Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

ZK-Rollups Top Three Possibilities for Scaling Bitcoin

Validated Project

ZK-rollups have emerged as one of the most promising scalability solutions on the Ethereum. The funding raised by leading projects in this space, such as zkSync and StarkWare, has surpassed millions of dollars. As Bitcoin scalability gradually becomes a significant narrative in the crypto space, exploring the possibilities of integrating ZK-rollups with Bitcoin has become increasingly important.

Before delving into the exploration, it is essential to have a clear understanding of the technical concepts of ZK-rollups in the context of Bitcoin scalability. These concepts can be broadly categorized into three aspects.

The Stored Data of ZK-Rollups

ZK-rollups require running verification code and storing result data on the Bitcoin layer 1. However, solutions that only store the final validated state data root (Merkle Root) of ZK-rollups on the Bitcoin layer are not considered genuine solutions.

For instance, the sovereign rollup solution by Rollkit, a Bitcoin scalability project, solely stores state data on the Bitcoin. However, this approach faced immediate ridicule from Ethereum influencer ryanb.eth regarding its implementation mechanism.

Storing state data on the Bitcoin layer 1 is currently the easiest way to implement ZK-rollups. However, this practice lacks true significance. Submitting and storing state data on the Bitcoin layer 1 is merely a self-verification act and does not constitute a complete solution.

Turing-Complete ZK-Rollups

To achieve EVM-compatible ZK-rollups, it is necessary to have support for Turing-complete smart contracts on the Bitcoin layer 1 to handle various types of ZK verifications.

This approach, which requires smart contract verification for ZK-rollups, is an imaginative and ambitious technological goal. However, the current progress in this area remains uncertain, involving extensive foundational research and development that are still being explored.

Customized ZK-Rollups

For certain limited and specific use cases, such as payment, customized ZK-rollups technology solutions can be developed. These solutions have well-defined and simplified functionality, often not requiring Turing-complete smart contract support, and can be implemented through hard-coding on the Bitcoin layer 1.

This specific category of ZK technology has the potential to evolve into a foundational component, similar to elliptic-curve cryptography, that underpins blockchain technology.

After clarifying the technical concepts of ZK-rollups in the context of Bitcoin scalability, we can undertake a comprehensive exploration and summary of the various possibilities and potential issues that arise from the integration of Bitcoin with ZK-rollups based on these three aspects.

1.Enabling Turing-Complete ZK-Rollups On The Bitcoin Layer 1

To embark on the path of supporting Turing-complete ZK-Rollups, it implies a significant upgrade for the Bitcoin mainnet. Following the upgrade, various applications on ZK-rollups will benefit from the decentralization and security of the Bitcoin network, thereby addressing sustainability issues within the Bitcoin network's economic model to some extent.

However, this also means the collapse of Bitcoin's long-held narrative as a money and store of value, transitioning it into a better version of Ethereum. Additionally, large-block approach represented by Bitcoin Cash may resurface as a valid alternative, causing a weakening of Bitcoin's network decentralization. The core narrative and the derived value foundation will face scrutiny.

The challenge with this direction lies in the need to upgrade the Bitcoin mainnet. This requires the overwhelming consensus and unified efforts of Bitcoin developers, miners, significant Bitcoin holders, and related market institutions.

Otherwise, an alternative approach, such as the proposal of BIP300/301 by LayerTwo Labs, would involve forking the Bitcoin mainnet directly, with the expectation of gaining consensus within the Bitcoin community based on the subsequent performance of the forked chain.

2.Optimization Of Bitcoin In Specific Aspects Through ZK-Rollups

Whether or not Bitcoin upgrades to support Turing-complete ZK-rollups, it does not hinder the technical optimization of ZK technology in specific aspects of Bitcoin. If Bitcoin does not upgrade to support Turing-complete ZK-rollups and only focuses on technical optimization in specific use cases, it means that the core narrative of Bitcoin as a money and store of value can continue to be preserved.

For example, in the realm of payments, ZK-rollups can bring higher efficiency than the Lightning Network through mathematical rather than economic means. However, this would entail increased computational costs and higher operating expenses for nodes. When other existing technical solutions can achieve similar outcomes, the market tends to favor the technology solution with lower overall costs.

The challenge with this direction lies in whether Bitcoin has enough specific use cases that require the adoption of ZK-rollups and whether ZK-rollups can achieve optimal efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Otherwise, there is a risk of projects engaging in coin speculation by solely relying on technical narratives.

3.ZK-Rollups Supported By Bitcoin-Compatible Chains

Due to the high difficulty in implementing ZK-Rollups with full Turing completeness on Bitcoin, as well as the risk of collapsing the Bitcoin narrative, there is a significant possibility of transferring Bitcoin to compatible chains for ZK-rollups scalability.

Currently, there are two main approaches for Bitcoin-compatible chains to support ZK-Rollups: sidechain and one-way transfer to new chains.

3.1 Sidechain Approach of ZK-Rollups

Sidechain solutions have represented a direction for Bitcoin scalability, where specific cross-chain technologies are used to transfer BTC to EVM-compatible chains for scalability. By adding ZK-Rollups on these chains, further scalability improvements can be achieved.

There are already several sidechains in the Bitcoin ecosystem focused on scalability, such as StacksRootstock, and Liquid Network. The possibility of this direction depends on whether future competitors will add ZK-rollups to existing sidechains or lead with entirely new sidechains dedicated to ZK-rollups.

3.2 One-Way Transfer Approach of ZK-Rollups

The one-way transfer approach for Bitcoin scalability has been proposed by the Hacash chain. The basic principle is to unidirectionally transfer BTC from the main network to a new chain that supports ZK-rollups for scalability.

Both approaches for Bitcoin-compatible chains supporting ZK-rollups require sufficient incentive mechanisms to facilitate the transfer of BTC to the chains. The main difference lies in whether the transferred BTC can return to the main network.

Therefore, for the one-way transfer approach of ZK-rollups to become more feasible, the issues with the sidechain approach of ZK-rollups need to be addressed, preferably with additional advantages.

The key challenge with sidechain scalability lies in achieving sufficient decentralization in the process of cross-chain management for BTC. Currently, most cross-chain bridge solutions have various centralization flaws.

On the other hand, the one-way transfer approach achieves transfer by maintaining the unchanged private keys of Bitcoin, eliminating the need for any form of centralized management or traditional cross-chain bridges.

Additionally, it is important to consider the advantages that the one-way transfer approach offers compared to the sidechain approach of ZK-Rollups.

Taking Hacash as an example, the PoW decentralization mechanism and the self-regulating money supply stabilization system based on the Hacash layer 1 can improve the lack of monetary properties of Bitcoin.

Conclusion

The combination of Bitcoin and ZK-rollups presents three main possibilities: Bitcoin supporting Turing-complete ZK-Rollups, ZK-Rollups optimizing specific functionalities and use cases of Bitcoin, and Bitcoin-compatible chains supporting ZK-Rollups.

To achieve Bitcoin supporting Turing-complete ZK-rollups, broad support from the entire community is necessary. However, this may trigger a crisis in the core narrative of Bitcoin.

The optimization of specific functionalities and use cases of Bitcoin through ZK-rollups needs to be evaluated based on specific circumstances. If there are already existing solutions, the cost implications of implementing ZK-rollups need to be weighed.

Bitcoin-compatible chains supporting ZK-rollups can be achieved through sidechains and one-way transfers. Both approaches require sufficient incentive mechanisms to attract BTC participation. Sidechain solutions need to consider competition between existing and emerging projects, while one-way transfer approaches need to address centralization concerns and possess advantages in other aspects of the economic model to increase their chances of success.

These are the key possibilities summarized regarding the combination of Bitcoin and ZK-Rollups.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • US Spot Bitcoin ETF Sees Net Inflow of $30.27 Million Yesterday

    On June 12, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Bitcoin ETF experienced a net inflow of $30.27 million yesterday.

  • US Spot Ethereum ETF Sees $8.65 Million Net Inflow Yesterday

    On June 12, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Ethereum ETF experienced a net inflow of $8.65 million yesterday.

  • Trump: War with Iran is Over

    On June 12, CNN reported that Trump claimed today (Eastern Time on the 11th) that the United States has 'ended' its war with Iran, following his assertion that both sides have agreed to a 'very strong memorandum of understanding' to cease hostilities. During a phone call supporting Georgia's Lieutenant Governor Burt Jones in his gubernatorial campaign, Trump stated, 'I don’t know if you’ve heard, but today we ended the war with Iran, and they have agreed to never have nuclear weapons, which is our insistence and the entire goal, making up 95% of the agreement.' This statement came after Trump earlier today canceled further strikes against Iran, hinting on the 'Truth Social' platform that an agreement had been reached, though he did not elaborate on the terms. Iran has yet to confirm any agreement has been reached.

  • US-Iran Likely to Enter Prolonged Tug-of-War of Conflict and Negotiation

    On June 11, according to CCTV International News, in light of the recent frequent mutual attacks between the US and Iran, Li Zixin, an assistant researcher at the China Institute of International Studies, analyzed that the current confrontation between the US and Iran is at risk of sliding into a low-intensity, normalized state. The US's logic of promoting talks through military action inherently requires continuous pressure, but American military operations are bound to face reciprocal retaliation from Iran. This spiral of military retaliation could easily lead both sides into a prolonged state of conflict. The US government has threatened to strike Iranian power plants and bridges, and should it cross the red line of military targets, Iran will inevitably escalate its retaliation. The US does not want to get involved in ground warfare, and Iran's economy cannot bear a prolonged blockade, so both sides are still maintaining contact through indirect channels. Therefore, it is highly likely that both will fall into a tug-of-war of conflict and negotiation, but each friction also carries the risk of misjudgment and escalation.

  • Crypto Market Bets on SpaceX's First Day Valuation at 20% Premium Over IPO Price, Reaching $2.2 Trillion

    On June 11, crypto market traders are overlooking SpaceX's expected IPO price, giving the Elon Musk-led rocket, satellite, and AI company a higher valuation ahead of its public trading debut. On Thursday morning in New York, perpetual futures linked to SpaceX were trading at approximately $165 on crypto exchanges like Hyperliquid and Binance, implying a valuation of about $2.2 trillion. The company is issuing shares at a fixed price of $135 in a record initial public offering. SpaceX's IPO is set to complete its pricing process on Thursday. Bloomberg reported on Wednesday that the subscription demand for this offering is reportedly more than four times the offering size. Insiders suggest that the terms of the offering are unlikely to change, meaning SpaceX will raise about $75 billion at a valuation of approximately $1.8 trillion. Amidst Musk supporters who are largely disregarding valuation in their enthusiasm for SpaceX stock, and seasoned investors like Jim Chanos labeling it as a 'hope and dreams IPO,' crypto perpetual contract traders seem to side with the former, despite prices having retreated from above $200 in May.

  • US Stocks Pull Back; S&P 500 and Nasdaq Turn Negative

    On June 11, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq turned negative, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average's gains narrowed to 0.4%.

  • Iranian Armed Forces Enter Highest State of Readiness

    On June 11, according to the Tasnim News Agency, Ibrahim Azizi, chairman of the National Security Committee of the Iranian Islamic Parliament, stated that the Iranian armed forces are currently in the highest state of alert and are prepared to respond to various threats and challenges.

  • Trump's New Fed Chair May Soon Be Forced to Raise Rates

    On June 11, President Donald Trump appointed Kevin Warsh as the new chair of the Federal Reserve, who had previously advocated for the possibility of rate cuts—a position that endeared him to the president, as Trump has long viewed rate cuts as a primary policy goal. Just weeks into his tenure, Warsh is facing a resurgence of inflation, which could ultimately compel him to diverge from the rate policy favored by Trump and utilize the Fed's core tools to combat inflation. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) released this week showed that the inflation rate has surpassed 4% year-on-year for the first time, reaching a three-year high. About a week after the release of this hot inflation report, Warsh will preside over his first regular policy meeting, which may set the policy tone for the early part of his term. Meanwhile, previously released employment data exceeded expectations, highlighting the resilience of the labor market—another key economic indicator that the Fed monitors. "The critical test for Warsh in the early part of his term will be whether he will implement the rate cuts that Trump is strongly advocating for," said David Wilcox, an economist at Bloomberg Economics and the Peterson Institute for International Economics. "The evolution of the economic situation may put Warsh and his colleagues in a dilemma: refusing to cut rates, and possibly even raising them, thereby defying Trump." The logic for raising rates is clear: an overheating economy and an exceptionally strong job market would increase borrowing costs for various loans, thereby suppressing demand and preventing economic overheating. As a former Fed chair once said, the classic role of the Fed is to "take away the punch bowl when the party is at its height." The question is whether Warsh will press this button, and when he will act. The Fed's meeting next week is almost certain to keep rates unchanged, but investors are increasingly predicting that the central bank will shift to raising rates before the end of the year.

  • TSMC Shares Rise Over 2%, 3nm Foundry Prices May Increase by 15%, Capacity Fully Utilized Yet Still in Short Supply

    On June 11, TSMC (TSM.US) shares rose over 2%, reaching $416.4. According to supply chain sources, TSMC plans to moderately increase foundry prices in the second half of the year due to rising upstream costs, with a projected 15% increase for the highly sought-after 3nm process. Chip industry players indicate that the queue for customers has not significantly eased, despite TSMC's continued ramp-up of wafer production capacity, which is expected to reach between 160,000 to 175,000 wafers per month in the second quarter. However, the growth rate of AI demand still far exceeds market expectations.

  • Iran Responds to Trump's Threat: Will Launch Stronger Retaliation Against the U.S.

    On June 11, the head of Iran's Parliament National Security Committee responded to U.S. President Trump's threats against Iran, stating that he will face a stronger and more painful retaliation.