Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

How currencies for online games were created

From paragraph by abradeux

Game money as one of the main game tools was present in computer and console games of the 1980s.

From there, they migrated to the 1990s and at the very beginning of the zero years of our century in the online version of these games.

Game money as one of the main game tools was present in computer and console games of the 1980s.

From there, they migrated to the 1990s and at the very beginning of the zero years of our century in the online version of these games.

And the number of new games based on the accumulation and spending of virtual goods (commodity money) or in-game currency grew rapidly, the popularity of such games was off the charts.

There is no point in looking for which online currency was the first. There were many of them, a rare fantasy world, even inhabited by dragons and other monsters, did without trade and money relations.

Many such currencies have sunk without a trace into the past, others, for example, rupees from Legend of Zelda, simoleons from Sims, coins from Ultima (every gamer with experience can continue this series to his taste), on the contrary, due to the global popularity of games with them not only became legends themselves, but also influenced the economy of the entire gaming industry.

In 2000, Professor of Economics at California State University Edward Castronova estimated the "gross gross national product" of the EverQuest virtual world at $135 million.

The professor was prompted to make such an assessment by the fact that:

"gamers who have accumulated virtual, intangible wealth, such as magic weapons in EverQuest, sell surplus on eBay for non-screen currency".

The rest was, as they say, a matter of technique: using the exchange value of virtual goods determined by eBay, he calculated the gross product of the virtual world inhabited by avatars in the form of people, elves, gnomes, trolls, dragons, etc.

But in reality, in 2003 on eBay, goods created in Internet games were sold for about $9 million, in 2004 for three times the amount. Sales growth was exponential.

However, having estimated the volume of exchange of virtual game currency on its first electronic "exchanges", for real, or rather "full-fledged" (as it is now positioned) electronic money, in several hundred million and, having understood the meagerness of their turnover compared to the world financial market, the economists of the zero years of our century have lost interest in the fate of online game currencies, giving their fate into the hands of MMORPG manufacturers.

Economists then were much more concerned about another problem - cryptocurrencies, which became a real headache for them.

Only now economists have again taken care of gaming money, or rather taxes on trading in-game currencies and items, which have become a real commodity with a global market volume, according to 2022 data of $4 billion. They say their sales are tax-free and can be used for money laundering and terrorist financing.

From the very beginning, the gamers were extremely outraged by the open trade of the values of their virtual worlds, which were obtained with such hard work and enthusiasm.

They believed that "the game should remain a game, otherwise everything comes down to an alternative to gambling with the emptying of the majority wallets and the enrichment of units both in the game and in real life".

But someone was trading these values. It was easy to guess who exactly. They didn't even hide, but on the contrary, they advertised themselves.

Sony Online Entertainment's EverQuest online game was released in 1999 in America, and in 2000 in Europe, and in 2001 two ardent gamers of this game, Brock Pierce and Alan Debonneville founded Internet Gaming Entertainment Ltd (IGE) and opened an online store in Hong Kong, where their Chinese team, which they hired, supplied avatars and virtual values for this game in the assortment.

As the IGE management explained, "gamers can play games all day and earn some money on it. They will sell us additional armor and pay for a subscription to the game."

Sony Online Entertainment has strongly stated that "selling characters, items or equipment in Everquest would contradict the end user license agreement", and it does not support trading, as it causes "more problems with customer service and game balancing than probably anything else that happens in the game".

And having said this, she immediately opened her own exchange Station Exchange to attract gaming money from eBay.In 2005, in a survey of gamers on the EverQuest II trading site, 47.76% of respondents agreed that trading on the side of in-game values is "a betrayal of every real player".

But the others agreed with the famous English proverb "If you can't defeat them, join them".

In its original form, in antiquity, this maxim sounded like this: "If you are in Rome, behave like a Roman."

or,

"To live with wolves is to howl like a wolf."

All the quotes taken above (except for the last one about wolves) are from scientific publications on virtual game currency and from gaming forums.

However, experienced gamers already know all this. For at least twenty years they have been haunted by advertising appeals of something like this:

Buy virtual currency for online games at a wholesale price. Are you worried about authenticity? Don't worry! We employ the best and most reliable specialists.

No matter how tangible the line between play and work (pretence and reality) is, in the currency market of computer games, this line is erased without any entertainment purpose, and players again find themselves in the real world, worrying about exchange rates between game currencies and the US dollar.

Manufacturers of MMORPG, in turn, realizing that where toy money is used as a game tool, saturation of the virtual market with a large amount of money from the outside would lead to the most real hyperinflation and thereby undermine the very essence of the game, but unable to stop the activities of the "exchanges" of game currency, sanely decided to lead this process.

They have directors (managers) for game monetization in the staff, we also have enough such specialists in our country now. At the same time, the profession of a gameologist appeared in science, and within its framework a gameologist-economist.

The same professor of economics Edward Castronova became a professor of telecommunications and cognitive sciences.

By the way, in 2018 he created the game American Abyss about the second Civil War with the United States, which broke out in 2040.

The game had its own game currency, but it was desktop, the professor of cognitive sciences for some reason was wary of its online version.

Gamologists have laid out virtual online currencies: hard, soft, internal, etc., only 11 varieties, that is, twice as many as the main types of modern real money. Warnings to parents of children playing online games with virtual money began to be published more and more often.

Perhaps the most touching such warning appeared in November 2020 on the financial educational platform Rooster Money of the British holding company NatWest Group:

"Where there is money, there are people ready to help you break up with it, so talk to your children about how to identify fraudsters and protect yourself from those who want to take away their valuables from innocent young players by deception."

In short, game money has long hatched from the cocoon of Milton Bradley cardboard coins and Charles Darrow's toy dollar bills, leaned and live their own life. There are many games with money from aggressive risky extraction of them (or their commodity equivalent) rather by looting than trade, with purchases for this weapon for real money, to bucolic games with harvesting crops of turnips, tomatoes and fishing in a pond, their sale on the in-game market for in-game money, which neither scammers nor game monetization managers will not come to mind and which are spent by players without problems and hassle on expanding their virtual farm.

After all these stories, should we be surprised that we played with virtual money independent of the state regulator with such excitement for a century and a half that we eventually invented cryptocurrency?

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • BTC falls below $88,000

     market shows BTC fell below $88,000, currently at $87,997.85, 24-hour decline reaches 0.88%, market volatility is significant, please manage your risk accordingly.

  • The U.S. spot Ethereum ETF saw net inflows of $84.59 million yesterday.

     according to Trader T monitoring, the US spot Ethereum ETF had a net inflow of 84.59 million USD yesterday.

  • ETH breaks $3,000

     the market shows ETH breaking through $3000, currently at $3000.08, with a 24-hour decline of 0.38%. The market is highly volatile, please manage your risk accordingly.

  • Binance Wallet launches "secure auto-signature" service

     according to the official announcement, Binance Wallet has launched the "Secure Auto Sign" (SAS) service: it now supports mnemonic/private key wallets to trade on Binance Wallet (web version).

  • Circle minted 500 million USDC on the Solana network.

    according to Onchain Lens monitoring, Circle has minted 500 million USDC on the Solana network. Since October 11, Circle has issued a total of 18 billion USDC on the Solana network.

  • Sources familiar with the matter: JPMorgan Chase is considering offering cryptocurrency trading services to institutional clients.

    according to Bloomberg, as major global banks deepen their involvement in the cryptocurrency asset class, JPMorgan Chase is considering offering cryptocurrency trading services to its institutional clients. A knowledgeable source revealed that JPMorgan is evaluating what products and services its market division can offer to expand its business in the cryptocurrency field. The source stated that these products and services may include spot and derivatives trading.

  • Federal Reserve Governor Milan: We believe that the policy rate will eventually be lowered.

    Federal Reserve Board member Mylan stated that due to the US government shutdown, there were some anomalies in last week's inflation data; he believes that the US will not experience an economic recession in the near term, but if policies are not adjusted, the US will face an increasing risk of economic recession. We believe that policy interest rates will eventually be lowered.

  • BlackRock deposited 819.39 BTC, worth approximately $73.72 million, into Coinbase.

     according to Onchain Lens monitoring, BlackRock deposited 819.39 BTC into Coinbase, worth approximately 73.72 million USD.

  • Ghana passes law legalizing the use of cryptocurrency

    according to Bloomberg, the Ghanaian Parliament has approved a cryptocurrency legalization bill aimed at addressing the expanding use of cryptocurrencies in the country but the lack of regulation. According to Johnson Asiamah, Governor of the Bank of Ghana, the newly passed Virtual Asset Service Providers Act will facilitate the licensing of crypto platforms and the regulation of related activities.

  • CryptoQuant: Bitcoin network activity cools, market shows clear bearish signs.

    CryptoQuant published an analysis stating that the Bitcoin market continues to be in a bear market state, with multiple network indicators showing a significant cooling of activity. Data shows that the 30-day moving average of Bitcoin is below the 365-day moving average (-0.52%), and the bull-bear cycle indicator confirms the current bear market pattern. The number of network transactions has dropped from about 460,000 to about 438,000, fees have decreased from $233,000 to $230,000, and highly active addresses have reduced from 43.3K to 41.5K, all indicating reduced speculative activity and that the market is in a defensive phase.