Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Will Crypto and DeFi Collapse With Binance?

Validated Individual Expert

It was my first job out of college, and I was required to wear a suit to rent cars. The job was not enjoyable. I worked long hours, had to wash cars by hand, and dealt with the public. The pay was shit, and I was miserable. But I was a competent worker. I showed up on time, upsold the optional insurance like I was supposed to, and followed orders like a good soldier.

At this particular company, they baited people like me with a carrot of career advancement. You started at the bottom and could climb to the top with hard work. I went along with it for one year when my career path hit an impassable roadblock.

I arrived in the office Monday morning, and my manager and area manager called me into the office. They were both men. They started asking me about what I had done over the weekend. Then, they asked me why I called my assistant manager, Katrina, and left an obscene message.

Completely taken aback, I explained how I had visited some friends over the weekend. We went to the Indian (Native American) casino, and I won money playing blackjack. I even bought a watch with my winnings which I was wearing that day.

They weren't buying it. In the voice message, they said I announced who I was and said some pretty nasty stuff. I asked them if I could hear the message. They said no, but that the person sounded exactly like me. I asked about the caller ID, and they said it came from a random number.

They didn't believe me. The female assistant manager didn't believe me. They said that she didn't feel comfortable being alone with me in the office. From that day forward, my career path at this company was destroyed. I never got a promotion and, shortly after that, left the company.

The Aftermath

I know who left the message impersonating me. But, just as I denied that I left the message, I'm sure he would have denied it if I confronted him.

I took away three main things from this incident over 20 years ago. First, I learned sometimes you don't need to commit a crime to be considered guilty. Second, I learned that interacting with women in a work environment is dangerous and that co-workers will set you up. And I realized that no matter how hard I worked, how often I showed up on time, and how much unnecessary insurance I sold, the corporation didn't give two shits about me.

In 2022, I'm getting deja vu about the last lesson. As crypto investors, we have had our money stolen by corporations on multiple occasions, and I am reminded that corporations don't give a shit about us.

Today, the largest crypto corporation by a country mile, Binance, is under fire. Fear is swelling that Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao's (CZ') empire may be built on an unstable foundation. Is this a case of wrongful accusations? Or is this another corporation ready to wreak havoc on ordinary people?

The Smoke

Multiple events have caused investors to fear Binance's reliability. CZ recently took down FTX after correctly identifying the risk of holding FTT tokens. This cost a lot of people a lot of money. If you've made it this far in the article, you lost money directly or indirectly from the fall of FTX.

In response, investors want to see proof of funds. Ironically, CZ has been the voice calling for this. So Binance released its audit. And investors didn't feel warm and fuzzy from the audit results.

On the contrary, investors began pulling their funds off of Binance. As a result, over $3 billion worth of crypto was removed in a single day. And why wouldn't they? Here's a clip from an article from pymnts.com sharing some of the flags.

The firm that undertook the exercise, Mazars, has stated they “make no statement regarding the appropriateness” of its work for the crypto exchange, adding that its report does not “express an opinion or an assurance conclusion.” The Mazars report only focused on Binance’s bitcoin holdings and liabilities. Still, it did not expand the scope of its audit to any of the many other cryptocurrencies held and traded on Binance.

“Had we performed additional procedures, other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported,” the auditors wrote in their statement. It is hardly a reassuring conclusion for retail investors who trusted their money with the exchange or plan to.-PYMNTS

After being told that funds were safe on Celsius, Voyager, and FTX by their CEOs, the crypto community has learned that corporate crypto CEOs are about as trustworthy as traditional corporate CEOs. Hence, why keep funds on Binance when there is nothing to gain and only the potential of losing?

There's more FUD on Binance's plate.

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) is also putting a target on Binance's back. According to Reuters, the DOJ is deciding whether or not to file charges against Binance and CZ for unlicensed money laundering conspiracy, unlicensed money transmission, and criminal sanctions violations.

In response, CZ tweeted:

CZ tweet in response to Reuters article

He implies that this attack on Binance is from writers on SBF's payroll.

Binance isn't helping its case.

A further lousy look for Binance is its decision to halt USDC withdrawals from the platform. There's no way of destroying confidence quicker than by not allowing customers to withdraw their funds, especially USDC, which is perceived as one of the safest crypto assets.

Binance is stating that this is due to a token swap. Nonetheless, this action shouldn't make any investors with funds on Binance gain confidence in the platform.

Why this may be a wrongful accusation

Fear and confidence in exchanges are currently at all-time lows since I've been in crypto (2017). Investors are learning that there is no good reason to keep their assets on centralized platforms. For many of us, it's like being extra cautious while driving after a car accident. So why should I retake the risk on Binance if I lost access to assets on FTX, Gemini Earn, Celsius, Voyager, or any other doomed platforms?

But, even though investors are removing their assets, Binance still has the reserves to provide them. While Binance didn't have the cleanest audit, its balance sheet has no glaring holes. If there were, everyone would be racing to get everything off the platform immediately.

And, unlike the FTX/Alameda relationship, CZ isn't running a hedge fund tied to Binance. Binance has been printing money for several years and has established itself. We don't read anything about political donations or conspiring with governments to create regulations.

In October, the Binance Smart Chain got attacked with a $570 million hack. However, Binance ensured everyone was made whole and handled the situation much better than other exploited platforms.

Why I think Binance is fine, but I'm still removing my assets

There's a slim chance of Binance facing the same fate as FTX and other doomed centralized crypto platforms in the foreseeable future. First, Binance saw more withdrawals following the Luna and the FTX crash. Today, Binance is even saying that deposits are picking back up.

Secondly, the BNB token isn't cratering. If the crypto community lost confidence in Binance, the BNB token would get hit extremely hard. However, we are still waiting to see that happening. Ironically, BNB is outperforming ETH and BTC during this bear market, only down 61% from its all-time highs.

Removing crypto from the platform is a little to no-risk choice for investors. But selling an asset representing the platform and its DeFi ecosystem has an opportunity cost, especially if that coin has outperformed competing crypto assets during the bear market.

At the same time, it should be noted that the FTT token performed well until the fraud was discovered. The FTT token held no real utility outside the FTX exchange, whereas BNB is the native token for the Binance Smart Chain. Transactions are still occurring on BSC as they usually do.

Nonetheless, I am removing most of my assets on the Binance platform to be safe rather than sorry. I staked a few coins on Binance, but I can easily stake them via decentralized finance and not rely on Binance's custody.

If Binance fails, DeFi will get smoked.

My confidence may be misplaced, and, like busted investors in FTX, I can't fathom the possibility of it being insolvent. However, if Binance fails and the BNB token crashes, it could cause irreparable damage to the DeFi ecosystem.

I see the Binance Smart Chain as DeFi for the ordinary person. Ethereum is built for white-collar DeFi users who can afford to pay dollars worth of ETH gas fees for transactions. Meanwhile, BSC is made for the working class. BSC does triple the transaction volume of Ethereum. Imagine the impact of all these DeFi early adopters getting wiped out because BNB pairings become worthless.

In other words, I need to display my confidence more because the alternative is too catastrophic to give strong consideration to happening.

Key Takeaways

Ironically, the centralized players are providing the most significant risks as the crypto goal is to become more decentralized. This is a thought to approach in a different article. It would be fallible to say that Binance couldn't collapse as FTX did. But, Binance has better leadership, a stronger balance sheet (and war chest), and less counterparty risk than FTX.

For now, this is likely a coordinated FUD attack to shake the crypto market's confidence further. We can see other articles trying to attack Binance today as well:

US Senator Claims Binance Has Ties to Chinese Government

-u.today

FTX Hearing: Kevin O'Leary Attacks Binance, Calling It An "Unregulated Monopoly"

-Coindesk

I'm not saying I'm a fan of Binance. Centralized exchanges are a current necessary evil. But hopefully, via regulation, investors can directly access crypto assets via DeFi. Until then, we will have to deal with shady corporations.

What do you think? Am I downplaying the Binance risk? Is this coordinated FUD or a canary in the coal mine? Share your thoughts and opinions in the response section.

This article isn't financial advice, and I am not a financial advisor. It is strictly my opinion. Crypto assets involve tremendous risks. I am someone who wants to maintain and grow my wealth so that I can provide a good livelihood for my family and myself. So do your research before making any investments.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETF On-Chain Holdings Exceed 2 Million BTC

    As of October 11, data from Dune shows that the on-chain total holdings of the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF have surpassed 2 million BTC, currently reaching approximately 2.013 million BTC, which accounts for 10.02% of the current BTC supply. The value of the on-chain holdings has reached approximately $227.6 billion.

  • Hedge Fund Net Exposure to US Tech Giants Reaches Record High of 22%

    On October 10, according to data from Goldman Sachs and The Kobeissi Letter, investor sentiment towards large tech stocks has reached an all-time high. Hedge fund net exposure to the 'Big Seven' tech giants in the US has risen to 22%, marking a historic peak; this figure has surged by 7 percentage points since July, representing the largest three-month increase in 2023, and surpassing the previous high of 21% set in June 2024 (compared to only 8% during the bear market low in 2022). During the same period, hedge fund net exposure to semiconductor stocks in the US has increased to 12%, slightly below the peak of 14% in June 2026, while this metric was only 2% at the beginning of 2025.

  • Anthropic Reveals Internal Issues: Out-of-Control AI Attempted to Access Multiple Government Websites, Reported to the White House

    Anthropic stated on Friday that its AI agents acted autonomously, attempting to access various federal, state, and local government websites. The company did not disclose which government agencies were involved but confirmed that it has reported these incidents to the White House. In a blog post, Anthropic mentioned that one of its AI models under testing had taken several unauthorized actions, including exploiting a vulnerability on a university website to download data and submitting a form to a government agency that it had been explicitly instructed not to submit. The company noted that it discovered these incidents after beginning a review of the AI's actions in July. Earlier on Friday, the Philadelphia Police Department stated that Anthropic had notified them that its technology had submitted a false homicide tip to the police website.

  • No Flights Departing or Arriving at Riyadh's King Khalid Airport Following Explosion Sounds

    On October 10, according to CCTV International News, witnesses reported that explosion sounds were heard at Terminal 3 of King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia, this afternoon, leading to the evacuation of personnel from the airport. Flight tracking website 'FlightRadar24' indicates that there are currently no flights departing or arriving at the airport, and some flights heading to Riyadh have been diverted or returned. King Khalid International Airport has issued a traveler advisory, recommending that passengers contact their airlines to confirm flight status before heading to the airport.

  • BTC Surpasses $83,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $83,000, currently priced at $83,020.19, with a 24-hour decline of 0.2%. The market is experiencing significant fluctuations, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • ETH Surpasses $2500

    Market data shows that ETH has surpassed $2500, currently priced at $2500.03, with a 24-hour increase of 0.33%. The market is experiencing significant fluctuations, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Houthi Forces Claim Saudi Airstrikes on Sana'a Airport in Yemen

    On October 10, according to information released by the Houthi forces in Yemen, on the afternoon of the same day local time, the Saudi-led coalition conducted airstrikes on Sana'a International Airport, which is under the control of the Houthi forces, dropping four bombs. Additionally, the Saudi coalition also targeted a communication facility in Hajjah Province, controlled by the Houthi forces, dropping three bombs. There has been no response from the Saudi side regarding these incidents. (Jinshi)

  • French Finance Committee Approves Amendments on Stablecoin Exchange Tax and Crypto Exit Tax

    On October 10, Decrypt reported that the Finance Committee of the French National Assembly approved two amendments related to cryptocurrency taxation this week: starting January 1, 2027, exchanges of stablecoins regulated under MiCA will be considered taxable sales; and an exit tax will be imposed on taxpayers who have been French tax residents for at least six of the past ten years and have moved abroad with crypto assets totaling over 800,000 euros. On October 9, the committee voted 31 to 3 to reject the budget revenue portion, and the full National Assembly will review based on the government's original text. The amendments will not be automatically included; supporters must reintroduce them during the debate starting on October 13, with a formal vote scheduled for October 20. The related measures have not yet become law. The stablecoin amendment was proposed by Nicolas Sansu, a member of the left-wing GDR party group, along with 16 co-signers, and does not set a new tax rate but aims to include the revenue under France's existing 31.4% flat tax system. The committee also passed an amendment allowing crypto asset losses to be carried forward for ten years to offset future gains.

  • Luxshare Precision: Company and Luxshare Technology Involved in 337 Investigation, Currently in Initial Filing Stage

    On October 10, Luxshare Precision announced that the company and its holding subsidiary, Dongguan Luxshare Technology Co., Ltd., have been listed as respondents in a 337 investigation by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), involving U.S. Patent US 10,903,700. The ITC officially launched the investigation on October 9, 2026, with investigation number 337-TA-1526. The case is currently in the initial filing stage, and no substantial determination has been made regarding the relevant infringement claims. The products involved are in the customer verification stage and have not yet entered mass production.

  • South Korea's Financial Commission: Shareholding Restrictions for Exchange Major Shareholders Not Targeting Specific Companies

    On October 10, Lee Ik-yeon, chairman of the Financial Services Commission of South Korea, stated that the provisions regarding shareholding restrictions for major shareholders of virtual asset exchanges in the ongoing 'Basic Law on Digital Assets' are not aimed at specific individuals or companies. Instead, they are designed to ensure that exchanges, once institutionalized, bear a higher level of public responsibility. Currently, South Korean virtual asset exchanges operate under a system that requires updates every three years, but this will transition to a licensing system after the implementation of the 'Basic Law on Digital Assets.' Lee emphasized that exchanges have infrastructure attributes and must possess public accountability and responsibility commensurate with their status.