Download App
iOS & Android

Mapping on the blockchain, explained

1. Can blockchain-based location mapping replace GPS mapping?

Using GPS-based navigation devices has become ubiquitous. People use tools such as Google Maps, OpenStreetMap and Foursquare, which rely on GPS. However, these services are plagued by a common fault — centralization — which makes them prone to opaque functioning and a central point of failure when it comes to hacking.

Blockchain technology offers several advantages over centralized systems and helps users tide over the limitations of traditional tools like GPS mapping. It improves transparency, increases resilience to hacking attempts and enables faster data processing. Unsurprisingly, several businesses have begun to use blockchain technology or are actively exploring its application.

 2. The inefficiencies in current interactive maps

Though the current system of GPS-based interactive maps has been around for more than a decade, it has its share of inefficiencies. The data from these systems may sometimes be inaccurate and slow to load on devices.

GPS mapping entails processing and storing enormous amounts of data, usually on centralized servers, which might cause delays when accessing and sharing. As these technologies track a person’s whereabouts in real time, they may jeopardize user privacy. Traditional GPS system development and maintenance might also be prohibitively expensive for businesses.

Centralized mapping relies on proprietary data that may be outdated, failing to adequately reflect recent advances in roads, highways and infrastructure due to rapid change. GPS also faces difficulty in adequately mapping dense metropolitan areas. Creating interactive maps in regions with narrow lanes necessitates hard work from the mapping provider to document each area, which is both time-consuming and costly. Moreover, in civil applications such as surveying and transportation, GPS is unencrypted, lacks proof-of-origin or authentication features and is susceptible to cyberattacks, jamming and spoofing.

Most mapping projects use crowdsourcing to enable their operations. In OpenStreetMap, for instance, a large number of contributors use GPS devices, aerial imagery and low-tech field maps to update map data. As the world pushes into the age of the Internet of Things (IoT), new crowdsourcing use cases are likely to emerge. However, problems like difficulty with accuracy and top-down policy implementation — which crowdsourcing projects have generally grappled with — may pervade. Blockchain-based mapping provides a viable alternative.

3. How blockchain augments interactive digital maps

The decentralized structure blockchain technology works on may provide effective answers to common difficulties in the usual interactive digital maps.

GPS mapping requires processing and storing large amounts of data, usually stored on a single or a few servers. The centralized nature of GPS mapping can lead to processing and delivery delays due to the strain of handling large amounts of data on limited servers. Decentralized apps (DApps), however, distribute data over several network devices (nodes), reducing latency and allowing for smooth data access.

As these applications rely on a decentralized network of nodes to continuously validate transactions and data updates rather than a single centralized authority, they can keep location information more current and accurate. The blockchain’s consensus process, which needs confirmation from several nodes before accepting changes, preserves data integrity and protects it from illegal changes.

Better privacy is another advantage of using blockchain for mapping. Traditional GPS mapping compels consumers to send their location data to major organizations, which can then monetize this geotagged information without the users’ consent. On the other hand, Blockchain functions without centralized authority that can make unanimous decisions, with data spread across multiple nodes, improving user privacy.

4. Can blockchains be used for spatial verification?

Spatial verification in blockchain is the process of authenticating the physical location of an event, object or user within a decentralized network.

Spatial verification refers to the confirmation that things are at the place where they claim to be. It is very useful in various industries, especially supply chain management.

For instance, when an Amazon delivery drone drops off a package at an owner’s door, the cost is charged to the owner’s account, relying on spatial verification. This eliminates problems with dishonest delivery persons and disagreements over charges for products that go missing.

Similarly, if someone has a broken windshield, they can use blockchain-based spatial verification to back up their insurance claim by sending a photo and documentation proving the time and location. This helps streamline insurance claim processing, reduces disputes and helps combat fraud.

When one creates a new bank account remotely, spatial verification allows them to verify the residence by merely being present at their home rather than providing proof of address such as utility bill copies.

A smart contract built in a blockchain-based proof-of-location (PoL) protocol would do spatial verification in these use cases. By providing a trustless way to prove location, PoL systems enhance transparency and efficiency in various industries.

5. What is proof-of-location protocol?

PoL uses a combination of cryptographic algorithms and consensus procedures to ensure the authenticity of a user’s location data without relying on a single authority.

In blockchain, PoL is the validation of a user’s physical position within a decentralized network. PoL assures the precision of location-based transactions and services in a range of applications, including supply chain management, asset tracking, decentralized finance and more.

One frequent approach to PoL is to use a network of trustworthy nodes or oracles to collect and validate location data from an array of sources, including GPS satellites, WiFi signals and cellphone towers. These nodes then verify the user’s location by broadcasting signed messages or proofs to the blockchain.

By implementing PoL into blockchain systems, users can securely engage with location-conscious smart contracts and DApps while maintaining privacy and trust. This technology expands the possibilities for location-based services and enables innovative use cases that require verifiable location data on the blockchain.

6. Core elements of a PoL smart contract

Location data submissions, verification mechanisms, data storage, and linking spatial verification to specific actions are the core elements of a PoL smart contract.

Location data submission

The smart contract would define how users or devices submit location data, including:

Geotagged photos or videos.

GPS coordinates from a mobile device.

Sensor readings from IoT devices confirming a location.

Verification mechanisms

The contract would need ways to verify the submitted location:

Using reputation systems to assess the reliability of data providers.

Cross-checking with multiple data sources.

Employing cryptographic techniques to prevent location spoofing.

Data storage

A tamper-proof record would be created by securely storing the verified location data on the blockchain.

Triggering actions

The spatial verification would be connected to particular activities by the smart contract, such as paying out in supply chain situations, approving claims made by insurance, or granting access upon verification of physical presence.

7. What are the limitations of a proof-of-location protocol?

Despite its potential, PoL has several drawbacks, including reliance on external data sources, scalability difficulties and variable applicability across geographies, among others.

While PoL offers several advantages, it has significant limitations. One problem is the reliance on external data sources, which can lead to vulnerabilities for manipulation or spoofing. Additionally, PoL may face scalability concerns because confirming location data for a large number of transactions demands significant processing resources.

Moreover, PoL solutions may not be universally applicable across geographic regions or situations, resulting in inconsistent verification accuracy. There are no standardized methods for incorporating geographic locations, physical addresses or coordinates into smart contracts.

Each developing platform has its own hardware infrastructure, protocols and business models. Addressing these restrictions is critical to the general adoption and efficacy of PoL in blockchain applications.


All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Qian Zhimin, the main culprit in the 60,000 Bitcoin money laundering case, was sentenced to 6 years in prison in the first instance

    On May 24th, the Southwark Crown Court in London ruled in the second trial that 42-year-old Chinese national Qian Zhimin was guilty of money laundering and will serve six years and eight months in prison. Previously, Qian Zhimin had attempted to purchase multiple luxury homes in London, including a 23.5 million pound seven-bedroom mansion in Hampstead and a 12.5 million pound mansion with a private cinema and gym, which caught the attention of the police. An investigation found over 61,000 bitcoins worth more than 3 billion pounds in a digital wallet, setting a record for the highest amount of cryptocurrency seized in the UK. Currently, 23,300 bitcoins worth over 1 billion pounds are still in circulation. It is said that these bitcoins came from a 5 billion pound investment fraud case in China between 2014 and 2017, where the funds were transferred overseas and used to purchase cryptocurrency. Qian Zhimin did not directly participate in the fraud, but played a "front desk" role in helping to disguise the source of the laundered funds.

  • Plume Network Raises $10M Seed Funding to Bring Real-World Assets on-Chain

    San Francisco-based Plume Network has secured $10m in seed funding to expand its operations and development efforts. The funding round was led by Haun Ventures, with participation from Galaxy Ventures, Superscrypt, A Capital, SV Angel, Portal Ventures, Reciprocal Ventures and others. Plume provides a modular EVM L2 blockchain for real-world assets, integrating asset tokenisation and compliance providers directly into the chain.

  • Time to Harvest! HTX Liquid Restaking Injects ETHFI & zkLink Airdrops and Allows Points Redemption Soon

    This summer, as the scorching heat envelopes the Northern Hemisphere, an even more exciting anticipation filled the air—the arrival of the restaking airdrop harvest season. HTX, the global leading cryptocurrency exchange, is heating up the restaking season with the addition of Etherfi (ETHFI) and zkLink airdrops to its Liquid Restaking event. Points earned through the event will soon be accessible for redemption, allowing users to capitalize on their participation. According to the previous report, the event has recently increased its quota to over $150 million and introduced a new version featuring a clearer reward display and automatic update from LRS points to r-points.

  • Privacy, human rights, and Tornado Cash

    I am more worried about privacy than crypto crime.

  • A certain address destroyed 11.51 million DOGE 16 minutes ago, worth $1.86 million

    According to on-chain data, an address transferred 11.51 million DOGE, worth $1.86 million, to a black hole address (zero address) 16 minutes ago.

  • Vitalik unlocked 845,205 STRK from the Locked Token Grant contract 50 minutes ago

    According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, V God unlocked and received 845,205 STRK tokens worth $1.07 million from the Starknet Locked Token Grant contract 50 minutes ago.

  • Fidelity FBTC holdings exceed 150,000 Bitcoins, with a market value of over $10 billion

    The net inflow of the Fidelity Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) FBTC was $19.1224 million yesterday. The total historical net inflow of FBTC has now reached $8.67 billion. According to the latest data from Dune Analytics, FBTC's holdings have exceeded 150,000 Bitcoins, currently reaching 151,797 Bitcoins, and the market value of holdings has also exceeded $10 billion, reaching $10.3 billion. So far, Fidelity is the third-largest holder of spot Bitcoin ETFs, second only to Grayscale (287,701 Bitcoins) and BlackRock (275,756 Bitcoins).

  • xAI to complete new round of financing at a valuation of $24 billion

    According to sources cited by Bloomberg, Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company xAI will complete a round of financing in June, with a valuation of over $24 billion after financing. The company originally planned to raise $6 billion this month. It is said that xAI's goal is to raise as much as $6.5 billion and is expected to achieve this goal in the coming weeks.

  • Bitcoin spot ETFs had a total net inflow of $108 million yesterday, continuing a net inflow for 9 consecutive days

    On May 24th, according to SoSoValue data, the net inflow of Bitcoin spot ETF on May 23rd was $108 million. Yesterday, Grayscale's (Grayscale) GBTC had a net outflow of $13.7209 million, and the historical net outflow of GBTC is currently $17.641 billion. The Bitcoin spot ETF with the highest net inflow in a single day is BlackRock's IBIT, with a net inflow of $88.9516 million in a single day, and the total historical net inflow of IBIT has reached $16.171 billion. The second is Fidelity's FBTC, with a net inflow of $19.1224 million in a single day, and the total historical net inflow of FBTC has reached $8.67 billion.

  • The Hong Kong Privacy Commissioner has issued an enforcement notice to Worldcoin, but the Worldcoin Foundation has not yet disclosed whether it will comply with the ruling.

    The Hong Kong Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data has completed an investigation into the Worldcoin project and emphasized on Thursday that a compulsory enforcement notice has been issued to Worldcoin. However, Worldcoin has not disclosed whether it will comply with the regulatory decision, suspend its biometric data collection activities in Hong Kong, or address the concerns of participants. The Worldcoin Foundation, the supporting organization behind Worldcoin based in the Cayman Islands, expressed disappointment with the views of Hong Kong regulators, stating that its operations are legal and aimed at complying with laws and regulations related to data collection and use in Hong Kong and many other markets. The foundation stated that "unfortunately, Hong Kong overlooked these aspects when evaluating the human verification process."