Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Based Rollups can reward Proposers first come first serve

Based rollups don’t need a complicated auctioning system to reward proposers if they are willing to sacrifice L2 MEV rewards

Introduction

Before reading it is vital to understand Based Rollups 3, the mev-boost 1 block supply chain 1, and sequencing

The inspiration for this article was a section of the Taiko docs that mentions their system for choosing which provider to reward:

The first proposeBlock tx in the enclosing L1 block will earn the [block] reward.– Proposing Taiko blocks 1

That sentence is followed up by this note:

This is a temporary solution which may change soon, as we see an issue that can arise where the proposer will submit empty blocks to earn the reward.– Proposing Taiko blocks 1

The rest of this article argues why it is unnecessary to change the first-come-first-serve (FCFS) system that is currently implemented in the Taiko testnet.

Explanation

Assumptions

L1 searchers = L2 builders = L2 proposers

All will be referred to as “L2 builders” for the remainder of this article.

This assumption is reasonable because L2 proposers will bid for inclusion in the L1 through the mev-boost system, acting as L1 searchers. L2 builders and proposers look the same to the block reward system.

L1 builders choose to include only the highest-paying L2 builder’s bundle

Every proposer implements a check in their contract that only pays the builder if they are the first to call proposeBlock (and therefore winning the l2 block reward.) L1 builders are then incentivized to only include the highest bidding L2 builder’s block.

An FCFS system rewards only the first block proposal in the L1 block.

Only the first L2 block proposed in a single enclosing L1 block wins the block reward. All subsequent block proposals are either ignored or simply not rewarded.

Reasoning

If these assumptions are true, the proposer with the most valuable L2 block will win the L2 proposer reward.

L2 builders will compete to build the most valuable L2 block, which they will submit to L1 builders as mev-boost bundles. Whichever L2 builder outcompetes its peers will be included at the top of block by the L1 builder.

Tradeoffs

MEV

As in most rollup designs, a based rollup using this design will sacrifice ALL MEV rewards to its L1. Researcher Justin Drake has stated that this problem is not specific to based rollups. 1

Additionally, MEV rewards are expected to trend towards 0 over time as MEV-aware applications leak less and less MEV to block builders.

Spam resistance

This is the concern of the Taiko team.

The idea is that L2 builders will propose empty (or nearly empty) blocks to earn the block reward without generating valuable blocks.

An FCFS system will resist spam because spamming L2 builders will only bid up to the value of the block reward. L2 blocks will be worth more than this because of the MEV opportunities that exist inside these L2 blocks. Legitimate (non-spamming) L2 builders will be able to outbid spamming L2 builders based on the MEV rewards that they can extract.

The Taiko team published an article on MEV in based rollups that begins to address this issue:

L1 builders will include L2 blocks into their L1 blocks as long as there is at least a tiny of piece of MEV in this block (and the gas limit is not reached). And as long as there are any DEXs deployed on L2, there always will be some MEV additionally to transaction fees;– MEV for “Based Rollup” 1

Changing the reward that L2 builders receive based on other aspects of their blocks (transaction count, execution layer information, etc.) may also allow legitimate L2 builders to outbid spamming L2 builders if MEV rewards are negligible. Further research is required to determine these metrics. These variable block rewards only help legitimate L2 builders outbid spamming L2 builders, they can be set up within an FCFS system.

Conclusion

As far as I can see, a simple FCFS system should be sufficient for Based Rollups, and no further development is required. Research into variable block rewards should be conducted to determine if MEV rewards will be enough to completely avoid spamming L2 builders earning the L2 block reward.

This article should be common sense, but I want to start a discussion on this (because I’m probably wrong lol)

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Cointime's Evening Highlights for May 19th

    1.US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw net inflows of $948.3 million this week

  • Will this cycle skip Ethereum?

    Ryan Sean Adams is going to take the perspective of long-term Ethereum bulls, not the obviously wrong dyed in the wool Ethereum is dead haters.

  • This year, there have been more than 90 Bitcoin ecosystem-related financings

    There have been more than 90 financing transactions related to the Bitcoin ecosystem since 2024, setting a new record for the highest number of financing transactions in a single year in Bitcoin's history. Kyle Samani, Managing Partner at Multicoin Capital, pointed out that with the emergence of the Bitcoin Taproot upgrade and the Ordinals protocol, the Bitcoin ecosystem is experiencing a "developer renaissance". For some developers, building financial tools on Bitcoin is more attractive because it is the oldest and most secure blockchain. Multicoin Capital's investment trend is reportedly shifting from Solana to the Bitcoin ecosystem. The venture capital firm has invested in projects such as Solana Labs and StarkWare, but recently participated in the funding of the Bitcoin-native music platform Arch Network and the Bitcoin scaling network Mezo.

  • $1.911 billion worth of SOL transferred

    According to Whale Alert monitoring, 11,040,253 SOL (US $1,911,291,365) was transferred from an unknown wallet to another unknown wallet.

  • DeFi TVL exceeds $95 billion again

    According to defillama data, as of May 18, 2024, the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi has once again surpassed $95 billion. It is currently reported at $95.069 billion, an increase of nearly $12 billion from the low point of $83.04 billion 35 days ago. Among the top five protocols in terms of TVL, Eigenlayer has the highest 30-day increase, with TVL rising by 19.67% to a total of $15.455 billion.

  • Cointime's Evening Highlights for May 24th

    1. CryptoPunks Launches “Super Punk World” Digital Avatar Series

  • An address mistakenly transferred about $7,000 in BTC to Satoshi Nakamoto’s wallet

    According to Arkham monitoring, someone accidentally sent 90% of their BTC assets to Satoshi Nakamoto's wallet address last night. They were trying to swap Ordinal for PupsToken, but ended up sending almost their entire wallet balance - about $7,000 worth of BTC.

  • USDC circulation increased by 200 million in the past 7 days

    According to official data, within the 7 days ending on May 16th, Circle issued 1.8 billion USDC, redeemed 1.6 billion USDC, and the circulation increased by 200 million. The total circulation of USDC is 33.2 billion US dollars, and the reserve is 33.4 billion US dollars, of which 3.8 billion US dollars are in cash, and Circle Reserve Fund holds 29.6 billion US dollars.

  • Bitcoin mining company Phoenix Group released its Q1 financial report: net profit of US$66.2 million, a year-on-year increase of 166%

    Phoenix Group, a listed mining company and blockchain technology provider for Bitcoin, released its Q1 financial report, with the following main points:

  • Pudgy Penguins and Lotte strategically cooperate to expand into the Korean market, and the floor price rose by 3.1% on the 7th

    The NFT series "Pudgy Penguins" has recently announced a strategic partnership with South Korean retail and entertainment giant Lotte Group on the X platform to expand its market in South Korea and surrounding areas. More information will be announced in the future. According to CoinGecko data, the floor price of Pudgy Penguins is currently 11.8 ETH, with a 7-day increase of 3.1%.