Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

The Bitcoin Demand Shock

From CoinShares Research Blog by James Butterfill

In the commodities world a demand shock refers to a sudden and significant change in the demand for basic goods or raw materials, triggered by unforeseen events. Positive demand shocks result from increased demand, potentially due to technological innovations, policy changes, or shifts in consumer preferences, driving prices up. The Chinese economic boom at the beginning of the 21st century created a commodities demand shock as property development ramped up, this led to steel prices rising 793% between 2000 and 2008. A combination of weaker economic growth following the great financial crisis, and a supply response in the form of increased production, then led to an 80% fall in steel prices over the following decade.

We believe Bitcoin is currently experiencing a positive demand shock. The SEC approval of a spot-based EFT has given access to over US$14 trillion of assets, while this was known, its timing was not and the magnitude of the resulting inflows were not a matter of widespread consensus. So far, the launch of the ETFs on the 11th of January has led to an average daily demand of 4500 bitcoins (trading days only), while only an average of 921 new bitcoin were minted per day.

This has led to the dramatic price rises we have seen in recent weeks, as the newly minted supply cannot keep up with demand, leading to ETF issuers having to source mainly from the secondary market. We can see this in the data, where OTC desk coin holdings have fallen by 74% since their 2020 peak, much likely due to ETF demand in recent years.

US ETFs have seen record breaking US$10bn in flows in the first two months, dwarfing the launch of the first Gold ETF by iShares in 2005 of US$288m over its first two months. In the first 2 months of 2020, just prior to the halving, ETPs saw US$436m of inflows representing 11% of total assets under management, remarkably similar to today, where recent inflows also represent 11%, although in nominal terms the inflows today are 23x higher than 2020.

We have also seen a significant reduction in bitcoin held by exchanges, which have fallen 29% since 2020 as investors utilise ETPs more and self-custody their bitcoin as they increasingly see it as a store of value.

At current rates of ~4500 bitcoin a day it would take 573 days to run that exchange balance down to zero — so a long way to go still.

After a demand shock in the commodities market there is typically a supply response. Over time, suppliers adjust their production levels in response to the new demand conditions. In the case of a positive demand shock, producers might increase production capacity or seek ways to enhance efficiency to meet higher demand. However, this is where Bitcoin’s similarities to the commodities market ends, as Bitcoin has a fixed immutable supply, which is programmatically designed to halve the newly issued supply every 210,000 blocks, or roughly every 4 years.

Ultimately, the market seeks a new equilibrium at the intersection of supply and demand. This adjustment process can be swift or slow, depending on the magnitude of the shock, and given Bitcoins supply is inflexible, it is only the price that can seek a new equilibrium. This is why we have seen such dramatic price rises in recent months, with the combination of the ETF launch demand and the upcoming halving exacerbating the issue.

The halving is well-known information and should, in theory at least, already be factored into the price. One could argue that the post-2020 halving price increases were more a result of the US COVID stimulus cheques rather than the halving itself. Statistically there is only a sample size of 3 prior events to go by and so it is dangerous to draw any conclusions — we have written more detail about this here. However, there might be an element of it becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy, particularly if there are a large number of trades linked to the event, although at present futures market trader positioning around the event is low.

Regardless, there are several other price supportive factors for Bitcoin prices this year, among the most significant developments are the platforms in the US that enable Registered Investment Advisors (RIAs) to include Bitcoin ETFs in client portfolios. However, we believe there will eventually be a reduction in these inflows, diminishing their impact on prices. If these flows start decreasing later this year, we anticipate that Bitcoin prices will realign with expectations for interest rates. With the US Federal Reserve expected to lower interest rates later this year, this is likely to materialise as additional price support for Bitcoin.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • A Total of 37,212.18 DMD Permanently Burned Over the Past 7 Days

    July 9, 2026 — According to the latest on-chain data released by DMDAO, a total of 37,212.18 DMD has been permanently burned over the past seven calendar days through the protocol's predefined trading and wealth management burn mechanisms.

  • Whale Transfers 1,133 BTC to Coinbase Prime, Valued at $71.48 Million

    According to Onchain Lens monitoring, a whale transferred 1,133 BTC from Coinbase to Coinbase Prime through an intermediary wallet, valued at $71.48 million.

  • U.S. AI Chip Stocks Decline Before Market Open, Intel Falls Over 3%

    On July 7, U.S. AI chip stocks experienced widespread declines before the market opened. Intel dropped over 3%, while AMD, Qualcomm, and NXP fell more than 2%. TSMC, Broadcom, and Tesla decreased by over 1%, and NVIDIA declined by 0.7%.

  • China's Central Bank Increases Gold Reserves for the 20th Consecutive Month

    As of the end of June, China's gold reserves stood at 75.44 million ounces (approximately 2,346.446 tons), an increase of 480,000 ounces (about 14.93 tons) from the end of May, which reported 74.96 million ounces (approximately 2,331.52 tons). This marks the 20th consecutive month of gold accumulation.

  • China's Foreign Exchange Reserves in June at $341.6262 Billion

    On July 7, China's foreign exchange reserves for June stood at $341.6262 billion, a decrease of $26 billion from the end of May, representing a decline of 0.75%, with expectations set at $343.2 billion.

  • U.S. Storage Stocks Drop Pre-Market, SanDisk and Micron Down Over 4%

    On July 7, U.S. storage concept stocks collectively fell in pre-market trading. Western Digital dropped over 5%, SanDisk and Micron Technology fell over 4%, Seagate Technology declined over 3%, Rambus fell over 2%, and SMI fell over 1%.

  • U.S. Stocks in Optical Communication Sector Drop Pre-Market

    On July 7, stocks in the optical communication sector of the U.S. market collectively fell pre-market. Astera Labs dropped over 4%, while Marvell Technology, Credo Technology, and AXT Inc. fell more than 3%. Tower Semiconductor, MaxLinear, Corning, Applied Optoelectronics, GlobalFoundries, Lumentum, and Qorvo all declined by more than 2%. Coherent, Nokia, Amphenol, and Broadcom dropped over 1%.

  • Pre-market Decline in U.S. Storage Stocks

    In pre-market trading, U.S. storage concept stocks experienced a widespread decline, with Micron Technology falling by 4.8%, SanDisk dropping over 4%, Corning down more than 2%, and Intel decreasing by over 3%.

  • Two Departments: Support for Reinsurance Institutions to Increase Capital and Issue Supplementary Capital Tools

    On July 7, the National Financial Supervision and Administration Bureau and the Shanghai Municipal Government released several measures to accelerate the construction of the Shanghai International Reinsurance Center. Among these measures, they proposed to enhance the quality and efficiency of the reinsurance industry, support reinsurance institutions in increasing capital and expanding shares, and issuing supplementary capital tools to improve the capacity for internal capital accumulation and external capital supplementation, thereby strengthening the reinsurance industry's capabilities. The initiative aims to guide the insurance industry to focus on major national projects, strategic emerging industries, and livelihood security, consolidating insurance and reinsurance underwriting capabilities to enhance risk protection levels. It also supports reinsurance institutions in leveraging their professional technical advantages to assist the insurance industry in reducing risk.