Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Why Does Price Slippage Happen While Trading?

Validated Venture

This is a common occurrence for all assets, including cryptocurrencies. Price slippage is most common in decentralized finance (DeFi), specifically on decentralized exchanges (DEX). Slippage in crypto asset trading can be caused by excessive volatility or, conversely, insufficient liquidity. In the case of onchain transactions, the speed of transaction confirmation in the blockchain is critical.

How does price slippage occur?

When a user places a market order on an exchange, he or she expects the order to be executed at the price specified. However, the actual execution may differ in a negative way, which is known as price slippage. It is calculated as a percentage of the transaction’s face value.

Slippage can be caused by a high spread, which is the difference between the asset’s buy and sell prices, as well as a low volume of the asset in the bet.

The presence of a large number of participants, high trading activity, and large volumes of the asset at different price levels in the stack are all indicators of high liquidity, or the ability to sell or buy as much cryptocurrency at different prices as possible. Under such conditions, the likelihood of experiencing price slippage in a trading transaction is practically nil.

Why is price slippage so common on decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges?

Large centralized cryptocurrency exchanges have long since fixed the problems of low liquidity. They may, however, face specific situations that may result in price slippage. This can occur, for example, during sharp price movements of the entire market or a single popular crypto-asset. A significant increase in trading volume means that the trading system will not be able to process the flow of orders in a timely manner.

A significant delay in order execution poses an even greater risk to DEX. Trading on such platforms takes place on a blockchain and is entirely dependent on its performance: to execute a trade, a new block must appear. If the trading protocol’s network is slow, users may experience price slippage even during slack periods.

In most cases, price slippage has little effect. When the market for a specific instrument is active, such as during a bull market, slippage becomes more noticeable.

According to DeFi Llama, DeFi has a growing share of productive blockchains such as Avalanche, BNB Chain or Polygon, but nearly 60% of all blockchain liquidity is in Ethereum, which has low bandwidth.

How is the price spread related to price slippage?

The market spread is the difference in market price between supply and demand that occurs when the market is unstable or insufficiently liquid.

When a user buys “on the market,” they accept the lowest price offered by the seller. When it sells, on the other hand, it accepts the highest price.

A high-demand asset has a smaller spread because market participants compete with one another to narrow the spread. Popular cryptocurrencies typically have a high level of liquidity.

What are the different types of price slippage?

For the trader, the difference in order execution price can be both positive and negative. Slippage is typically regarded as a negative phenomenon, but in rare cases, it can work in the trader’s favor.

Slippage is considered positive if the actual price of the executed buy order is lower than expected because it provides the trader with a better bid at a lower price.

If a cryptocurrency’s final bid price is higher than expected, there is negative slippage, and the user ends up with less favorable terms. This also applies to sell orders for the asset.

Price differences usually occur when market orders are executed (Market). Suppose the current market value of a cryptocurrency is $100. The investor wishes to sell 20 coins and anticipates a $2000 profit.

However, before the order is executed, the asset’s price drops dramatically to $98. Each of the 20 tokens suffers a $2 loss as a result. In this case, the slippage value is 2%, which results in a $40 loss for the trader.

How to avoid price slippage?

To eliminate or reduce the risk of slippage, it is best to avoid Market-type orders, at least during periods of high market volatility, and instead use limit orders.

With a few exceptions, this type of order is available on all centralized cryptocurrency exchanges but not on decentralized platforms (for example, in 1inch). In addition, there is a high risk of order execution taking too long due to onchain operations.

However, when trading cryptocurrencies on DEX, there are several basic ways to reduce the risk of price slippage:

If you are trading in an Ethereum-based protocol, we recommend increasing the amount of gas used; otherwise, the transaction may “hang” for an extended period of time, possibly several hours. The current optimal gas level can be viewed on Etherscan, for example.

Leading Ethereum DEXs frequently support Layer 2 (L2) solutions, which can significantly speed up order execution and lower transaction costs. When sending an order, many decentralized venues allow you to manually adjust the maximum possible price slippage value.

Slippage is prevented by special mechanisms on some centralized crypto-asset trading platforms. For example, while the user reviews transaction details, Coinbase temporarily fixes the price for order execution.

Read more: https://medium.com/@SunflowerCorpAdmin/why-does-price-slippage-happen-while-trading-623c5a4db518

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Musk's Wealth Reaches $1.2 Trillion as SpaceX Surpasses TSMC in Valuation

    On June 15, according to the latest global billionaire rankings released by Forbes, Elon Musk, the head of Tesla and SpaceX, has seen his personal wealth soar to an astonishing $1.2 trillion, setting a historical record. He became the world's first 'trillionaire' in the previous trading day. This wealth phenomenon is primarily attributed to the strong performance of his two flagship companies. Recent market data shows that SpaceX (SPCX) has reached a total valuation of $2.28 trillion (approximately $2.28 trillion), surging 8% in a single day, officially surpassing semiconductor giant TSMC (TSM), which has a market value of $2.26 trillion, and entering the top tier of U.S. stock market valuations, ranking sixth. Currently, the top three in the U.S. stock market by total market value are Nvidia ($5.05 trillion), Google, and Apple. SpaceX, with its absolute dominance in the commercial space and Starlink sectors, continues to see its valuation skyrocket, becoming the core pillar of Musk's trillion-dollar fortune.

  • Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Soars 4.7% in Early Trading

    On June 15, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index opened high, rising by 4.7%. Nvidia's stock price increased by 2.67%, TSMC's stock price rose by 3.76%, Broadcom's stock price went up by 3.37%, Micron Technology's stock price surged by 9.31%, Advanced Micro Devices' stock price climbed by 6.61%, and ASML's stock price gained 1.47%.

  • SpaceX Raises Approximately $85.7 Billion in Initial Public Offering

    On June 15, SpaceX announced that underwriters have fully exercised their over-allotment option in the IPO, purchasing an additional 83.33 million shares. SpaceX has raised approximately $85.7 billion through the IPO.

  • Nasdaq Golden Dragon China Index Rises Over 1%

    On June 15, the Nasdaq Golden Dragon China Index rose over 1%. Canaan Inc. increased by 13.84%, EHang soared by 10.86%, Zai Lab gained 5.59%, Xunlei rose by 5.16%, and Kingsoft Cloud climbed by 5.31%.

  • Anthropic Sued by User for Allegedly Inflating Subscription Usage Limits

    On June 15, according to The Wall Street Journal, a consumer is seeking compensation from Anthropic for its highest-tier subscription plan and has accused the company of exaggerating the usage limits provided. The lawsuit claims that Anthropic misled consumers regarding the usage restrictions of its Max 5x and Max 20x subscription plans. The cheapest Pro subscription for individual users costs between $17 and $20 per month, while the Max 5x costs $100 per month and the Max 20x costs $200 per month. The lawsuit alleges that Anthropic advertised the Max 5x and Max 20x plans as having 5 times and 20 times the usage limits of the Pro plan, respectively, but the actual limits are difficult to determine and appear to be far below the advertised levels. The lawsuit seeks to qualify for a class action on behalf of users who purchased these packages since April of last year.

  • ETH Surpasses $1800

    Market data shows that ETH has surpassed $1800, currently priced at $1804.82, with a 24-hour increase of 8.2%. The market is experiencing significant fluctuations, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • BitMine Increases ETH Holdings by Over 76,000, Total Holdings Exceed 5.62 Million ETH

    As of June 14, Eastern Time, BitMine's total cryptocurrency and cash holdings amount to $10.4 billion. BitMine holds 5,620,754 ETH (an increase of 76,882 ETH from last week), which represents 4.66% of the total Ethereum supply (120.7 million ETH). Additionally, it holds 204 BTC, shares in Beast Industries worth $180 million, shares in Eightco Holdings (NASDAQ: ORBS) valued at $88 million, and $502 million in unsecured cash. As of June 14, 2026, the total amount of staked ETH by BitMine is 4,718,677 ETH (valued at $8.1 billion based on $1,718 per ETH).

  • US Spot Ethereum ETF Sees Net Outflow of $4.93 Million

    On June 13, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Ethereum ETF experienced a net outflow of $4.93 million yesterday.

  • US Spot Bitcoin ETF Sees Net Inflow of $85.82 Million Yesterday

    On June 13, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Bitcoin ETF recorded a net inflow of $85.82 million yesterday.

  • U.S. Bans Foreign Access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5; Anthropic Issues Detailed Rebuttal

    On June 13, Anthropic issued a statement announcing that the U.S. government, citing national security powers, has released an export control directive requiring the suspension of all access to the AI models Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by foreign entities, regardless of whether the individuals are within the U.S., including Anthropic employees who are foreign nationals. The practical effect of this order is that we must immediately disable access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all customers to ensure compliance. Access to all other Anthropic models will not be affected. We received the government's directive at 5:21 PM (Eastern Time) today. The letter did not specify the details of its national security concerns. Our understanding is that the government believes it has become aware of a method to bypass or 'jailbreak' Fable 5. So far, the government has only provided us with verbal evidence suggesting the existence of a potential narrow, non-general jailbreak, essentially by requiring the model to read specific code libraries and fix any software defects. We are complying with the government's legitimate directive and are in the process of removing all users' access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5. However, we disagree with the conclusion that 'a narrow potential jailbreak vulnerability should be the reason to recall commercial models deployed to hundreds of millions of users.' (Jinshi)