Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

9 Reasons Why Solid Crypto Projects Fail to Attract Users

Validated Individual Expert

Over the last few years, I researched more than 1.000 crypto projects and wrote many articles to share my insights. Every year, hundreds or even thousands of new cryptocurrencies and tokens launch. But few survive the competition.

Most of the projects’ fate is to end up forgotten by the community with their tokens approaching zero value. There are many reasons why a project fail. Unable to attract users is one of them. In this article, I will tell you 9 reasons why many crypto projects fail to attract users.

1. Having names that are difficult to spell and remember

HalloweenShibaZilla, PummpshibaXX, and Shibadogebitcoin Inu. You won’t believe how many coins and tokens there are which contain the phrase ‘shiba’.

I can understand that when thousands of coins are out there, it becomes hard to find a name that sticks. But crypto is international. When giving a name to a project, it is important to find one that is easy for users to remember. It should be simple, not too long, and not difficult to spell.

2. Not providing enough precise information about what the project actually does

Unfortunately, a lot of projects don’t do a good job when it comes to explaining to potential users what they are all about.

For example, almost daily I see Twitter accounts that only offer very vague information in their bio such as “built by the people for the people”. That’s nice and all but as a first-time visitor, this doesn’t tell me anything about what the project is about. As a result, people feel confused and probably lose interest to read further.

Similar problems exist with the websites of many crypto projects. In the best case, visitors should be able to get the most important information within seconds. The page should briefly address the following:

  • You have this problem.
  • This is how our project solves it.

Furthermore, other resources such as white papers, use case descriptions, roadmaps, and more should be accessible with as few clicks as possible.

The problem: Many projects get lost in marketing fluff and endless details without really becoming concrete.

3. Super fancy website with animations that are difficult to load

I am probably nitpicking here but this is something a lot of projects do and I find it annoying — creating complex website animations that look super cool, take forever to load, and ultimately do little to help with understanding the project.

Don’t get me wrong. It is good to be creative and show how unique your project is. However, make sure to build something that is easy to load for people who have just average-speed internet. Also, the animations should not be too long. The average first-time visitor stays only 8 seconds on your site. Use this time wisely or potential users will lose interest and go somewhere else.

4. Assuming users already know the technology

According to TripleA, crypto users only account for about 4.2% — of the global population. As an active part of these approximately 420 million people, you quickly forget that many people have never had anything to do with blockchains and crypto. And even for those who deal with developments in the crypto space on a daily basis, it is becoming increasingly difficult to keep track.

The following graphic illustrates this:

While many new crypto projects aim to reach out to people outside the orange circle, they don’t provide the necessary foundation these people need to get into their projects and crypto.

In order to increase awareness, understanding, and adoption, detailed tutorials and documentation are vital. For example:

  • Tutorials should be easy to read, and not contain jargons which are difficult to understand for non-technical people.
  • There should be screenshots or videos to teach a potential user where to find and how to execute specific functions in each step.
  • Frequently updated FAQ section. Make sure it is easy for users to submit their questions, and answer them promptly.

5. Launching a crypto project at the wrong time

I analyzed 1.600 ICOs to see which ones performed best:

One finding was that it plays a major role in the performance of a crypto project whether it is launched during a bull market or a bear market.

New coins and tokens usually do not perform well if they are launched during a bear market. That’s because when the markets are down a lot of people leave the crypto space. The hard truth is that a great project launched at the wrong time will perform much worse than a crappy project launched at the right time.

6. Failing to build a strong community and not engaging with the community enough

Strong communities are essential for success, as crypto projects thrive on the network effect. Accordingly, sufficient resources should be provided for the community to grow rapidly. This includes the production of engaging content as well as the quick answering of user questions via various channels.

While good marketing and community management don’t solve all problems, they are usually the pillars of success. There are many mediocre projects that hold a spot in the current top 100 largely because of their dedicated community.

7. No real use case

In my opinion, this is one of the main problems of many new crypto projects. People will only use new tech or product if it brings significantly greater value to them.

For example, Coingecko is currently tracking over 400 NFT projects. Now I don’t know how saturated the market is. But it seems to me that many new projects will have a hard time penetrating the market unless they have very strong partners.

And the same can be said for many new projects in other areas. For example, many projects issue their own tokens which do not add any value to the project or the users.

8. Bad user experience

This is a persisting problem that has multiple reasons.

One of them is crypto’s inherent complexity. Even one of the most technically capable people in the crypto space, Vitalik Buterin, recently admitted that using the technology is difficult.

Wallets, key management, and many different platforms make it difficult for beginners to find their way around.

In addition, there is often a bad user experience due to bad designs. Over the years, this has gotten much better, since various design standards have now proven their worth. However, this is not the case with many new crypto projects and users have to deal with products that are difficult to use.

Many providers try to simplify the user experience by cutting corners and centralizing certain functions — the opposite of what crypto should be.

9. Poor risk management and security issues

Each year, many crypto projects get hacked. Critical security incidents are poisonous, especially for new projects.

In one of my previous analyses, I found that after a crypto project is hacked, the value of its token decreases significantly. That by itself is not really surprising. But what I also found is that most of the time, the prices of affected projects never recover.

In some cases, a loyal user base will forgive established projects when security incidents occur. However, most new projects do not have this luxury. That’s why safety must be taken seriously from the very first minute.

Get the latest news here: Cointime channel — https://t.me/cointime_en

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Bitcoin ETF Sees $663.9 Million Net Inflow, Ethereum ETF Sees $127.4 Million Net Inflow

    On April 18, according to Farside Investors, the U.S. Bitcoin spot ETF saw a net inflow of $663.9 million yesterday, with IBIT net inflow at $284 million, FBTC net inflow at $163.4 million, and ARKB net inflow at $117.9 million. The Ethereum ETF recorded a net inflow of $127.4 million yesterday, marking the seventh consecutive day of net inflows, with ETHA net inflow at $30.8 million and FETH net inflow at $84.1 million.

  • Trump Hints at 'Good News' on Iran Issue

    On April 18, U.S. President Donald Trump stated that there is some 'pretty good news' regarding the Iran issue, but he declined to provide further details. 'We heard some pretty good news about 20 minutes ago, and it seems that progress related to Iran in the Middle East is going very smoothly,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. When asked what the so-called good news was, Trump replied, 'You will hear it. I think it is something that should happen. It is a matter of course. And I believe it will happen. We will see, but I think it will happen.' (Jinshi)

  • Trump Suggests War Will Resume if No Agreement with Iran is Reached

    On April 18, President Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that if an agreement with Iran is not reached by Wednesday, war will resume. When asked if he was prepared to extend the ceasefire agreement if no deal is made by the time the ceasefire expires on Wednesday, Trump replied, "Maybe I won't extend the ceasefire. But the blockade will continue. So, the blockade remains in place, and unfortunately, we will have to start dropping bombs again," Trump warned.

  • Chinese Ship Trapped in Strait of Hormuz Informs Crew to Prepare for Departure

    On April 18, according to Yicai, around 4 PM local time on the 17th, the Chinese ship trapped in the Strait of Hormuz has informed its crew to 'prepare for departure.' According to CCTV, on the afternoon of the 17th, Iranian Foreign Minister Amir-Abdollahian stated on social media that, based on the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, all commercial vessels are allowed to pass through the Strait of Hormuz completely open during the remaining time of the ceasefire, following the coordinated routes announced by Iranian ports and maritime organizations.

  • DeepSeek Seeks Over $300 Million in First Round of External Funding

    According to The Information, DeepSeek is seeking over $300 million in its first round of external funding, with a valuation exceeding $10 billion.

  • BTC Surpasses $78,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $78,000, currently priced at $78,024.64, with a 24-hour increase of 5.63%. The market is highly volatile, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • BTC Surpasses $77,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $77,000, currently priced at $77,022.24, with a 24-hour increase of 3.42%. Due to significant market fluctuations, please ensure proper risk management.

  • US and Iran Discuss Plan to End War

    On April 17, U.S. media reported, citing two American officials and two sources familiar with the negotiations, that the United States and Iran are communicating about a plan aimed at ending the war. One key topic is the U.S. potentially unfreezing $20 billion of Iran's frozen assets in exchange for Iran giving up its enriched uranium stockpile. The report also quoted another source familiar with the mediation efforts, stating that negotiations are expected to take place this Sunday in Islamabad, the capital of Pakistan. (Xinhua News Agency)

  • ETH Surpasses $2400

    Market data shows that ETH has surpassed $2400, currently priced at $2402.37, with a 24-hour increase of 2.58%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • US Plans to Unfreeze $20 Billion in Funds for Iran's Uranium Cessation

    On April 17, according to AXIOS, two US officials and two sources familiar with the negotiations revealed that the US and Iran are negotiating a three-page plan to end the conflict, one element of which involves the US unfreezing $20 billion of Iranian funds in exchange for Iran abandoning its enriched uranium stockpile. According to the two sources, in the early stages of negotiations, the US proposed unfreezing $6 billion for humanitarian supplies, while Iran requested $27 billion. The latest figures being discussed between the US and Iran are $20 billion. One US official stated that this is the US proposal. Another US official described the concept of 'cash for uranium' as 'one of many discussions.' Meanwhile, the US is demanding that Iran agree to send all its nuclear materials to the US, while Iran has only agreed to 'dilution' within its territory. Under the compromise being discussed, some highly enriched uranium would be sent to a third country (not necessarily the US), while some would be diluted under international supervision within Iran.