Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Why Efinity Is the Lamborghini to the Metaverse

With something as important as our digital future, we need to pick the right tool for the job.

If you want fast and flashy, you don’t walk into a Ford dealership – you go for the Lamborghini.

A Ford-150 is a wonderful vehicle. Just not your first pick for a long, open road and a clear blue sky.

Similarly, if you want a non-fungible token (NFT) blockchain, you don’t look for a jack-of-all-trades blockchain. You use Efinity.

Efinity is a purpose-built chain, with NFT functionality built right into the protocol layer. It’s the real deal – not a Ford riddled with Lambo stickers.

If You Want a Lamborghini…

Bitcoin is the Ferrari of payments, “A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System” as the 2009 whitepaper was entitled. Bitcoin has one job. If you need a balance deducted from Wallet A and increased in Wallet B—whether one dollar or one billion dollars—Bitcoin gets the job done. Over 10 years later, it’s still recognized as safe, secure, somewhat fast, and never having been hacked.

Later, Ethereum emerged as the opposite of Bitcoin. Ethereum was styled as the supercomputer of blockchains. But Ethereum at its core is relatively simple. It was intended to be an amazing foundation for infinite permutations of decentralized apps (DApps) all on the same chain.

Ethereum was revolutionary because it was envisioned to do everything.

Ethereum was designed to be a car that could be a Lamborghini or a Ford F-150.

But if you want a Lamborghini, drive a Lamborghini. Not a car that tries to be both.

Efinity exists to challenge this 2014 architectural decision. It argues that a blockchain should not do everything from decentralized finance (DeFi) to the metaverse.

Efinity emphasizes: If you want a NFT chain, use a NFT chain. If you want a Lamborghini, drive a Lamborghini.

Protocol Layer NFT Functionality: More Security, Less Friction

Almost 10 years after the Ethereum whitepaper, not everyone looks under the hood. If it has smart contracts and gas is relatively cheap, you might call it a good Layer 1 chain.

Efinity argues that having NFT functionality built right into the protocol layer itself is a gamechanger, and people should look deeper under the hood.

This is a gamechanger for two reasons: more security and less friction.

More Security

Protocol level NFT functionality increases security because these functions are right in the core source code. These functions are known, documented, and do what they are intended to do.

Think about this key difference in several contexts.

First, an NFT wallet user signing an Efinity transaction knows what they're signing because the function should be well known and well defined. There will be no mysterious request that ends up sucking NFTs out of a wallet. There will be no add-on smart contract for a basic function that turns out to contain malicious code.

Second, because NFT functions are in the core source code itself, they would necessarily be audited as part of the core source code. In contrast, not every smart contract or DApp out there is audited to the same degree. Surely, a cohesive security audit that covers a chain’s NFT functions as part of its native functions is more reassuring.

Less Friction

If Efinity were a laptop, wouldn’t you embrace NFT functions that work out of the box? Wouldn’t you want NFT functions that work as seamlessly as Microsoft Office works with Windows or Pages, and Numbers work with MacOS?

Efinity’s cohesive, focused architecture as a chain that promises NFTs and only NFTs (not DeFi derivatives) makes NFT transfers the equivalent of native token transfers. NFT transfers on Efinity would necessarily have less friction, be more secure, and be more transparent and more visible on-chain.

Like using Microsoft Office and Pages, or Numbers with the companion OS, Efinity’s NFT functionality has no compatibility issues and no malware.

This spells out what NFTs as part of the protocol layer means.

Engineering Away the “Infinite Approval” Problem

Just search for “infinite approval” in a blockchain wallet context. The many headlines you’ll get demonstrate the problem in the wild, from DeFi to NFT gaming.

Existing Ethereum smart contract frameworks are less efficient and generate friction for users because they evolved ad-hoc. For example, one may have to sign a transaction, wait for it to finish, then have to be alert to sign the next transaction.

A common Ethereum DApp solution is to simply ask users to give broad approval–infinite approval–over a wallet’s entire token balance, to make the DApp usable.

Strong security in individual components is meaningless if it is so inconvenient that users and developers waive this to make a DApp usable.

This unfortunately leads to exploits. Just around October 11th, for example, the Rabby Swap smart contract had a “hack attack” for at least 114 ETH and 179 BNB. The project asked users to revoke approvals for this contract.

What about the blockchain maxim, trust but verify? The contract was open source and audited by a blockchain security firm. Blockchain development is hard, but the point is that the fragmented development where the basic building blocks of your DApps are themselves add-ons only makes it harder.

In contrast, imagine a chain where the NFT functions are at the protocol level, where they are shown as clearly and as transparently as the permissions for a new app you install on your smartphone. You trust your smartphone enough not to read the fine print for these permissions, so imagine if you could trust a NFT chain the same way.

The Power of Polkadot

Ethereum itself solved the problem of having dozens of narrowly focused blockchains for each job, after Bitcoin. Efinity, however, avoids becoming an overly narrow tool that stands alone by being the first NFT parachain of the even larger Polkadot ecosystem.

Polkadot lets Efinity solve the problems of NFT transfers while backing Efinity with the resources of one of the world’s largest blockchain ecosystems.

First, Efinity operates under Polkadot’s shared security umbrella. Efinity’s collator nodes process the chain’s NFT-specific functions. Efinity and the other parachains, however, are secured by the Polkadot Relay Chain. They do not need to design their own security models and, again, can rely on the architecture and the resources of one of the world’s largest blockchain ecosystems.

Efinity plugs into this shared security even in its early evolution. A malicious actor would have difficulty assembling the resources needed to challenge those of the larger Polkadot ecosystem, unlike a new, fledgling chain.

Second, Efinity capitalizes on how Polkadot interoperability is in turn at the protocol level. Polkadot is already designed for Efinity to talk to the other parachains and call their functions as a native, core function. Efinity can call infrastructure features from other parachains from DeFi to digital identity solutions as a native Polkadot function. Efinity tokens and other parachain native tokens can be moved across parachains as a native Polkadot function.

All this is done without bridges, and therefore without bridge hacks, because this is Polkadot’s own out-of-the-box functionality.

Third, Efinity capitalizes on Polkadot’s sustainability and energy efficiency. Being a Polkadot parachain, Efinity has lower energy consumption than other proof of stake chains. Bloomberg reported:

“Polkadot has the lowest total electricity consumption and total carbon emissions per year of the six so-called proof-of-stake blockchains studied... When assessing the economic value secured in financial applications on each platform – known as the the total value locked – it’s $18,454 per kilowatt hour for Avalanche, versus $4,395 for Solana and $19.18 for Polkadot, the report said, using DeFiLlama data from Feb. 1.”

Driving to the Metaverse in Style

We are extremely excited to see Efinity evolve.

Efinity has very carefully thought out architecture, with a community that includes Polkadot Chief Architect and former Ethereum CTO Gavin Wood and Enjin CTO and ERC-1155 author Witek Radomski. The NFT functions are right in the protocol level, a gamechanger that more people need to see after they look deeper under the hood.

All these functions remove user friction and promote mass adoption, from discrete accounts (NFTs placed in addresses before wallets are created, incentivizing new users to create wallets to claim these) to fuel tanks (developers subsidize gas fees, making them invisible to select users such as new users).

Again, if you want a Lamborghini, drive a Lamborghini.

If you want a NFT chain, use Efinity.

If you want to step on the gas and speed along an open road under a clear blue sky, envisioning the wind sliding against the smooth contours of an amazing car, drive a Lamborghini.

If you want powerful, developer friendly features right at the protocol level that remove friction, like how fuel tanks make gas invisible for select users, use Efinity.

If you want to arrive in the open, decentralized metaverse in style, get in your seat, fasten your seat belt, and ride with the Efinity community.

NFT
Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Ethereum Foundation Sells 2,785 ETH Worth Approximately $6.42 Million

    On October 26, according to monitoring by Onchain Lens, the Ethereum Foundation sold 2,785 ETH through CoW Swap for approximately $6.42 million in exchange for USDS.

  • Qatari Mediators Arrive in Tehran to Alleviate Regional Tensions

    According to an official familiar with the situation, Qatari mediators arrived in Tehran on Sunday with the aim of easing regional tensions. Qatar's mediation efforts are being conducted in coordination with the United States.

  • Musk: Future Phones Will Have No Apps or Operating Systems, Just AI Generation

    On October 25, Musk predicted that in the next 5 to 6 years, smartphones may undergo a complete transformation: traditional operating systems and apps will gradually disappear, and phones will become dedicated terminals for running AI. At that time, users will no longer need to download applications or open software; instead, they will simply tell the AI what they want, and the phone's AI will collaborate with cloud AI to generate videos, images, and various interactive content in real-time.

  • Iran: Tehran's Stance Unchanged Despite Potential New U.S. Strikes

    On October 25, Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif stated on Sunday that Iran's position will not change even if a new round of conflict erupts between Israel and the United States. This comes amid escalating tensions between Tehran and Washington. U.S. President Trump had mentioned on Friday that Washington "might come back for another small-scale 'epic fury'" military operation. Zarif remarked, "Recently, some have talked about the possibility of a new war, but I am already considering the post-war situation. Our policies will not change whether or not war occurs. They have tried twice before and have seen the results. If they want to try again, they should understand that the final outcome will be no different from the past." (Golden Ten)

  • Russia Ready to Supply Any Amount of Diesel to the U.S.

    On October 25, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Novak stated that Russia is prepared to supply any amount of diesel to the United States.

  • Egypt's Benchmark Stock Index Declines by 5%

    Egypt's benchmark stock index has expanded its decline to 5%.

  • Yemen Conflict Escalates, Saudi and Egyptian Stock Markets Decline

    On October 25, Sunday, the stock markets in Saudi Arabia and Egypt experienced declines. This followed a statement from the Saudi-led coalition indicating that, amid escalating conflicts with the Yemeni Houthi forces, the coalition intercepted several drones and missiles over Riyadh and southern Saudi Arabia. Under pressure from widespread sell-offs, the Saudi benchmark index (TASI) fell by 2.6%, marking its worst intraday performance since April 2025, with major stock Saudi Aramco dropping by 1.1%. Outside the Gulf region, the Egyptian blue-chip index (EGX30) plummeted by 2.5%, nearing its lowest level in about seven months, with all constituent stocks declining. The Egyptian parliament is expected to vote on October 26 to decide whether to authorize the armed forces to provide support for Saudi Arabia in its conflict with the Houthi forces upon request.

  • SemiAnalysis CEO: Substrates are the 'Biggest Bottleneck'

    On October 25, the CEO of SemiAnalysis stated: 'I believe that in the semiconductor industry, the biggest limiting factor, aside from memory, is substrates. Substrates, PCB materials, and substrate materials are all severely under-invested. Many companies in the supply chain that produce these materials in Japan are relatively conservative and unwilling to make significant investments in capacity. As a result, there is a huge bottleneck. In terms of what can be produced in the next two years, whether it’s accelerators, CPUs, or any other component in the supply chain, I believe substrates are the biggest bottleneck.'

  • Keystone Hardware Wallet Website Hacked, Customer Information Leaked

    On October 25, Hong Kong-based self-custody hardware wallet brand Keystone, known for its full isolation and QR code signing, disclosed that its official website was unauthorizedly accessed on October 20, exposing customer names, contact information, shipping addresses, and order details (including purchased products and prices). The company confirmed on October 23, after verifying API activity with Shopify, that a third party obtained customer shipping information. Keystone emphasized that payment card and bank information, mnemonic phrases, private keys, and wallet passwords were not leaked. The company has blocked access, patched vulnerabilities, initiated an investigation, and notified affected customers via email, warning that scammers may impersonate Keystone to deceive customers under the pretext of refunds or device exchanges. Customers are advised not to click on suspicious links and not to disclose mnemonic phrases and private keys, with plans to release a detailed report within a few days. Other companies in the industry, such as Trezor (which experienced a leak from logistics provider ShipMonk in August) and Ledger (which had a security incident this month involving modified devices stealing mnemonic phrases), have also faced security issues.

  • Goldman Sachs Lowers 12-Month Target for South Korea's KOSPI Index by 25%

    On October 25, strategists at Goldman Sachs Group lowered their target for South Korea's KOSPI index by 25%. Previously, they had raised the target multiple times this year, but with increasing market concerns over AI-related trades, they have now opted for a downgrade. Led by analyst Timothy Moe, the team reduced the 12-month target for the KOSPI index from 12,000 points to 9,000 points. They noted that, given the benchmark index has fallen more than 35% from its peak in June, valuation assumptions need to become more cautious. These strategists believe that the current sell-off has left the South Korean stock market significantly undervalued; even after the target downgrade, the index still has over 60% upside potential.