Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Why Does Price Slippage Happen While Trading?

Validated Venture

This is a common occurrence for all assets, including cryptocurrencies. Price slippage is most common in decentralized finance (DeFi), specifically on decentralized exchanges (DEX). Slippage in crypto asset trading can be caused by excessive volatility or, conversely, insufficient liquidity. In the case of onchain transactions, the speed of transaction confirmation in the blockchain is critical.

How does price slippage occur?

When a user places a market order on an exchange, he or she expects the order to be executed at the price specified. However, the actual execution may differ in a negative way, which is known as price slippage. It is calculated as a percentage of the transaction’s face value.

Slippage can be caused by a high spread, which is the difference between the asset’s buy and sell prices, as well as a low volume of the asset in the bet.

The presence of a large number of participants, high trading activity, and large volumes of the asset at different price levels in the stack are all indicators of high liquidity, or the ability to sell or buy as much cryptocurrency at different prices as possible. Under such conditions, the likelihood of experiencing price slippage in a trading transaction is practically nil.

Why is price slippage so common on decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges?

Large centralized cryptocurrency exchanges have long since fixed the problems of low liquidity. They may, however, face specific situations that may result in price slippage. This can occur, for example, during sharp price movements of the entire market or a single popular crypto-asset. A significant increase in trading volume means that the trading system will not be able to process the flow of orders in a timely manner.

A significant delay in order execution poses an even greater risk to DEX. Trading on such platforms takes place on a blockchain and is entirely dependent on its performance: to execute a trade, a new block must appear. If the trading protocol’s network is slow, users may experience price slippage even during slack periods.

In most cases, price slippage has little effect. When the market for a specific instrument is active, such as during a bull market, slippage becomes more noticeable.

According to DeFi Llama, DeFi has a growing share of productive blockchains such as Avalanche, BNB Chain or Polygon, but nearly 60% of all blockchain liquidity is in Ethereum, which has low bandwidth.

How is the price spread related to price slippage?

The market spread is the difference in market price between supply and demand that occurs when the market is unstable or insufficiently liquid.

When a user buys “on the market,” they accept the lowest price offered by the seller. When it sells, on the other hand, it accepts the highest price.

A high-demand asset has a smaller spread because market participants compete with one another to narrow the spread. Popular cryptocurrencies typically have a high level of liquidity.

What are the different types of price slippage?

For the trader, the difference in order execution price can be both positive and negative. Slippage is typically regarded as a negative phenomenon, but in rare cases, it can work in the trader’s favor.

Slippage is considered positive if the actual price of the executed buy order is lower than expected because it provides the trader with a better bid at a lower price.

If a cryptocurrency’s final bid price is higher than expected, there is negative slippage, and the user ends up with less favorable terms. This also applies to sell orders for the asset.

Price differences usually occur when market orders are executed (Market). Suppose the current market value of a cryptocurrency is $100. The investor wishes to sell 20 coins and anticipates a $2000 profit.

However, before the order is executed, the asset’s price drops dramatically to $98. Each of the 20 tokens suffers a $2 loss as a result. In this case, the slippage value is 2%, which results in a $40 loss for the trader.

How to avoid price slippage?

To eliminate or reduce the risk of slippage, it is best to avoid Market-type orders, at least during periods of high market volatility, and instead use limit orders.

With a few exceptions, this type of order is available on all centralized cryptocurrency exchanges but not on decentralized platforms (for example, in 1inch). In addition, there is a high risk of order execution taking too long due to onchain operations.

However, when trading cryptocurrencies on DEX, there are several basic ways to reduce the risk of price slippage:

If you are trading in an Ethereum-based protocol, we recommend increasing the amount of gas used; otherwise, the transaction may “hang” for an extended period of time, possibly several hours. The current optimal gas level can be viewed on Etherscan, for example.

Leading Ethereum DEXs frequently support Layer 2 (L2) solutions, which can significantly speed up order execution and lower transaction costs. When sending an order, many decentralized venues allow you to manually adjust the maximum possible price slippage value.

Slippage is prevented by special mechanisms on some centralized crypto-asset trading platforms. For example, while the user reviews transaction details, Coinbase temporarily fixes the price for order execution.

Read more: https://medium.com/@SunflowerCorpAdmin/why-does-price-slippage-happen-while-trading-623c5a4db518

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • U.S. Tech Hardware Stocks Face Sell-Off, Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Plummets 5.7%

    On October 22, U.S. semiconductor stocks collectively declined, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index dropping 5.67%, marking a new low since July 29. Among the component stocks, AMD fell 7.21%, Intel dropped 6.57%, Applied Materials decreased by 6.57%, Arm fell 6.75%, Seagate Technology dropped 7.81%, and Western Digital decreased by 6.95%. Micron Technology fell 4.29%, NVIDIA dropped 3.93%, TSMC decreased by 3.97%, Broadcom fell 3.79%, and ASML dropped 4.83%. Various sub-sectors, including memory and semiconductor equipment, as well as chip design, faced simultaneous pressure. Additionally, Lam Research fell 9.78%, Lumentum dropped 9.24%, Coherent decreased by 11.81%, and the 3x Long Semiconductor ETF fell 17.09%.

  • Spot Gold Falls Below $4,050/Ounce for the First Time Since August 4

    Spot gold has fallen below $4,050 per ounce for the first time since August 4, with a daily decline of 2.19%.

  • Nasdaq Opens Down 1.55%, Meta Falls Over 4%

    U.S. stock indices opened lower, with the Dow Jones down 0.44%, the S&P 500 down 0.91%, and the Nasdaq Composite down 1.55%. Chip equipment manufacturer Lam Research provided a disappointing earnings outlook, causing its stock to open down over 9%. Following a reduction in spending plans, Tesla's stock fell by 2.8%. Meta dropped over 4%, with the company's future spending commitments totaling $825 billion. IBM also fell over 4%, reporting third-quarter revenue of $17.1 billion, a 4.7% year-over-year increase.

  • DeepSeek Raises Financing Target from 50 Billion to 100 Billion Yuan, Potentially Paving the Way for Sci-Tech Board IPO

    On October 22, market sources reported that domestic large model company DeepSeek plans to raise approximately 100 billion yuan (about 15 billion USD) in its latest financing round. Tencent and CATL are the largest investors in this round, with the transaction expected to be officially completed in the coming days. As of now, neither DeepSeek nor the related investors, including Tencent, have publicly responded. Journalists have cross-verified the information with multiple sources close to the company and investors, confirming its accuracy. Sources revealed that the initial fundraising target was set at 50 billion yuan, which has since been raised multiple times to approximately 100 billion yuan, although it has not been officially announced and the final amount is still not fully determined. The funds will continue to be used for model training, computing power construction, and talent recruitment to support DeepSeek's participation in global competition. Some sources also speculate that this round of financing will pave the way for the company's upcoming IPO on the Sci-Tech Board. (Shanghai Securities Journal)

  • Ethereum Researchers Propose Reducing Final Transaction Confirmation Time from 16 Minutes to Approximately 4 Minutes

    On October 22, Ethereum researchers proposed a draft for a rapid finality mechanism aimed at reducing the final transaction confirmation time from the current approximately 16 minutes to about 4 minutes, targeting an enhancement of around 4 times. The draft was submitted on Wednesday by Ben Edgington, the coordinator of the rapid finality research, and is still in the early stages, with no activation timeline determined yet. The proposal plans to split the validator voting for determining new blocks and finalizing historical blocks into two separate mechanisms, allowing for a faster pace of finality.

  • Visa Negotiates Acquisition of Fireblocks Valued at Approximately $2.5 Billion

    On October 22, Bloomberg reported that Visa is in talks to acquire the cryptocurrency custody infrastructure company Fireblocks, with a transaction valuation of approximately $2.5 billion. If the deal is finalized, it will further expand Visa's presence in the digital asset custody and blockchain payment infrastructure sectors. This information is yet to be confirmed, and specific terms and progress of the acquisition negotiations have not been disclosed.

  • US Spot Ethereum ETF Sees Net Inflow of $14.98 Million Yesterday

    On October 22, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Ethereum ETF recorded a net inflow of $14.98 million yesterday.

  • Sonic to Transfer 13 Million S Tokens via Strategic OTC Agreement in Next 24 to 48 Hours

    On October 22, Sonic announced on the X platform that approximately 13 million S tokens will be transferred in the next 24 to 48 hours under a strategic over-the-counter (OTC) agreement. The counterparty is a long-term partner of Sonic, and both parties will collaborate to expand Sonic's reach and enhance user engagement through the partner's network.

  • Bank of Korea Maintains Interest Rate as Expected

    On October 22, the Bank of Korea kept the policy interest rate unchanged at 3%, in line with market expectations. Previously, South Korea raised interest rates in consecutive meetings in July and August.

  • U.S. Treasury Secretary Becerra: GENIUS Act Establishes Federal Regulatory Framework for Stablecoin Payments

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Becerra stated that the GENIUS Act is a milestone in the American financial sector, further solidifying the U.S. position as a global cryptocurrency hub. He compared the bill to the National Currency Act signed by President Lincoln in 1863, asserting that it establishes a federal regulatory framework for stablecoin payments in the digital age. Becerra also mentioned that the final rules issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) will facilitate the implementation of the bill, providing a clear and pragmatic institutional foundation for private sector innovation, market competition, and maintaining U.S. leadership in the digital asset space.