and artificial intelligence companies. Sources indicated that the CEOs of companies such as Coinbase, Ripple, Gemini, Robinhood, Polymarket, and Kalshi are members of the U.S. CFTC Innovation Advisory Committee. Before attending the committee's first official meeting on Thursday, these crypto industry CEOs will gather at the White House for the meeting on Wednesday. Attendees learned that Trump plans to participate in this meeting. The meeting is expected to take place at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building next to the White House, aiming to initiate policy discussions on several key directions in the U.S. innovation sector. Sources also stated that CFTC Chairman Mike Selig and other policy advisors are expected to attend the meeting. One source further revealed that U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick may also be present. The White House spokesperson has not yet responded to requests for comments regarding the meeting arrangements.

  • U.S. Optical Communication Stocks Rise, Lumentum Up Over 6%

    On August 14, U.S. optical communication stocks collectively rose, with Applied Optoelectronics increasing by over 14%, AXT Inc and MaxLinear rising by over 7%, POET Technologies and Lumentum up by over 6%, and Lightwave Logic increasing by over 5%. Corning and Tower Semiconductor also saw gains of over 4%.

  • Dunamu Reports 73% Decrease in Q2 Operating Profit to 23.5 Billion Won

    On August 14, Upbit operator Dunamu announced its Q2 2026 performance, reporting quarterly revenue of 173.5 billion won (approximately 123 million USD) and an operating profit of 23.5 billion won (approximately 16.65 million USD), representing declines of about 26% and 73% respectively compared to Q1. In the first quarter, Dunamu's revenue was 234.6 billion won (approximately 166 million USD) with an operating profit of 88 billion won (approximately 62.34 million USD). Dunamu stated that the decline in performance this quarter was primarily influenced by the overall contraction in liquidity in the global digital asset market, which weakened investor sentiment.