Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Ethereum is a Game Environment

From Digital Objects by Ben Roy

People describe Ethereum in a lot of different ways.

It’s a smart contract platform, an asset ledger, an always-on financial system, a massive multiplayer online money game, and so on and so forth.

People describe Ethereum in a lot of different ways.

It’s a smart contract platform, an asset ledger, an always-on financial system, a massive multiplayer online money game, and so on and so forth.

The gaming metaphor is the one that I’ve always resonated with most. It helps tie together my entire engagement with this blockchain into a consolidated experience, that of a gamer.

Think about it.

There are different “levels,” starting with the main chain and followed by other execution environments that exist like layer 2s and aligned scaling solutions.

There are different “players” active in these environments, from traders and speculators to investors and collectors. Some are retail, some are institutional, and each have different degrees of skill, awareness, and experience.

There are different specializations, and players can “play” in NFTs, DeFi, memecoins, infrastructure, or other more niche domains.

There are different “game modes” as well. One period of time will be talked about as player versus player (PvP) where the same actors are fighting over the same liquidity to make money. Then another period will be thought of as player versus environment (PvE) where it’s easier to trade profitably because net new users (and funds) enter the ecosystem and lift it up.

The beginnings of a “gamer score” also exist with onchain transaction history converting into credentials like a wallet’s Degen Score or NFTs like POAPs from Proof of Attendance Protocol. Trackers like Nansen even categorize wallet addresses into “whales” or “smart money” based on their activity.

We see a unit of account for the game (i.e. Ether) as well as status symbols connected to the subculture that has formed around it (e.g. CryptoPunks), both of which are reminiscent of massively multiplayer online role playing games like RuneScape with its gold and party hats.

Ethereum also has a loose parallel to mainstream games like Fortnite or Roblox in that it thrives on user generated content (UGC). People are naturally incentivized to create “content” including everything from art to applications and gaming assets because there is money to be made by building out extensions of the game.

All of this is tied together in a “user interface” for Ethereum, which is how I think about the patchwork of block explorers (Etherscan), analytics platforms (Arkham), wallets (MetaMask), marketplaces (OpenSea), and relevant social media apps (Twitter, Discord, Telegram) that all players use to process and interact with the game.

There are a lot of implications that arise from thinking about Ethereum in this way. In my view, the most important one is that all products, services, and experiences built onchain inherit this game environment as their primary context.

People are drawn in by the global, open source game that we’ve created, and in this domain they behave in particular ways.

Every builder, every artist, every team doing something in crypto land would be wise to design with those norms and behaviors in mind.

Thank you to Liam, Lambo, Emmy, and Apix for feedback and review.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • BTC Falls Below $77,000

    Market data shows that BTC has fallen below $77,000, currently priced at $76,996.84, with a 24-hour decline of 0.28%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • BTC Falls Below $77,000

    Market data shows that BTC has fallen below $77,000, currently priced at $76,996.84, with a 24-hour decline of 0.28%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • ITI Opposes FCC's Inclusion of Optical Modules in Covered List

    According to the authoritative U.S. communications media Communications Daily, the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) formally expressed its opposition to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) last week, urging the FCC not to include foreign-manufactured optical modules in the restricted list. This represents the latest stance of the U.S. technology industry organization on this issue, further reducing the likelihood of a blanket inclusion of optical modules in the Covered List. In its latest submission to the FCC, ITI explicitly recommended that the Covered List should continue to adopt a 'precise, risk-based' approach, focusing on entities or products with clear ties to foreign adversaries, rather than broadly covering entire categories of technology from trusted companies. More importantly, ITI specifically stated that optical transceivers should not be included in the Covered List, particularly opposing the inclusion of all foreign-produced optical modules in the restrictions.

  • ITI Opposes FCC's Inclusion of Optical Modules in Covered List

    According to the authoritative U.S. communications media Communications Daily, the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) formally expressed its opposition to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) last week, urging the FCC not to include foreign-manufactured optical modules in the restricted list. This represents the latest statement from the U.S. technology industry organization on the matter, further reducing the likelihood of a blanket inclusion of optical modules in the Covered List. In its latest submission to the FCC, ITI explicitly recommended that the Covered List should continue to adopt a 'targeted, risk-based' approach, focusing on entities or products with clear ties to foreign adversaries, rather than broadly covering entire categories of technology from trusted companies. More importantly, ITI specifically stated that optical transceivers should not be included in the Covered List, particularly opposing the inclusion of all foreign-produced optical modules in the restrictions.

  • Ulanqab Plans 12.5GW, Surpassing OpenAI's Stargate Target

    According to Goldman Sachs, Ulanqab, a prefecture-level city in Inner Mongolia, has committed to a total data center capacity of approximately 12.5GW, which exceeds OpenAI's initial target of 10GW for Stargate. However, only about 1.2GW is currently operational. This expansion has primarily occurred in the past year, with over 70% of the capacity commitments made in this timeframe. DeepSeek plans to build approximately 1GW of data centers, while Xiaohongshu is reportedly considering a project of around 600MW. Companies like ByteDance and Alibaba have also entered the market. The area benefits from low land and electricity costs, cold weather, and proximity to Beijing. Dedicated fiber optics have reduced the average latency from Ulanqab to Beijing to under 5 milliseconds.

  • Ulanqab Plans 12.5GW, Exceeding OpenAI's Stargate Target

    According to Goldman Sachs, the city of Ulanqab in Inner Mongolia has a total committed data center capacity of approximately 12.5GW, which surpasses the initial 10GW target set by OpenAI for Stargate. However, only about 1.2GW is currently operational. This expansion has primarily occurred in the past year, with over 70% of the capacity commitments made in that timeframe. DeepSeek plans to build approximately 1GW of data center capacity, while Xiaohongshu is reportedly considering a project of around 600MW. Companies such as ByteDance and Alibaba have also entered the market. The area benefits from low land and electricity costs, cold weather, and proximity to Beijing. Dedicated fiber optics have reduced the average latency from Ulanqab to Beijing to under 5 milliseconds.

  • Saudi Reconnaissance Drone Shot Down in Yemen's Hajjah Province

    According to the Iranian Tasnim News Agency, a Yemeni military source stated that the Yemeni armed forces shot down a Saudi 'ScanEagle' reconnaissance drone over Hajjah Province while it was attempting to enter Yemeni airspace. The source informed the Yemeni official news agency that the drone was hit and downed using 'appropriate weapons'.

  • Iranian Parliament Speaker Mocks: U.S. Economic Pressure on Iran Will Backfire

    Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf shared an image on social media platform X, outlining the economic pressures against Iran and the impact of changes in the energy market on the U.S. economy. Referring to recent measures taken by Trump to control U.S. commodity prices, he wrote: 'Importing frozen meat to control meat prices? Well, maybe effective. But what is the U.S. plan for national debt? Want to import “frozen yields”? For the housing market, are you going to introduce “frozen buyers”? To address wage issues, are you going to issue “frozen payrolls”? A rigid and uninnovative foreign policy will lead to a frozen and stagnant economy. What is the only thing still functioning? It is the boomerang of imposing “devastating economic pressure” on Iran, which will ultimately come back to the U.S. itself.' (Jinshi)

  • US Military Casualties in Iran War Rise to 774

    According to the Washington Post, the casualty statistics system of the U.S. Department of Defense shows that the number of U.S. military casualties in the Iran war has risen to 774, including 18 deaths and 756 injuries. Even during periods without large-scale combat, the Department of Defense has quietly added about 60 new injury records recently. A significant number of the injured were affected by traumatic brain injuries caused by explosions when U.S. bases in Jordan, Kuwait, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia were attacked.

  • US Military Casualties in Iran War Rise to 774

    According to the Washington Post, the casualty statistics system of the U.S. Department of Defense shows that U.S. military casualties in the Iran war have risen to 774, including 18 deaths and 756 injuries. Even during periods without large-scale combat, the Department of Defense has quietly added about 60 new injury records recently. A significant number of the injured were affected by traumatic brain injuries caused by explosions during attacks on U.S. bases located in Jordan, Kuwait, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia.