Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Blockchain in trademark and brand protection, explained

Validated Media

What do trademarks and brand protection mean?

Trademarks and brand protection refer to legal measures taken to safeguard a company’s distinctive symbols, logos and brand identity from unauthorized use by others.

Trademarks are unique names, symbols or emblems used to identify a firm or brand and set it apart from competitors’ offerings. They are essential to consumer trust and brand awareness. The legal and tactical steps taken to defend these trademarks and the reputation they represent are referred to as brand protection. It includes actions taken to stop illegal usage, forging and infringement to preserve the uniqueness and integrity of the brand.

There are many different obstacles to overcome when it comes to protecting brands, and infringement and counterfeiting are two major ones. In addition to eroding brand value, counterfeit goods compromise customer confidence and safety. Online infringement makes things even more difficult because counterfeiters can operate anonymously and globally on digital platforms. Furthermore, managing global legal frameworks becomes more difficult and calls for thorough plans to stop cross-border violations.

Today’s trademark and brand-protection strategies include technology, proactive enforcement and legal action. A foundation for protection is provided by legal channels, including intellectual property legislation and trademark registration. Innovative methods of authentication and traceability are provided by technological solutions like digital watermarking and blockchain. To detect and address infringement instances quickly, brands also monitor, investigate and cooperate with law enforcement. However, because counterfeit operations are dynamic, brand protection methods must constantly evolve and adapt.

How blockchain enhances trademark and brand protection

Blockchain technology revolutionizes how businesses fight counterfeiting, ensure supply chain transparency, and manage digital rights.

Anti-counterfeiting software is one of the key applications of blockchain in trademarks and brand protection. Through the use of blockchain technology, firms are able to generate irreversible documentation of product legitimacy. It is possible to provide each product with a unique identification number that allows retailers and customers to instantly confirm its legitimacy. In addition to shielding customers against fake items, this also helps firms preserve their goodwill, ensure data integrity, and win over new customers.

Additionally, supply chains benefit from the transparency and traceability that blockchain offers, allowing firms to monitor the flow of goods from manufacturing to distribution. Businesses can use blockchain technology to confirm the legitimacy of products and spot any illegal or fake goods that are trading in the market. This preserves the business’s reputation and builds consumer trust by ensuring the authenticity of the products.

The implementation of smart contracts enhances brand protection measures by mechanizing licensing and enforcement procedures. These self-executing contracts are designed to carry out certain tasks in response to particular triggers. Smart contracts are useful for brands to protect their trademark usage rights. They can be used to automatically penalize unauthorized use or start licensing agreements when products are sold. As a result, there is less need for manual enforcement procedures, which streamlines efforts to protect brands and ensure compliance throughout supply chains.

Advantages of adopting blockchain for trademark and brand protection

Adopting blockchain technology for trademark and brand protection brings a multitude of advantages, particularly with the integration of NFTs and the emergence of the metaverse.

Immutability is a major benefit since blockchain creates an immutable record of transactions, making it very difficult to falsify or change trademark information. This reduces the possibility of intellectual property theft and infringement by ensuring the authenticity and integrity of brand assets.

Additionally, public blockchains do not require intermediaries like centralized agencies or registries, which simplifies the trademark registration procedure and lowers administrative expenses. Self-executing contracts, or smart contracts, can be programmed onto a blockchain to automate processes like royalty payments and licensing agreements. This ensures compliance and diminishes the likelihood of disagreements.

Furthermore, blockchain improves transparency by giving stakeholders real-time access to the ownership and usage history of trademarks. This enables them to confirm the validity of brands and monitor their use in various marketplaces.

Similarly, nonfungible tokens (NFTs) provide a distinctive digital representation of assets, allowing companies to tokenize their brands and safely verify ownership on the blockchain. By offering verifiable proof of ownership and provenance, this innovation improves brand identity protection by lowering the possibility of counterfeiting and unauthorized use.

Furthermore, blockchain technology ensures the seamless management and safety of digital assets inside virtual environments as companies traverse the metaverse. Brands may create and enforce trademark rights in virtual environments by utilizing blockchain-based registries and smart contracts, which promote authenticity and trust in digital interactions. In this environment, NFTs are essential because they make it possible to create branded virtual products and experiences with real value and exclusivity.

Barriers to adopting blockchain for trademark and brand protection

Notwithstanding its possible advantages, a number of obstacles prevent blockchain from being widely used for trademark and brand protection.

Firstly, stakeholders do not fully comprehend or know about blockchain technology or its uses in trademark protection. Businesses may be reluctant to use blockchain because they believe it to be complicated or unfamiliar.

Moreover, it might be difficult and expensive to integrate blockchain technology with current systems and procedures. To apply blockchain efficiently, firms might need to redesign their infrastructure and make considerable investments in new technology and knowledge. This can be a major hurdle, particularly for smaller companies with tighter budgets.

The implementation of blockchain in brand protection is further complicated by problems with scalability and interoperability. Blockchain networks may experience scalability problems as they expand, which could result in longer processing times for transactions and greater costs. To achieve seamless integration and data sharing, interoperability between various blockchain platforms and traditional systems also needs to be addressed.

Moreover, blockchain’s use for brand protection is hampered by regulatory uncertainties and compliance issues. Strict laws pertaining to consumer protection, intellectual property rights and data privacy apply to many businesses. It can be difficult and time-consuming for businesses to negotiate various regulatory environments and make sure blockchain systems abide by applicable laws and standards.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Grayscale transferred more than 1,000 BTC to Coinbase Prime address again last night

    According to Arkham data monitoring, the grayscale address transferred about 411 BTC to Coinbase Prime last night, and about 14 hours ago transferred 1003 BTC to Coinbase Prime address again, worth about $64.18 million.

  • Justin Sun has deposited 166 million USDT to Binance in the past 7 hours

    According to on-chain analyst @ai_9684xtpa, in the past 7 hours, Sun Yuchen has accumulated a total of 166 million USDT deposited into Binance.

  • An address transferred 8150 ETH to Galaxy Digital OTC address 8 hours ago

    According to on-chain analyst @ai_9684xtpa monitoring, 8 hours ago, address 0x4E8...fA555 transferred 8,150 ETH (valued at $25.64 million) to Galaxy Digital OTC address, suspected of commissioning sales.

  • Suspected Amber Group address withdraws 3 million SAFE from Gate.io

    Spot On Chain monitoring shows that wallet 0x011 (possibly Amber Group) withdrew 3 million SAFE tokens (worth $6.72 million) from Gate.io for the first time at a price of $2.25, six hours ago. It is worth noting that the price of SAFE has fallen by about 36% since April 23, 2024.

  • Franklin Ethereum ETF EZET listed on DTCC website

    COINOTAG has stated on the X platform that the Franklin Ethereum ETF EZET has been listed on the DTCC website.

  • Grayscale GBTC Bitcoin holdings fell below 300,000 BTC

    Official data from Grayscale shows that as of April 26th local time, GBTC's Bitcoin holdings have fallen below the 300,000 BTC mark to 298,445.4699 BTC, a decrease of approximately 2,167 BTC from the previous day. Additionally, GBTC's assets under management (non-GAAP) have decreased to $19,052,609,573.56, and its circulating shares have decreased to 335,190,100.

  • Hong Kong Investment Commission: Virtual asset spot ETFs can be bought and sold through banks

    Hong Kong investors and the Financial Education Committee have stated that the investment scope of spot virtual asset ETFs is limited to virtual assets (currently limited to Bitcoin and Ethereum) provided to the Hong Kong public for buying and selling on virtual asset trading platforms holding China Securities Regulatory Commission licenses. Trading counterparties must buy and sell virtual assets through licensed virtual asset trading platforms to reduce counterparty risks. Asset custody must be entrusted to designated institutions regulated in Hong Kong, such as licensed virtual asset trading platforms, banks, or their subsidiaries registered in Hong Kong, to reduce custody risks. Investors can buy and sell virtual asset spot ETFs through securities firms or banks. Some virtual asset spot ETFs also provide non-listed fund unit categories, which operate similarly to non-listed funds. Investors can apply for and redeem units through securities firms or banks.

  • Lido: SSV Simple DVT testnet has ended, selected participants will join the mainnet Simple DVT module

    Lido announced the end of the SSV Simple DVT testnet on the X platform and will soon launch the mainnet. In the next few weeks, selected participants will use SSV technology to join the Lido Simple DVT module on the mainnet.

  • Public blockchains' superpower: global consensus

    There’s nothing new here. I’ve been talking about applications for the last couple of years, but very few care - the industry is still mostly obsessed with infra and gambling. Some people told me “next bull things will be different” - but nothing has changed; indeed, I only see a greater indulgence in infra and degeneracy as speculation has returned. I have given up on things ever changing, but I’ll keep writing occasionally, repeating myself.

  • Major Financial Firms Accelerate Blockchain Adoption Ahead of 2024

    Major financial institutions such as JPMorgan and HSBC are increasing their blockchain-related activities ahead of schedule, accelerating the adoption of distributed ledger technology in traditional finance. In November, JPMorgan made its first decentralized finance trade on a public blockchain and introduced programmable payments for its institutional blockchain platform, JPM Coin. JPMorgan Chase and Apollo executives also revealed plans for a tokenized enterprise mainnet. HSBC has also been active, testing tokenized deposits with Ant Group and partnering with Ripple-owned tech firm Metaco to hold tokenized securities on its new custody platform. The growing interest from major financial companies indicates that the potential of DLT is gaining momentum, with some seeing a pathway to re-engineering global financial markets.