Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

How You Can Know Cathie Woods Is Wrong About Bitcoin

Cathie Woods recently called for 1 million Bitcoin by 2030. Nobody knows what Bitcoin will be worth in 2030. Many influencers and fin media “experts” have been known to make wildly inaccurate predictions and are never held to account. Jim Cramer is wrong so often that many have poked fun at him with the meme “inverse Cramer” trending. On the other hand, there are some people who can call markets somewhat accurately — in fact, I called but did not publish many accurate market calls or predictions. The question is how can you distinguish the fake experts from the real experts? How can you differentiate nonsense speculations from accurate speculations? Read on to learn how.

Principle #1 Falsifiable Statement

A prediction must be encoded into a falsifiable statement or set of probabilistic statements before it can be tested. David Aronson, in his book, “Evidence-Based Technical Analysis” faulted much of technical analysis because it wasn’t falsifiable. Many market calls are not actually predictions because the statements themselves cannot be falsified. Vague calls or calls without timeframes cannot be tested. In this case, Cathie Woods statement can be tested and thus is a prediction.

Principle #2 Feedback

Malcom Gladwell of “Outliers” fame, published that he discovered that it takes about 10,000 hours of deliberate practice to achieve expertise and that holds true across diverse endeavors. However, for practice to be meaningful one must get meaningful and responsive feedback.

When “experts” make rare predictions, like where Bitcoin, will be in 8 years we know that there one simply cannot gain enough feedback with predictions like that to develop meaningful expertise. And, true to form, the predictions I made that were accurate were only 1–2 days duration and were made in real-time.

Some people like to crow when they call the top or bottom in markets. While they may have did that accurately once or twice, we should be skeptical that they have developed any true expertise in doing that because there simply isn’t enough feedback to develop expertise. On the other hand, we may give more weight if the calls are on shorter time frames where feedback is possible.

This is the second litmus test — is the prediction of a nature that one can gain sufficient feedback to develop expertise?

Principle #3 Explainable Model

Good predictions should derive from explainable models. The most explainable models are surely quantitative models with specific rules that can be tested. However, expertise can also benefit from qualitative factors and it is possible to develop expertise without the ability to elucidate the specific rules that govern the insight.

I do not recall Cathie Woods offering any specific model as to why Bitcoin should be 1 million by 2030. Indeed, by referencing a model, it invites others to be able to better question your work.

Principle #4 Costs of being wrong

Any good model should elucidate the costs of being wrong. Some influencers have called market tops or bottoms somewhat “accurately” but never specified a stop loss or condition where they would be wrong. A market call with no understanding of the costs is not a good market call. We can only assume someone is willing to assume a 100% loss if they do not provide a stop loss in a call. Think about what that means, if someone is willing to incur a 100% loss — even if they make 100% on their call they have only made about as much as they risked. That’s not to say stops are always required — but we need to understand the cost of being wrong to understand the value of a call.

Likewise, if someone is betting on a long shot event and Bitcoin is just 1 out of 100 other long shot plays, one needs to understand this to understand the value of a speculation.

Principle #5 What if…

Markets are complex. With long odds plays, in order demonstrate one has factored in the complexities, they should be able to answer when or where they might be wrong. A market call that one will stick with no matter what has little value. A great example is Michael Saylor — there is no “what if..” with his position. It will eventually work or it won’t. He is unwilling to accept any alternative.

What if — a superior technology comes along compared to Bitcoin?

What if — governments impose regressive regulations on Bitcoin?

What if — a central bank digital currency is offered?

A forecast unlike a prediction offers a range of possibilities based on the complexities of reality.

Will Bitcoin Be A Million Dollars By 2030?

The reality is that smart people get things wrong all the time. Expertise rarely transfers across disciplines. This type of prediction or speculation fails most of our tests: it is not a reasoned speculation but a wild speculation. It might be or it might not be but the speculation itself is wild. The key questions one must ask are: What model are you using to project that? What ifs have you considered? What is the risk to reward analysis have you considered?

BTC
Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • BuildBear Labs Raises $1.9M to Accelerate Development of Web3 Tools for Secure dApp Creation

    Singapore-based BuildBear Labs has secured $1.9m in funding from investors including Superscrypt, Tribe Capital, and 1kx, as well as angel investors such as Kris Kaczor and Ken Fromm. The funds will be used to speed up development of the company's flagship platform, which provides developers with testing and validation solutions for secure decentralized applications. BuildBear Labs' platform is dedicated to dApp development and testing, offering developers the ability to create customised Private Testnet sandboxes across multiple EVM and EVM-compatible blockchain networks, with features including private faucets for unlimited Native and ERC20 token minting.

  • Multiple incidents of stETH being stolen and cross-chained to the Blast mainnet were discovered. The victim’s mnemonic words/private keys may have been leaked.

    SlowMist founder, Yu Xian, posted on X platform stating that SlowMist and MistTrack have received at least four cases of stETH being stolen and cross-chain transferred to the Blast mainnet. The common feature is that a small amount of ETH transaction fee is sent from an address with obvious traces (including exchanges) to the stolen address, and then stETH is cross-chain transferred to the Blast mainnet for subsequent transfer, and finally the remaining small amount of ETH in the victim's address is transferred to different ETH addresses. The known loss exceeds 100 stETH, and it is likely a group event. The mnemonic phrase/private key of these victims must have been leaked, and the attackers lurked to start on the Blast mainnet. Previously, Scam Sniffer monitoring showed that a certain address lost over 10 BTC pledged on Aave and some PANDORA due to interaction (clicking on the signature authorization) with a fake Blast airdrop website, with a total loss of approximately $717,817.

  • Hong Kong has closed the application for virtual asset trading platform licenses, and a total of 22 virtual asset trading platforms are waiting for approval.

    The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission website shows that the deadline for virtual asset trading platform license applications was yesterday (29th). As of the update on February 28th, there were a total of 22 virtual asset trading platform applicants.The applicants include Bybit, OKX, Crypto.com, Gate.io, HTX, Bullish, and others.Ammbr, BitHarbour, and Huobi HK withdrew their applications, while Meex had its application returned by the Securities and Futures Commission.In addition, virtual asset trading platforms operating in Hong Kong that did not submit license applications to the Securities and Futures Commission by yesterday (29th) must end their business in Hong Kong by May 31, 2024, at the latest.

  • In February, NFT sales on the Bitcoin chain were approximately US$301 million, down nearly 10% from the previous month.

    According to cryptoslam data, the sales of NFTs on the Bitcoin blockchain in February reached $301,983,035.33, a decrease of nearly 10% from the previous month's $335,121,977.66, and the fourth-highest monthly sales to date. The total number of NFT transactions on the Bitcoin blockchain in February was approximately 203,000, a decrease of about 18.4% from the previous month. In addition, there were 67,139 independent buyers and 57,724 independent sellers of NFTs on the Bitcoin blockchain last month.

  • Attorneys general of many U.S. states: SEC is expanding the definition of “investment contract”

    Law enforcement officials from Montana, Arkansas, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota, and Texas submitted a joint amicus brief (or friend of the court brief) to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in the lawsuit against Kraken on Thursday. The brief states that the states are not supporting the exchange, but rather opposing federal regulatory agencies. If the SEC wins, it may prioritize state consumer protection laws and state regulations surrounding cryptocurrencies.

  • Ethereum mainnet interaction costs rise sharply

    On March 1st, due to the heat of the market and the rise in the price of Ethereum, the interaction cost on the Ethereum mainnet has significantly increased. In the past 24 hours, the lowest average value of Gas on the Ethereum mainnet was about 50 gwei, under which:

  • Blockchain data analysis company Octav completes US$4 million in strategic financing

    According to official sources, blockchain data analysis company Octav has announced the completion of a strategic investment of $4 million. The funding round was led by high net worth individuals in the cryptocurrency space, but their identities have not been disclosed. Currently, Octav is primarily focused on unlocking the potential of on-chain data using machine learning technology to improve the accuracy of data labeling and classification. Its clients include Gelato, Request Finance, and Alchemix.

  • Validation Cloud raises $5.8M in funding for its Web3 technology platform.

    Swiss Web3 tech company, Validation Cloud, has secured $5.8 million in its inaugural funding round. The investment was led by Cadenza Ventures, with participation from Blockchain Founders Fund, Bloccelerate, Blockwall, Side Door Ventures, Metamatic, GS Futures, and AP Capital. The funds will be used to expand the company's operations and development efforts. Validation Cloud's innovative system architecture, dubbed the "Cloudflare of Web3," provides scalable and intelligent Staking, Node API, and Data services, supporting a range of ecosystems from established networks like Chainlink and Hedera to emerging ones such as Aptos, Eigenlayer, and Berachain, laying the groundwork for enterprise adoption.

  • The daily trading volume of spot Bitcoin ETF is approximately US$4.7 billion, the second highest in history

    According to Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart's data, as of Thursday's US stock market close, the daily trading volume of the US spot Bitcoin ETF was about $4.7 billion, lower than the historical high of $7.7 billion set the previous day, ranking the second highest in history. Among them:

  • AI robot company Figure completed US$675 million in financing at a valuation of US$2.6 billion, with participation from Microsoft and others

    AI robot company Figure completed a financing round of $675 million with a valuation of $2.6 billion. This round of financing was participated by Microsoft, OpenAI Startup Fund, NVIDIA, Jeff Bezos (through Bezos Expedition), Parkway Venture Capital, Intel Capital, and Align Ventures.