Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

How Did We Come From the Stock Exchanges to AI Technologies?

Validated Individual Expert

Good morning, good evening and good night! Good morning to people who read the article on how Vitalik Buterin uses the ChatGPT to solve his problems. Good evening to traders who are excited by the news that Arbitrum (ARB) rose 28% as the Biggest Beneficiary of Shapella Upgrade. And of course, good night to users and programmers who have already joined the network using Metamask and receive test WBTs, because WhiteBIT crypto exchange launched a test net of its own blockchain.

The history period from the beginning of stock exchanges to AI technologies is longer than even the timelines of the TV show Dynasty. Telling about the beginning of development of the stock market, I always use the timeline from the SoFi Learn, because if I were to write about each period of changes, it has to be the article on 10 pages.

I know that it’s not a history lesson at school. That’s why I prefer to write about what interests not only financiers and economists, but also ordinary people who watched movies about the Wall-Street, in the center of the Universe — New York City.

It took centuries for the New York Stock Exchange to reach its current state. The Buttonwood traders created the New York Stock and Exchange Board in 1817 after visiting and observing the Philadelphia Merchants Exchange. The members have to enter the exchange and adhere to a dress code. Additionally, they had to pay a charge, which by 1837 had gone from $25 to $100. Lower Manhattan lost 700 buildings in the Great Fire of 1835, while Wall Street sustained substantial property losses. Fortunately, Samuel Morse established a telegraph demonstration office, enabling remote communication between brokerages.

The NYSE opened its doors in 1903 with thousands of stock certificates stored in underground vaults. Despite signs of an economic collapse, the stock market soared and reached a 50% high in 1928. Black Thursday, a day when the market fell 11% in 1929, is referred to as such. Investors panic as the market falls, and it takes the whole 1930s to recover from the disaster. The Great Depression was in effect during this time.

Several additional disasters have occurred since then, most notably the subprime mortgage crash in 2008. Even though the NYSE was founded by a small group of merchants centuries ago, several investors, exchange executives, businesses, and regulators have helped it develop into what it is today.

After the world-wide mortgage crash in 2008, the world had known about the new objective that became the topic for discussions, disputes and scandals, of course to the present days. Similar to most things in life, when something new is introduced to the market, it doesn’t take long for it to be imitated. This was also true of Bitcoin. Rival cryptocurrencies began to enter the market in 2011, with the likes of Litecoin, Namecoin, and Swiftcoin to mention a few. This is hardly surprising given that the market value of the Bitcoin currency is currently a staggering $44 billion. As a result, software developers all over the world are constantly producing new cryptocurrencies in an effort to outdo Bitcoin as the next big thing.

Despite the thousands of active cryptocurrencies experiencing the highest value increases in 2017, they have yet to significantly impact our day-to-day lives. The majority of people who hold sizable quantities of Bitcoin do so as an investment rather than as a new method of making online purchases. Immediately following the unheard-of surge in 2017, the start of 2018 saw a different story. Market novices are uncertain whether the market would ever rebound after it plummeted and plunged by 65%.

Any automated procedure that creates, modifies, or synthesizes data using algorithms, frequently in the form of images or text that can be read by humans, is referred to as generative AI. Because the AI develops something that didn’t previously exist, it is considered generative. It differs from discriminative AI, which makes distinctions between various input types, in that regard. To put it another way, generative AI reacts to requests like “Draw me a picture of a lion and a rabbit sitting next to each other,” but discriminative AI tries to determine whether an image is a drawing of a rabbit or a lion.

Phipps’ argument will be largely clear when we give these AI models specific instructions. Take the question, “What weighs more, a pound of lead or a pound of feathers?” as an example. Even if our instinct or common sense would lead us to believe that the feathers are lighter, the obvious explanation is that they both weigh the same (one pound).

You would believe that ChatGPT will provide the correct response to this puzzle because it is a coldly logical machine without any “common sense” to confuse it. But that’s not what’s happening behind the scenes. ChatGPT simply generates output based on its predictions of what should happen after a question about a pound of feathers and a pound of lead; it does not logically reason out the solution. Since its training set contains a ton of text outlining the puzzle, it puts together a rendition of the right response.

Even while AI is still in its infancy, its promise has captured the attention of commercial and political leaders in addition to scientists and philosophers. The rationale is straightforward: AI will grow into a sizable industry that opens up a flood of business opportunities and gives industry leaders, including governments and corporations, unmatched technological power.

Regardless of the shape AI takes, its development will be riddled with ethical quirks and greeted, frequently simultaneously, with fear and joy. Some people will be concerned about job losses, privacy, and control, while others will be excited about the next development in human greatness. Whatever your opinion, AI will likely impact us and our world in a variety of ways, so it’s critical to be ready for what lies ahead. In conclusion, the main purpose of humanity right now is helping to promote new technologies, not confront them.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • U.S. Tech Hardware Stocks Face Sell-Off, Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Plummets 5.7%

    On October 22, U.S. semiconductor stocks collectively declined, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index dropping 5.67%, marking a new low since July 29. Among the component stocks, AMD fell 7.21%, Intel dropped 6.57%, Applied Materials decreased by 6.57%, Arm fell 6.75%, Seagate Technology dropped 7.81%, and Western Digital decreased by 6.95%. Micron Technology fell 4.29%, NVIDIA dropped 3.93%, TSMC decreased by 3.97%, Broadcom fell 3.79%, and ASML dropped 4.83%. Various sub-sectors, including memory and semiconductor equipment, as well as chip design, faced simultaneous pressure. Additionally, Lam Research fell 9.78%, Lumentum dropped 9.24%, Coherent decreased by 11.81%, and the 3x Long Semiconductor ETF fell 17.09%.

  • Spot Gold Falls Below $4,050/Ounce for the First Time Since August 4

    Spot gold has fallen below $4,050 per ounce for the first time since August 4, with a daily decline of 2.19%.

  • Nasdaq Opens Down 1.55%, Meta Falls Over 4%

    U.S. stock indices opened lower, with the Dow Jones down 0.44%, the S&P 500 down 0.91%, and the Nasdaq Composite down 1.55%. Chip equipment manufacturer Lam Research provided a disappointing earnings outlook, causing its stock to open down over 9%. Following a reduction in spending plans, Tesla's stock fell by 2.8%. Meta dropped over 4%, with the company's future spending commitments totaling $825 billion. IBM also fell over 4%, reporting third-quarter revenue of $17.1 billion, a 4.7% year-over-year increase.

  • DeepSeek Raises Financing Target from 50 Billion to 100 Billion Yuan, Potentially Paving the Way for Sci-Tech Board IPO

    On October 22, market sources reported that domestic large model company DeepSeek plans to raise approximately 100 billion yuan (about 15 billion USD) in its latest financing round. Tencent and CATL are the largest investors in this round, with the transaction expected to be officially completed in the coming days. As of now, neither DeepSeek nor the related investors, including Tencent, have publicly responded. Journalists have cross-verified the information with multiple sources close to the company and investors, confirming its accuracy. Sources revealed that the initial fundraising target was set at 50 billion yuan, which has since been raised multiple times to approximately 100 billion yuan, although it has not been officially announced and the final amount is still not fully determined. The funds will continue to be used for model training, computing power construction, and talent recruitment to support DeepSeek's participation in global competition. Some sources also speculate that this round of financing will pave the way for the company's upcoming IPO on the Sci-Tech Board. (Shanghai Securities Journal)

  • Ethereum Researchers Propose Reducing Final Transaction Confirmation Time from 16 Minutes to Approximately 4 Minutes

    On October 22, Ethereum researchers proposed a draft for a rapid finality mechanism aimed at reducing the final transaction confirmation time from the current approximately 16 minutes to about 4 minutes, targeting an enhancement of around 4 times. The draft was submitted on Wednesday by Ben Edgington, the coordinator of the rapid finality research, and is still in the early stages, with no activation timeline determined yet. The proposal plans to split the validator voting for determining new blocks and finalizing historical blocks into two separate mechanisms, allowing for a faster pace of finality.

  • Visa Negotiates Acquisition of Fireblocks Valued at Approximately $2.5 Billion

    On October 22, Bloomberg reported that Visa is in talks to acquire the cryptocurrency custody infrastructure company Fireblocks, with a transaction valuation of approximately $2.5 billion. If the deal is finalized, it will further expand Visa's presence in the digital asset custody and blockchain payment infrastructure sectors. This information is yet to be confirmed, and specific terms and progress of the acquisition negotiations have not been disclosed.

  • US Spot Ethereum ETF Sees Net Inflow of $14.98 Million Yesterday

    On October 22, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Ethereum ETF recorded a net inflow of $14.98 million yesterday.

  • Sonic to Transfer 13 Million S Tokens via Strategic OTC Agreement in Next 24 to 48 Hours

    On October 22, Sonic announced on the X platform that approximately 13 million S tokens will be transferred in the next 24 to 48 hours under a strategic over-the-counter (OTC) agreement. The counterparty is a long-term partner of Sonic, and both parties will collaborate to expand Sonic's reach and enhance user engagement through the partner's network.

  • Bank of Korea Maintains Interest Rate as Expected

    On October 22, the Bank of Korea kept the policy interest rate unchanged at 3%, in line with market expectations. Previously, South Korea raised interest rates in consecutive meetings in July and August.

  • U.S. Treasury Secretary Becerra: GENIUS Act Establishes Federal Regulatory Framework for Stablecoin Payments

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Becerra stated that the GENIUS Act is a milestone in the American financial sector, further solidifying the U.S. position as a global cryptocurrency hub. He compared the bill to the National Currency Act signed by President Lincoln in 1863, asserting that it establishes a federal regulatory framework for stablecoin payments in the digital age. Becerra also mentioned that the final rules issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) will facilitate the implementation of the bill, providing a clear and pragmatic institutional foundation for private sector innovation, market competition, and maintaining U.S. leadership in the digital asset space.