Download App
iOS & Android

Binance Launches Industry Recovery Fund, but It Goes Against Crypto's Principles

Validated Individual Expert

An International Monetary Fund for Crypto.

The bailor to all insolvent Crypto projects.

A glorified copycat of all that’s wrong in traditional finance, but actually even worse.

The Crypto industry, the industry born to take power away from the few and hand it to the many, may very well become a hideous copy of the industry whose sins gave birth to Crypto.

It may seem like an extreme point of view, but for Crypto to succeed we want to be extremists in the idea of what boundaries Crypto must not cross.

And we are about to cross one.

Decentralization is multi-faceted

My mom always tells me that everything in excessive quantities is bad, no matter what it is.

And I agree.

Being dogmatic about something makes you probably wrong

In fact, I always try to remain as unbiased as possible with regard to Crypto.

For instance, I put into value Bitcoin’s good things and also understand its — actual — shortcomings.

And same applies to Ethereum.

For that matter, maximalists on both sides attack me for it, ironically calling me a Bitcoin maxi or an Ethereum maxi (maxis are people who follow certain Crypto projects in an almost religious/dogmatic approach).

It’s funny how I’ve been accused of being two completely opposite things at once.

And yet I completely understand why this occurs, as these people aren’t capable of seeing the problems the project they are blindly following has, as their support is more about faith and less about objectivity.

Thus, an attack on “their” project is an attack on them, on their beliefs.

And yet here I am, making an effort to see through all the noise to explain the innovations coming to Crypto, as well as being sufficiently critical to understand what needs to be improved.

It’s as simple as that.

But certainly, there’s something about Crypto that really makes me feel like a maxi, and that’s decentralization.

Centralization defeats the purpose of blockchains

The problem with the majority of Crypto people is that they don’t really understand how blockchain works.

To them, blockchain is just a buzzword being thrown out at people outside the space to sound interesting and legit.

And yet, these same people are quick to applaud events that centralize Crypto, like the one we are about to discuss today, because the moment people are losing money, it isn’t about Crypto or blockchain anymore, it’s about them.

About their survival.

And yet, the reasoning is quite simple.

Centralization defeats the purpose of blockchains. A centralized blockchain, no matter how scalable, fancy, and multi-featured it is, is still pointless.


Because a centralized blockchain can never compete with the performance of a centralized system, while sharing a centralized system’s biggest problem, single points of failure.

And then, the “solution” to a rightful problem ends up being a worse implementation than the original problem.

But decentralization isn’t only about the IT architecture of the system, it’s also about decision-making and concentration of power and wealth.

Your system is as decentralized as your most centralized link

When people talk about being decentralized, they are normally talking about the blockchain itself, the architecture.


Because decentralized architectures are highly secure and difficult to hack, making them the superior technology for storing data with high-security requirements. You can read this article of mine for more detail.

That is certainly important, but there’s another thing that truly decentralized systems offer, and that’s censorship resistance.

You can be super decentralized, like Bitcoin, or decently decentralized like Ethereum, and still not be censorship resistant.

  • In the Bitcoin network, a majority of the hashing rate is owned by a handful of mining companies, some of them being so big they are actually public companies.
  • In the Ethereum network, a majority of the stake is owned by a subset of companies using a centralized, OFAC-compliant MEV-boost known as Flashbots, a fact that is closely approaching Ethereum into becoming a fully-censoring chain.

In other words, in blockchains, censorship resistance depends on those introducing new blocks to the chain, so even though your system may be decentralized at the hardware level, it is far from being decentralized if a few people have the power to decide what transactions do go in and what transactions don’t.

To be fully decentralized, you also have to be decentralized at the protocol level, and few blockchains, if any, have a passing grade on that aspect.

And now, an uber-important centralized player wants to make things worse at a new layer, the decision-making one.

The Binance Recovery Fund

It is no secret that traditional finance players have always a last resort when things go south:

  • In the case of banks, they have central banks to bail them out
  • In the case of countries, they have the International Monetary Fund to bail them out

In other words, if you’re a country or a bank and you f*ck up, these entities have your back unless you are seriously in the mud, like Lehman Brothers was.

Now Binance wants to create a similar concept in Crypto, a recovery fund to prevent disasters like that of FTX from ever happening again.

This seems great, right?

It would be, if it wasn’t for the fact that it goes against Crypto’s principles.

A centralized bank for Crypto

I’ll be honest with you guys, this fund is a euphemism for simply creating a privately-owned, centralized global bank that will provide liquidity to those in need.

The problem?

No private company ever will give you money altruistically, it always has a price.

I’ll be honest with you guys, this fund is a euphemism for simply creating a privately-owned, centralized global bank that will provide liquidity to those in need.

The problem?

No private company ever will give you money altruistically, it always has a price.

And, needless to say, the moment this fund provides you liquidity, they own you.

And the moment ownership is centralized, what does that say about that project? Can it truly claim to be decentralized?

Of course not. And in that case, what’s the point?

As no Crypto protocol or project will ever acknowledge they are centralized, as that would put them in the bullseye of the SEC, possibly inducing their cryptocurrency to be deemed a security, thereby killing it instantly, they are fooling us into believing they are decentralized when they’re not.

So, if no one will ever accept they are centralized, why the h*ll are we taking quick steps toward centralization?

I’ll tell you why, money.

It’s always about money

People in this space love to talk about how differential and disruptive Crypto is — hint, this only is true if decentralized —, how important is Crypto’s role to bank the unbanked and fight for our rights but, the moment their portfolio or their money is on the line, they instantly become open to anything that saves their money, even if that means betray Crypto’s principles.

Saving the world? More about saving my savings.

Because let’s be real. Few in this space are here because they want to have a positive impact in the world.

It’s all about the money.

And people won’t give a second thought to anything compromising the future of this industry (anything that centralizes it, for that matter) as long as they get rich.

Am I implying that CZ, Binance’s CEO, doesn’t care about the future of the industry?


I personally feel that CZ genuinely understands Crypto and wants to make it thrive. But let’s not forget his multi-billion net worth is on the line when it comes to Binance.

It’s impossible for him to be truly unbiased. If that was the case, he would have never proposed a potentially centralized Recovery Fund.

Yes, he opens it to being participated by several companies, but it still centralizes liquidity on a few important players.

But… there’s no other option, as this industry needs a bailor to prevent similar collapses, right?

Of course not!

The answer is actually in front of our own very eyes.


DeFi is, up, running, and unharmed

Why do we need a Recovery fund, if no DeFi protocols have collapsed?

That is, if we all used DeFi instead of CeFi (centralized Crypto companies like FTX or Binance) none of this would have happened.


Because in DeFi, you won’t ever have to worry about people stealing your funds to gamble them like FTX did, as everything is governed by smart contracts (besides hacks, but that’s another story).

It’s all liquidity pools and market makers providing liquidity to trade pairs so that you can borrow or lend your assets in a peer-to-peer manner.

Sure there’s a lot of risk in DeFi, as innovations like SBTs or validity proofs have still to mature to allow things like creditworthiness or undercollateralized lending, but one thing’s for sure, nobody is going to scam the living sh*t of you like FTX did, because it’s code what’s behind those trades, not greedy humans.

Maybe your risk tolerance doesn’t incentivize you to have a go at DeFi for now.

I get it, because:

  • It sure lacks utility besides getting loans on cryptocurrencies to then automatically stake them for interest.
  • It evidently still needs some sort of traction in real life for DeFi to truly become useful.

But, as JP Morgan has said, if there’s one thing that the FTX collapse has clarified, is that DeFi has a strong value proposition and resilient fundamentals.

That, in my opinion, proves DeFi’s capacity to become the superior alternative to traditional finance.

Thus, let’s forget about recovery funds and let’s start improving self-custody user experiences to democratize that ownership model and remain faithful to the one thing that ascends blockchains above other technologies: decentralization.


All Comments

Recommended for you

  • On Compressionism

    How a technological necessity is becoming the face of a burgeoning realm of cryptoart

  • BuildBear Labs Raises $1.9M to Accelerate Development of Web3 Tools for Secure dApp Creation

    Singapore-based BuildBear Labs has secured $1.9m in funding from investors including Superscrypt, Tribe Capital, and 1kx, as well as angel investors such as Kris Kaczor and Ken Fromm. The funds will be used to speed up development of the company's flagship platform, which provides developers with testing and validation solutions for secure decentralized applications. BuildBear Labs' platform is dedicated to dApp development and testing, offering developers the ability to create customised Private Testnet sandboxes across multiple EVM and EVM-compatible blockchain networks, with features including private faucets for unlimited Native and ERC20 token minting.

  • Multiple incidents of stETH being stolen and cross-chained to the Blast mainnet were discovered. The victim’s mnemonic words/private keys may have been leaked.

    SlowMist founder, Yu Xian, posted on X platform stating that SlowMist and MistTrack have received at least four cases of stETH being stolen and cross-chain transferred to the Blast mainnet. The common feature is that a small amount of ETH transaction fee is sent from an address with obvious traces (including exchanges) to the stolen address, and then stETH is cross-chain transferred to the Blast mainnet for subsequent transfer, and finally the remaining small amount of ETH in the victim's address is transferred to different ETH addresses. The known loss exceeds 100 stETH, and it is likely a group event. The mnemonic phrase/private key of these victims must have been leaked, and the attackers lurked to start on the Blast mainnet. Previously, Scam Sniffer monitoring showed that a certain address lost over 10 BTC pledged on Aave and some PANDORA due to interaction (clicking on the signature authorization) with a fake Blast airdrop website, with a total loss of approximately $717,817.

  • Hong Kong has closed the application for virtual asset trading platform licenses, and a total of 22 virtual asset trading platforms are waiting for approval.

    The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission website shows that the deadline for virtual asset trading platform license applications was yesterday (29th). As of the update on February 28th, there were a total of 22 virtual asset trading platform applicants.The applicants include Bybit, OKX,,, HTX, Bullish, and others.Ammbr, BitHarbour, and Huobi HK withdrew their applications, while Meex had its application returned by the Securities and Futures Commission.In addition, virtual asset trading platforms operating in Hong Kong that did not submit license applications to the Securities and Futures Commission by yesterday (29th) must end their business in Hong Kong by May 31, 2024, at the latest.

  • In February, NFT sales on the Bitcoin chain were approximately US$301 million, down nearly 10% from the previous month.

    According to cryptoslam data, the sales of NFTs on the Bitcoin blockchain in February reached $301,983,035.33, a decrease of nearly 10% from the previous month's $335,121,977.66, and the fourth-highest monthly sales to date. The total number of NFT transactions on the Bitcoin blockchain in February was approximately 203,000, a decrease of about 18.4% from the previous month. In addition, there were 67,139 independent buyers and 57,724 independent sellers of NFTs on the Bitcoin blockchain last month.

  • Attorneys general of many U.S. states: SEC is expanding the definition of “investment contract”

    Law enforcement officials from Montana, Arkansas, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota, and Texas submitted a joint amicus brief (or friend of the court brief) to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in the lawsuit against Kraken on Thursday. The brief states that the states are not supporting the exchange, but rather opposing federal regulatory agencies. If the SEC wins, it may prioritize state consumer protection laws and state regulations surrounding cryptocurrencies.

  • Ethereum mainnet interaction costs rise sharply

    On March 1st, due to the heat of the market and the rise in the price of Ethereum, the interaction cost on the Ethereum mainnet has significantly increased. In the past 24 hours, the lowest average value of Gas on the Ethereum mainnet was about 50 gwei, under which:

  • Blockchain data analysis company Octav completes US$4 million in strategic financing

    According to official sources, blockchain data analysis company Octav has announced the completion of a strategic investment of $4 million. The funding round was led by high net worth individuals in the cryptocurrency space, but their identities have not been disclosed. Currently, Octav is primarily focused on unlocking the potential of on-chain data using machine learning technology to improve the accuracy of data labeling and classification. Its clients include Gelato, Request Finance, and Alchemix.

  • Nigeria Detains Binance Executives Amidst Allegations of Currency Manipulation and Illicit Fund Movements

    The Nigerian government has detained two senior executives of Binance, a cryptocurrency exchange platform, as part of a wider crackdown on crypto platforms. The move comes amid concerns over currency manipulation and illicit fund movements, which have been blamed for weakening the value of the local currency, the naira. The Central Bank of Nigeria has raised concerns over the flow of funds through Binance Nigeria, highlighting the need for regulatory scrutiny and collaboration among government agencies. Binance has disabled its peer-to-peer function for Nigerian users in response to the crackdown, raising uncertainties about trading on the platform. The future of crypto trading in Nigeria remains uncertain.

  • iOS 17.4 is also an attack on crypto

    The gist of the story is that Apple is going to release the iOS 17.4 update soon, and it’s going to severely impact the usability of PWAs. In this post, I want to summarize the story and explain how crypto apps like Kiwi News are being affected by this update.