Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

What Are Bitcoin NFTs Ordinals and How Do They Work?

Bitcoin is no stranger to NFTs, but it's not been much of a friend to them either. That could be all changing as a new kind of Bitcoin-based NFTs called Ordinals emerge.

The first blockchain-based NFTs were made in 2014 on Counterparty, a protocol built on Bitcoin. The biggest collections that came out of this were Spells of Genesis in 2015 and Rare Pepes in 2016.

When Counterparty was taking off, it led to a debate over whether this was a good use of the Bitcoin blockchain. “Using full nodes as dumb data storage terminals is simply abusing an all-volunteer network resource,” Jeff Garzik, then a Bitcoin core developer, said at the time. 

The core issue is the use of what’s called OP_RETURN, a function that can be used to store arbitrary data in the blockchain. Bitcoin had a limit that meant you could effectively only store 40 bytes of data using this function, but in 2016 it was increased to 80 bytes.

The 2017 upgrade Segwit made it 75% cheaper to store data with this function, while the 2021 upgrade Taproot made it around 10% cheaper and easier to store this data in single transactions (as opposed to spreading it among multiple ones), according to Bitcoin core developer Peter Todd.

As a result, anyone can now store as much data as they like with this function as long as they’re willing to pay for it and the total block size remains under 4MB.

Introducing Ordinals

That's where Ordinals comes in. It’s still basically a bit of a workaround, but it provides a new way to store NFTs on the Bitcoin blockchain now that it's easier and cheaper to store larger amounts of data.

There are two things that stand out when it comes to Ordinals NFTs. First, they are comprised entirely of on-chain data. This means the actual image for the NFT itself is stored on the blockchain, instead of simply linking to some image that’s stored on an external website. This matches only a select few NFTs on Ethereum, as the vast majority link to external sites.

Swedish researcher (and former Arcane Assets CIO) Eric Wall estimates that storing fully on-chain NFTs is now seven times cheaper on Bitcoin than on Ethereum.

The second standout is that NFTs are connected with individual satoshis. That's different from Ethereum, where NFTs are more natively supported and each one has its own token.

It can get complicated, though. Bitcoins are fungible, meaning each one can be used interchangeably and the only way to separate them is through the complex system of transaction inputs and outputs. Ordinals basically set out to find a way to make fungible Bitcoin non-fungible, and to do that, it decided on a shared logic with the project giving every satoshi a number based on the order in which it was mined. It uses that numbering system, and a few other details, to maintain continuity for the NFTs.

None of this is natively supported by Bitcoin software, and if Ordinals NFT holders aren’t careful, they might accidentally spend their NFTs on transaction fees, as Dennis Porto, general partner at Huat Ventures, noted in a blog post.

What are people using Ordinals for?

With a new tool for creating NFTs on Bitcoin, enthusiasts have already started getting creative with all the possibilities. 

Someone paid about $2 a pop to mint a copy of the 100 Ether Rocks — one of the oldest Ethereum NFT projects — on Bitcoin. As Porto noted, each individual NFT has to be minted in its own transaction for its own fee, unlike Ethereum where many NFTs can be minted in one go. You can even see the larger transactions filling up the block they’re contained in.

Wall — and an engineer called Rijndael — took this one step further by mining one of the Trump NFT images onto Bitcoin. Rijndael then transferred it onto a satscard, a device that lets you store and transport Bitcoin like it was a gift card. He noted that the satoshi associated with the NFT was mined in 2009, potentially giving it a bonus attribute.

Other Ordinals NFTs include the Nyan Cat meme, pictures of AI-generated Bitcoin clocks, Rare Pepes cards, Bored Apes and the original dogecoin meme. But so far, these are all unofficial.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • HKEX CEO: Virtual asset exchanges have become HKEX’s competitors

    On May 10th, Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited's new CEO, Nicolas Aguzin, stated in an interview with the Shanghai Securities News that HKEX faces competition not only from other securities exchanges, but also from external competitors such as virtual asset exchanges. In order to meet the rapidly evolving demands of customers and technology, HKEX must balance innovation and stable business operations, continuously expand its resources for listed companies, and improve its market services.

  • WOOFi attacker address has transferred 100 ETH to Tornado cash

    PeckShield monitoring shows that the address marked by the WOOFi attacker has transferred 100 ETH to Tornado cash. The WOOFi attacker has already transferred 2200 ETH (worth about $6.5 million) to Tornado cash.

  • Trump will hold a private dinner on the day of the court recess, inviting NFT trading card buyers to attend

    On May 10th, according to sources, former US President Donald Trump will host a dinner at his Mar-a-Lago estate on a day off, inviting NFT trading card buyers to attend. This event is part of Trump's series of non-campaign activities, aimed at balancing his White House campaign and legal disputes. After Stormy Daniels testified in Trump's trial on Tuesday, Trump expressed his desire for campaigning rather than being tied up in court. Despite no public campaign activities on Wednesday, Trump's schedule includes private political meetings.

  • Tether: Deutsche Bank’s analysis lacks clarity and substantive evidence

    According to a report on stablecoins released on May 7, Deutsche Bank analyzed 334 currencies linked to stablecoins and found that 49% of stablecoins had failed during their median lifespan of about eight to ten years. The analysts concluded that most anchored assets in the cryptocurrency field will experience significant "turbulence" caused by speculative sentiment and ultimately suffer some form of decoupling event. Deutsche Bank analysts also pointed out that Tether's reserve transparency was lacking and described the company's solvency as "doubtful".

  • Yesterday, Solana’s on-chain DEX transaction volume surpassed Ethereum, reaching $1.314 billion

    On May 10th, according to DeFiLlama data, the trading volume of Solana's DEX reached 1.314 billion US dollars yesterday, surpassing the trading volume of 1.297 billion US dollars on Ethereum's DEX.

  • US court orders seizure of 279 virtual currency accounts containing criminal proceeds from North Korean hacking

    A US court has ordered the confiscation of 279 virtual currency accounts containing proceeds from North Korean hacker crimes. US District Court Judge Timothy Kelly in Washington, DC approved the federal prosecutor's request for a summary judgment on these accounts and ordered their confiscation on May 8. This ruling means that these accounts are now under the control of the US Department of Treasury.

  • South Korea’s National Tax Service announced that it would collect 40 billion won in taxes from Bithumb users

    Bithumb has issued a preliminary notice of comprehensive income tax to some users who participated in activities held between 2018 and 2021, and announced full support for the related tax amount. The position of the National Tax Service is that rewards paid to users through various activities (including virtual assets) constitute taxable income. Bithumb does not agree with the National Tax Service's opinion, but explains that taxation is mandatory.

  • The Base ecosystem Bloom project said it has recovered 90% of the funds stolen in the attack

    On May 10th, Bloom, a decentralized derivatives exchange on the X platform, announced that they have recovered $486,000 (minus 10% for bug bounties) out of the total funds utilized ($540,000). All of these funds will be redistributed to limited partners. 10% of the bug bounty has been agreed upon in exchange for not pressing charges against those who exploited the bug. A compensation plan for limited partners affected by the bug will be completed within the next 24-48 hours. Funds are safe and there is currently no need to revoke contract access.

  • Bitcoin opens $63K futures gap as thin liquidity threatens BTC price

    Bitcoin market participants are doubting the staying power of the ongoing BTC price relief bounce.

  • Cointime May 3rd News Express

    1. The 133rd Ethereum ACDC meeting: The goal is to complete the devnet within 7-10 days