Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Wash Trading in Ethereum’s NFT Marketplaces: An Overview

Validated Project
  • According to data from Dune Analytics, over $30B of NFT trading volume on Ethereum is wash trading.
  • This means that the majority of trades are not legitimate, and are done in order to artificially inflate the price of an NFT collection.
  • Wash trading is illegal under U.S. law and remains difficult to track in the crypto space.
  • Some of the most common methods for wash trading involve investors buying and selling their NFTs between multiple wallets that they control.

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are the hottest new trend in crypto right now. From digital art to collectibles, these unique tokens are a great way to invest in digital assets and show off your creativity. Unfortunately, there is one major problem with NFTs — wash trading. Wash trading is an illegal practice where an investor trades with themselves or other investors they control to inflate prices and manipulate markets.

Wash trading can impact the legitimacy of Ethereum’s NFT marketplaces. The activity of wash trading is well-known to those in a variety of industries, however, it’s alarming to see the sheer volume being transacted on Ethereum. Recent data from Dune Analytics shows that over $30B of NFT trading volume on the Ethereum blockchain is being performed via wash trades.

What Is Wash Trading?

Wash trading is a form of market manipulation where an investor trades with themselves or other investors they control in order to create a false appearance of high demand for an asset or service. This practice is illegal because it skews the actual demand for the asset being traded and artificially inflates prices, which harms both buyers and sellers alike.

The Impact of Wash Trading

Wash trading has several negative impacts on the legitimacy of Ethereum’s NFT marketplaces. First, it makes it difficult for buyers and sellers to get accurate pricing information on assets due to the inflated values created by wash traders. Second, it reduces public trust in crypto markets as a whole because people are wary of participating in markets where illicit activities occur without consequence. Finally, those who engage in wash trading can be subject to legal action if caught by authorities — which can result in hefty fines or even jail time for repeat offenders.

The world of Non-fungible Tokens (NFTs) is on fire with collectors hoping to strike it rich and artists trying to cash in on the trend. But according to reports, illegitimate trades account for more than 70% of all NFT transactions. This means that people are buying and selling tokens not because they appreciate their artistry or want to bring attention to the artist’s work, but rather because they are attempting to manipulate the prices in the market by trading between themselves and creating artificial demand. This ultimately diminishes the value of authentic and valuable NFTs and creates a damaging ripple effect throughout the entire ecosystem.

While digital collectibles were all the rage in 2021, there was an issue with wash trading that hildobby’s research study reveals. Wash trading was particularly prominent with NFT trades and accounted for a whopping 58% of total Ethereum NFT trade volumes in that year. The research team likely conducted a thorough analysis to unfold the intricacies of these transactions and employed four filters such as filtering out trades of NFTs between the same wallet address and those who purchased the same NFT three or more times. Moreover, back-and-forth trades of the same NFT between two different wallet addresses were also flagged as wash trading since it involved false transactions to bolster volume. January 2022 saw a peak of 80% wash trading which is indicative of its prevalence in this area; enough to suggest a few steps taken by government authorities regarding stopping illegal practices on Ethereum.

Common Methods Used To Carry Out Wash Trading

There are several methods that unscrupulous investors use when engaging in wash trades. The most common method involves buying and selling NFTs between multiple wallets controlled by one investor — essentially creating a “closed loop” of transactions that artificially inflates prices without actually adding any value to the marketplace as a whole. Other methods include creating fake accounts to trade with oneself; manipulating exchange rates; and exploiting loopholes in smart contracts to profit from inflated prices.

Not clean, just dirty

In the crypto space, wash trading is illegal under U.S. law yet remains difficult to detect and track due to the decentralized nature of digital assets and funds. In layman’s terms, wash trading is a type of market manipulation in which an investor or group of investors trade with themselves to create the illusion of higher liquidity than actually exists. This type of fraudulent behavior artificially inflates asset prices and can be dangerous for investors as it creates false impressions about the true value and health of a particular asset or market. In order to properly regulate these markets, governments must invest more in modern technology and data analytics tools that will allow greater transparency between transactions in order to root out this activity once and for all.

Wash trading has become an increasingly pressing issue within Ethereum’s burgeoning NFT marketplaces thanks to its ability to distort pricing and undermine public trust in crypto investments as a whole. While authorities have begun cracking down on those engaging in this illegal activity, more needs to be done if we want these markets to remain legitimate investment opportunities for all participants involved — from experienced traders looking for returns on their investments, all the way down to casual buyers simply looking for something unique or creative that appeals only them personally. As such, continued research into this topic is absolutely essential if we want our collective investments in these digital assets to remain secure going forward!

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Circle minted 500 million USDC on the Solana network.

    according to Onchain Lens monitoring, Circle has minted 500 million USDC on the Solana network. Since October 11, Circle has issued a total of 18 billion USDC on the Solana network.

  • Sources familiar with the matter: JPMorgan Chase is considering offering cryptocurrency trading services to institutional clients.

    according to Bloomberg, as major global banks deepen their involvement in the cryptocurrency asset class, JPMorgan Chase is considering offering cryptocurrency trading services to its institutional clients. A knowledgeable source revealed that JPMorgan is evaluating what products and services its market division can offer to expand its business in the cryptocurrency field. The source stated that these products and services may include spot and derivatives trading.

  • Federal Reserve Governor Milan: We believe that the policy rate will eventually be lowered.

    Federal Reserve Board member Mylan stated that due to the US government shutdown, there were some anomalies in last week's inflation data; he believes that the US will not experience an economic recession in the near term, but if policies are not adjusted, the US will face an increasing risk of economic recession. We believe that policy interest rates will eventually be lowered.

  • BlackRock deposited 819.39 BTC, worth approximately $73.72 million, into Coinbase.

     according to Onchain Lens monitoring, BlackRock deposited 819.39 BTC into Coinbase, worth approximately 73.72 million USD.

  • Ghana passes law legalizing the use of cryptocurrency

    according to Bloomberg, the Ghanaian Parliament has approved a cryptocurrency legalization bill aimed at addressing the expanding use of cryptocurrencies in the country but the lack of regulation. According to Johnson Asiamah, Governor of the Bank of Ghana, the newly passed Virtual Asset Service Providers Act will facilitate the licensing of crypto platforms and the regulation of related activities.

  • CryptoQuant: Bitcoin network activity cools, market shows clear bearish signs.

    CryptoQuant published an analysis stating that the Bitcoin market continues to be in a bear market state, with multiple network indicators showing a significant cooling of activity. Data shows that the 30-day moving average of Bitcoin is below the 365-day moving average (-0.52%), and the bull-bear cycle indicator confirms the current bear market pattern. The number of network transactions has dropped from about 460,000 to about 438,000, fees have decreased from $233,000 to $230,000, and highly active addresses have reduced from 43.3K to 41.5K, all indicating reduced speculative activity and that the market is in a defensive phase.

  • ETH falls below $3,000

    the market shows that ETH has fallen below $3000, currently at $2999.5, with a 24-hour increase of 0.86%. The market is highly volatile, please manage your risks accordingly.

  • BTC breaks through $89,000

    market shows BTC breaking through $89,000, currently at $89,014.5, with a 24-hour increase of 0.85%. The market is highly volatile, please manage your risk accordingly.

  • F2Pool co-founder: Last year, 500 bitcoins were transferred in to confirm whether the private key had been leaked; hackers took 490 bitcoins.

    regarding the community's heated discussion about the 50 million USDT phishing attack, F2Pool co-founder Wang Chun tweeted, "Last year, I suspected that my private key was leaked. To confirm whether the address was really hacked, I transferred 500 bitcoins to that address. To my surprise, the hacker 'generously' only took 490 bitcoins, leaving me 10 bitcoins, enough for me to make a living."