Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Zero-Knowledge Proof in Blockchain Explained | Quillaudits

Validated Project

Table of Contents:

  1. What is Zero-Knowledge Proof?
  2. History of Zero-Knowledge Proof
  3. Types of Zero-Knowledge Proof
  4. Working of Zero-Knowledge Proofs
  5. Zero-Knowledge Applications in Blockchain
  6. Zero-Knowledge Proofing Techniques
  7. ZK Rollups (ETH Scaling)
  8. ZK Based Privacy Protocols

What is Zero-Knowledge Proof?

A zero-knowledge proof is a way of proving if a certain statement is true or not without actually revealing the statement itself. Here, the ‘prover’ is the party trying to prove a claim, while the ‘verifier’ is responsible for validating the claim.

In Simpler Terms, Zero-knowledge proof (ZK proof) technologies enable one party to prove to another party that they know something without actually sharing the information with another party in order to prove their knowledge.

A Use Case:Let's Suppose I want to take a loan, But don’t want to reveal my financial history to banks. Using Zero-Knowledge proof, bank will be able to verify my financial history (e.g. credit score, proof of residence, account payments, and real estate) without knowing any specific data about those assets.

History of Zero Knowledge Proofs?

Zero-knowledge proofs were first devised by MIT researchers Shafi Goldwasser, Silvio Micali, and Charles Rackoff in a 1985 paper, “The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof-Systems”. The paper introduced key concepts including an interactive proof (IP) hierarchy and conceived the concept of knowledge complexity, a measure to see how much proof is transferred from the prover to the verifier.

Perhaps most importantly, they gave the first zero-knowledge proof for a concrete problem when they demonstrated how to construct ZKPs for any NP-set, with any commitment scheme.

Types of Zero Knowledge Proofs?

The two fundamental types of ZKPs include the following:

  1. Interactive ZeroKnowledge Proofs: In Interactive ZKP, The verifier challenges the prover who provides replies to these challenges until the verifier is convinced. They need to be simultaneously online and the prover must complete a series of actions to convince the verifier about a specific fact.
  2. Non-Interactive ZeroKnowledge Proofs: Non-interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs do not require an interactive process between the prover and verifier. The prover delivers the proof to the verifier and the proof can be verified by the verifier only once at any time. It requires more computational power as compared to Interactive Zero Knowledge Proof.

Working of Zero-Knowledge Proof:

In basic form, a zero-knowledge proof is made up of three elements: witness(confidential Info), challenge, and response.

  • Witness: With a zero-knowledge proof, the prover wants to prove knowledge of some hidden information. The secret information is the “witness” to the proof, and the prover’s assumed knowledge of the witness establishes a set of questions that can only be answered by a party with knowledge of the information. Thus, the prover starts the proving process by randomly choosing a question, calculating the answer, and sending it to the verifier.
  • Challenge: The verifier randomly picks another question from the set and asks the prover to answer it.
  • Response: The prover accepts the question, calculates the answer, and returns it to the verifier. The prover’s response allows the verifier to check if the former really has access to the witness. To ensure the prover isn’t guessing blindly and getting the correct answers by chance, the verifier picks more questions to ask. By repeating this interaction many times, the possibility of the prover faking knowledge of the witness drops significantly until the verifier is satisfied.

The Application of Zero Knowledge Proof in BlockChains?

There are many applications of Zero Knowledge Proof, In this blog, we will be covering applications of ZK in Block Chains:

  • Private transactions on blockchains: Transaction data is encrypted and proof posted to prove it was computed correctly. ZKPs are also used in private transactions that do not reveal monetary data and receiver and sender information. An example is Tornado Cash, a decentralized, non-custodial service that allows users to conduct private transactions on Ethereum
  • Performance optimizations: Application code is executed off-chain, or by a single node on the blockchain network, and only proof of its correct execution is posted to the blockchain for other parties to verify its correctness. An example is ZK Rollups, where transactions are executed off-chain and finally, a summary of all transactions is then submitted on-chain.
  • Transferring private blockchain transactions: The most notable concern in private blockchain transactions is the numerous loopholes evident in conventional procedures. The productive integration of ZKP with private blockchain transactions can create a powerful hacker-proof process.
  • Data Security and Privacy: Organizations that control sensitive data, such as banks and hospitals, must keep them free from third-party access. ZKPs and blockchain together can make accessing data impossible.

Zero-knowledge Proofing technologies:

1. zk-SNARK

SNARK stands for “zero-knowledge succinct non-interactive argument on knowledge.” A SNARK is a type of cryptographic proof that is small in size and easy to verify. SNARKs generate a cryptographic proof using elliptical curves, which assume that it’s infeasible to find the discrete logarithm of a random elliptic curve element from a publicly known base point. Computing elliptic curves are less computationally expensive than computing hashing functions used by STARKs, which is why SNARK-based protocols can be more gas efficient.

2. zk-STARKS

STARKS stands for “zero-knowledge scalable transparent argument of knowledge.” It’s a type of cryptographic proof that requires little to no interaction between the prover and the verifier. The key advantages of STARKs over SNARKs are that they have fast prover times and are easier to scale as they offer more computing power. Also, using hash functions makes them quantum resistant.

3. Bulletproofs

Bulletproofs are short, non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs that can convince a verifier that an encrypted value lies within a stated range without disclosing any information about the number.Bulletproofs is a type of range proof that employs zero-knowledge proofing techniques similar to those seen in zkSNARKs and zkSTARKs. Like zkSTARKs, bulletproofs do not require an initial trusted setup ceremony or procedure. Also, they are smaller than zkSTARKs and have significant efficiency and security.

zk-Rollups

Rollups are Layer 2 protocols built on top of Ethereum. Rollups process transactions off-chain, primarily on a rollup-specific chain, and then batch, compress, and deliver the transaction data to the main Ethereum chain. Shifting computation off-chain helps reduce congestion on Ethereum and reduce overall gas costs for users.

ZK Rollups Projects:

zkSync

Loopring

Polygon Hermez

ZK- Based Privacy Protocols

Zero-knowledge proofs power several privacy protocols today due to their non-disclosure feature. With ZK-proofs, users can currently transact on privacy-enabled blockchains and post proofs that confirm that their transactions are valid, and don’t reveal any extra info.

Popular privacy coin, Zcash, uses zk-SNARK cryptography to restore blockchain anonymity for its users and give them control over their transaction information. For instance, when a Zcash user sends coins to another Zcash user, the only available proof of their privacy-enabled transaction comes with zero knowledge. A third-party observer cannot find any additional information about the nature of the transaction, nor the parties and amounts involved.

ZK- Based Privacy Projects:

Zcash

Tornado Cash

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • BTC Surpasses $84,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $84,000, currently priced at $84,035.16, with a 24-hour increase of 1.16%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Zelensky Responds to Trump's Russia-Ukraine Ceasefire Statement: Ukraine Will Agree if Russia Accepts Energy Ceasefire

    According to Axios, Ukrainian President Zelensky stated that Trump's ceasefire statement was also a surprise to him. Ukraine will agree if Russia accepts an energy ceasefire.

  • CryptoBillis Ledger Attacker Deposits $3.89 Million in Crypto Assets to Binance

    On October 11, the attacker of CryptoBillis Ledger deposited approximately $3.89 million in crypto assets to Binance over the past two days, including 3.685 million USDT and 615,000 TRX (about $204,000). This attacker had previously stolen over $90 million in crypto assets. (PeckShieldAlert)

  • KillaXBT: BTC May Surge Before Midterm Elections, Drop After, Historical Probability 75% Bearish

    On October 11, Killa (@KillaXBT), a user on X, shared his perspective that the ideal path for BTC is to rise before the midterm elections, establishing a bullish narrative and surpassing previous highs. Following this, he anticipates a pullback post-election, similar to past cycles, but with higher lows instead of new cycle lows. He believes that if there is a decline before the elections, it is more likely to rise towards $95,000 afterward. Citing data, he noted that nearly $2 billion in long positions were just liquidated, with only three weeks until the midterm elections. Historically, in four midterm elections, three have seen bearish trends emerge one to two months after the elections, giving a probability of 75%. He stated that the worst-case scenario would be a price rebound leading into the elections, followed by a reversal that traps the other side before de-risking. He believes that the narrative for one side has already been liquidated, and the current exposure of shorts is higher than that of longs. The author claims to still hold 10x long positions and longs established at 62.6K and 76.4K, with all positions fully allocated and not closed. This represents his personal trading view and is not an objective event.

  • Argentine Central Bank Indicates Cryptocurrencies May Open to Banks

    On October 11, the Argentine Central Bank stated that during Milei's second term, cryptocurrencies may be opened to banks, lifting a ban that has been in place for four years.

  • Trump: Russia and Ukraine Agree to 'Energy Ceasefire'

    On October 11, U.S. President Trump announced that an 'energy ceasefire' has been reached in the Russia-Ukraine war, effective immediately. Both sides have agreed not to disrupt it.

  • CITIC Securities: Hong Kong Stocks' Fundamentals Expected to Have Bottomed Out

    On October 11, CITIC Securities' research report pointed out that for Hong Kong stocks, although the overseas interest rate hike cycle combined with the restart of AI-driven trading continues to pressure liquidity, the fundamental expectations have bottomed out, and the earnings growth expectations for major broad-based indices have begun to be revised upwards. There is a significant divergence in the adjustment of industry earnings expectations, with some specific sectors seeing upward revisions, while industries related to domestic demand still face downward pressure on earnings expectations. The upcoming third-quarter performance will be an important basis for assessing the progress of recovery. The report advises investors to maintain patience with Hong Kong stocks, expecting that short-term dividend strategies will continue to outperform.

  • Five Major U.S. TV Networks Boycott White House Coverage; DOJ Launches Antitrust Investigation

    On October 11, the U.S. Department of Justice announced it is investigating whether five television networks, including CNN, violated federal antitrust laws. This follows President Trump's ban on reporters from CNN and two other news organizations from entering the White House for coverage, prompting these five major media outlets to collectively boycott and refuse to report on White House activities in solidarity with the banned reporters. The antitrust division of the DOJ is examining CNN, NBC, CBS, Fox News, and ABC. These news organizations have formed a television broadcasting alliance to jointly cover presidential activities and share video footage. The DOJ stated that the members of this television press corps are boycotting White House coverage; such collective boycott actions among business competitors may violate the Sherman Antitrust Act. The antitrust division is investigating to determine if these news organizations have violated antitrust laws. Last month, Trump barred reporters from CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from entering the White House, citing that their coverage was unfavorable to him. Following this, major television networks suspended joint reporting. When CNN was removed from its scheduled coverage of Trump at the United Nations General Assembly, other networks refused to take its place.

  • Zelensky: Will Organize Ukrainian Elections if Putin Agrees to 60-Day Ceasefire

    On October 11, according to ABC News, Ukrainian President Zelensky responded to U.S. President Trump, stating that he would organize Ukrainian elections if Russian President Putin agrees to a 60-day ceasefire.

  • CITIC Securities: Hong Kong Stocks' Fundamentals Expected to Have Reached Bottom

    On October 11, CITIC Securities' research report indicated that for Hong Kong stocks, although the overseas interest rate hike cycle combined with the restart of AI-driven trading continues to pressure liquidity, the fundamental expectations have reached a bottom, and the earnings growth expectations for major broad-based indices have begun to be revised upward. There is a significant divergence in the adjustment of industry earnings expectations, with some specific sectors seeing upward revisions, while earnings expectations in domestic demand-related industries still face downward pressure. The upcoming third-quarter performance will be an important basis for assessing the progress of recovery. The report advises investors to maintain patience with Hong Kong stocks, expecting that short-term dividend strategies will still outperform.