Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Based Rollups can reward Proposers first come first serve

Based rollups don’t need a complicated auctioning system to reward proposers if they are willing to sacrifice L2 MEV rewards

Introduction

Before reading it is vital to understand Based Rollups 3, the mev-boost 1 block supply chain 1, and sequencing

The inspiration for this article was a section of the Taiko docs that mentions their system for choosing which provider to reward:

The first proposeBlock tx in the enclosing L1 block will earn the [block] reward.– Proposing Taiko blocks 1

That sentence is followed up by this note:

This is a temporary solution which may change soon, as we see an issue that can arise where the proposer will submit empty blocks to earn the reward.– Proposing Taiko blocks 1

The rest of this article argues why it is unnecessary to change the first-come-first-serve (FCFS) system that is currently implemented in the Taiko testnet.

Explanation

Assumptions

L1 searchers = L2 builders = L2 proposers

All will be referred to as “L2 builders” for the remainder of this article.

This assumption is reasonable because L2 proposers will bid for inclusion in the L1 through the mev-boost system, acting as L1 searchers. L2 builders and proposers look the same to the block reward system.

L1 builders choose to include only the highest-paying L2 builder’s bundle

Every proposer implements a check in their contract that only pays the builder if they are the first to call proposeBlock (and therefore winning the l2 block reward.) L1 builders are then incentivized to only include the highest bidding L2 builder’s block.

An FCFS system rewards only the first block proposal in the L1 block.

Only the first L2 block proposed in a single enclosing L1 block wins the block reward. All subsequent block proposals are either ignored or simply not rewarded.

Reasoning

If these assumptions are true, the proposer with the most valuable L2 block will win the L2 proposer reward.

L2 builders will compete to build the most valuable L2 block, which they will submit to L1 builders as mev-boost bundles. Whichever L2 builder outcompetes its peers will be included at the top of block by the L1 builder.

Tradeoffs

MEV

As in most rollup designs, a based rollup using this design will sacrifice ALL MEV rewards to its L1. Researcher Justin Drake has stated that this problem is not specific to based rollups. 1

Additionally, MEV rewards are expected to trend towards 0 over time as MEV-aware applications leak less and less MEV to block builders.

Spam resistance

This is the concern of the Taiko team.

The idea is that L2 builders will propose empty (or nearly empty) blocks to earn the block reward without generating valuable blocks.

An FCFS system will resist spam because spamming L2 builders will only bid up to the value of the block reward. L2 blocks will be worth more than this because of the MEV opportunities that exist inside these L2 blocks. Legitimate (non-spamming) L2 builders will be able to outbid spamming L2 builders based on the MEV rewards that they can extract.

The Taiko team published an article on MEV in based rollups that begins to address this issue:

L1 builders will include L2 blocks into their L1 blocks as long as there is at least a tiny of piece of MEV in this block (and the gas limit is not reached). And as long as there are any DEXs deployed on L2, there always will be some MEV additionally to transaction fees;– MEV for “Based Rollup” 1

Changing the reward that L2 builders receive based on other aspects of their blocks (transaction count, execution layer information, etc.) may also allow legitimate L2 builders to outbid spamming L2 builders if MEV rewards are negligible. Further research is required to determine these metrics. These variable block rewards only help legitimate L2 builders outbid spamming L2 builders, they can be set up within an FCFS system.

Conclusion

As far as I can see, a simple FCFS system should be sufficient for Based Rollups, and no further development is required. Research into variable block rewards should be conducted to determine if MEV rewards will be enough to completely avoid spamming L2 builders earning the L2 block reward.

This article should be common sense, but I want to start a discussion on this (because I’m probably wrong lol)

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • BTC Surpasses $64,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $64,000, currently priced at $64,081.64, with a 24-hour increase of 2.34%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • ETH Surpasses $1800

    Market data shows that ETH has surpassed $1800, currently priced at $1803.77, with a 24-hour increase of 1.86%. The market is highly volatile, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • BonkDAO Suffers Governance Attack, Losing Approximately $20 Million; Upbit Suspends BONK Deposits and Withdrawals

    On July 7, BonkDAO, associated with the Solana ecosystem meme coin project BONK, experienced a "malicious governance proposal" attack. The attacker successfully executed an abnormal proposal by forging/manipulating governance votes, transferring approximately $20 million worth of BONK tokens from the treasury. The stolen funds have begun flowing to multiple cryptocurrency exchanges, triggering market sell pressure and causing BONK's price to drop over 9%. In response to the risk, South Korean exchange Upbit announced the suspension of BONK deposit and withdrawal services. BonkDAO has stated that it has notified law enforcement and is cooperating with relevant parties to track down the attacker and attempt to recover the funds. This incident once again highlights the potential security risks in DAO governance mechanisms.

  • BTC Surpasses $63,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $63,000, currently priced at $63,016.31, with a 24-hour increase of 0.46%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Riot Platforms Deposits 500 BTC with NYDIG, Possible Sale Ahead

    According to Onchain Lens monitoring, Riot Platforms has deposited a total of 500 BTC (approximately $30.9 million) into a NYDIG custody account, suspected to be preparing for a sale. The transfer was completed in two transactions: 413.793 BTC (approximately $25.57 million) and 86.207 BTC (approximately $5.33 million).

  • U.S. Treasury Yields Continue to Rise, 30-Year Yield Exceeds 5% Again

    U.S. Treasury yields continue to climb, with the 30-year Treasury yield surpassing 5% once more. (Jin Shi)

  • Spot Gold Falls Below $4,130

    On July 6, spot gold fell below $4,130 per ounce, declining by 1.10% during the day.

  • Bitcoin ETF Records Net Inflow for the First Time in a Month

    On July 6, according to data from CoinGlass, Bitcoin ETFs entered the holiday weekend with a positive trend. On July 2, these ETFs recorded a net inflow of $223.5 million, marking the first such influx since June 12. CoinGlass data indicates that Bitcoin performed relatively well over the holiday weekend, peaking at nearly $64,000, but trading prices fell below $62,000 this morning. Some pressure came from Michael Saylor's Strategy Inc. selling Bitcoin, although the market did receive some advance warning. Christopher Tahir from Exness noted in a report, 'The market's reaction may be more subdued than in the past following the company's recent policy launch.'

  • Today's Bitcoin ETF Net Inflow in the U.S. Reaches 3,774 BTC, Ethereum ETF Net Inflow at 498 ETH

    According to monitoring by Lookonchain, today's net inflow for Bitcoin ETFs in the U.S. is 3,774 BTC, with a net outflow of 10,837 BTC over the past seven days; the net inflow for Ethereum ETFs is 498 ETH, with a net inflow of 15,393 ETH over the past seven days.

  • Goldman Sachs: Global Humanoid Robot Market to Grow from 20,000 Units in 2025 to 1.4 Million by 2035

    On July 6, Goldman Sachs stated that another pathway for AI entering the real world is through robots, autonomous devices, drones, and smart industrial equipment. Goldman Sachs refers to this as 'physical AI,' which presents challenges far greater than those of text generation models, as machines must not only understand language and images but also handle gravity, friction, materials, temperature, motion trajectories, and safety constraints. Humanoid robots are the most closely watched segment of the market. Goldman Sachs predicts that the global humanoid robot market will grow from approximately 20,000 units in 2025 to 1.4 million by 2035. The demand is driven by labor shortages: the U.S. manufacturing sector has about 13 million workers, with a gap of over 1 million positions in material handling. Goldman Sachs expects widespread commercial deployment of humanoid robots to occur between 2027 and 2029.