Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Addressing the barriers to DeFi adoption — Interview with Velvet Capital

Validated Media

The coming together of decentralized finance (DeFi) and asset management is marking a big change in the financial world.

DeFi’s decentralized and transparent architecture offers a compelling alternative to traditional financial systems. It could improve how assets are managed, give investors better returns, and make investment opportunities more widely available — not only for institutional players but also for individuals.

The growth of DeFi has prompted traditional asset management firms to cautiously explore the potential benefits of DeFi integration. But what challenges do institutions and individuals face when entering the DeFi space, and what can drive the institutional adoption of DeFi? In this interview, Vasily Nikonov, the CEO of Velvet Capital, a decentralized asset management platform, shares his thoughts on the details and possibilities of institutions and private investors using DeFi.

Cointelegraph: BlackRock sees institutional adoption of DeFi many years away. Do you agree with it?

Vasily Nikonov: It depends on what type of institution you are talking about and where in the world they are located. Due to regulatory uncertainty, for larger U.S. institutions such as BlackRock, DeFi adoption is likely three years away. However, smaller players in Asia and the Middle East are already actively exploring DeFi and piloting new products.

CT: In your opinion, what can drive the institutional adoption of DeFi?

VN: The genie is out of the bottle — DeFi is inevitable. Asset management, a multi-trillion dollar sector, is poised for a transformative era as an estimated $8 to $19 trillion of assets, both native to Web3 and stemming from the real world, are expected to reside on the blockchain within the next decade. Recognizing the need for robust on-chain financial rails to manage these assets, an increasing number of professional asset managers are actively exploring DeFi.

Source: Velvet Capital

Greater clarity and regularity will speed up this process — with a strong focus on the United States. But beyond that, institutions need professional-grade DeFi toolkits. Velvet Capital is here to provide the tools and infrastructure to make this transformation happen.

CT: What challenges do institutions face when entering the DeFi space?

VN: Institutions face many challenges in DeFi that aren’t prevalent in TradFi. For example, so far in 2023, over $1 billion has been hacked from DeFi protocols, a risk that isn’t as prevalent in TradFi. These hacks include bridges, compromised keys, liquidity pools drained, and more.

Another challenge is custody. Institutions, especially those based in the U.S., aren’t legally allowed to hold their own funds and are legally required to have a custodian. For example, Rule 206(4)-2 requires financial advisers to safeguard client funds and securities in their possession or over which they have authority to obtain possession. This rule makes it nearly impossible for U.S. financial advisers to interact with DeFi protocols on behalf of their clients because they must use a third-party custodian.

CT: How does Velvet Capital address all these challenges?

VN: Velvet Capital prioritizes security by implementing a comprehensive multi-layered security strategy, including audits from independent security firms such as PeckShield and Shellboxes. To further enhance security, we have launched a bug bounty program to incentivize white hat hackers to identify and report vulnerabilities in our contracts. Additionally, we employ real-time security monitoring solutions like Forta, Open Zeppelin, and Tenderly to detect and respond to potential threats promptly.

Regarding regulatory uncertainty, we recognize the need to adapt to evolving regulatory landscapes. While we cannot directly influence the policies of unfavorable jurisdictions, we have implemented features such as multisig vaults, optional KYC, and know your counterparty protocols to accommodate regulatory requirements and enhance compliance for institutions in certain regions. Nevertheless, we prioritize working with institutions in jurisdictions that foster a supportive environment for DeFi innovation.

CT: How does Velvet Capital differentiate itself from other decentralized asset management platforms?

VN: Institutional adoption of DeFi is impossible without a professional toolkit. That’s where Velvet Capital comes in. We stand out from the competition with our superior flexibility, functionality, and user interface.

We provide all the infrastructure necessary to create and manage DeFi products with ease. Everyone could benefit from professional-grade DeFi infrastructure. The Velvet Marketplace is open, allowing anyone to set up their own vault and seamlessly manage a personal DeFi portfolio.

For larger institutional investors who want to leverage our DeFi Operating System while preserving their own brand and client relationships, we offer a white-glove DeFi-as-a-Service solution that enables the use of Velvet infrastructure on a white-label basis.

Source: Velvet Capital

CT: Can you explain how Velvet Capital’s omni-chain DeFi operating system works and what its key features are?

VN: We provide a seamless and user-friendly platform that empowers anyone to create, manage, and launch on-chain funds, structured products, and tokenized portfolios. With Velvet, users can consolidate their DeFi interactions into a single platform and optimize returns through lending, staking, or liquidity provision across diverse assets and ecosystems.

The Velvet Marketplace serves as a central hub for exploring top-performing DeFi vaults and crafting customized vaults tailored to individual strategies. Asset managers can swiftly establish new vaults by selecting the parameters that align with their objectives.

Additionally, Velvet Capital offers a suite of advanced features that enhance the DeFi experience, including superior on-chain trade execution, effortless intent-based yield farming, native account abstraction, comprehensive KYC/KYB permissioning capabilities, omnichannel exposure with derivative strategies, access to real-world assets (RWAs), and an upcoming API layer.

Source: Velvet Capital

CT: What is the role of Velvet’s native governance token in decision-making processes related to institutional services/features/partnerships?

VN: Velvet introduces a new tokenomics model called ve(3,3), which combines the vote-escrow mechanism with (3,3) staking to promote long-term commitment and incentivize growth. The model aligns the interests of tokenholders, vault investors, and vault managers.

Our native VLVT token has not yet launched but will be used to reward vault managers, investors and referral program participants. Users can stake VLVT to earn veVLVT, a vote-escrowed token version, to vote on Velvet DAO decisions and earn VLVT rewards for voting.

Source: Velvet Capital

CT: Are there any specific strategies or DeFi products tailored to institutional clients that Velvet Capital plans to launch in the near future?

CT: Velvetl’s institutional-grade product has successfully launched, marking a significant milestone for the platform. With notable growth metrics, including a top ranking among BSC ecosystem projects in terms of monthly TVL growth on DefiLlama, Velvet is positioned for continued expansion. Plans are underway to deploy on Arbitrum, Optimism, and Ethereum mainnet in the coming months, further solidifying Velvet’s presence in the DeFi landscape.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Musk: Future Phones Will Have No Apps or Operating Systems, Just AI Generation

    On October 25, Musk predicted that in the next 5 to 6 years, smartphones may undergo a complete transformation: traditional operating systems and apps will gradually disappear, and phones will become dedicated terminals for running AI. At that time, users will no longer need to download applications or open software; instead, they will simply tell the AI what they want, and the phone's AI will collaborate with cloud AI to generate videos, images, and various interactive content in real-time.

  • Iran: Tehran's Stance Unchanged Despite Potential New U.S. Strikes

    On October 25, Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif stated on Sunday that Iran's position will not change even if a new round of conflict erupts between Israel and the United States. This comes amid escalating tensions between Tehran and Washington. U.S. President Trump had mentioned on Friday that Washington "might come back for another small-scale 'epic fury'" military operation. Zarif remarked, "Recently, some have talked about the possibility of a new war, but I am already considering the post-war situation. Our policies will not change whether or not war occurs. They have tried twice before and have seen the results. If they want to try again, they should understand that the final outcome will be no different from the past." (Golden Ten)

  • Russia Ready to Supply Any Amount of Diesel to the U.S.

    On October 25, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Novak stated that Russia is prepared to supply any amount of diesel to the United States.

  • Egypt's Benchmark Stock Index Declines by 5%

    Egypt's benchmark stock index has expanded its decline to 5%.

  • Yemen Conflict Escalates, Saudi and Egyptian Stock Markets Decline

    On October 25, Sunday, the stock markets in Saudi Arabia and Egypt experienced declines. This followed a statement from the Saudi-led coalition indicating that, amid escalating conflicts with the Yemeni Houthi forces, the coalition intercepted several drones and missiles over Riyadh and southern Saudi Arabia. Under pressure from widespread sell-offs, the Saudi benchmark index (TASI) fell by 2.6%, marking its worst intraday performance since April 2025, with major stock Saudi Aramco dropping by 1.1%. Outside the Gulf region, the Egyptian blue-chip index (EGX30) plummeted by 2.5%, nearing its lowest level in about seven months, with all constituent stocks declining. The Egyptian parliament is expected to vote on October 26 to decide whether to authorize the armed forces to provide support for Saudi Arabia in its conflict with the Houthi forces upon request.

  • SemiAnalysis CEO: Substrates are the 'Biggest Bottleneck'

    On October 25, the CEO of SemiAnalysis stated: 'I believe that in the semiconductor industry, the biggest limiting factor, aside from memory, is substrates. Substrates, PCB materials, and substrate materials are all severely under-invested. Many companies in the supply chain that produce these materials in Japan are relatively conservative and unwilling to make significant investments in capacity. As a result, there is a huge bottleneck. In terms of what can be produced in the next two years, whether it’s accelerators, CPUs, or any other component in the supply chain, I believe substrates are the biggest bottleneck.'

  • Keystone Hardware Wallet Website Hacked, Customer Information Leaked

    On October 25, Hong Kong-based self-custody hardware wallet brand Keystone, known for its full isolation and QR code signing, disclosed that its official website was unauthorizedly accessed on October 20, exposing customer names, contact information, shipping addresses, and order details (including purchased products and prices). The company confirmed on October 23, after verifying API activity with Shopify, that a third party obtained customer shipping information. Keystone emphasized that payment card and bank information, mnemonic phrases, private keys, and wallet passwords were not leaked. The company has blocked access, patched vulnerabilities, initiated an investigation, and notified affected customers via email, warning that scammers may impersonate Keystone to deceive customers under the pretext of refunds or device exchanges. Customers are advised not to click on suspicious links and not to disclose mnemonic phrases and private keys, with plans to release a detailed report within a few days. Other companies in the industry, such as Trezor (which experienced a leak from logistics provider ShipMonk in August) and Ledger (which had a security incident this month involving modified devices stealing mnemonic phrases), have also faced security issues.

  • Goldman Sachs Lowers 12-Month Target for South Korea's KOSPI Index by 25%

    On October 25, strategists at Goldman Sachs Group lowered their target for South Korea's KOSPI index by 25%. Previously, they had raised the target multiple times this year, but with increasing market concerns over AI-related trades, they have now opted for a downgrade. Led by analyst Timothy Moe, the team reduced the 12-month target for the KOSPI index from 12,000 points to 9,000 points. They noted that, given the benchmark index has fallen more than 35% from its peak in June, valuation assumptions need to become more cautious. These strategists believe that the current sell-off has left the South Korean stock market significantly undervalued; even after the target downgrade, the index still has over 60% upside potential.

  • Iran-Pakistan Border Reopens

    On October 25, according to Fars News Agency, Pakistan has reopened the Gabd-Rimdan border crossing in the Gwadar region, allowing trucks carrying liquefied gas and essential goods to resume passage. The crossing had been closed for less than a week due to security concerns and efforts to combat smuggling. Meanwhile, natural gas prices in Pakistan have reached a historic high.

  • South Korea Delays Cryptocurrency Tax Policy Originally Set for January

    On October 25, the South Korean presidential office decided to postpone the cryptocurrency income tax policy that was scheduled to take effect in January next year. An official from the presidential office stated on the 25th, "The discussions are leaning towards delaying the implementation of the cryptocurrency tax." The South Korean government had established a tax on virtual asset gains as early as 2020 when it revised the Income Tax Act, but the policy has been delayed three times. Initially set to take effect on January 1, the presidential office has now decided to postpone it again, citing incomplete tax administration preparations and public opinion among the youth. According to the revised Income Tax Act, annual gains from the transfer or lending of virtual assets are subject to a combined tax rate of 22% (including other income taxes and local income taxes) after a basic tax exemption of 2.5 million won.