Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

What are Flash Loans?

Validated Venture

Flash loans have emerged as one of the most important developments in the world of decentralized finance in 2020, bringing profits to some market participants while causing losses to others.

How did Flash Loans emerge and when?

Since the inception of decentralized lending, all crypto-asset loans have required the borrower to provide excess collateral (collateral). This changed in January 2020, when Aave, a lending company based in the United Kingdom, launched a decentralized lending protocol based on liquidity pools. Third-party DeFi developers were granted instant unsecured loans.

The fundamental requirement for a flash loan is straightforward: loan origination and repayment transactions, as well as any intermediate operations with disbursed funds, must all occur within a single block of transactions. As a result, the time between borrowing and repayment is only a few seconds. Simultaneously, the size of an instant loan can reach tens of millions of dollars, with a commission of only 0.09% of the amount (in addition to the cost of gas to address the smart contracts).

DeFi-application developers recognized the enormous potential of instant loans almost immediately after the Aave documentation on this feature was published. However, it became extremely popular a few months later, as the number of DeFi-application users increased and commissions on the Ethereum network increased. Conventional DeFi-protocol transactions were prohibitively expensive, and the use of instant loan-based strategies enabled significant cost savings and the discovery of new revenue opportunities.

Aave’s lending platform processed $2 billion in flash loans at the end of 2020, and by the end of the first half of 2021, that figure had risen to $4.2 billion. According to AaveWatch, the largest instant loan was $195 million.

The flash loan feature became available to users of the decentralized trading platform dYdX in the first half of 2020. The flash swaps function, which was introduced in May 2021 by the popular decentralized cryptocurrency exchange Uniswap in the v2 protocol version, can be considered an analogue of instant loans.

Users could borrow more than 100 tokens without putting up any collateral, which can be used for arbitrage transactions (for example, between Uniswap and SushiSwap) and other strategies. This feature can only be accessed via smart contracts, as there is no user interface. Borrowing costs are 0.3% (Excluding gas fees and Uniswap commissions).

When can we use flash loans?

The ability to obtain low-cost unsecured loans has created numerous opportunities for DeFi users to profit from market inefficiencies while also lowering the costs of lending and other operations. The most common scenarios for using flash loans are listed below.

Arbitrage trading

Profiting from the price difference of one asset on different trading floors necessitates the use of a significant amount of your own funds. Under the following scheme, instant loans become a source of low-cost financing for such operations:

  • Take a flash loan for a given asset from DeFi-protocol;
  • Use the borrowed funds to buy the asset on that DEX, where it is cheaper;
  • Sell the asset on the DEX, where it is more expensive;
  • Pay back the flash credit with fees and interest.

Arbitrage trading is the most commonly used scenario for using flash credits.

Self-liquidation of debt positions

The lending protocols initiate an automatic liquidation procedure when the value of the collateral falls below the value of the borrower’s debt. Part of the collateral is sold to repay the debt, and a liquidation penalty is assessed, which on Aave is 5% or 10% (depending on the type of collateral), and 13% in the case of the Vaults service MakerDAO.

Using instant loans allows you to do a much cheaper self-liquidation without penalties, without having to wait for this costly procedure, by employing the following scheme:

  • Take a flash loan on the asset;
  • Repay the debt with borrowed funds and thereby release the security deposit;
  • Use part of the security deposit to repay the flash loan with the appropriate fees and interest.

Quick replacement of collateral

Replacing loan collateral may be necessary when the value of the pledged asset falls or the risk of liquidation rises. In such a case, it is prudent to swap a falling asset for a rising or less volatile crypto-asset.

Conventional collateral replacement requires full repayment of the debt and then reopening it, which raises transaction fees and necessitates the availability of the entire amount of debt. By combining all transactions in one blockchain, flash credits allow you to do this much faster and cheaper.

Fast loan refinancing

Loan rates on various DeFi platforms fluctuate based on market conditions and available liquidity. Flash loans have proven to be a useful tool for low-cost loan “flipping” to lower-rate platforms, including the replacement of collateral with another asset.

How dangerous are Flash Loans?

Not only developers and crypto traders, but also attackers, have begun to take advantage of instant loans. In February 2020, two flash-loan attacks on DeFi-protocols resulted in a $1 million loss. They exploited a flaw in the bZx protocol, which allowed them to manipulate cryptocurrency prices and artificially inflate them for profit. The instant loans themselves had no vulnerabilities, but they served as a very cheap source of funding for the attacks.

Flash credit attacks were one of the most common methods of stealing funds from various DeFi protocols in 2020. The majority of the attacks carried out exploited vulnerabilities related to the unreliability of the pricing oracles used and the ability to manipulate asset prices.

In the spring of 2021, instant loans became available on multiple EVM-enabled networks at the same time, triggering a slew of DeFi-protocol attacks, most notably on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC) network.

Decentralized services lost a total of $167 million in May 2021 as a result of attacks on the BSC network. The largest losses were suffered by Belt Finance projects ($50 million) and Pancake Bunny ($45 million in assets). BurgeSwap, ApeRocket, bEarnFi, and a number of other BSC-based DeFi projects were also victims.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Whale Transfers 1,133 BTC to Coinbase Prime, Valued at $71.48 Million

    According to Onchain Lens monitoring, a whale transferred 1,133 BTC from Coinbase to Coinbase Prime through an intermediary wallet, valued at $71.48 million.

  • U.S. AI Chip Stocks Decline Before Market Open, Intel Falls Over 3%

    On July 7, U.S. AI chip stocks experienced widespread declines before the market opened. Intel dropped over 3%, while AMD, Qualcomm, and NXP fell more than 2%. TSMC, Broadcom, and Tesla decreased by over 1%, and NVIDIA declined by 0.7%.

  • China's Central Bank Increases Gold Reserves for the 20th Consecutive Month

    As of the end of June, China's gold reserves stood at 75.44 million ounces (approximately 2,346.446 tons), an increase of 480,000 ounces (about 14.93 tons) from the end of May, which reported 74.96 million ounces (approximately 2,331.52 tons). This marks the 20th consecutive month of gold accumulation.

  • China's Foreign Exchange Reserves in June at $341.6262 Billion

    On July 7, China's foreign exchange reserves for June stood at $341.6262 billion, a decrease of $26 billion from the end of May, representing a decline of 0.75%, with expectations set at $343.2 billion.

  • U.S. Storage Stocks Drop Pre-Market, SanDisk and Micron Down Over 4%

    On July 7, U.S. storage concept stocks collectively fell in pre-market trading. Western Digital dropped over 5%, SanDisk and Micron Technology fell over 4%, Seagate Technology declined over 3%, Rambus fell over 2%, and SMI fell over 1%.

  • U.S. Stocks in Optical Communication Sector Drop Pre-Market

    On July 7, stocks in the optical communication sector of the U.S. market collectively fell pre-market. Astera Labs dropped over 4%, while Marvell Technology, Credo Technology, and AXT Inc. fell more than 3%. Tower Semiconductor, MaxLinear, Corning, Applied Optoelectronics, GlobalFoundries, Lumentum, and Qorvo all declined by more than 2%. Coherent, Nokia, Amphenol, and Broadcom dropped over 1%.

  • Pre-market Decline in U.S. Storage Stocks

    In pre-market trading, U.S. storage concept stocks experienced a widespread decline, with Micron Technology falling by 4.8%, SanDisk dropping over 4%, Corning down more than 2%, and Intel decreasing by over 3%.

  • Two Departments: Support for Reinsurance Institutions to Increase Capital and Issue Supplementary Capital Tools

    On July 7, the National Financial Supervision and Administration Bureau and the Shanghai Municipal Government released several measures to accelerate the construction of the Shanghai International Reinsurance Center. Among these measures, they proposed to enhance the quality and efficiency of the reinsurance industry, support reinsurance institutions in increasing capital and expanding shares, and issuing supplementary capital tools to improve the capacity for internal capital accumulation and external capital supplementation, thereby strengthening the reinsurance industry's capabilities. The initiative aims to guide the insurance industry to focus on major national projects, strategic emerging industries, and livelihood security, consolidating insurance and reinsurance underwriting capabilities to enhance risk protection levels. It also supports reinsurance institutions in leveraging their professional technical advantages to assist the insurance industry in reducing risk.

  • Sources: Saudi Arabia Plans to Expand Oil Pipeline to Red Sea, Increasing Capacity by 2 Million Barrels Daily to Bypass Strait of Hormuz

    On July 7, five informed sources revealed that Saudi Arabia is considering expanding the crude oil pipeline capacity to its western coast on the Red Sea, allowing Saudi Arabia and its neighbors to transport more oil without passing through the Strait of Hormuz. This east-west pipeline, built in the early 1980s, has gained strategic importance since the outbreak of the Iran war in February and the disruption of shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. The pipeline can deliver up to 7 million barrels of crude oil per day to the Red Sea port. The CEO of Saudi Aramco stated in May that approximately 2 million barrels are supplied to west coast refineries, while about 5 million barrels are for export. Sources indicate that Saudi Arabia is in preliminary discussions with some neighboring countries regarding the pipeline expansion, aiming to add about 2 million barrels of pipeline capacity per day. It remains unclear whether Aramco's planned expansion involves upgrading existing infrastructure or constructing new pipelines. One source mentioned that the expansion plan also includes a smaller refined oil pipeline. Two sources indicated that the expansion scale could range from 1 million to 2 million barrels per day, with refined oil also being considered. Another source stated that the project would take several years and cost billions of dollars, requiring adjustments to Saudi crude pricing mechanisms.

  • Citi: Tencent's WorkBuddy Gains Momentum, Maintains 'Buy' Rating

    On July 7, Citi released a research report stating that, according to the latest industry data, Tencent's AI agent product WorkBuddy has reached 20 million monthly active users (MAU) and over 13 million daily active users (DAU), with a DAU/MAU ratio between 65% and 75%. Considering the product has only been launched for a few months, user stickiness and daily engagement are performing strongly. Citi quoted Tencent's management as saying that in terms of daily active users, Tencent is leading its Chinese peers in the deployment of AI agents. Early user data reflects strong natural growth for both CodeBuddy and WorkBuddy, with high retention rates. Early users are interacting with the AI agents for long durations and with high frequency, creating a positive feedback loop. It is expected that AI products will become a key revenue source for Tencent Cloud. The firm believes that WorkBuddy's success demonstrates the strength of Tencent's ecosystem, the synergy between various productivity tools, and users' trust in Tencent's products and security. Citi maintains a 'Buy' rating on Tencent with a target price of HKD 763 unchanged.