Download App
iOS & Android

Tech’s Money Woes: Beginning of the End for Web2?

After two decades of dominating and reshaping our lives, “Big Tech” is finally looking weakened.

According to Crunchbase, more than 46,000 staffers at U.S.-based tech companies lost their jobs in the first three weeks of 2023 alone, following a layoff tally of 107,000 in 2022. This week, Microsoft gave a gloomy forecast of 2023 enterprise demand for its Azure cloud services, which coincidentally suffered a major outage at the same time, while the Department of Justice (DOJ) served Google with a lawsuit that could end its monopolistic advertising operation. Add to that the chaos at Twitter since Tesla owner Elon Musk took over and Meta’s dismal stock performance as its earnings plunged in 2022, and we find broad-based malaise across the industry that brought us Web2.

The question is whether this is just a cyclical phenomenon or whether it’s a secular shift, the end of an era for the titans of Web2. And if it’s the latter, what comes next?

Those who want to see a Web3 economy in which centralized internet platforms have less influence over our lives and where people and businesses have greater control over their data and content are naturally hopeful Big Tech’s woes are the precursor to a brighter future. But it could just as well be that this moment of distress passes and we either return to the status quo or a new architecture arises around artificial intelligence (AI) and metaverse technologies that’s overrun by the very same centralized firms dominant today.

Cyclical or secular?

The cyclical case is easy to make: The lax monetary environment before 2022 drove these firms to invest massively in new, pre-mainstream technologies such as AI and virtual reality. Now, as rising interest rates force their clients to reduce spending on these companies' cash-cow product offerings, such as online advertising and data storage, they’re forced to curb their outlays.

Seen that way, this is just a downsizing exercise, one that will put Big Tech in a healthier position to capitalize on the advance of the new technologies once they gain mainstream application.

But it’s noteworthy that cyclical financial weakness coincides with declining public trust in the tech industry, a trend that could portend a more lasting, secular decline in its prospects. After all, public opinion drives political response and, arguably, Big Tech’s greatest vulnerability lies in Washington, D.C.

In April, the annual Edelman Trust Barometer showed that in aggregate, trust in technology industries remains higher than others worldwide (including lowly thought-of media businesses, sadly.) But the key takeaway was that in the U.S., whose policy making apparatus has the greatest power to determine the industry’s fortunes, trust in tech hit an all-time low.

This isn’t surprising, given the negative news flow these past few years. People now have a clear window into Twitter’s intractable problems around hate speech moderation, bots, disinformation and the debate over identity and reputation – all unresolved, if not elevated, by Musk’s leadership. They’ve also had the curtain pulled back on Meta (formerly Facebook), whose well-documented abuses of people’s data inspired a rare case of bipartisan agreement in Congress.

Waning confidence has coincided with an escalation of regulatory action against the internet platforms, first in Europe, now in the U.S., with this week’s lawsuit against Google potentially the biggest threat of all to the Web2 titans’ economic model.

The antitrust suit, which accuses Google of having “corrupted legitimate competition in the ad tech industry,” could directly upend the central mechanism by which these firms turn their near-omniscient view of a billion-plus users’ data into dollars. For all the mounting criticism of this “surveillance capitalism” model, the platforms entrenched it, even deepened it, because it routinely delivered profits to shareholders. End all that and the ad- and data-driven Web2 economic system is itself put into question.

Frying pan to fire?

OK. But if this is the beginning of the end for Web2, what comes next?

Well, by definition, the future is Web3. But that says nothing other than to offer a word to describe the unknown world after Web2. Who is in control of that future system, that’s the question.

The idea that we will all be in control, because we generate the all-important data and the content that drives the internet economy, is appealing. I certainly support all efforts to achieve that, be they based on blockchains and non-fungible tokens (NFT) or something else. But there’s no guarantee such a utopia will arise.

In fact, without deliberate efforts by all stakeholders to establish fair frameworks around decentralized identity, credentialing, encryption and data storage, the “platform-less” Web3 world may still be controlled by giant data-hogging entities. And it could even be the same ones.

Consider AI, whose importance to the future digital economy is underscored by the recent advance of ChatGPT. As I wrote in December, many see this technology ending internet search as we know it. In a ChatGPT world, the idea goes, we’ll no longer ask a search engine to provide a list of websites with information related to what we’re interested in; we’ll simply query an AI chatbot and the answers will come back as text or audio. No need for Google, right?

Well, maybe we’ll no longer use Google search, but what about Google AI? The company’s parent, Alphabet, is investing enormous sums to develop AI systems – it was referenced multiple times in CEO Sundar Pichai’s note to staff when he announced 12,000 layoffs last week.

Maybe the victor won’t be Google but Microsoft, in partnership with the Elon Musk-founded OpenAI. The Seattle-based software provider just invested $10 billion in the company that developed the ChatGPT technology, on top of the $3 billion it had already dedicated to the partnership.

Or maybe these corporations lose and we end up with a nominally decentralized entity dominating everything, such as Ethereum, the leading platform for NFTs and decentralized finance. Do we want that?

At CoinDesk’s I.D.E.A.S. conference last fall, Osmosis Labs co-founder Sunny Aggarwal talked of Ethereum as an “empire” that wants developers of software and new ideas to abide by its standards and rules. Independent app-specific chains, linked together by the Cosmos protocol on which Osmosis builds, he said, is the way to a truly democratic, open internet.

Whether the Cosmos vision to interoperability is the solution, or Polkadot founder Gavin Wood’s, or whether the answer lies in the Decentralized Social Network Protocol (DSNP) underpinning entrepreneur Frank McCourt’s Project Liberty mission to fix the internet is perhaps less important than the fact that the shape of that future internet is up to us.

If we want a decentralized internet and don’t want our lives manipulated by AI and by data-mining, centrally controlled public and private entities, we’re going to have to band together and insist on it. We need laws, standards bodies and multi-stakeholder governance systems in place. There’s a lot at stake.


All Comments

Recommended for you

  • a16z ·

    Investing in EigenLayer

    It’s exceedingly rare to come across a founder with a vision and plan that has the potential to change everything. I have come to know EigenLayer founder Sreeram Kannan to be not only brilliant, but also fundamentally motivated by a vision of the future so crisp and compelling that it momentarily becomes real when you talk to him. Sreeram has what I like to call the Promethean flame; he is driven to bring a new technology to life first and foremost because of the future it will create.

  • a16z invests $100 million in crypto startup EigenLayer

    Venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) has invested $100 million in the cryptocurrency startup EigenLayer.

  • Solana ecosystem developer platform Helius announced the completion of a $9.5 million Series A round of financing, led by Foundation Capital

    According to Fortune, Helius, a developer platform within the Solana ecosystem, announced the completion of a $9.5 million Series A funding round. The round was led by Foundation Capital, with participation from Reciprocal Ventures, 6th Man Ventures, Chapter One, and Propel.

  • Hong Kong plans to submit stablecoin bill as soon as practicable

    Hong Kong's highest financial official stated that the government will "submit a stablecoin bill to the Legislative Council as soon as practicable." A Hong Kong financial official stated that once negotiations make progress, the government will focus on submitting a stablecoin licensing bill. Hong Kong's Financial Affairs and Treasury Bureau Director, Christopher Hui, stated that depending on the consultation results and progress of preparatory work, the government will submit the bill to the Legislative Council as soon as possible.

  • Nigeria imposes ban on cryptocurrency exchanges including Binance, OctaFX and Coinbase

    Following India, Nigeria has implemented a ban on leading cryptocurrency exchanges such as Binance, OctaFX, and Coinbase. Nigeria has instructed its telecommunications companies to block access to the websites of famous cryptocurrency companies.

  • Inco Raises $4.5M to Expand Development of Confidentiality Layer for Ethereum and Other Networks

    NYC-based developer Inco has secured $4.5 million in funding for its confidentiality layer for Ethereum and other networks. The funding round was led by 1kx, with participation from Circle Ventures, Robot Ventures, and others. Inco plans to use the funds to expand its operations and development efforts. The company's confidentiality layer uses fully homomorphic encryption and is interoperable with other blockchains, allowing for the development of decentralized applications with encrypted data. Inco has also launched the Gentry testnet to address confidentiality challenges in Web3.

  • Monkey Tilt completed US$21 million in financing, with participation from Polychain, Hack VC and others

    Monkey Tilt announced the completion of a $21 million financing round, with participation from Polychain Capital, Hack VC, Poker Go, Accomplice, Paper Ventures, and Folius Ventures. In addition, the company announced the launch of its betting game platform MTFantasy in 20 states in the United States.

  • U.S. crypto companies and industry organizations sued the SEC, claiming it “overstepped its authority” over digital assets

    US cryptocurrency company Lejilex and the Cryptocurrency Freedom Alliance of Texas (CFAT) have sued the US SEC on Wednesday, claiming that the regulatory agency has acted beyond its authority with regards to digital assets and requesting that the court rule that digital assets traded on exchanges are not securities. Lejilex stated that the SEC has exercised jurisdiction over the industry without "clear statutory authority" and that its classification of digital assets as "investment contracts" is incorrect, as they do not establish a continuing commitment between creators and purchasers. They also request that the court apply the "significant question" doctrine, which allows judges to declare administrative agency actions with "enormous economic and political significance" invalid unless authorized by Congress.

  • Terra founder Do Kwon to be extradited to U.S.

    Terra founder Do Kwon will be extradited to the United States.

  • ABCDE: Viewing AI+Crypto from a Primary Market Perspective

    After more than a year since the release of ChatGPT, discussions about AI+Crypto have once again heated up in the market. AI is seen as one of the most important tracks in the bull market of 2024–2025. Even Vitalik Buterin himself published an article titled “The promise and challenges of crypto + AI applications,” exploring the possible directions for future AI+Crypto exploration.