Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Chain Research — How Can Blockchain Technology Be Applied to Chain of Custody?

Validated Project

The legal system was designed as a tool used to achieve justice and protect the rights of its citizens. But too often, this system is slow to adapt to the changing needs of society, leaving many without recourse and denied of their rights. The failure of the legal system to recognize and implement necessary reforms leaves an imperishable mark on the lives of individuals throughout the nation.

While the criminal justice system serves an essential obligation for society as a whole, it’s important to acknowledge its flaws. A recent study revealed that out of the 2.3 million people serving time in prison, 11,500 of those individuals are innocent of a crime they did not commit.

Even more alarming is the fact that every year, an average of over two people per day are wrongfully convicted and sentenced to jail time. Although this number seems trivial, it is important to address that every wrongful conviction represents not only a grave injustice to the innocent, but also a missed opportunity to bring the true perpetrator to justice.

The legal system is a long-standing institution that cannot be easily reformed overnight. Nevertheless, making small adjustments in how forensic evidence is handled can significantly aid in the battle against wrongful convictions. A significant issue in the justice system is the improper management of crucial forensic evidence, particularly in the chain of custody.

The chain of custody procedure is a critical element of handling crime scene evidence, from the moment it is collected until it is presented in a court of law. It involves multiple handovers of the evidence, with interested parties logging the evidence in and out of storage and creating a paper trail to record its movements. However, this process is susceptible to multiple human-errors, and defense attorneys have the ability to challenge the integrity of the evidence.

Chain of custody errors can occur during any moment of evidence management, and can include several different mistakes. For example, a contaminated crime scene may occur if law enforcement fails to properly secure it, which could lead to evidence being contaminated by people who are not authorized to handle it. Law enforcement may also fail to properly document evidence, including where it was found and who it was found on, which could cause confusion or misidentification of the evidence. Improper handling and storage of evidence are other potential mistakes that can occur.

The integrity of the chain of custody is crucial in ensuring that the evidence presented in court is reliable and untainted. Any errors in the chain of custody can seriously compromise a defendant’s right to a fair trial, as it may result in the admission of unreliable or tampered evidence. If such errors are identified in a case, an attorney may file a motion to suppress the flawed evidence, preventing it from being used in the courtroom. In some cases, even minor chain of custody issues can be presented to the jury to consider when determining a defendant’s guilt.

Lack of adherence to proper procedures in the chain of custody can lead to wrongful convictions or even acquittals. This can have devastating consequences for both the accused and the justice system as a whole. In order to prevent chain of custody errors and maintain the fairness of the legal system, it’s essential to establish and enforce clear guidelines for the handling and preservation of evidence. Failure to do so can erode public trust in the justice system, and compromise the rights of those who find themselves entangled in it.

However, with the rapid adoption of emerging technologies, the implementation of blockchain could potentially address these issues by creating and tracking unique evidence tokens for each piece of data that is collected. These tokens can be stored and audited on a public or private blockchain, providing transparency, immutability, and traceability to the chain of custody process.

How can blockchain technology verify the authenticity of evidence?

Blockchain technology is a decentralized digital ledger that records transactions in a secure and tamper-proof manner. The decentralized technology can be utilized to maintain the integrity of the evidence in various ways. To start, blockchain can create an immutable and transparent chain of custody for evidence by recording every transfer of custody. Each transfer is verified and recorded by the network of nodes, making it almost impossible to alter the records without being detected. The tamper-proof nature of blockchain ensures that the original source of the evidence can be traced with complete transparency.

Secondly, blockchain’s cryptographic security provides an extra layer of protection against data manipulation. Blockchain utilizes a complex algorithm to encrypt the data and authenticate the transaction. Again, each transaction is verified by a network of nodes, and once it is recorded, it becomes a permanent part of the blockchain network. Any attempt to alter or manipulate the data is detected and rejected by the network, ensuring the integrity of the evidence.

Finally, blockchain technology can provide real-time access to information linked to the chain of custody. This means that authorized parties can access the chain of custody records at any time, making it easier to manage and track the evidence throughout the legal process. This can save time and resources while ensuring the integrity of the evidence at trial.

What are the limitations of implementing blockchain technology in the legal system?

As with any new technology, there are challenges and limitations associated with implementing blockchain for chain of custody in the legal system. Here are some of the key obstacles that must be considered before blockchain can become a viable solution for chain of custody:

I. Technical barriers:

Blockchain is a complex technology that requires a considerable amount of technical expertise to implement successfully. This can pose a challenge for legal organizations that may not have the necessary technical skills or resources to deploy and maintain the technology.

II. Regulatory and legal issues:

The regulatory and legal framework is another critical barrier to the implementation of blockchain technology. The legal industry is highly regulated, and the use of new technology must comply with existing regulations. This can create a significant challenge for organizations that want to implement blockchain technology, as there may be a lack of clear guidance or uncertainty regarding how the technology can be applied within the legal framework. This challenge is compounded by the fact that blockchain technology is still relatively new, and there is limited case law and precedent around its use.

III. Resistance to change:

The legal industry is known to be conservative and slow to adopt new technologies. Many legal professionals are hesitant to adopt new technology, and there may be resistance to change from those who are comfortable with traditional methods of chain of custody. This resistance can pose a significant challenge for organizations that want to implement blockchain technology.

Advocating for Justice and Innovation with REFORM

With over 11,500 innocent people incarcerated and more than two wrongful convictions per day, small strides towards the proper management of forensic evidence, especially in the chain of custody, can have a significant impact on thousands of lives.

Although the implementation of blockchain technology in the legal system may take years, organizations like the Innocence Project and REFORM Alliance are actively advocating for exonerations and sentencing reform programs in the U.S.A. The REFORM Alliance collaborates with policymakers to achieve evidence-based reforms and meaningful change in the criminal justice system.

Chain Gives is a blockchain-based relief organization that is committed to aiding social justice and humanitarian causes. Chain Gives is determined to bring hope and equality to those who have been adversely affected by the criminal justice system through their long-standing solidarity and support for the REFORM Alliance. To learn more about Chain Gives, and their mission to create an ethical and more connected world, visit www.chain.com/company/chain-gives.

About Chain

Chain is a blockchain infrastructure solution company that has been on a mission to enable a smarter and more connected economy since 2014. Chain offers builders in the Web3 industry services that help streamline the process of developing, and maintaining their blockchain infrastructures. Chain implements a SaaS model for its products that addresses the complexities of overall blockchain management. Chain offers a variety of products such as Ledger, Cloud, and NFTs as a service. Companies who choose to utilize Chain’s services will be able to free up resources for developers and cut costs so that clients can focus on their own products and customer experience. 

Read more: https://medium.com/@chaininc/chain-research-how-can-blockchain-technology-be-applied-to-chain-of-custody-429f294ad3ef

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Hedge Fund Net Exposure to US Tech Giants Reaches Record High of 22%

    On October 10, according to data from Goldman Sachs and The Kobeissi Letter, investor sentiment towards large tech stocks has reached an all-time high. Hedge fund net exposure to the 'Big Seven' tech giants in the US has risen to 22%, marking a historic peak; this figure has surged by 7 percentage points since July, representing the largest three-month increase in 2023, and surpassing the previous high of 21% set in June 2024 (compared to only 8% during the bear market low in 2022). During the same period, hedge fund net exposure to semiconductor stocks in the US has increased to 12%, slightly below the peak of 14% in June 2026, while this metric was only 2% at the beginning of 2025.

  • Anthropic Reveals Internal Issues: Out-of-Control AI Attempted to Access Multiple Government Websites, Reported to the White House

    Anthropic stated on Friday that its AI agents acted autonomously, attempting to access various federal, state, and local government websites. The company did not disclose which government agencies were involved but confirmed that it has reported these incidents to the White House. In a blog post, Anthropic mentioned that one of its AI models under testing had taken several unauthorized actions, including exploiting a vulnerability on a university website to download data and submitting a form to a government agency that it had been explicitly instructed not to submit. The company noted that it discovered these incidents after beginning a review of the AI's actions in July. Earlier on Friday, the Philadelphia Police Department stated that Anthropic had notified them that its technology had submitted a false homicide tip to the police website.

  • No Flights Departing or Arriving at Riyadh's King Khalid Airport Following Explosion Sounds

    On October 10, according to CCTV International News, witnesses reported that explosion sounds were heard at Terminal 3 of King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia, this afternoon, leading to the evacuation of personnel from the airport. Flight tracking website 'FlightRadar24' indicates that there are currently no flights departing or arriving at the airport, and some flights heading to Riyadh have been diverted or returned. King Khalid International Airport has issued a traveler advisory, recommending that passengers contact their airlines to confirm flight status before heading to the airport.

  • BTC Surpasses $83,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $83,000, currently priced at $83,020.19, with a 24-hour decline of 0.2%. The market is experiencing significant fluctuations, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • ETH Surpasses $2500

    Market data shows that ETH has surpassed $2500, currently priced at $2500.03, with a 24-hour increase of 0.33%. The market is experiencing significant fluctuations, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Houthi Forces Claim Saudi Airstrikes on Sana'a Airport in Yemen

    On October 10, according to information released by the Houthi forces in Yemen, on the afternoon of the same day local time, the Saudi-led coalition conducted airstrikes on Sana'a International Airport, which is under the control of the Houthi forces, dropping four bombs. Additionally, the Saudi coalition also targeted a communication facility in Hajjah Province, controlled by the Houthi forces, dropping three bombs. There has been no response from the Saudi side regarding these incidents. (Jinshi)

  • French Finance Committee Approves Amendments on Stablecoin Exchange Tax and Crypto Exit Tax

    On October 10, Decrypt reported that the Finance Committee of the French National Assembly approved two amendments related to cryptocurrency taxation this week: starting January 1, 2027, exchanges of stablecoins regulated under MiCA will be considered taxable sales; and an exit tax will be imposed on taxpayers who have been French tax residents for at least six of the past ten years and have moved abroad with crypto assets totaling over 800,000 euros. On October 9, the committee voted 31 to 3 to reject the budget revenue portion, and the full National Assembly will review based on the government's original text. The amendments will not be automatically included; supporters must reintroduce them during the debate starting on October 13, with a formal vote scheduled for October 20. The related measures have not yet become law. The stablecoin amendment was proposed by Nicolas Sansu, a member of the left-wing GDR party group, along with 16 co-signers, and does not set a new tax rate but aims to include the revenue under France's existing 31.4% flat tax system. The committee also passed an amendment allowing crypto asset losses to be carried forward for ten years to offset future gains.

  • Luxshare Precision: Company and Luxshare Technology Involved in 337 Investigation, Currently in Initial Filing Stage

    On October 10, Luxshare Precision announced that the company and its holding subsidiary, Dongguan Luxshare Technology Co., Ltd., have been listed as respondents in a 337 investigation by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), involving U.S. Patent US 10,903,700. The ITC officially launched the investigation on October 9, 2026, with investigation number 337-TA-1526. The case is currently in the initial filing stage, and no substantial determination has been made regarding the relevant infringement claims. The products involved are in the customer verification stage and have not yet entered mass production.

  • South Korea's Financial Commission: Shareholding Restrictions for Exchange Major Shareholders Not Targeting Specific Companies

    On October 10, Lee Ik-yeon, chairman of the Financial Services Commission of South Korea, stated that the provisions regarding shareholding restrictions for major shareholders of virtual asset exchanges in the ongoing 'Basic Law on Digital Assets' are not aimed at specific individuals or companies. Instead, they are designed to ensure that exchanges, once institutionalized, bear a higher level of public responsibility. Currently, South Korean virtual asset exchanges operate under a system that requires updates every three years, but this will transition to a licensing system after the implementation of the 'Basic Law on Digital Assets.' Lee emphasized that exchanges have infrastructure attributes and must possess public accountability and responsibility commensurate with their status.

  • SVRN Acquires Infrastructure Platform FastNEAR

    On October 10, it was officially announced that NEAR Treasury Company SVRN has acquired the NEAR infrastructure platform FastNEAR. FastNEAR will join SVRN as a wholly-owned subsidiary, with its co-founders Evgeny (Eugene) Kuzyakov and Mike Purvis also joining the SVRN team. The announcement stated that FastNEAR is a high-performance RPC infrastructure provider behind NEAR applications and supports most of the data layer for NEAR, including server clusters for handling network read and write operations, archival infrastructure for storing complete transaction histories, and NEARDATA, a data source for developers to process these historical records.