Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Meta Defender: can DeFi insurance effectively address structured risk in the DeFi market?

Cointime Official

By Cointime.com 237

In 2020, the Total Value Locked (TVL) grows significantly as the DeFi protocol becomes more widespread. However, this has also led to many assets being coveted by hackers. Since DeFi protocols are open to everyone to trade, contractual issues can easily lead to asset loss. Despite the fact that almost every protocol is code-vetted by large companies such as CertiK, attackers stole more than $77 million in 2020, and the situation continues to worsen.

Since many forks make only minor changes and are deployed on multiple EVM chains, all of these forks can quickly become targets for hackers if something goes wrong with the original project's smart contracts. One common hacking tactic is Flashloan, which has become commonplace in the hacked lending space.

When a protocol is hacked, it will undoubtedly face huge losses and also when hackers transfer assets to an anonymous protocol like Tornado, there is no one who can trace the stolen funds and hence most hackers will not return any tokens to the protocol.

Statistically, about 53% of hacked funds were returned to projects in 2021, but most of that was actually due to the PolyNetwork breach that occurred in August.

So what can be done for DeFi participants to avoid losses due to these breaches?DeFi insurance may be one of the very few ways to prevent this from happening.

By purchasing insurance, users can mitigate risk and loss by receiving compensation in the event of an attack on the protocol or loss of assets. Such an insurance mechanism is expected to provide greater security and reliability to the DeFi industry, attracting more players into the space.

Meta Defender: Decentralized Insurance Protocol Compatible with EVM and Substrate Frameworks

Meta Defender is a decentralized insurance protocol built on the blockchain. It is compatible with the most popular EVM and Substrate frameworks and is designed to insure users' transactional and non-transactional assets on the blockchain.

As a leading DeFi insurance provider, Meta Defender eliminates intermediaries in insurance transactions through a transparent, trustworthy and convenient decentralized mechanism. The protocol is inspired by AMM pools, where there is a pool in the insurance transaction and the cost of insurance is market-driven. Similar to other DeFi protocols, Meta Defender operates on a DAO system where the decision to whitelist covered protocols (e.g., DeFi protocols or public chain security) is made jointly by all token holders.

Participants in Meta Defender include liquidity providers, policyholders and governors. Liquidity providers put money into the pool and receive premiums from policyholders, but they also bear the risk of paying losses in a whitelisted DeFi protocol or public chain attack. The policyholders are those who are concerned about being hacked while participating in the DeFi protocol, and they pay premiums to allow the liquidity providers to protect their assets. The governor, on the other hand, is an independent party responsible for determining whether the protocol should pay out losses to policyholders.

At the same time, Meta Defender is committed to applying blockchain technology to real-world insurance scenarios, becoming an important addition to the traditional insurance industry. When choosing a project to cover, Meta Defender evaluates the code security and financial risk of the project. Therefore, the project is not only an insurance protocol, but also a set of credit rating standards for the Web3 world. By introducing a decentralized insurance mechanism, Meta Defender provides users with more choices and guarantees, and offers a reliable layer of protection for the development of the DeFi industry.

How it works

Meta Defender is an insurance protocol that runs on DeFi as an insurance contract that matches policyholders with insurers. The protocol works as follows:

1. Business Process: Insuring

Anyone can participate in the insurance of digital assets at any time. The premium will be collected by the underwriter as a reward and accordingly a certain amount of capital will be frozen until the policy expires.

2、Business Process: Claims

Idle capital can be provided to several liquidity pools for mining. Part of the proceeds from mining will stay in the risk reserve. When a loss claim is filed, the capital in the risk reserve will be used first; only in extreme cases where the capital in the risk reserve is insufficient to cover the claim will the capital initially injected by the underwriter be used.

3. Pricing Logic

Meta Defender draws on and improves upon the well-known constant product model.

First, we need to define two concepts first:

1) Premium rate α: the ratio of the amount spent on purchasing the policy to the amount insured by the policy;

2) Remaining available capital P: in the extreme case, assuming that the remaining funds are located in the underwriting fund pool after settling claims on all existing policies; it can also be interpreted as the current total funds in the underwriting fund pool minus the total insured amount of all existing policies.

Under the assumption that there are no new underwriters joining/no underwriters exiting liquidity, the above two conditions will always satisfy the following equation:

K is a fixed value. As the number of insureds increases, P gradually decreases and α increases, indicating an increase in demand for insurance and vice versa. When a new insurer enters, P increases, α remains constant, and k increases accordingly.

Similarly, when an insurer withdraws from liquidity, both P and k decrease. An increase in P also occurs if the surviving policy matures and the frozen capital is released. In this case, k is constant and α decreases. α has a minimum value, and the decrease in α is limited by this value, and then the value of k increases. When the value of P "expands" to the point where α touches it, α no longer decreases but increases by k:

Existing blockchain insurance products also build some actuarial models, but it is difficult to ensure that the actuarial results are truly objective and trustworthy when the sample of historical data is insufficient.Meta Defender tends to be based on a market game, pricing the risk of each agreement based on the most basic economic principles of supply and demand.

A possible question is whether the mechanism would allow underwriters to purchase insurance in bad faith and increase premium rates. To avoid this attack, Meta Defender calculates the k-value by adding a dummy value to the actual P-value. This makes the premium rate curve very smooth and significantly increases the cost of such attacks.

Products

1、Meta Insurance

Meta Insurance provides financial protection for users' crypto assets.

Policyholders transfer their single risk to an underwriter by paying a premium, and the underwriter collects the premium and assumes the diversified risk.

Anyone can participate in the underwriting process at any time by generating a corresponding liquidity certificate NFT. premiums are earned by the underwriters as a reward and, accordingly, a certain amount of capital is frozen until the maturity of the policy. The underwriter is entitled to other rewards and incentives and the underwriting capital can be withdrawn at any time.

The policyholder is free to determine the term of the policy. Idle capital can be injected into several reliable liquidity pools for mining. A portion of the mining proceeds will remain in the risk reserve. When a loss claim is filed, the funds in the risk reserve will be used first; only in the extreme case that the funds in the risk reserve are insufficient to cover the claim, the capital initially injected by the underwriter will be used.

2、Meta Credit

Meta Credit provides a performance guarantee of repayment when a borrower applies for a certain credit facility from a lending platform.Meta Credit references several third-party DID credit rating systems to determine the criteria for qualified borrowers.

For example, a lending platform may require a 150% collateralization rate (the same as MakerDao's criteria), but a creditworthy borrower may wish to obtain a loan with a 120% collateralization rate. He can purchase performance insurance with Meta Defender that covers him for the loan amount, and of course, the beneficiary of the insurance is the lending platform.

When the borrower fails to repay the loan on time, or when the borrowed balance of his account exceeds the limit set by the liquidation collateralization factor (e.g., if the price of the collateral suddenly drops), the lending platform can claim against Meta Defender for alternative repayment. Of course, the collateral will be returned to the Meta Defender smart contract.

3、Meta AMD

Meta AMD is an asset management DAO.

Even though compensation for losses was provided during the DeFi attack, the effects of the incident are still not really over. Similar to the traditional way of dealing with toxic assets, there are still potential opportunities in these devalued assets.

As a result, Meta Defender requires those who submit claims to turn over affected digital assets (e.g., un-anchored tokens) to Meta Defender Contracts for asset management after receiving compensation. This not only provides compensation for those who bear the loss, but also provides additional profit opportunities for all parties involved.

Token Economy

Meta Defender's official project token is DEF and its distribution plan is shown in the table below.

According to officials, early participants of Meta Defender will receive DEF token airdrops as a reward in the future.

Conclusion

DeFi insurance is a rapidly growing field that provides participants with additional safety and security. As the DeFi industry continues to grow and innovate, asset security has become one of the key concerns for investors.The emergence of DeFi Insurance protocols fills this gap and provides users with the opportunity to be compensated in the event of an attack on the protocol or loss of assets.

Meta Defender, a leading DeFi insurance provider, offers insurance services to users through a decentralized mechanism and a market-driven approach. The compatibility and scalability of the protocol allows it to adapt to different blockchain frameworks and provide insurance coverage for users' transactional and non-transactional assets. Meta Defender also ensures that all token holders are involved in the decision-making and governance process by introducing a DAO system and governance mechanism.

The development of DeFi insurance will provide important support for the sustainable development of the DeFi industry. As more investors and users participate in DeFi, they become more attentive to the security and risk management of their assets. the existence of DeFi insurance provides users with additional confidence and protection and helps to attract more participants to the space.

However, DeFi insurance still faces some challenges and risks. For example, determining insurance costs and coverage is a complex issue that requires a combination of market demand, risk factors of the agreement, and user interests. In addition, auditing and regulation of insurance organizations is an important issue to ensure the safety and transparency of insurance funds.

Overall, DeFi insurance will play an increasingly important role in the development of the DeFi industry. It provides users with additional protection and confidence, and provides a safe environment for DeFi's sustainable development. As the technology continues to innovate and the industry matures, DeFi Insurance is expected to become an important part of the crypto-financial landscape and promote greater participation in this revolutionary financial model.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Xinjiang launches special campaign to combat illegal fundraising, with key areas including virtual currency, blockchain, etc.

    According to Chang'an Xinjiang Public Account, Xinjiang Autonomous Region and Corps have launched a joint special action to crack down on illegal fund-raising, with key areas including third-party wealth management, fake private equity, fake gold exchange and other traditional fields, as well as emerging fields such as virtual currency, blockchain, cultural tourism, film and television investment, and debt resolution services. It is reported that key cases include cases involving more than 100 million yuan and cases that have been criminally filed for more than five years.

  • A British court has postponed the final sentencing of Wen Jian, a British-Chinese national involved in the country's largest Bitcoin money laundering case, until May 24.

    On May 11th, it was reported that Jian Wen, a 42-year-old British Chinese citizen, was found guilty of "participating in arranging money laundering" in the UK's largest Bitcoin money laundering case. He could be sentenced to up to 14 years in prison. Jian Wen's defense lawyer, Mark Harries, stated that due to the judge's busy schedule, the UK court has postponed Jian Wen's final sentencing, which was originally scheduled for May 10th, to May 24th.

  • Web3 startup Star Nest completes $6 million in Pre-A round of financing

    Hong Kong Web3 music startup Star Nest announced that it has completed a $6 million Pre-A round of financing, led by Chuangqi International Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hong Kong Stock Exchange-listed company Guofu Innovation. Star Nest will collaborate with Armonia Meta Chain to develop the Star Nest SpaceStar metaverse game, which includes music, role-playing, and social features.In addition, Star Nest plans to launch its NEST project in the third quarter of 2024. Nest will receive 2.1 billion NEST tokens tailored for the project, and Star Nest will use the NEST token to build a more complete music industry token economic system. The NEST token will be widely used for purchasing performance tickets, chain game cooperation, metaverse consumption, governance voting, and other activities.

  • Over $594 million worth of PYTH is staked

    According to Dune data,  there are currently 1,201,167,362 PYTH tokens in the staked state, with a total staked value exceeding $594 million. The number of PYTH stakers has reached 151,211.

  • US Department of Justice: Tornado Cash indictment has nothing to do with "free speech"

    On May 11th, the US Department of Justice explained why the motion to dismiss the criminal case against Tornado Cash founder Roman Storm was invalid. The Department of Justice reiterated that their indictment was not related to whether the Tornado Cash computer code had freedom of speech or was protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution. The defendant was not charged for publishing computer code, but for using it to facilitate profitable illegal activities.

  • USDC circulation decreased by $100 million in the past week, with a total circulation of $33 billion

    According to official data,as of May 9th, Circle has issued approximately $2 billion USDC and redeemed approximately $2 billion USDC in the past 7 days, with a decrease in circulation of approximately $100 million. The total circulation of USDC is $33 billion, with a reserve of $33.1 billion, including approximately $3.3 billion in cash and Circle Reserve Fund holding approximately $29.8 billion.

  • SEC rejects Coinbase's request for appeals court ruling on cryptocurrency rules

    The US SEC has rejected Coinbase's request to appeal to the court to review whether traditional securities rules are applicable to cryptocurrencies. In its application, Coinbase stated that it hoped the appeals court would consider whether the Howey test, which has long been used for securities evaluation, should be applied to digital assets. However, the SEC pointed out that Coinbase has not successfully demonstrated the need for such an evaluation. The SEC stated that Coinbase is attempting to create a "new legal test," but this attempt was rejected by the court. The court found that Coinbase's arguments lacked consistency and did not successfully demonstrate the existence of decisive issues. Currently, the judge responsible for hearing the SEC's case against Coinbase will make a ruling on Coinbase's intermediate appeal motion.

  • Colombian President Suspected of Accepting $500,000 in Illegal Crypto Donations

    Colombian President Gustavo Petro is suspected of accepting over $500,000 in digital token donations from a fraudulent cryptocurrency project during his 2022 election campaign. A former contractor revealed that the illegal donation occurred during a meeting in February 2022 that discussed the advantages of cryptocurrency and the possibility of working with the government. This allegation is one of the latest charges faced by President Petro during his election campaign, with the Colombian Prosecutor's Office investigating his campaign last year.

  • Fed's Kashkari: The bar for another rate hike is high, but it cannot be ruled out

    The Federal Reserve's Kashkari expressed a cautious attitude towards restrictive monetary policy; he is adopting a wait-and-see attitude towards future monetary policy; he is in a wait-and-see state to see if inflation is stagnating; the threshold for raising interest rates again is high, but this possibility cannot be ruled out; if inflation data supports it, the Fed will maintain interest rates.

  • The address that defrauded 1,155 wBTC has returned more than 96% of the funds to the victims

    Blockchain data shows that the address poisoning attacker lured users to send 1,155 Wrapped Bitcoins (wBTC) (valued at $68 million at the time) to them. The attacker has returned almost all of the stolen funds. These funds were exchanged for Ethereum (ETH) during the attacker's holding period, and the price of ETH has since fallen. However, the attacker returned about 22,960.07 ETH, worth about $65.7 million, which accounts for over 96% of the initial stolen funds in terms of US dollar value.