Download App
iOS & Android

What is Web3 Penetration Testing?

Validated Project

Web3 has introduced a new era of decentralized applications (dApps) and blockchain-based systems. As the use of these technologies and the value secured by them grow, the need for secure Web3 development and implementation also increases. Billions of dollars of value are drained each year from Web3 platforms and protocols. This presents a major obstacle to growth of the industry.

Sometimes, the best form of defense is offense. That's where Web3 penetration testing comes in. In this article, we'll explore what it is, why it's important, and how you can leverage it to secure your Web3 wallet, exchange, or dApp.

Web3 penetration testing is the process of offensively assessing the security of Web3 applications and blockchain-based systems. The goal of Web3 penetration testing is to identify both Web 2.0 and Web3 vulnerabilities and weaknesses that could be exploited by malicious actors.

Although Web 2.0 infrastructure testing is included as part of a Web3 penetration testing suite, Web3 penetration testing takes this process a step further by focusing on the unique security challenges presented by blockchain technology and the environment those applications are running in. Traditional Web 2.0 penetration testing alone is not enough, and leads to security gaps.

Although Web3 introduces a number of novel technological innovations, these innovations also come with security considerations.

A short list of Web3-specific security considerations includes:

  • Smart contract vulnerabilities: Smart contracts are self-executing computer programs that run on a blockchain. They are an integral part of many Web3 dApps, but can also be vulnerable to coding errors, logical flaws, and design flaws.
  • Decentralization vulnerabilities: The decentralized nature of Web3 applications means that there is no central authority to enforce security policies or protocols. This can make it difficult to ensure the security of the network and prevent 51% or Sybil attacks.
  • Wallet vulnerabilities: Web3 applications typically rely on digital wallets to store and manage digital assets. These wallets can be vulnerable to hacking or phishing attacks if they are not properly secured.
  • Interoperability vulnerabilities: Web3 applications often need to interact with other applications or systems, which can introduce unforeseen vulnerabilities. A smart contract may be vulnerable to an injection attack if it does not properly validate incoming data from external dependencies.

How Does it Work?

Penetration testing, also known as pen testing or ethical hacking, involves playing the role of a "hacker" to try and find security weaknesses in a system or network.

The first step involves gathering information about the applications, system or network that is being tested. This could include information about the type of technology stack the wallet or dApps is running, the smart contracts that make up the protocol, the baselayer consensus mechanism that is in place, and any other relevant details.

Next, the penetration tester will try various attack vectors to find vulnerabilities or weaknesses in the application, system or network. This step involves both specific custom Web3 style tests as well as standard Web 2.0 tests suits like OWASP Top 10, API tests (API AST) or OWASP MAS (Mobile Application Security). Various tools will be used to support execution of these tests e.g. BurpSuite. Once vulnerabilities are identified, the penetration tester will try to exploit them to gain access to the system or network.

Most vulnerability testing tools will find some vulnerabilities, but the effectiveness of picking up on severe issues varies across different tools. This effectiveness is known as the false-positive rate. The human process of distinguishing real vulnerabilities from false positives is known as vulnerability verification.

Finally, the penetration tester will document the verified vulnerabilities that were found and provide recommendations on how to fix them. Overall, the goal of penetration testing is to identify and address security weaknesses before they can be exploited by malicious actors. Systems and applications evolve over time, which means continuous assessment needs to be built into all Web3 projects. By conducting regular penetration testing and addressing vulnerabilities as they are discovered, organizations can help to ensure the security of their systems and data.

Why Does Web3 Penetration Testing Matter?

Web3 technology presents unique security challenges that traditional cybersecurity methods may not adequately address. For example, the decentralized nature of Web3 applications means that there are no central authorities to enforce security policies or protocols. Additionally, the transparency and immutability of blockchain-based systems mean that any security vulnerabilities can have far-reaching consequences.

Both offensive and defensive security are critical components of a comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. Defensive security measures are important for protecting against known threats and vulnerabilities. Offensive security, on the other hand, is an effective way to identify previously unknown vulnerabilities.

Offensive security testing can also provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of a team's incident response plan. By simulating a breach, Web3 penetration testing can help organizations to identify areas where their incident response plan may be lacking. This is the first step toward ensuring a more effective response in the event of a real security incident.

How to Get Started with Web3 Penetration Testing

If you're interested in securing your application with Web3 penetration testing, the first step is to engage an experienced Web3 security firm. CertiK is a leading provider of blockchain and smart contract audits, including Web3 penetration testing. Our team of ethical hackers have assessed thousands of projects and hundreds of wallets, exchanges and dApps, and can help you identify vulnerabilities and develop a plan to address them.

Web3 technology is changing the way we think about security. Penetration testing is a critical component of ensuring the security of decentralized applications and blockchain-based systems. It's essential to take a proactive approach to identifying vulnerabilities and weaknesses in your web and mobile applications.

Read more:


All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Cyvers Alerts: The attacker exchanged the stolen assets for 78 ETH and deposited them into Tornado Cash

    Cyvers Alerts posted on X platform that multiple suspicious transfers were detected at the address starting with 0x159. The address has received 38 ETH, 12,400 DAI, 13,900 USDC, and 53,400 USDT. The address has converted all digital assets into 78 ETH and deposited them into Tornado Cash to prevent freezing.

  • Bitcoin Layer 2 project MAP Protocol has received strategic investment from waterdripfund

    Bitcoin Layer2MAP protocol announced receiving strategic investment from waterdripfund. MAP protocol was established in 2019 and is a Bitcoin Layer-2 protocol for peer-to-peer cross-chain interoperability. By utilizing Bitcoin's security mechanism, MAP protocol not only enhances network security, but also achieves BRC20 cross-chain capability, allowing assets and users from other public chains to seamlessly interact with the Bitcoin network.

  • US Lawmakers Slam SEC for Deliberately Obfuscating Cryptocurrency Regulations

    A US legislator has criticized the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for its intentional policy preference to reduce market transparency. The legislator posted on social media platform X, stating that it is now obvious that the SEC's policy preference is to provide less clarity to the market, rather than more. This is a complete detriment to our great capital markets.

  • ARK Invest sold approximately $24.29 million in Coinbase shares again yesterday

    On December 7th, according to Ark Invest Daily, Cathie Wood's ARK Invest sold 180,422 shares of Coinbase stock through three funds on December 6th, worth approximately $24.29 million.

  • About 72% of Ethereum block builders are “reviewing” transactions sanctioned by OFAC

    According to research by Toni Wahrstätter, a researcher at the Ethereum Foundation, about 72% of the data blocks released on MEV-Boost are now considered "censored," higher than the approximately 25% in November 2022. This metric measures the blocks assembled by MEV-Boost block builders, and according to statistical analysis, these builders seem to deliberately exclude encrypted addresses subject to US OFAC sanctions.Wahrstätter explained: "Block builders have the right to decide which transactions (and in what order) to include in their blocks, and which transactions they want to review. This means that block builders can decide the content of the blockchain."

  • Hong Kong Police: The HOUNAX investment fraud case currently involves approximately NT$159 million

    Hong Kong police stated that as of 4:00 pm the day before yesterday, a total of 164 victims had reported the HOUNAX investment fraud case involving approximately RMB 159 million on the virtual asset trading platform.

  • Multiple whales/institutions sold a total of 16.85 million BLUR

    According to data monitored by Lookonchain, the price of BLUR fell by about 8% today. It is noteworthy that many whales/institutions are selling BLUR, with a total of 16.85 million coins (8.43 million US dollars) sold.

  • Beosin Trace: TIME token was attacked, hackers made about $188,000

    Beosin EagleEye security risk monitoring, warning and blocking platform under Beosin detected an attack on the TIME token, with hackers profiting about $188,000. Beosin security team analyzed that the hacker exploited a contract vulnerability to destroy the TIME token in the TIME-ETH trading pair, thereby profiting. The reason for this is that the _msgSender() of the TIME token returns not msg.sender, but is selected based on the caller. If the caller is the Forwarder contract, then the specified address of the caller is returned. At the same time, the Forwarder contract has arbitrary external call function, and the attacker calls the TIME contract's burn function through the Forwarder contract, passing in the pair address, and finally destroying the TIME token in the pair.

  • US presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy: Encryption regulations need to keep up with the current situation, the current framework is not working

    In the Republican presidential debate held in Tuscaloosa, Alabama on Wednesday night, when presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy was asked about his cryptocurrency policy, he said: "Scammers, criminals and terrorists have been deceiving people for a long time, and our regulations need to keep up with the current situation. In fact, what SBF has done on FTX shows that the current framework is not working."

  • Web3 Music Streaming Platform Sona Launches Music NFTs for Artists to Auction and Fans to Collect, with 70% Streaming Revenue Going to SONA Holders.

    Sona Stream, a Web3 music streaming marketplace, has launched with a $6.9 million seed round from Polychain Capital, Haun Ventures and Rogue Capital. The platform allows artists to sell "digital twins" of their songs as SONAs (Music NFTs) to collectors, who can promote the songs by sharing them on social media. SONA owners receive 70% of the streaming revenue on a pro-rata basis, while artists get 30%. The company redistributes the revenue every two weeks, proportional to how much the specific song is streamed. Sona currently features music tracks from several artists and aims to raise the number to over 16 million tracks by 2024.