Download App
iOS & Android

Former Spartan Group Partner Jason Choi:The Definitive Thread on FTX

The Definitive Thread on FTX

I met SBF before FTX started, and witnessed their rise and fall. I can't stand @nytimes's puff piece.If anyone wants to know what happened, send them this.

0/ The story of Alameda and FTX can best be summarized by @SBF_FTX's philosophy of betting big.Every major decision they have made is related to acquiring more leverage - via deceptive fundraises, financial engineering, and ultimately, outright fraud, as we will see below.

1/ In Nov 2018 - Jan 2019, a small hedge fund called Alameda Research was raising debt from investors, promising "HIGH RETURNS WITH NO RISK".

3/ Later that year, @FTX_Official planned a launch for July 2019 and closed a $8M seed from several funds, announced in August 2019.In one investor's memo, "Alameda & FTX" is cited as a risk, as well as concerns around @SBF_FTX's personal split commitment between the two.

4/ From my primary sources (who will remain undisclosed), @FTX_Official was allegedly started as an easy way to access capital by Alameda due to difficulties in raising for the latter.This is unprovable short of leaking internal chats, so we'll leave that for the courts.

5/ In the early days, Alameda being a heavy portion of @FTX_Official's volumes was an open secret.Employees told me Alameda has an exclusive API key that allows faster access than any user - offering a systematic way to profit off clients.

A message I sent to a FTX investor:

6/ Around September 2019, Alameda allegedly attempted to manipulate futures on @binance, which was thwarted by the latter.However, this would likely mark the beginning of the bad blood between Binance and FTX that spelled the end for FTX.

7/ As FTX continued to grow, its appetite for capital seems insatiable.In the midst of the so-called "DeFi Summer", FTX capitalized on the DeFi hype by creating @ProjectSerum, a decentralized exchange on @solana

8/ The raise was conducted in a way to encourage speed and not diligence - the faster investors committed, the lower the price.Below is a screenshot of their fundraising tranches for @ProjectSerum, with some investors getting a 50% higher price for committing a few hours later

9/ After, @FTX_Official became directly involved with multiple Serum / Solana ecosystem projects such as $FIDA, @Oxygen_protocol and $MAPSAll launched tokens in a short expanse of time.Full thread from @SBF_FTX shilling all of these in Dec 2020.

10/ According to my sources, much of Serum was operated by full-time @FTX_Official employees.Some Serum ecosystem projects were made to seen as third party projects but were in fact internally incubated/ operated.

11/ Why did FTX do this?First, some context.Assuming Alameda and FTX were much closer than they represented, something changed internally with Alameda/FTX around that time (winter 2020).

12/ Namely, Alameda moved AWAY from delta-neutral strategies as their edge eroded and began to assume massive directional risks in crypto.They did so on massive amounts of leverage as well.

13/ How did the Serum assets fit in?They were likely used as collateral to enable the aforementioned leverage. All traded at thin circulations. It was easy to manipulate an artificial price for them and use them to pad balance sheet.

14/ To give an example -Let's say Alameda funds a semi-incubated project at a $10M "fully diluted valuation" (price of token * total number of tokens ever to be issued) with $2M.FTX then lists the token on its exchange, but only releases 1% of the total tokens to market.

15/ As markets are thin, Alameda can prop up prices using a few million dollars to create a "fake" fully diluted valuation of say $1BSuddenly, $2M is $200M on *paper*.This is an open secret for what industry insiders call "Sam coins". Note the circulating supply across them:

16/ By doing this, Alameda creates the illusion of a large + diversified balance sheet, which it could then borrow against to fund directional bets.@FTX_Official also lists swaps contracts for "Sam coins", which means Alameda can short to lock in profits on unvested tokens.

17/ Insiders who questioned the legitimacy of these schemes were personally bullied and threatened by @SBF_FTX into silence.

18/ All in all, this circus created hundreds of millions for Alameda/ @FTX_Official in equity value, based on a very illiquid market, as its leaked balance sheet showed.Still, this was dwarfed by its $FTT holdings

19/ Some of the Serum coins and $FTT itself were pledged on @FTX_Official- the only exchange to allow such assets to be used - as collateral.Some of it was likely used to borrow from credit desks.

20/ This is likely how Alameda/FTX incurred the multi-billion dollar hole:Alameda pledging illiquid collateral to borrow money to finance bets, which get margin called as markets went down this year, leading to theft of FTX user funds to put out fires.

21/ This means liquid reserves on @FTX_Official were likely lower in amount than user deposits - but chances are this hole was manageable given enough time as more of FTX/Alameda's illiquid assets get vested over years.That is, until @cz_binance's induced bank-run (more later).

22/ As all of this was brewing in the background, @SBF_FTX was aggressively pushing for mainstream legitimacy and establishing a regulatory moat...Two things that would ensure the equity value of FTX and $FTT - which they used to finance leveraged bets - do not collapse.

23/ To do this, FTX increased their marketing.The most dramatic examples: a $135M deal to rename the Miami Heats Stadium, being the second biggest donor to @JoeBiden, and a failed attempt to join @elonmusk's Twitter bid (happened post recent raise).

24/ The subsequent rounds of fundraises that pushed FTX's valuation to $32B (Jan 2022), bringing in @paradigm, @Sequioa, @TomBrady, @Temasek were widely documented.Point is @FTX_Official was quickly capturing mainstream mindshare, bolstered by retail-facing ads as well.

25/ Amidst the growth in retail mindshare and aggressive capital raise, @SBF_FTX was making a push in policy too.Important to note that SBF's parents - Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried - are both professors at @StanfordLaw.

26/ The above is important as the family is known to have strong ties to the Democrats in the US.A more detailed thread on SBF's familial relationships and *deep* political ties can be found here. You can bookmark this for later.

27/ This is relevant as @SBF_FTX was exercising his considerable political muscles to establish a regulatory moat for @FTX_Official.In Oct 2022, FTX proposes a standard for regulation that widely favored FTX over any DeFi competitors.

28/ Important to note that immediately prior to this, @AlamedaTrabucco, co-CEO of Alameda at the time, announces his stepping down from the firm in Aug 2022.This did not raise much alarm at the time...but it should have.

29/ A month later, @FTX_Official secured a $1.4B bid on Voyage Digital, a brokerage firm that went under due to the collapse of Three Arrows Capital earlier this year.Court docs show >100K creditors and billions in liabilities

30/ Why would FTX bid for Voyager when it itself is in a cash crunch?This is purely conjecture - but the likely explanation is that FTX was likely bailing out entities with large $FTT holdings to prevent forced selling, as much of its own leverage is backed against $FTT.

31/ Not long after, as @SBF_FTX seeks to establish legitimacy in Washington, his and @cz_binance commercial feud gives way to a Twitter spat.Below is a deleted tweet from SBF.

32/ Shortly thereafter, @CoinDesk releases a concerning piece regarding Alameda's balance sheet, citing that a huge part of its $14.6B in assets are assets issued by the FTX team itself.The sharks smell blood now.

33/ On Nov 06 2022, @cz_binance states that in light of revelations regarding Alameda's balance sheet, Binance will liquidate the entirety of its whopping ~$584M in $FTT

34/ In response, @carolinecapital , sole remaining CEO of Alameda, cites that ~$10B worth of assets are not reflected by the balance sheet reveal, which is echoed by @SBF_FTXThis added to fears that Alameda and FTX were more commingled than publicly perceived.

35/ @carolinecapital then makes a public offer to @cz_binance to purchase all $FTT at $22, leading to speculation that perhaps Alameda had loans that would be liquidated if $FTT trades under that price

36/ Markets react in panic.As of Nov 07 2022, according to @nansen_alpha, ~$450M worth of stable coins left the exchange within 7 days.A bank run is set in motion.

37/ On Nov 08 2022, @SBF_FTX assured the public that FTX is "heavily regulated" and GAAP audited, with $1B in excess cash.This tweet has since been deleted, but I got receipts.

38/ At the time, FTX CEO @rsalame7926 calls @cz_binance "the worst" in a now-deleted tweet, as multiple junior to senior employees attempt to allay public fears and stop the bleeding.

39/ Based on internal chats shared with me, @SBF_FTX, who was fully aware of the situation at the time, seems to have kept his employees in the dark and asked them to publicly commit fraud.

40/ Shortly after, @SBF_FTX publicly claimed that FTX DOES NOT INVEST CLIENT ASSETS, EVEN IN TREASURIES, and that it has enough to cover all withdrawals.This tweet has since been deleted.

41/ Withdrawals from the exchange were soon frozen on Nov 08 2022, with no further communication from @FTX_Official.On Nov 09, @SBF_FTX announced a potential deal with @binance, and made another fraudulent assurance that assets were 1:1 backed

42/ While withdrawals were frozen, Alameda was still able to siphon funds off of the exchange.When asked why, @carolinecapital claimed this was the FTX US exchange, implying that only the FTX Intl entity was facing liquidity issues.

43/ On Nov 10th, @cz_binance announced that chances for a potential bail out deal are off as suspicions arise that the hole was too big to fill.In an internal note on Nov 9th, @cz_binance stated that Binance did not "master plan this".

44/ Shortly after, withdrawals seemed to have resumed on FTX.Later, @FTX_Official would claim that this is part of its compliance with regulations in Bahamas, where FTX's HQ is based.Bahamian regulators would soon debunk this in an official statement.

45/ Below is a DM leaked to me, where @SBF_FTX seemingly instructed one of his employees to once again commit fraud publicly.But if not Bahamians locals, who was cashing out millions at a time?

46/ From a primary source I can confirm that at least one employee - who is neither Bahamian nor based in Bahamas - was able to successfully withdraw assets.Speculation began to arise that insiders were cashing out, and commingling their withdrawals with actual Bahamaian users.

47/ Soon, users began to find ways to exploit the loophole, with at least one prominent trader @AlgodTrading supposedly purchasing Bahamian KYC'd accounts to launder assets out.

48/ On Nov 11 2022, @justinsuntron announced a credit facility to allow part of FTX's users to withdraw capital via assets associated with the @trondao network.This led to a massive premium in $TRX price on FTX.

49/ For some inexplicable reason, @SBF_FTX never paused trading either for @FTX_Official - leading to alleged washtrading on multiple perp pairs, whereby a user would intentionally lose against an account that was able to withdraw in order to cash out.

50/ @FTX_Official + @SBF_FTX also never responded to questions regarding Bahamas withdrawals, and whether insiders cashed out.But the comms blackout was conveniently timed right before a public announcement for FTX's bankruptcy on Nov 11, 2022

51/ After the bankruptcy announcement, withdrawals were finally paused; however, hundreds of millions began to be siphoned from FTX.General Counsel @_Ryne_Miller claimed that FTX was moving its own assets to cold storage.

52/ However, this was likely not the entire truth as seasoned onchain sleuth @zachxbt revealed a potential hack has likely occurred.

53/ Miller responded with an official statement regarding cooperation with law enforcement to secure stolen assets.

54/ The fact that @SBF_FTX@rsalame7926 did not have tighter opsec and lock down + pause trading + withdrawals when multiple employees were claiming they were lied to and clearly disgruntled was a monumental failure in management.

55/ After a brief period of silence, @SBF_FTX began to taunt the public by tweeting cryptic, one letter tweets on Nov 14, 2022.

56/ Crypto investor @ercwl revealed that @SBF_FTX was likely using the tweets to fool bots that are designed to detect tweets being deleted.This is currently unproven and unlikely.

57/ Earlier on Nov 15, @yaffebellany, who has previously co-written a hit piece on rival exchange @krakenfx, published a piece on @SBF_FTXThis was widely considered to be a puff piece.

58/ Most recently, news regarding loopholes in FTX's backend that allowed @SBF_FTX to launder user funds seem to have surfaced but currently unproven.

59/ According to primacy sources from FTX, only 4-5 senior executives knew the extent of FTX's woes until the very end.Their names as shared with me are: SBF, Caroline Ellison, Gary Wang, Ramnik Arora, Constance Wang, Nishad SinghSome have denied.(Source: @AutismCapital)

60/ There are a lot more interesting facts - such as @carolinecapital's blog, @SBF_FTX's supposed stimulant addiction, alleged orgies in the FTX office - which I don't think are that relevant for those who seek to understand what happened.I will leave the tabloids for @nytimes

61/ This will (hopefully) be the last development, short of prosecution and paying out of creditors, for the FTX saga.I've also recorded an abridged, 20-min version of this on my podcast @theBlockcrunch, which you can find below.


All Comments

Recommended for you

  • BuildBear Labs Raises $1.9M to Accelerate Development of Web3 Tools for Secure dApp Creation

    Singapore-based BuildBear Labs has secured $1.9m in funding from investors including Superscrypt, Tribe Capital, and 1kx, as well as angel investors such as Kris Kaczor and Ken Fromm. The funds will be used to speed up development of the company's flagship platform, which provides developers with testing and validation solutions for secure decentralized applications. BuildBear Labs' platform is dedicated to dApp development and testing, offering developers the ability to create customised Private Testnet sandboxes across multiple EVM and EVM-compatible blockchain networks, with features including private faucets for unlimited Native and ERC20 token minting.

  • Multiple incidents of stETH being stolen and cross-chained to the Blast mainnet were discovered. The victim’s mnemonic words/private keys may have been leaked.

    SlowMist founder, Yu Xian, posted on X platform stating that SlowMist and MistTrack have received at least four cases of stETH being stolen and cross-chain transferred to the Blast mainnet. The common feature is that a small amount of ETH transaction fee is sent from an address with obvious traces (including exchanges) to the stolen address, and then stETH is cross-chain transferred to the Blast mainnet for subsequent transfer, and finally the remaining small amount of ETH in the victim's address is transferred to different ETH addresses. The known loss exceeds 100 stETH, and it is likely a group event. The mnemonic phrase/private key of these victims must have been leaked, and the attackers lurked to start on the Blast mainnet. Previously, Scam Sniffer monitoring showed that a certain address lost over 10 BTC pledged on Aave and some PANDORA due to interaction (clicking on the signature authorization) with a fake Blast airdrop website, with a total loss of approximately $717,817.

  • Hong Kong has closed the application for virtual asset trading platform licenses, and a total of 22 virtual asset trading platforms are waiting for approval.

    The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission website shows that the deadline for virtual asset trading platform license applications was yesterday (29th). As of the update on February 28th, there were a total of 22 virtual asset trading platform applicants.The applicants include Bybit, OKX,,, HTX, Bullish, and others.Ammbr, BitHarbour, and Huobi HK withdrew their applications, while Meex had its application returned by the Securities and Futures Commission.In addition, virtual asset trading platforms operating in Hong Kong that did not submit license applications to the Securities and Futures Commission by yesterday (29th) must end their business in Hong Kong by May 31, 2024, at the latest.

  • In February, NFT sales on the Bitcoin chain were approximately US$301 million, down nearly 10% from the previous month.

    According to cryptoslam data, the sales of NFTs on the Bitcoin blockchain in February reached $301,983,035.33, a decrease of nearly 10% from the previous month's $335,121,977.66, and the fourth-highest monthly sales to date. The total number of NFT transactions on the Bitcoin blockchain in February was approximately 203,000, a decrease of about 18.4% from the previous month. In addition, there were 67,139 independent buyers and 57,724 independent sellers of NFTs on the Bitcoin blockchain last month.

  • Attorneys general of many U.S. states: SEC is expanding the definition of “investment contract”

    Law enforcement officials from Montana, Arkansas, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota, and Texas submitted a joint amicus brief (or friend of the court brief) to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in the lawsuit against Kraken on Thursday. The brief states that the states are not supporting the exchange, but rather opposing federal regulatory agencies. If the SEC wins, it may prioritize state consumer protection laws and state regulations surrounding cryptocurrencies.

  • Ethereum mainnet interaction costs rise sharply

    On March 1st, due to the heat of the market and the rise in the price of Ethereum, the interaction cost on the Ethereum mainnet has significantly increased. In the past 24 hours, the lowest average value of Gas on the Ethereum mainnet was about 50 gwei, under which:

  • Blockchain data analysis company Octav completes US$4 million in strategic financing

    According to official sources, blockchain data analysis company Octav has announced the completion of a strategic investment of $4 million. The funding round was led by high net worth individuals in the cryptocurrency space, but their identities have not been disclosed. Currently, Octav is primarily focused on unlocking the potential of on-chain data using machine learning technology to improve the accuracy of data labeling and classification. Its clients include Gelato, Request Finance, and Alchemix.

  • Validation Cloud raises $5.8M in funding for its Web3 technology platform.

    Swiss Web3 tech company, Validation Cloud, has secured $5.8 million in its inaugural funding round. The investment was led by Cadenza Ventures, with participation from Blockchain Founders Fund, Bloccelerate, Blockwall, Side Door Ventures, Metamatic, GS Futures, and AP Capital. The funds will be used to expand the company's operations and development efforts. Validation Cloud's innovative system architecture, dubbed the "Cloudflare of Web3," provides scalable and intelligent Staking, Node API, and Data services, supporting a range of ecosystems from established networks like Chainlink and Hedera to emerging ones such as Aptos, Eigenlayer, and Berachain, laying the groundwork for enterprise adoption.

  • The daily trading volume of spot Bitcoin ETF is approximately US$4.7 billion, the second highest in history

    According to Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart's data, as of Thursday's US stock market close, the daily trading volume of the US spot Bitcoin ETF was about $4.7 billion, lower than the historical high of $7.7 billion set the previous day, ranking the second highest in history. Among them:

  • FTX agrees to sell FTX Europe back to its founders for $32.7 million

    Bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX has reached a settlement in a lawsuit in which the company attempted to recover $323 million spent on acquiring a European startup. FTX stated that it paid an excessive fee for a startup that was "unable to launch and operate," and FTX Europe's founder will buy back his company for $32.7 million. It is reported that Digital Assets DA AG was acquired by FTX and renamed FTX Europe in 2021, and FTX stated in a lawsuit in July 2023 that the acquisition was a "huge overpayment" paid with FTX customer funds. According to documents submitted to the Delaware Wilmington Bankruptcy Court on Thursday, FTX stated that no other buyers would agree to purchase its European subsidiary FTX Europe, and the proposed settlement is the best result for FTX creditors. (Reuters) In July 2023, FTX Trading recently sued insiders of FTX's European division, claiming that former CEO SBF paid an obviously high acquisition price. Accounting firm BDO stated that FTX's $376 million acquisition of Swiss startup Digital Assets AG (DAAG) "reasonably represents fair value" and is not improper. DAAG was later renamed FTX Europe.