Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Bitcoin Is Less Affected by Rate Hikes and Crypto Bankruptcies Than Many Believe

Validated Individual Expert

2022 was a tough year for Bitcoin. The price dropped from over $46K to $16K. Many pointed to rate hikes and crypto bankruptcies as the main reasons. These certainly played a role, but perhaps not as big as many thought.

Let’s look at the numbers.

📊Impact of Fed Rate Hikes on Bitcoin Price

Many analysts — myself included — believed that the Fed’s quantitative tightening was the major reason for Bitcoin’s price drop. The Fed hiked 75 bps four times in 2022, the most rigorous rate hikes in decades.

But when I took a closer look at the numbers and correlations, I realized that not all of the 75 bps hikes had the same impact.

The above chart shows the impact of Fed rate hikes. Percentage price changes for each month are visualized for the S&P 500 (green) and Bitcoin (orange). The blue dots are the Fed rate hikes.

The short version: In the last 24 months, there is only a small correlation between Fed rate hikes and percentage changes in S&P 500 and Bitcoin price.

Let’s look at this in detail.

When the first hike rates happened at the beginning of 2022 we indeed saw prices going down. However, this effect diminished over time.

Even though the Fed hiked 75 bps in July and September 2022, Bitcoin price closed at 17% higher and then barely changed (-3.1%). We can see similar patterns when looking at the S&P 500.

This gets more confirmation when we look at previous data.

During the 2017 bull run, the Fed was also hiking up rates throughout 2017 and 2018. That did not prevent Bitcoin to reach $20K in December 2017.

  Source: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FEDFUNDS


The takeaway

In summary, this means that the Fed rate hikes do seem to have a smaller effect on Bitcoin price than is often assumed.

It seems that other factors are at play here.

Let’s take a closer look at what else I found out.

🗡️Impact of Crypto Bankruptcies and Hacks on Bitcoin Price

For many, the numerous hacks and bankruptcies in the crypto sector were another driving reason for Bitcoin’s poor performance over the past year.

For example, the total number of hacks increased from 236 in 2021 to 303 in 2022. However, much less money was lost than in 2021.

  Source: https://www.web3rekt.com/insights


But again it turns out that these events are not clearly related to the price performance of Bitcoin. For example, in March 2020 the Ronin bridge hack happened which caused losses of over $600 million. Nonetheless, March closed positively.

Do total lost amounts and amounts of funds lost due to bankruptcies play any role? I think the effect is limited.

The bankruptcies of 3AC ($3,5bn) and FTX ($9bn + $650 million hacked) did clearly cause price drops. But when zooming out to look at the month when they happened, the effect was not so significant (here I define a drop of 20% or more as significant).

The takeaway

While there seems to be small correlation between bankruptcies in the crypto sector and Bitcoin price drops, I couldn't see any correlations between hacks and Bitcoin price.

That is likely because neither bankruptcies nor hacks change the decentralization and security characteristics of the Bitcoin blockchain. As a result, it is very unlikely that they will have a long-term negative effect on the price.

🔮If it Wasn’t the Fed or FTX, Then What Caused the Price to Drop?

Let’s be clear that the Fed’s actions and the collapses of various crypto platforms certainly had an impact on Bitcoin’s price.

However, I see the simple fact that Bitcoin and thus crypto went into a bear cycle at the end of 2021 as the main reason.

In a bear market, all negative events are amplified, just as in a bull market, all positive news is enough to pump the price higher.

We are talking about a tough bear market. But in historical comparison, with a temporary decline of 73% from the ATH, it wasn’t the worst — despite the Fed and despite FTX & Co.

And it looks like we’ve already bottomed out.

Conclusion

I believe that Bitcoin’s 4-year cycle is still intact. The worst of the bear market seems to be behind us and we are slowly entering a new cycle. While the current pump looks promising I think that we should expect more sideways action in the coming months until the full-blown bull market returns.

All of this means that other factors such as rate hikes only have temporary effects on Bitcoin price. When in doubt, zoom out and focus on the long term. Many things can and will affect BTC price negatively. But as long as the fundamentals of Bitcoin do not change, I expect to see big returns in the coming years.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • KOSPI Index in South Korea Rises by 3%

    On June 30, the KOSPI index in South Korea increased by 3%, reaching 8647.03 points.

  • Analysis: Overweight in Chip Stocks Pushes South Korean Market into Danger Zone

    On June 30, news emerged that the global AI boom has driven the stock prices of Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix to historic highs this year. However, this surge has also exposed the structural vulnerabilities of the South Korean stock market, which is not accustomed to extreme volatility. Currently, SK Hynix and Samsung account for a record 60% of the KOSPI index, up from about 40% two years ago. Last week, after a significant market downturn, regulators intervened twice to suspend KOSPI trading to stabilize market confidence. Plans to introduce large-cap stock options, including those for SK Hynix, have been postponed. One concern is that retail investors are borrowing money to buy shares of Samsung and SK Hynix, which could expose them to margin call risks—where brokers require additional cash when stock prices fall below a certain level. The excessive concentration of market risk in these two stocks may also prompt institutional investors to withdraw, thereby amplifying downward pressure on stock prices. Matthieu Lacheteau, head of equity research at Baosheng, stated that the recent market trends serve as an important reminder of concentration risk. When investor positions become crowded, high volatility should be expected.

  • TrendForce: New Factory Production Timelines Likely Between Late 2027 and 2028, DRAM Supply Shortage to Persist

    On June 30, according to Yicai, analysts believe that the expansion plans of the two major South Korean memory manufacturers are primarily aimed at server DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory) and HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) products. Whether this will affect the competitive landscape in the memory market will depend on the capacity expansion plans released by other manufacturers. TrendForce analyst Xu Jiayuan stated that the new factory production timelines are likely to fall between the second half of 2027 and 2028, and that the DRAM supply shortage will be difficult to reverse before then. Regarding whether the latest expansion plans from South Korean manufacturers will impact the memory competition landscape, he noted that AI-driven demand growth is strong, and it is expected that various suppliers will successively release their capacity expansion plans. Ultimately, each supplier's market share will depend on the implementation of their expansion plans and customer composition. 'Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix's expansion plans from 2026 to 2030 are primarily aimed at securing long-term orders from large cloud providers, thereby increasing their market share in high-margin server DRAM and HBM.'

  • DBS: Optimistic GDP Growth Outlook for Singapore in the Second Half

    On June 30, Chua Han Teng, a senior economist at DBS Group, stated in a report that as tensions between the U.S. and Iran ease, Singapore's GDP growth outlook for the second half of the year is becoming optimistic. With improvements in financial markets, business, and consumer confidence amid a reduction in geopolitical tensions, the country's economy may benefit. There also appears to be further development potential in the global AI-driven technology cycle. As major hyperscale cloud service providers strengthen their AI infrastructure, demand for Singapore's storage chips, server-related products, and semiconductor equipment will be boosted. DBS Group has raised its GDP growth forecasts for Singapore for 2026 and 2027 from 2.8% and 2.3% to 4.3% and 3.0%, respectively.

  • South Korea's KOSPI Index Rises by 2%

    On June 30, South Korea's KOSPI index increased by 2%.

  • Ethereum Spot ETF Sees $30.04 Million Net Outflow Yesterday, Marking 8 Days of Continuous Outflows

    On June 30, according to SoSoValue data, the Ethereum spot ETF experienced a total net outflow of $30.04 million yesterday (Eastern Time, June 29). The Ethereum spot ETF with the highest net inflow yesterday was Blackrock's ETF ETHA, which saw a net inflow of $5.8693 million, bringing its historical total net inflow to $11.086 billion. Following this was Fidelity's ETF FETH, with a net inflow of $5.2520 million, currently totaling $2.113 billion in historical net inflows. The Ethereum spot ETF with the highest net outflow yesterday was Blackrock's Staked ETH ETF ETHB, which had a net outflow of $37.549 million, with a historical total net inflow of $520 million. As of the time of this report, the total net asset value of Ethereum spot ETFs is $8.594 billion, with an ETF net asset ratio (market value relative to total Ethereum market value) of 4.4%, and a cumulative historical net inflow of $10.873 billion.

  • Bank of Japan Appears More Hawkish Internally, But Dovish Opposition Votes May Double

    On June 30, the Bank of Japan appointed Ayano Sato, seen as a supporter of loose monetary policy, as a new policy board member. This appointment increases the likelihood of two dissenting votes on future interest rate hike proposals. Although the nine-member committee still maintains a hawkish stance overall, this structural change may slow the pace of policy tightening by the Bank of Japan. Additionally, the committee's most steadfast hawkish members, Naoki Tamura and Hajime Takeda, will leave their positions in July next year, adding uncertainty to the path of policy tightening. Sato is scheduled to hold a press conference on Tuesday at 5 PM Tokyo time (4 PM Beijing time), and the market will closely watch whether she aligns with Masayoshi Amamiya in opposing further tightening. Her formal policy debut will occur at the meeting on July 30-31, where it is widely expected that the Bank of Japan will keep interest rates unchanged. The market will weigh the evident monetary caution of Sato, related to the financing costs of government investment plans, against the Bank of Japan's established position of continuing to tighten policy in response to price pressures driven by energy shocks.

  • Bitcoin Spot ETF Sees $231 Million Net Outflow Yesterday, Marking Eight Consecutive Days of Outflows

    On June 30, news emerged that, according to SoSoValue data, the total net outflow from Bitcoin spot ETFs reached $231 million yesterday (Eastern Time, June 29). The Bitcoin spot ETF with the highest net inflow yesterday was the ARK ETF from Ark Invest and 21Shares, with a single-day net inflow of $49.969 million, bringing its historical total net inflow to $1.209 billion. Following this was the Grayscale ETF GBTC, which saw a net inflow of $35.1026 million yesterday, while its historical total net outflow now stands at $27.108 billion. The Bitcoin spot ETF with the largest net outflow yesterday was the Blackrock ETF IBIT, which experienced a net outflow of $300 million, with its historical total net inflow currently at $60.466 billion. As of the time of this report, the total net asset value of Bitcoin spot ETFs is $73.190 billion, with an ETF net asset ratio (market cap relative to total Bitcoin market cap) of 6.05%, and a historical cumulative net inflow of $51.375 billion.

  • FTSE China A50 Index Futures Rise Over 1%

    On June 30, FTSE China A50 Index futures rose over 1%.

  • Goldman Sachs: A 1% Increase in Samsung and SK Hynix Weight Could Lead to $2 Billion Foreign Capital Withdrawal from Korea

    On June 30, Goldman Sachs' Timothy Moe and John Kwon pointed out that a 1 percentage point increase in the combined weight of Samsung and SK Hynix in the Korean stock index could lead to approximately $2 billion in foreign investor withdrawals from the Korean market, as the U.S. Investment Company Act requires portfolios to meet diversification thresholds. Goldman Sachs also noted that a significant influx of funds into leveraged ETFs, along with increased options trading and retail margin trading, has created a structural environment where daily price fluctuations far exceed what corporate fundamentals can support. The growth in Korea's asset management scale since last year has primarily been driven by investment returns rather than new capital. As valuations rise, institutional investors' mechanical exposure to market volatility is also increasing—often related to hedging strategies. This means that even a mild market correction could trigger a series of forced sell-offs.