Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

CBDCs: How Dangerous Are Central Bank Digital Currencies?

Validated Individual Expert

Blockchain technology is ushering in a new form of currency and central banks are taking advantage of this.

Central Banks around the world are in the process of creating and implementing a new type of digital currency — Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDCs).

CBDCTracker.org

CBDCs are Worldwide

According to CBDC Tracker, almost all countries of the world are experimenting with CBDCs and are in various phases of development and implementation.

There are nine countries and territories that have already launched their CBDCs which include:

  • The Bahamas
  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • St. Kitts and Nevis
  • Monserrat
  • Dominica
  • Saint Lucia
  • St. Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Grenada
  • Nigeria

There are also +80 other countries with CBDC initiatives and projects underway and just recently a pilot CBDC program was launched by the New York Feds.

What is a Central Bank Digital Currency?

A Central Bank Digital Currency is an equivalent to digital cash, issued by a central bank and pegged to the value of the country's fiat currency.

Privacy Concerns of CBDCs

However, unlike physical cash, which has the ability to be transacted anonymously, digital cash is not anonymous and can be programmed. It is this programmability of digital cash which is of greatest concern.

The programmability of digital cash gives the power to (central) banks direct insight into purchases and the identities of the transacting parties as well as the ability to block or censor any transaction.

This new form of ‘digital cash’ may pose the single greatest threat to personal liberty and freedom in our lifetime.

Concerns of Programmable Digital Money

Due to the technological nature of ‘digital money’, much more control over its usage can be made when compared to traditional cash.

This is a new type of money that has many ‘features’ which have not been previously possible with traditional money.

CBDCs give the ability for (central) banks to block, censor, incentivize or discourage any type of transaction.

This can include:

- Capping Cash Balances

Banks have the ability to disincentive saving money by putting a cap on cash balances and then charging a negative interest rate on balances over the cap. While this may sound like science fiction, it is already in place in the Bahamas CBDC, (The Sand dollar).

- Specific Use Only

CBDCs could be programmed to only be spendable at certain retailers, during specific periods and/or only spendable by specific individuals.

- Negative Interest Rates

While it is common to expect a positive interest rate in your bank account, CBDCs can be programmed to include negative interest rates as a form of disincentive.

- Expiry Dates

Unlike traditional money, CBDCs could be programmed to expire after a specific date, in this way creating an incentive to spend it before it expires.

- Taxation per transaction

Mandatory taxation could be imposed on every CBDC transaction as a form of tax revenue for the state and could be imposed on all and every transaction.

The term ‘digital cash’ doesn’t fully encompass the possibilities available to (central) banks when they have the power to program money, effectively transforming this ‘digital money’ into a state-issued token, which then would only be able to be spent under their predefined conditions.

How Dangerous are CBDCs?

Central Bank Digital Currencies are a tool with the power to effectively turn digital money into a state-issued token.

CBDCs are set to be implemented across the world in each and every country which has an existing central bank.

This new form of digital money gives (central) banks a level of transactional granularity and control over the use of money which has never existed before.

While they may tout the benefits of digital money to help control the money supply and reduce illegal or illicit transactions, the freedom we once had to anonymously spend cash would be non-existent with this digital money.

Our ability to spend this ‘digital money’ would be at the discretion of the governing body and the level of programming embedded in the money.

November of this year is set to be the beginning of the ISO 20022 standard, a standard that will be used by central banks and financial institutions in the cross-border and international money movement and a key component of this new financial system.

While CBDCs have been touted as a means to fight fraud and enable greater financial stability, they also have the (likely) potential to be abused.

CBDCs have the potential to become the greatest single threat to personal liberty and freedom in our lifetime.

While it is likely we can do little to prevent the adoption and implementation of CBDCs by banks and world governments, as individuals we do have the power to educate ourselves and be well-prepared for this new global financial system.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • DMDAO Burns Nearly 35,000 Tokens Over the Past 7 Days, Bringing Total DMD Burned to Over 716,000

    On September 3, 2026, the latest on-chain data monitoring showed that from August 28 to September 3, 2026, the DMDAO distributed market-making protocol ecosystem maintained a high and stable level of activity, with a cumulative 34,928.27 DMD burned over the past 7 days.

  • Trump Shares Op-Ed Claiming He is Winning the War Against Iran

    On August 29, U.S. President Trump shared a commentary article from the New York Post on Truth Social on Saturday, which stated that he is winning the war against Iran and should maintain the current strategy. The title of the article Trump shared read: 'Trump is Winning the War Against Iran - Stay the Course.'

  • Morgan Stanley: 2028 as a Key Observation Point for Global Memory Competition Landscape

    On August 29, Morgan Stanley pointed out that the rise of Chinese memory manufacturers should not be viewed merely as a technological catch-up or low-cost substitution; what is truly noteworthy is that their production capacity may gradually become large enough to alter the supply structure of the global memory market. Changxin Technology and Yangtze Memory Technologies are currently entering the mainstream product market and gradually extending into high-profit markets such as HBM, high-end server DRAM, and enterprise SSDs. Morgan Stanley considers 2028 as an important observation point for the global memory competition landscape. From 2026 to 2027, demand for AI servers, capacity crowding of advanced wafers by HBM, import substitution, and the time required for customer certification may absorb most of the new supply from Chinese memory manufacturers. By 2028, as Chinese manufacturers expand production, the additional capacity from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron, which had previously initiated expansions, will also be released. At that time, the supply variables in the global memory market will significantly increase. Morgan Stanley estimates that Changxin's DRAM monthly production capacity will rise from 180,000 wafers in 2025 to 300,000 in 2026, accounting for approximately 13% of global DRAM wafer capacity and about 11% of bit shipments; by 2028, it is expected to further increase to 500,000 wafers, and by 2031, it could reach 800,000 wafers. If the expansion proceeds smoothly, Changxin's global DRAM bit shipment market share could approach 15% by 2030, and it may even have the opportunity to surpass Micron in production capacity around 2028, becoming the third-largest DRAM supplier in the world.

  • US Spot Ethereum ETF Sees Net Inflow of $102.17 Million Yesterday

    On August 29, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Ethereum ETF recorded a net inflow of $102.17 million yesterday.

  • US Spot Ethereum ETF Sees Net Inflow of $102.17 Million

    On August 29, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Ethereum ETF experienced a net inflow of $102.17 million yesterday.

  • US Spot Bitcoin ETF Sees Net Outflow of $201.81 Million

    On August 29, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Bitcoin ETF experienced a net outflow of $201.81 million yesterday.

  • US Spot Bitcoin ETF Sees Net Outflow of $201.81 Million Yesterday

    On August 29, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Bitcoin ETF experienced a net outflow of $201.81 million yesterday.

  • BTC Surpasses $78,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $78,000, currently priced at $78,009.49. The 24-hour decline has narrowed to 3.23%. Due to significant market fluctuations, please ensure proper risk management.

  • BTC Surpasses $78,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $78,000, currently priced at $78,009.49, with a 24-hour decline narrowing to 3.23%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • BTC Briefly Drops Below $77,000

    Market data shows that BTC briefly fell below $77,000, currently reported at $77,694, with a 24-hour decline of 3.3%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.