Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Ethereum’s EEZ could pull other blockchains into its orbit

A proposal to stitch Ethereum’s fragmented liquidity together extends beyond its own ecosystem and may bring other blockchains into the fold.

On March 29, Gnosis, a long-time Ethereum builder and blockchain infrastructure company, unveiled that it is developing the Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) with Zisk, a zero-knowledge virtual machine project. 

The EEZ is aimed at linking layer-2 rollups more tightly to Ethereum layer 1, with Ether remaining as the gas token and settlement layer. It introduces a model where smart contracts can interact across the mainnet and EEZ rollups with atomic execution.

  The EEZ’s ultimate goal is to make the Ethereum economy function as a unified market. Source: Frederike Ernst


However, Gnosis co-founder Frederike Ernst told Cointelegraph that networks outside the Ethereum ecosystem can join the EEZ as well.

“A lot of networks outside the traditional Ethereum ecosystem have reached out to us,” Ernst said.

I have the hope that this doesn't just unify the greater Ethereum ecosystem, but it actually grows the greater Ethereum to chains that so far we've kind of excluded mentally from this model because they didn't fit the template of what a chain should look like.

How Ethereum’s scaling path fractured its ecosystem

In the past, Ethereum has repeatedly seen transaction fees spike to unusable levels during periods of heavy demand. The pattern emerged early, from the initial coin offering boom to the surge in activity driven by the non-fungible token (NFT) game CryptoKitties. It resurfaced during DeFi summer of 2020 and again in the NFT boom of 2021.

Each wave strained the network and priced out everyday users. In response, Ethereum shifted toward a rollup-centric roadmap, aiming to offload activity to L2s.

Rollups secured almost $34 billion worth of assets on April 24. Source: L2Beat

The approach has largely reduced fee spikes, but it has also redirected a significant share of economic activity away from the base layer. Some critics have described the relationship as “parasitic.”

“Currently — because there is no synchronous composability between L2 and L1 — L2s have to replicate the entire L1 ecosystem. You have an Aave deployment on every notable L2, a Maker deployment, and so on,” Ernst said.

She added:

That’s a struggle for L2s, but also for protocols, which now have to maintain multiple versions of the same system across chains. It fragments liquidity, because instead of one market, you end up with 20.”

The EEZ’s solution to get these markets to behave as one again is to give chains the ability to prove their state to other networks in the economic zone.

Under the hood, a smart contract on one network can call a smart contract on another network and receive a response within the same block. It can then use that response to execute further actions, so the networks start behaving like a single system.

Technically, this is handled by builders, the entities that construct blocks before validators propose them. 

“If a call is made to a smart contract, they can recognize when it refers to a contract on another network and determine whether the corresponding transaction can be executed there as well,” Ernst said. “They then include both transactions atomically, so either both happen or neither does.”

The reorg problem and the price of joining

Bankless called the EEZ the most “serious answer” to Ethereum’s fragmentation problem. If successful, it would allow transactions to execute across the ecosystem, enabling L2s to interact directly with applications on Ethereum without duplicating them across chains.

The broader vision extends beyond L2s to other L1s, but there are three boxes networks must tick to join, according to Ernst:

  • Well-defined state transition function: The network must clearly define how it moves from one block to the next so builders can understand and simulate its state transitions.
  • Ability to prove state for each block: The network must generate cryptographic proofs of its state, allowing other chains in the EEZ to verify it when composing transactions.
  • Ability to reorg with Ethereum: The network must be able to reorganize its state in sync with Ethereum to preserve atomic execution across chains.

The first requirement is almost a given for most blockchains, while the second can be met by systems capable of generating cryptographic proofs of their state, such as ZK rollups or zkVM-based architectures. 

The third is the “tricky one.”

“What happens when Ethereum reorgs, and all of a sudden this guy is no longer here? What happens to this guy?” Ernst said, gesturing with both fists to represent transactions on different networks.

  Ethereum generally has fewer than 10 reorgs a day. Source: Etherscan

In Ethereum, reorgs occur when competing versions of recent block history are produced and the network selects one as canonical. This can occur due to latency issues. Block reorgs occur regularly and are usually harmless, though more serious cases can point to malicious attacks.

“The requirement to reorg with Ethereum is a pretty tough one for a lot of the chains, but it’s kind of the price you have to pay in order to use everything that’s already on Ethereum,” Ernst said.

Not every chain will choose to join Ethereum

The requirements mean networks weighing whether to join the EEZ do not need to be EVM-based and can even be permissioned.

“Having a permissioned chain and still allowing it to interoperate with Ethereum, or parts of Ethereum, is a super valuable proposition,” Ernst said.

The initiative was originally designed as a ZK-based system. While ZK remains the preferred approach, networks joining the EEZ can also use other types of proving systems.

Ernst added that one of the networks EEZ has engaged with is the Canton Network, an institution-focused system gaining traction in real-world assets. However, the reorg requirement may hold such networks back from joining.

A potential solution is single-slot finality, which Ethereum researchers have been exploring as a possible upgrade. Single slot finality would make a block final the moment it is produced, effectively eliminating reorgs under normal conditions.

While EEZ enables rollups to access Ethereum’s liquidity and applications more seamlessly, the same model could extend to L1s outside the ecosystem. At the same time, not all L2s have the same incentives to join. Ernst said only a small number are viable as standalone ecosystems. She described Base as “definitely” one of them, while Arbitrum is “arguable.” Most others are not viable on their own.

“Every ecosystem that’s not viable gains much more than it gives up by joining the EEZ, and the rest will just have to decide, ‘am I Ethereum or am I not Ethereum?’” she said.

Ernst added that EEZ participation won’t be binding and networks are free to leave.

It’s not like Hotel California where you check in and then you never check out.”

If the EEZ works, Ethereum shifts from being just a base layer to becoming a coordination layer for multiple chains, consolidating liquidity and activity across the ecosystem. If it doesn’t, fragmentation persists and value continues to spread across competing networks.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Anthropic's Off-Market Valuation Reaches $1.974 Trillion

    On August 27, HIP-3 market deployer Entropy launched the Anthropic Pre-IPO market on Hyperliquid. ANTH has dropped 2.22% in the last 24 hours, currently priced at $1,974, with a 24-hour trading volume of $19.88 million and contract positions totaling $3.44 million.

  • Anthropic's Off-Exchange Market Cap Reaches $1.974 Trillion

    On August 27, HIP-3 market deployer Entropy launched the Anthropic Pre-IPO market on Hyperliquid. ANTH has decreased by 2.22% in the last 24 hours, currently priced at $1,974, with a 24-hour trading volume of $19.88 million and a contract open interest of $3.44 million.

  • Alibaba Cloud: Qwen3.8-Flash Model Pricing Adjusted

    On August 27, Alibaba Cloud announced that its large model service platform, Bai Lian, will adjust the pricing for the Qwen3.8-Flash model starting at 12:00 PM Beijing time on August 27, 2026. The Qwen3.8-Flash is the latest multimodal large model from Qianwen, natively supporting a context window of millions, capable of processing long documents, code repositories, and complex dialogues in one go. It excels in scenarios such as programming assistance, agent collaboration, and image-text understanding, and is compatible with OpenAI and Anthropic interface protocols, making it suitable for building high-concurrency applications and intelligent workflows. Specifically, the input price will change from 1 yuan to 0.8 yuan, and the output price will change from 3 yuan to 2.7 yuan.

  • Alibaba Cloud: Qwen3.8-Flash Model Pricing Adjustment

    On August 27, Alibaba Cloud announced that its large model service platform, Bailian, will reduce the billing unit price for the Qwen3.8-Flash model starting at 12:00 PM Beijing time on August 27, 2026. Qwen3.8-Flash is the latest multimodal large model launched by Qianwen, natively supporting a million-level context window, capable of processing long documents, code repositories, and complex dialogues in one go. It excels in scenarios such as programming assistance, agent collaboration, and image-text understanding, and is compatible with OpenAI and Anthropic interface protocols, making it suitable for building high-concurrency applications and intelligent workflows. The specific adjustments are as follows: input price reduced from 1 yuan to 0.8 yuan; output price reduced from 3 yuan to 2.7 yuan.

  • US Spot BTC ETF Sees Net Inflow of $1.192 Billion Over Four Trading Days

    On August 27, it was reported that over the past four trading days, the US spot BTC ETF has experienced a continuous inflow of funds, totaling $1.192 billion. The largest inflow was into IBIT, amounting to $933 million, followed by FBTC with an inflow of $176 million.

  • US Spot BTC ETF Sees $1.192 Billion Net Inflow Over Four Trading Days

    On August 27, it was reported that over the past four trading days, the US spot BTC ETF has experienced continuous inflows, totaling $1.192 billion. During this period, the largest inflow was into IBIT, amounting to $933 million, followed by FBTC with an inflow of $176 million.

  • Intellectus (02513.HK) Shares Rise by 10%

    Intellectus (02513.HK) shares have increased by 10%.

  • Smart Group (02513.HK) Sees Share Price Increase of 10%

    Smart Group (02513.HK) has seen its share price increase expand to 10%.

  • Response to Rumors of IPO Restrictions for Unprofitable Companies in A-Shares: Focus on Quality, Not Blockage

    On August 27, according to 21st Century Business Herald, there have been recent market rumors suggesting that the IPO applications for unprofitable companies in A-shares are being tightened, with a simultaneous impact on Hong Kong stocks. Sources indicate that there is currently no possibility of a blanket ban on unprofitable companies going public. Both A-shares and Hong Kong stocks will continue to welcome high-quality unprofitable companies, but the review process for these companies will be more stringent. Companies will be required to have clearer paths to commercial monetization and expectations for performance improvement. For companies that have sustained losses with no signs of narrowing, face significant challenges in short-term commercialization, and are not absolute leaders in their niche sectors, the IPO review standards will be even stricter.

  • Response to Rumors of IPO Restrictions for Unprofitable A-Shares: Focus on Quality, Not Closure

    On August 27, according to 21st Century Business Herald, there have been recent market rumors suggesting that IPO applications for unprofitable companies in the A-share market are being tightened, with a corresponding impact on the Hong Kong stock market. Sources indicate that there is currently no possibility of a blanket ban on unprofitable companies going public. Both the A-share and Hong Kong markets will continue to welcome high-quality unprofitable companies, but the review process for these companies will be more stringent. They will be required to demonstrate clearer paths to commercial monetization and expectations for performance improvement. For companies that continue to incur losses without signs of narrowing, face significant challenges in short-term commercialization, and are not absolute leaders in their niche sectors, the IPO review standards will be even stricter.