Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

What Is NFTFi? Everything You Need To Know

Validated Project

Before the NFT Summer of 2021 — a time where the global market for NFTs ballooned to over USD$2.5B — the cryptosphere bore witness to a similarly exuberant period, which has since come to be known as the DeFi Summer of 2020.

In large part fueled by the phenomenon of yield-farming, the events of DeFi Summer drove the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi protocols to roughly USD$10B by late-September. With the recent explosions that both the NFT and DeFi markets have undergone, it was only a matter of time before the two technologies would inevitably cross paths.

What is NFTFi exactly?

NFTFi is using NFTs to finance transactions through accessing more liquid assets.NFTFi is using NFTs to finance transactions through accessing more liquid assets.

This collision of DeFi and NFTs has opened up a variety of possibilities for NFT holders by making their NFTs a much more liquid asset.

There are a variety of sectors within NFTFi, and this article will go through what they are, their respective pros and cons, and the largest platforms in these sectors.

The sectors within NFTFi include:

  • NFT fractionalization
  • NFT renting
  • NFT derivatives
  • Lending\Borrowing using NFTs

Where NFTs and DeFi collide

Currently DeFi protocols are designed around mimicking traditional finance. However, with the introduction of NFTs, there’s potential for a whole new range of financial products. For example, some lending protocols now allow for NFTs to be pledged as loan collateral, granting both borrowers and lenders an alternative to the more traditional stablecoin or cryptocurrency-backed loans in DeFi. In either case, NFT/-DeFi projects exploit the strengths of each technology to offer a product that is patently more valuable than the sum of its parts.

In practice, the marriage between DeFi and NFTs is an area that has been accumulating increasingly more interest and development activity. Overall, it would appear that some projects are generally more geared towards augmenting NFTs to suit DeFi methods. For instance, the existence of liquidity pools and fractionalization protocols allow NFT holders to realize liquidity on their holdings while granting investors who are not as well-capitalized the opportunity to gain exposure to high-value tokens. In contrast, other projects seem to place greater emphasis on enhancing DeFi primitives through the use of NFT-based assets. As an example, some lending protocols now allow for NFTs to be pledged as loan collateral, granting both borrowers and lenders an alternative to the more traditional stablecoin or cryptocurrency-backed loans in DeFi. In either case, NFT/DeFi projects exploit the strengths of each technology to offer a product that is patently more valuable than the sum of its parts. Let’s look at some examples.

What is NFT Fractionalization?

NFT fractionalization is the process of sharing ownership of an NFT through a set of fungible tokens tied to the original NFT.

To fractionalize an NFT, the NFT is placed in a vault. ERC-20 tokens representing ownership of the NFT are then minted, each of which represents a share of ownership in the original NFT.

Pros

NFT fractionalization allows investors that are less well-capitalized to gain exposure to expensive NFT collections. This enables more liquidity to enter the market, since an expensive NFT can be divided into shares of its worth using fungible tokens.

Cons

A difficulty that arises from NFT fractionalization is the process of “putting it back together.” For the whole NFT to be removed from the vault, all of the holders must sell their shares, meaning all of the fractions have to be put back together.

Platforms

  • Unic.ly allows users to fractionalize NFT by connecting their wallets, depositing their NFTs into a vault, and minting new ERC-20 tokens (uToken). Unic.ly has its own DEX, UnicsSwap, a fork of UniSwap, where uTokens can be traded. Unic.ly provides mechanisms to help ensure that uToken pools have sufficient liquidity. uTokens can also be whitelisted if a collection is of high enough value. LP token holders of whitelisted collections can stake their LP tokens to earn $UNIC, the governance token of Unic.ly.
  • Fractional.art offers similar services. The key difference between the two platforms is that Fractional.art does not have an option for investors to stake to earn yields.
  • NFTX.io is a NFT marketplace platform that lets users deposit their NFTs into a vault to create a fungible ERC20 token (vToken). The newly minted token represents a 1:1 claim on any random NFT within the vault. Users can pool the ERC20 tokens in Automated Market Makers (AMMs) like SushiSwap to create liquidity and trade.

What is NFT Renting?

Blue-chip NFT projects such as the BAYC or the Cryptopunks are not affordable for the majority of people. At the time of writing, the collections have floor prices of 84 ETH ($142,200) and 74 ETH ($125,300) respectively. Like fractionalization, NFT Renting has been established as a solution to this problem, just in a different, more familiar form.

Like renting a flat or a car, renting NFTs provides an individual with access to an NFT for a limited time.

NFT renting comes in two forms:

1. collateralized renting

2. collateral-less renting.

Collateralized Renting

For collateralized renting, an NFT owner lists their asset on a rental marketplace. The renter can then initiate the renting process.

The NFT is placed in a smart contract with the terms and conditions of the borrower and the lender. These conditions include the rental fee and collateral, which has a higher price than the NFT to protect the lender. After the contract expires, the NFT and the collateral will return to their original owners.

The process of overcollateralized renting isn’t dissimilar to the method adopted by borrowing and lending protocols in DeFi. A prospective renter can gain access to the NFT they’d like to borrow by posting collateral valued at a higher price than the NFT they’d like. Borrowers can then access the NFT for a period of time specified by the NFT holder and encoded smart contract to which the NFT is tied.

Collateral-Less Renting

The key difference between the two is that the renter, in collateral-less renting, will never receive the original NFT.

Platforms that offer Collateral-less renting allow lenders to deposit their NFT and make a wrapped version of it. Once a user rents the NFT and pays the rental fee the renter will receive the wrapped NFT enjoying the same utility as the original one. After the contract expires, the wrapped NFT is burned and the rental fee will be sent to the lender. Collateral-less renting minimizes risk for both parties since the renter doesn’t need to put up collateral, and the lender doesn’t need to rent out their original asset.

Pros

Renting affords NFT holders the opportunity to earn passive income from their NFT collections on their own terms, without having to concern themselves with fractionalization.

The use cases for renting are continuously expanding. As the space develops, renting NFTs will increasingly have use cases in NFT galleries and museums, with platforms like Musee Dezentral already offering this experience. Holders of NFTs that provide access rights can rent out their NFTs to those that wish to attend NFT-gated events of communities for a period of time, if they’re not using them for that purpose themselves, but wish to retain exposure to the NFT.

Cons

NFT renting is still new as a business model in the world of NFTs, and therefore is still prone to exploits. One exploit that recently happened was during the Ape Coin airdrop for BAYC holders. An unknown user took a flash loan and rented out 5 BAYC NFTs before the airdrop to make his/her wallet eligible for the Ape Coin airdrop. They were airdropped Ape Coin, and the unknown user managed to make $800,000 because of a NFT renting exploit.

Platforms

  • Most NFT rental platforms provide a relatively similar service. They offer a menu to browse different NFTs and collections, and all it takes to either mint a wrapped NFT or post collateral is to connect a user’s wallet. The largest collateralized NFT renting platforms are IQ Protocol and Vera.
  • The largest collateral-free renting platform is reNFT.
  • The platform IQ Protocol is not yet fully operational for renting, nor is reNFT so the number of collections which will be available and the experience of renting is still difficult to judge. Vera is operational, but currently only has 25 NFTs listed for rent.

What are NFT Derivatives?

NFT derivatives are one of the newer developments in the NFTFi world. Derivatives within the realms of NFTs, are similar to non-NFT derivatives;

they represent tradable contracts which let people bet on the future prices of NFT collections.

Pros

NFT derivatives help a lot in terms of NFT liquidity. It opens a lot of possibilities, such as access to trading high value NFTs, and even access to using leverage to trade NFTs. Users can also trade in either direction of the price of the NFT either up (long) or down (short).

The derivatives market in TradFi is significantly bigger than spot markets, with the notional value of derivatives estimated to be worth hundreds of trillions of dollars. This shows the market growth potential of NFT derivatives, especially when using the 11 billion dollar market for NFTs as the equivalent to the spot market.

Cons

Just like other derivatives trading, NFT derivatives are highly risky, especially when using leverage, as it can magnify losses. Moreover, NFT derivatives trading is in its nascency, therefore few NFT collections are currently available for derivatives trading.

Platforms

  • The most well-known platform that offers NFT derivatives trading is NFTures which is a product by Synfutures. Currently, the platform is only available for early access, with only one NFT available to long/short, a CryptoPunk with a current price of 77 ETH.
  • Fuku is another firm pioneering the NFT derivatives space. Fuku will offer the first options trading NFT marketplace, where anyone can buy and write options on any NFT, rather than limiting trading to certain collections. This means that there are over 2 million collections, and 80 million NFTs that Fuku allows consumers to write and buy options on, expanding NFTFi trading beyond just blue-chip NFTs. Fuku also offers a variety of trading services beyond just call and put options, such as limit orders, and the ability to bid on multiple NFT derivatives with the same collateral. Tokenized options can also be resold on secondary markets, expanding Fuku influence. On Fuku, writing options is completely gasless due to it occurring off-chain. Gas is only paid when a buyer and seller agree on a trade, which is then tokenized as an ERC721 non-fungible-token. These factors truly differentiate Fuku, and have led to confidence in their platform from some of the largest players in the web3 market. Their partners include blockchain capital, Coinbase, a16z, and Y Combinator.

Lending/Borrowing using NFTs

There are three emerging types of lending in the NFTFi world:

1. P2P NFT Lending

NFT lending is a growing sector within the NFT industry. Like DeFi lending, NFT lending is usually facilitated on-chain via a smart contract. The smart contract contains the assets, the liquidity (loan), and the terms and conditions of the loan. P2P NFT lending platforms connect prospective borrowers with lenders on a peer-to-peer basis, setting up a trustless loan between the two parties, using NFTs as collateral.

2. Lending/CDPs

A collateral debt position for NFTs is created by locking collateral in a smart contract to generate a stablecoin. The collateral in this case would be an NFT, and the CDP is created by finding a floor price for the NFT collection, which is used to determine the size of the loan.

3. Lending Pools

Lending pools in NFT money markets operate much like they do in DeFi, where they’ve become popularized by platforms like Aave and Compound. Lending pools use an over-collateralization approach. Borrowers post NFTs as collateral. This enables them to borrow funds for a fee for lending, with a market value which is less than the total value of the collateral. This fee is distributed to lenders to incentivise them to provide liquidity.

Pros

NFT lending provides additional liquidity support to the whole NFT ecosystem. This new industry allows NFT lenders to leverage their collections to earn yield, which is paid by the borrower, in the form of a borrowing fee. Borrowers also have the potential to finance new NFT purchases through loans, as they can access more liquid capital without having to sell their NFT.

Cons

A con of all of these lending options is the difficulty of pricing an NFT. As seen below, platforms have different mechanisms, such as simply using the price floor, or using their own pricing oracle. Using a price floor can severely undervalue the NFT though, as the price floor is that of the least valuable NFT in a collection. The oracle pricing mechanisms are also problematic, as they are shrouded with uncertainty over their methods or their accuracy.

To mitigate this issue, currently, most platforms only allow certain NFT collections to be used as collateral, guaranteeing some form of stability in the price of collateral for those who provide loans.

Platforms

  • One of the most known NFT lending platforms is NFTfi.com. It allows NFT owners to use NFTs to access the liquidity they need by receiving secured wETH and DAI loans. NFTfi.com is a peer-to-peer platform that lets NFT holders and liquidity providers connect via permissionless smart contract infrastructure. NFTfi.com offers their services for over 150 NFT collections, making their services available for a variety of customers.
  • Arcade, formerly known as Pawn.fi is another popular NFT lending platform. Arcade allows users to wrap multiple NFTs together to be used as collateral for a single loan, meaning users can take out larger loans than on other platforms. Loans on Arcade can be repaid at any time, and in full, giving more flexibility to borrowers. This differentiates Arcade from NFTfi.com.
  • UnUniFi is a NFT CDP platform that claims to have the most flexible Loan-To-Value (LTV) ratio in NFTFi. UnUniFi has an internal NFT marketplace which is used to gather data on NFT price floors. This data is used to determine loan sizing. UnUniFi has three stablecoins that can be minted and loaned out.

In contrast to UnUniFi, all debt positions on JPEG’d have a LTV ratio of 32%. There is some maneuverability, as special requests can be put into the DAO to allow for a higher or lower ratio. As well as having a set debt position, there is a set interest of 2% on all loans at launch. JPEG’d also allows for borrowers to buy insurance on their CDPs.

The Future of NFTFi

NFTFi is emerging as one of the most exciting newer innovations within Web3. This industry solves the liquidity problem that NFTs face by opening up them to a wide variety of new financial use cases which are currently enjoyed by other asset classes.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Whale Transfers 1,133 BTC to Coinbase Prime, Valued at $71.48 Million

    According to Onchain Lens monitoring, a whale transferred 1,133 BTC from Coinbase to Coinbase Prime through an intermediary wallet, valued at $71.48 million.

  • U.S. AI Chip Stocks Decline Before Market Open, Intel Falls Over 3%

    On July 7, U.S. AI chip stocks experienced widespread declines before the market opened. Intel dropped over 3%, while AMD, Qualcomm, and NXP fell more than 2%. TSMC, Broadcom, and Tesla decreased by over 1%, and NVIDIA declined by 0.7%.

  • China's Central Bank Increases Gold Reserves for the 20th Consecutive Month

    As of the end of June, China's gold reserves stood at 75.44 million ounces (approximately 2,346.446 tons), an increase of 480,000 ounces (about 14.93 tons) from the end of May, which reported 74.96 million ounces (approximately 2,331.52 tons). This marks the 20th consecutive month of gold accumulation.

  • China's Foreign Exchange Reserves in June at $341.6262 Billion

    On July 7, China's foreign exchange reserves for June stood at $341.6262 billion, a decrease of $26 billion from the end of May, representing a decline of 0.75%, with expectations set at $343.2 billion.

  • U.S. Storage Stocks Drop Pre-Market, SanDisk and Micron Down Over 4%

    On July 7, U.S. storage concept stocks collectively fell in pre-market trading. Western Digital dropped over 5%, SanDisk and Micron Technology fell over 4%, Seagate Technology declined over 3%, Rambus fell over 2%, and SMI fell over 1%.

  • U.S. Stocks in Optical Communication Sector Drop Pre-Market

    On July 7, stocks in the optical communication sector of the U.S. market collectively fell pre-market. Astera Labs dropped over 4%, while Marvell Technology, Credo Technology, and AXT Inc. fell more than 3%. Tower Semiconductor, MaxLinear, Corning, Applied Optoelectronics, GlobalFoundries, Lumentum, and Qorvo all declined by more than 2%. Coherent, Nokia, Amphenol, and Broadcom dropped over 1%.

  • Pre-market Decline in U.S. Storage Stocks

    In pre-market trading, U.S. storage concept stocks experienced a widespread decline, with Micron Technology falling by 4.8%, SanDisk dropping over 4%, Corning down more than 2%, and Intel decreasing by over 3%.

  • Two Departments: Support for Reinsurance Institutions to Increase Capital and Issue Supplementary Capital Tools

    On July 7, the National Financial Supervision and Administration Bureau and the Shanghai Municipal Government released several measures to accelerate the construction of the Shanghai International Reinsurance Center. Among these measures, they proposed to enhance the quality and efficiency of the reinsurance industry, support reinsurance institutions in increasing capital and expanding shares, and issuing supplementary capital tools to improve the capacity for internal capital accumulation and external capital supplementation, thereby strengthening the reinsurance industry's capabilities. The initiative aims to guide the insurance industry to focus on major national projects, strategic emerging industries, and livelihood security, consolidating insurance and reinsurance underwriting capabilities to enhance risk protection levels. It also supports reinsurance institutions in leveraging their professional technical advantages to assist the insurance industry in reducing risk.

  • Sources: Saudi Arabia Plans to Expand Oil Pipeline to Red Sea, Increasing Capacity by 2 Million Barrels Daily to Bypass Strait of Hormuz

    On July 7, five informed sources revealed that Saudi Arabia is considering expanding the crude oil pipeline capacity to its western coast on the Red Sea, allowing Saudi Arabia and its neighbors to transport more oil without passing through the Strait of Hormuz. This east-west pipeline, built in the early 1980s, has gained strategic importance since the outbreak of the Iran war in February and the disruption of shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. The pipeline can deliver up to 7 million barrels of crude oil per day to the Red Sea port. The CEO of Saudi Aramco stated in May that approximately 2 million barrels are supplied to west coast refineries, while about 5 million barrels are for export. Sources indicate that Saudi Arabia is in preliminary discussions with some neighboring countries regarding the pipeline expansion, aiming to add about 2 million barrels of pipeline capacity per day. It remains unclear whether Aramco's planned expansion involves upgrading existing infrastructure or constructing new pipelines. One source mentioned that the expansion plan also includes a smaller refined oil pipeline. Two sources indicated that the expansion scale could range from 1 million to 2 million barrels per day, with refined oil also being considered. Another source stated that the project would take several years and cost billions of dollars, requiring adjustments to Saudi crude pricing mechanisms.

  • Citi: Tencent's WorkBuddy Gains Momentum, Maintains 'Buy' Rating

    On July 7, Citi released a research report stating that, according to the latest industry data, Tencent's AI agent product WorkBuddy has reached 20 million monthly active users (MAU) and over 13 million daily active users (DAU), with a DAU/MAU ratio between 65% and 75%. Considering the product has only been launched for a few months, user stickiness and daily engagement are performing strongly. Citi quoted Tencent's management as saying that in terms of daily active users, Tencent is leading its Chinese peers in the deployment of AI agents. Early user data reflects strong natural growth for both CodeBuddy and WorkBuddy, with high retention rates. Early users are interacting with the AI agents for long durations and with high frequency, creating a positive feedback loop. It is expected that AI products will become a key revenue source for Tencent Cloud. The firm believes that WorkBuddy's success demonstrates the strength of Tencent's ecosystem, the synergy between various productivity tools, and users' trust in Tencent's products and security. Citi maintains a 'Buy' rating on Tencent with a target price of HKD 763 unchanged.