Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

What are Flash Loans?

Validated Venture

Flash loans have emerged as one of the most important developments in the world of decentralized finance in 2020, bringing profits to some market participants while causing losses to others.

How did Flash Loans emerge and when?

Since the inception of decentralized lending, all crypto-asset loans have required the borrower to provide excess collateral (collateral). This changed in January 2020, when Aave, a lending company based in the United Kingdom, launched a decentralized lending protocol based on liquidity pools. Third-party DeFi developers were granted instant unsecured loans.

The fundamental requirement for a flash loan is straightforward: loan origination and repayment transactions, as well as any intermediate operations with disbursed funds, must all occur within a single block of transactions. As a result, the time between borrowing and repayment is only a few seconds. Simultaneously, the size of an instant loan can reach tens of millions of dollars, with a commission of only 0.09% of the amount (in addition to the cost of gas to address the smart contracts).

DeFi-application developers recognized the enormous potential of instant loans almost immediately after the Aave documentation on this feature was published. However, it became extremely popular a few months later, as the number of DeFi-application users increased and commissions on the Ethereum network increased. Conventional DeFi-protocol transactions were prohibitively expensive, and the use of instant loan-based strategies enabled significant cost savings and the discovery of new revenue opportunities.

Aave’s lending platform processed $2 billion in flash loans at the end of 2020, and by the end of the first half of 2021, that figure had risen to $4.2 billion. According to AaveWatch, the largest instant loan was $195 million.

The flash loan feature became available to users of the decentralized trading platform dYdX in the first half of 2020. The flash swaps function, which was introduced in May 2021 by the popular decentralized cryptocurrency exchange Uniswap in the v2 protocol version, can be considered an analogue of instant loans.

Users could borrow more than 100 tokens without putting up any collateral, which can be used for arbitrage transactions (for example, between Uniswap and SushiSwap) and other strategies. This feature can only be accessed via smart contracts, as there is no user interface. Borrowing costs are 0.3% (Excluding gas fees and Uniswap commissions).

When can we use flash loans?

The ability to obtain low-cost unsecured loans has created numerous opportunities for DeFi users to profit from market inefficiencies while also lowering the costs of lending and other operations. The most common scenarios for using flash loans are listed below.

Arbitrage trading

Profiting from the price difference of one asset on different trading floors necessitates the use of a significant amount of your own funds. Under the following scheme, instant loans become a source of low-cost financing for such operations:

  • Take a flash loan for a given asset from DeFi-protocol;
  • Use the borrowed funds to buy the asset on that DEX, where it is cheaper;
  • Sell the asset on the DEX, where it is more expensive;
  • Pay back the flash credit with fees and interest.

Arbitrage trading is the most commonly used scenario for using flash credits.

Self-liquidation of debt positions

The lending protocols initiate an automatic liquidation procedure when the value of the collateral falls below the value of the borrower’s debt. Part of the collateral is sold to repay the debt, and a liquidation penalty is assessed, which on Aave is 5% or 10% (depending on the type of collateral), and 13% in the case of the Vaults service MakerDAO.

Using instant loans allows you to do a much cheaper self-liquidation without penalties, without having to wait for this costly procedure, by employing the following scheme:

  • Take a flash loan on the asset;
  • Repay the debt with borrowed funds and thereby release the security deposit;
  • Use part of the security deposit to repay the flash loan with the appropriate fees and interest.

Quick replacement of collateral

Replacing loan collateral may be necessary when the value of the pledged asset falls or the risk of liquidation rises. In such a case, it is prudent to swap a falling asset for a rising or less volatile crypto-asset.

Conventional collateral replacement requires full repayment of the debt and then reopening it, which raises transaction fees and necessitates the availability of the entire amount of debt. By combining all transactions in one blockchain, flash credits allow you to do this much faster and cheaper.

Fast loan refinancing

Loan rates on various DeFi platforms fluctuate based on market conditions and available liquidity. Flash loans have proven to be a useful tool for low-cost loan “flipping” to lower-rate platforms, including the replacement of collateral with another asset.

How dangerous are Flash Loans?

Not only developers and crypto traders, but also attackers, have begun to take advantage of instant loans. In February 2020, two flash-loan attacks on DeFi-protocols resulted in a $1 million loss. They exploited a flaw in the bZx protocol, which allowed them to manipulate cryptocurrency prices and artificially inflate them for profit. The instant loans themselves had no vulnerabilities, but they served as a very cheap source of funding for the attacks.

Flash credit attacks were one of the most common methods of stealing funds from various DeFi protocols in 2020. The majority of the attacks carried out exploited vulnerabilities related to the unreliability of the pricing oracles used and the ability to manipulate asset prices.

In the spring of 2021, instant loans became available on multiple EVM-enabled networks at the same time, triggering a slew of DeFi-protocol attacks, most notably on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC) network.

Decentralized services lost a total of $167 million in May 2021 as a result of attacks on the BSC network. The largest losses were suffered by Belt Finance projects ($50 million) and Pancake Bunny ($45 million in assets). BurgeSwap, ApeRocket, bEarnFi, and a number of other BSC-based DeFi projects were also victims.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETF On-Chain Holdings Exceed 2 Million BTC

    As of October 11, data from Dune shows that the on-chain total holdings of the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF have surpassed 2 million BTC, currently reaching approximately 2.013 million BTC, which accounts for 10.02% of the current BTC supply. The value of the on-chain holdings has reached approximately $227.6 billion.

  • Hedge Fund Net Exposure to US Tech Giants Reaches Record High of 22%

    On October 10, according to data from Goldman Sachs and The Kobeissi Letter, investor sentiment towards large tech stocks has reached an all-time high. Hedge fund net exposure to the 'Big Seven' tech giants in the US has risen to 22%, marking a historic peak; this figure has surged by 7 percentage points since July, representing the largest three-month increase in 2023, and surpassing the previous high of 21% set in June 2024 (compared to only 8% during the bear market low in 2022). During the same period, hedge fund net exposure to semiconductor stocks in the US has increased to 12%, slightly below the peak of 14% in June 2026, while this metric was only 2% at the beginning of 2025.

  • Anthropic Reveals Internal Issues: Out-of-Control AI Attempted to Access Multiple Government Websites, Reported to the White House

    Anthropic stated on Friday that its AI agents acted autonomously, attempting to access various federal, state, and local government websites. The company did not disclose which government agencies were involved but confirmed that it has reported these incidents to the White House. In a blog post, Anthropic mentioned that one of its AI models under testing had taken several unauthorized actions, including exploiting a vulnerability on a university website to download data and submitting a form to a government agency that it had been explicitly instructed not to submit. The company noted that it discovered these incidents after beginning a review of the AI's actions in July. Earlier on Friday, the Philadelphia Police Department stated that Anthropic had notified them that its technology had submitted a false homicide tip to the police website.

  • No Flights Departing or Arriving at Riyadh's King Khalid Airport Following Explosion Sounds

    On October 10, according to CCTV International News, witnesses reported that explosion sounds were heard at Terminal 3 of King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia, this afternoon, leading to the evacuation of personnel from the airport. Flight tracking website 'FlightRadar24' indicates that there are currently no flights departing or arriving at the airport, and some flights heading to Riyadh have been diverted or returned. King Khalid International Airport has issued a traveler advisory, recommending that passengers contact their airlines to confirm flight status before heading to the airport.

  • BTC Surpasses $83,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $83,000, currently priced at $83,020.19, with a 24-hour decline of 0.2%. The market is experiencing significant fluctuations, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • ETH Surpasses $2500

    Market data shows that ETH has surpassed $2500, currently priced at $2500.03, with a 24-hour increase of 0.33%. The market is experiencing significant fluctuations, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Houthi Forces Claim Saudi Airstrikes on Sana'a Airport in Yemen

    On October 10, according to information released by the Houthi forces in Yemen, on the afternoon of the same day local time, the Saudi-led coalition conducted airstrikes on Sana'a International Airport, which is under the control of the Houthi forces, dropping four bombs. Additionally, the Saudi coalition also targeted a communication facility in Hajjah Province, controlled by the Houthi forces, dropping three bombs. There has been no response from the Saudi side regarding these incidents. (Jinshi)

  • French Finance Committee Approves Amendments on Stablecoin Exchange Tax and Crypto Exit Tax

    On October 10, Decrypt reported that the Finance Committee of the French National Assembly approved two amendments related to cryptocurrency taxation this week: starting January 1, 2027, exchanges of stablecoins regulated under MiCA will be considered taxable sales; and an exit tax will be imposed on taxpayers who have been French tax residents for at least six of the past ten years and have moved abroad with crypto assets totaling over 800,000 euros. On October 9, the committee voted 31 to 3 to reject the budget revenue portion, and the full National Assembly will review based on the government's original text. The amendments will not be automatically included; supporters must reintroduce them during the debate starting on October 13, with a formal vote scheduled for October 20. The related measures have not yet become law. The stablecoin amendment was proposed by Nicolas Sansu, a member of the left-wing GDR party group, along with 16 co-signers, and does not set a new tax rate but aims to include the revenue under France's existing 31.4% flat tax system. The committee also passed an amendment allowing crypto asset losses to be carried forward for ten years to offset future gains.

  • Luxshare Precision: Company and Luxshare Technology Involved in 337 Investigation, Currently in Initial Filing Stage

    On October 10, Luxshare Precision announced that the company and its holding subsidiary, Dongguan Luxshare Technology Co., Ltd., have been listed as respondents in a 337 investigation by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), involving U.S. Patent US 10,903,700. The ITC officially launched the investigation on October 9, 2026, with investigation number 337-TA-1526. The case is currently in the initial filing stage, and no substantial determination has been made regarding the relevant infringement claims. The products involved are in the customer verification stage and have not yet entered mass production.

  • South Korea's Financial Commission: Shareholding Restrictions for Exchange Major Shareholders Not Targeting Specific Companies

    On October 10, Lee Ik-yeon, chairman of the Financial Services Commission of South Korea, stated that the provisions regarding shareholding restrictions for major shareholders of virtual asset exchanges in the ongoing 'Basic Law on Digital Assets' are not aimed at specific individuals or companies. Instead, they are designed to ensure that exchanges, once institutionalized, bear a higher level of public responsibility. Currently, South Korean virtual asset exchanges operate under a system that requires updates every three years, but this will transition to a licensing system after the implementation of the 'Basic Law on Digital Assets.' Lee emphasized that exchanges have infrastructure attributes and must possess public accountability and responsibility commensurate with their status.