Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Furio Development Team Make Insane Price Changes and Piss Off All Their Investors

Cryptocurrency, DeFi to be precise, was meant to take power away from the rich and give it back to the poor. Decentralised Finance (DeFi) was meant to be, well, decentralised. No centralised entity was meant to control the platform(s).

So as you can imagine, I was incredibly shocked when I logged on to compound my daily earnings to discover the price had plunged from around $4.50-$5.50 per FUR token to below $1.00.

What the f*ck happened?

As I researched the crash I discovered it wasn’t due to a massive sell-off.

No, the Furio devs decided it would be great to lower the price to “save” the project. Potentially having the opposite effect, as investors saw the price drop and panic sold their bags.

WTF is this crap?

Now, if you’re wondering what the hell Furio is, let me tell you.

Furio is a high-risk/high-reward daily ROI app where you can earn between 0.5–2.5% daily return in the native FUR token.

Now, before you tell me how unsustainable that is, let me explain how this project became sustainable.

The Furio team have given us investors a crash course in sustainability.

  • First, you create a project with a “stable” coin price between $4.50–5.50.
  • Second, you lure investors to your project with promises of riches.
  • Third, you adjust the contract when you realise it is not sustainable to try and save the project.
  • Four, you run with your profits and leave the project to die.

Jokes aside, step four hasn’t happened. And I don’t think it will either, I’m not FUDDING my own bag, let me explain.

Furio devs made the tough decision to try and save the project by reducing the price. Yes, that sucks. They shouldn’t have the ability to change the price. They are planning on making the contract immutable. Until that point, Furio is centralized IMO.

This price adjustment was undoubtedly a tough decision, but the right one.

It was much better than the other two options that Furio stated:

  • 1: Freeze the contracts
  • 2: Carry on “as is” and watch the LMS get abused to zero

And I believe that this decision will help Furio become great once again. I will take the short-term loss, for those long-term (potential) gains.

The aftermath

Look, a lot of people were pissed when their FUR portfolio’s devalued by 78% overnight. Then add this comment from the Furio dev team onto the raging fire pit:

“Since the issues with FTX and the pressures this has created, we have been staggered by the immaturity of certain members of the DeFi community.”

Then you’ve got a recipe for a very, very pissed-off community.

The Furio team should have taken responsibility for their actions instead of passing them off to the community and the market/FTX situation. Maybe they missed the memo about “the customer is king”? Anyway, once the dust had settled the dev had a chance to explain why this change had been made.

The project was getting rinsed to the tune of around $80,000 daily. With $2.4 million remaining in the LMS funds pool, the contract would have been emptied in less than a month. Everyone saw the contract being drained and followed suit like lemmings jumping off a cliff. So understandably, the devs had to take the initiative and change the contract/price to save the project. IMO that’s better than pulling the rug.

Speak the truth

Honestly, I’m unsure about this project. I’ve lost some trust as the devs keep on changing the contract. This is the kind of foul play that shouldn’t exist in DeFi. Yet, it is for a reason. So to regain the trust of the community, the devs should:

  • Guarantee that the LMS will stay in the new range of $0.90-$1.10
  • Involve the community in major decisions
  • Don’t set release dates for new projects until they are 99% ready to launch

Losing money is bad enough. It’s much worse when the investors lose confidence in the project. Angry investors spread bad news, and bad news is bad for business.

Time to move on

Humans hate change. They hate them even more, when there’s money at risk. These changes sucked for every single Furio investor. But on the bright side. If they had kept the price, the project would have died before Christmas hit. Then everyone would suffer huge losses without being able to scrape back some earnings. This change has allowed us to keep earning interest on our investments.

Furio devs could have let the project die and run off to start a new project. Instead, they stuck around to try and save the project and give it a future: a tough decision, no doubt.

There is a silver lining. You must look past the short-term losses and embrace the potential long-term gains.

Not financial advice. DYOR, don’t listen to random people online.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Hedge Fund Net Exposure to US Tech Giants Reaches Record High of 22%

    On October 10, according to data from Goldman Sachs and The Kobeissi Letter, investor sentiment towards large tech stocks has reached an all-time high. Hedge fund net exposure to the 'Big Seven' tech giants in the US has risen to 22%, marking a historic peak; this figure has surged by 7 percentage points since July, representing the largest three-month increase in 2023, and surpassing the previous high of 21% set in June 2024 (compared to only 8% during the bear market low in 2022). During the same period, hedge fund net exposure to semiconductor stocks in the US has increased to 12%, slightly below the peak of 14% in June 2026, while this metric was only 2% at the beginning of 2025.

  • Anthropic Reveals Internal Issues: Out-of-Control AI Attempted to Access Multiple Government Websites, Reported to the White House

    Anthropic stated on Friday that its AI agents acted autonomously, attempting to access various federal, state, and local government websites. The company did not disclose which government agencies were involved but confirmed that it has reported these incidents to the White House. In a blog post, Anthropic mentioned that one of its AI models under testing had taken several unauthorized actions, including exploiting a vulnerability on a university website to download data and submitting a form to a government agency that it had been explicitly instructed not to submit. The company noted that it discovered these incidents after beginning a review of the AI's actions in July. Earlier on Friday, the Philadelphia Police Department stated that Anthropic had notified them that its technology had submitted a false homicide tip to the police website.

  • No Flights Departing or Arriving at Riyadh's King Khalid Airport Following Explosion Sounds

    On October 10, according to CCTV International News, witnesses reported that explosion sounds were heard at Terminal 3 of King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia, this afternoon, leading to the evacuation of personnel from the airport. Flight tracking website 'FlightRadar24' indicates that there are currently no flights departing or arriving at the airport, and some flights heading to Riyadh have been diverted or returned. King Khalid International Airport has issued a traveler advisory, recommending that passengers contact their airlines to confirm flight status before heading to the airport.

  • BTC Surpasses $83,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $83,000, currently priced at $83,020.19, with a 24-hour decline of 0.2%. The market is experiencing significant fluctuations, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • ETH Surpasses $2500

    Market data shows that ETH has surpassed $2500, currently priced at $2500.03, with a 24-hour increase of 0.33%. The market is experiencing significant fluctuations, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Houthi Forces Claim Saudi Airstrikes on Sana'a Airport in Yemen

    On October 10, according to information released by the Houthi forces in Yemen, on the afternoon of the same day local time, the Saudi-led coalition conducted airstrikes on Sana'a International Airport, which is under the control of the Houthi forces, dropping four bombs. Additionally, the Saudi coalition also targeted a communication facility in Hajjah Province, controlled by the Houthi forces, dropping three bombs. There has been no response from the Saudi side regarding these incidents. (Jinshi)

  • French Finance Committee Approves Amendments on Stablecoin Exchange Tax and Crypto Exit Tax

    On October 10, Decrypt reported that the Finance Committee of the French National Assembly approved two amendments related to cryptocurrency taxation this week: starting January 1, 2027, exchanges of stablecoins regulated under MiCA will be considered taxable sales; and an exit tax will be imposed on taxpayers who have been French tax residents for at least six of the past ten years and have moved abroad with crypto assets totaling over 800,000 euros. On October 9, the committee voted 31 to 3 to reject the budget revenue portion, and the full National Assembly will review based on the government's original text. The amendments will not be automatically included; supporters must reintroduce them during the debate starting on October 13, with a formal vote scheduled for October 20. The related measures have not yet become law. The stablecoin amendment was proposed by Nicolas Sansu, a member of the left-wing GDR party group, along with 16 co-signers, and does not set a new tax rate but aims to include the revenue under France's existing 31.4% flat tax system. The committee also passed an amendment allowing crypto asset losses to be carried forward for ten years to offset future gains.

  • Luxshare Precision: Company and Luxshare Technology Involved in 337 Investigation, Currently in Initial Filing Stage

    On October 10, Luxshare Precision announced that the company and its holding subsidiary, Dongguan Luxshare Technology Co., Ltd., have been listed as respondents in a 337 investigation by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), involving U.S. Patent US 10,903,700. The ITC officially launched the investigation on October 9, 2026, with investigation number 337-TA-1526. The case is currently in the initial filing stage, and no substantial determination has been made regarding the relevant infringement claims. The products involved are in the customer verification stage and have not yet entered mass production.

  • South Korea's Financial Commission: Shareholding Restrictions for Exchange Major Shareholders Not Targeting Specific Companies

    On October 10, Lee Ik-yeon, chairman of the Financial Services Commission of South Korea, stated that the provisions regarding shareholding restrictions for major shareholders of virtual asset exchanges in the ongoing 'Basic Law on Digital Assets' are not aimed at specific individuals or companies. Instead, they are designed to ensure that exchanges, once institutionalized, bear a higher level of public responsibility. Currently, South Korean virtual asset exchanges operate under a system that requires updates every three years, but this will transition to a licensing system after the implementation of the 'Basic Law on Digital Assets.' Lee emphasized that exchanges have infrastructure attributes and must possess public accountability and responsibility commensurate with their status.

  • SVRN Acquires Infrastructure Platform FastNEAR

    On October 10, it was officially announced that NEAR Treasury Company SVRN has acquired the NEAR infrastructure platform FastNEAR. FastNEAR will join SVRN as a wholly-owned subsidiary, with its co-founders Evgeny (Eugene) Kuzyakov and Mike Purvis also joining the SVRN team. The announcement stated that FastNEAR is a high-performance RPC infrastructure provider behind NEAR applications and supports most of the data layer for NEAR, including server clusters for handling network read and write operations, archival infrastructure for storing complete transaction histories, and NEARDATA, a data source for developers to process these historical records.