Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Breaking the Stigma: Why Crypto Isn’t to Blame for Traditional Finance Failures

Validated Project

Did you hear about Silvergate Bank and Silicon Valley Bank? They recently went belly-up and it’s causing major drama in the financial world. These two banks were among the largest in the United States, so everyone is freaking out about what this means for the rest of the banking system and how safe our money really is. It’s not just affecting traditional banking. The crypto industry is taking a major hit too.

In the aftermath of the collapse, many people attributed the blame to crypto. However, crypto could be the solution rather than the root cause of the problem.

The collapse of Silvergate Bank

Silvergate Bank was a reputable institution in the crypto world, known for being super friendly to the space and having some big-time clients like Coinbase, Gemini, and FTX.

The collapse of Silvergate Bank was a classic bank run. The draining of deposits started from the collapse of Sam Bankman-Fried’s FTX exchange. At the end of September, Silvergate had a whopping $13.3 billion in deposits, with $1.9 billion in cash and $11.4 billion in investment securities.

But over the next few months, after FTX went down, deposits started dwindling fast. By the end of last year, they were down to $6.3 billion, and the bank had to sell off some of their securities to get more cash. Plus, rising interest rates meant that the value of their securities had gone down too. To make matters worse, folks were getting spooked and moving their funds to bigger banks for safety.

To sum up, Silvergate Bank’s failure was triggered by the withdrawal initiated by the fall of FTX, and their holdings could not fulfill the ongoing withdrawal request, leading to liquidation in the end.

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank

So, let’s talk about Silicon Valley Bank. They were a more traditional bank that had been around for ages and weren’t really into the whole crypto thing. They had a great rep and were all about serving the tech industry in Silicon Valley.

Unfortunately, things took a turn for the worse and they ended up collapsing. There were a few factors at play here. For one, interest rates were going up, so the bank had to pay out more to keep people’s deposits. And since the VC investments were slowing down due to market sentiment, the bank wasn’t getting as many new deposits. Plus, they made the mistake of investing in long-term government bonds, which lost value when interest rates went up. And finally, they couldn’t call back a lot of their high-risk venture loans, which made it impossible for them to repay all the withdrawal requests.

It’s a shame to see a bank with such a good reputation go under like this.

Stablecoins depegged

Last year, there were a bunch of crypto incidents, and a lot of them started with the stablecoin sector. It all kicked off when TerraUSD collapsed in May, and things just went downhill from there.

One of the most significant things to come out of Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse was the impact it had on the USDC stablecoin, which is the second-most liquid U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoin out there.

USDC is supposed to be super stable, meaning its value shouldn’t fluctuate much. However, when SVB filed for bankruptcy, it was revealed that the bank held over $3.3 billion worth of deposits in USDC. This caused panic in the crypto world, where USDC temporarily lost its peg, fell below $0.87, and rebounded when the news came out that SVB depositors were going to be made whole. But man, what a ride.

Is Crypto to Blame?

Despite the big collapse of Silvergate Bank and Silicon Valley Bank, we can’t go around saying that cryptocurrency itself is a failure. That’s just not true. These banks went belly-up because they made some bad investments and couldn’t pay back their depositors. It’s as simple as that.

The collapse uncovered weaknesses in centralized financial systems, leading people and companies to seek alternative options. The drawbacks of these systems, including the possibility of single points of failure, inefficiencies, and mismanagement, can push individuals towards decentralized financial systems such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies.

Unlike centralized banking, blockchain offers increased security, transparency, and autonomy, making it a viable alternative. By harnessing blockchain’s inherent strengths, the financial industry can overcome its weaknesses, such as vulnerabilities, inefficiencies, and mismanagement, ultimately leading to a more innovative, resilient, and sustainable financial ecosystem.

The recent collapse of Silicon Valley Bank underscores the importance of adopting blockchain technology in the financial industry to avoid similar crises in the future. By utilizing the unique advantages of blockchain, we can create a more robust and reliable financial infrastructure that benefits individuals, businesses, and the global economy as a whole.

Read more: https://nes-tech.medium.com/breaking-the-stigma-why-crypto-isnt-to-blame-for-traditional-finance-failures-26bd7ec32b06

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Amazon Shares Surge 15.2%, Biggest Gain Since 2012

    On July 31, Amazon shares surged 15.2% to $271.255 per share, marking their biggest gain since 2012, with a total market value of $2.92 trillion.

  • US Treasury Secretary Bessent Vows to Track Down Iranian Assets Globally for Terror Victims

    US Treasury Secretary Bessent said the US will actively track down Iranian assets worldwide to ensure compensation funds for victims of Iran-backed terrorist activities. Bessent stated that the US government's military and economic blockade measures against the Iranian regime will continue and will not be relaxed. (Jinshi)

  • Apple Plunges Nearly 10%, Q4 Revenue Guidance Misses Expectations

    On July 31, Apple (AAPL.US) plunged nearly 10% to $300.33, marking its biggest drop since April 2025. In terms of fundamentals, Apple's third-fiscal-quarter revenue rose approximately 16% year-over-year to $109.42 billion, slightly above analyst expectations. Among the details, product revenue came in at $78.68 billion, beating the expected $77.25 billion. However, services revenue—a key driver of its valuation re-rating in recent years—totaled $30.74 billion, missing the consensus estimate of $31.36 billion. Additionally, Greater China revenue reached $18.82 billion, with year-over-year growth slowing to 22%, also below analysts' forecast of $19.58 billion. During the earnings call, Apple guided fourth-fiscal-quarter revenue growth in the range of 9% to 11%, overall below the 12.1% analysts had expected. CFO Parekh noted that component supply constraints would impact iPhone, Mac, and iPad businesses in the fourth fiscal quarter, with currency fluctuations also constraining growth.

  • Three Fed Officials Back Rate Hike, Hawkish Pressure Builds

    On July 31, three Federal Reserve policymakers said that dissenting votes in favor of a rate hike this week stemmed from stubborn inflationary pressures, highlighting rising internal pressure on Fed Chair Warsh to act. In statements released Friday morning, Hammack and Kashkari said they worry that although the current round of price increases may stem from short-term factors such as President Trump's tariff policies and the Iran war, the inflation situation already warrants Fed action. Logan also joined in, saying that even if inflation cools, if the Fed does not raise rates, inflation is unlikely to fully fall back to the Fed's 2% target; without any policy constraints, inflation could continue to run above target until an unexpected shock occurs. Kashkari said that if inflation remains persistently stubborn, he might support a series of rate hikes, not just a single increase, to prevent inflation from becoming further entrenched. He said: "A series of small policy adjustments may be preferable to waiting for developments to unfold and ultimately having to take more forceful action." Hammack said that if the Fed does not tighten policy, price increases could continue to accelerate. She said: "Inflation has been stubbornly above 2% for more than five years, and I have no confidence that it will return to our target on its own." (Jin Shi)

  • US 10-Year Treasury Yield Rises to 4.7388%, Highest Since January 2025

    On July 31, the US 10-year Treasury yield rose to 4.7388%, the highest level since January 2025.

  • Spot Gold Intraday Decline Widens to 2%, at $4,021.08 per Ounce

    On July 31, spot gold's intraday decline widened to 2%, reported at $4,021.08 per ounce.

  • BTC Falls Below $63,000

    Market数据显示,BTC has fallen below $63,000, currently reported at $62,985.99, with a 24-hour decline of 2.99%. Market volatility is significant, please exercise risk control.

  • Fed's Logan: Leaning Toward 25 Basis Point Rate Hike

    On July 31, Federal Reserve Governor Logan said she leans toward a 25 basis point rate hike, believing inflation has not yet entered a sustainable path back to the Fed's 2% target. Logan stated that taking moderate action now would reduce the risk of needing more aggressive tightening in the future, while emphasizing that the Fed cannot rely on unexpected shocks to achieve its inflation target.

  • Fed's Logan: Taking Modest Actions Now Reduces Likelihood of Needing Stronger Action Later

    On July 31, Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan said that taking modest actions in the near term would reduce the likelihood of needing to take stronger action in the future.

  • Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Erases 5% Gain, Turns Lower

    On July 31, U.S. chip and semiconductor stocks rapidly weakened, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index wiping out a 5% gain and turning lower. Micron Technology, which had risen 6%, is now down 4.2%. SanDisk, which had gained nearly 10%, is now down over 6%. SK Hynix and Seagate Technology, which had risen over 8%, are now down 2%. TSMC, which had gained 4%, is now down nearly 1%.