Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

OpenSea Addresses Scammers With New Collection Settings, but They Create New Issues for NFT Teams

So, I ran into a new and exciting issue on OpenSea yesterday as I was doing some setup for a new ETH smart contract — claiming and setting up the collection on OpenSea.

As most people who’ve been in the space for a while already know, scammers are everywhere in web3. And since there’s so much $$$ in the NFT space, scammers have complicated matters for marketplaces and for NFT teams alike.

Here’s an example of the problem I’ll address here: You’re doing an NFT drop in the next 6 months. It’s going to be called “Nuclear Cat Squad.” (I just made that up. Hopefully there isn’t an actual “Nuclear Cat Squad” already.)

Anyway, so you start doing your various hyping on Twitter and elsewhere, pasting sample NFTs, building up your audience, etc.

At first no one cares because it’s tough to get noticed. But after months of work, you’ve got yourself 10,000 Twitter followers and word is spreading. All is going well.

And then… someone on your Discord says, “Hey, what’s this?” And they link to a collection on OpenSea. Some scammer has collected every single preview image you’ve posted, created an OpenSea account / collection, and has of course taken the name “Nuclear Cat Squad” as well as the URL “nuclearcatsquad” (which is what OpenSea uses for the URL of your collection).

The above scenario has happened about 8 million times to people. It’s actually something that, very early on, we all expected to happen. And so we came up with this process:

Our Previous Solution

To avoid this, we would always advise our clients to grab a temp wallet, go to OpenSea, and setup a whole bunch of collections. We would have them setup “Nuclear Cat Squad” as well as “Nuclear Cats” and “Nuclear Cat Squad NFT” and various other similar names (and also similar URLs). To some extent, this seemed to have deterred scammers, although you can never get ALL of the names you want, and scammers will find a way.

Anyway, when it came time to launch, we would deploy the contract, mint an NFT, and then head over to OpenSea to setup the actual collection. We would have the client login to OpenSea at the same time, and we would have them change “Nuclear Cat Squad” (and the “nuclearcatsquad” URL) to something else (like “Nuclear Cat Squad Old” and “nuclearcatsquadold”). This would free up the names for us to use, using their deployer wallet. And thus, we’d get the actual, desired name and url for the collection.

We’ve actually got a handful of clients with forthcoming collections who’ve done the above already.

OpenSea’s New Code

Yesterday, though, I noticed that the above approach no longer works. When I had the client go in and change his “Nuclear Cat Squad” and “nuclearcatsquad” to something else, it didn’t let me take the name (even if it DID indicate that the name was free). Instead, it alerted me that the name was “too similar” to something else that existed already.

It suggested I reach out to support if there is something wrong. (So, I did that. Will update with their resoponse.)

What’s Wrong Here…

So, I suspect this is one of those good/bad moves that coders can make sometimes. You implement a fix, but the fix creates new problems!

It’s a good thing for existing collections, of course. If someone tries to start a new “Bored Ape Yacht Club,” it’s going to know (rightly so) that this is probably a scam.

But OpenSea’s solutions creates a big problem for unlaunched collections: If NFT teams can no longer create temp / placeholder collections to reserve the official names, then it’s almost 100% certain that scammers will be grabbing/using those names/urls before any collection launches. That’s what they’ve always done, and that’s what they’ll certainly continue to do.

Thus, launching a collection will ALWAYS be a problem from here on out on OpenSea. Anytime you launch, you’re going to clash with whatever scam set has grabbed the name and URL you’d wanted. And so you’re going to have to contact support and hopefully work it out. But that’s going to take time, which is not always in high supply during an NFT launch.

What Does OpenSea Recommend?

I’m awaiting a response to a support ticket on that, in which I’ve asked this question. Will update with their recommendation, if they respond.

NFT
Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Iranian Navy Launches 88th Wave of 'True Commitment 4' Operation

    On March 31, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) of Iran announced that at dawn today, the IRGC Navy initiated the 88th wave of the 'True Commitment 4' operation, delivering significant strikes against multiple U.S. and Israeli targets in the Persian Gulf and surrounding areas. The announcement stated that the IRGC Navy used ballistic missiles to hit an Israeli container ship in the central waters of the Persian Gulf. In a subsequent series of coordinated strikes, a U.S. Marine Corps outpost along the UAE coast, an anti-drone system deployed by the U.S. Fifth Fleet near Bahrain's Manama Airport, and two advanced early warning radars located at a U.S. military base in Kuwait were all precisely and destructively targeted by drones. The announcement emphasized that the Strait of Hormuz is now completely under Iran's strict control, and any hostile provocation will face retaliation from missiles and drones. (CCTV International News)

  • Iran's Revolutionary Guard Claims Attack on Ship in Gulf Region

    According to Tasnim News Agency: The Iranian Revolutionary Guard stated, 'We have attacked a ship in the Gulf region.' (Jinshi)

  • Dubai Releases Regulatory Framework for Crypto Derivatives

    On March 31, the Dubai Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) released version 2.1 of the 'Trading Platform Service Rules Manual,' which clarifies the methods for licensed crypto companies to offer crypto derivatives trading in Dubai. The framework covers requirements such as customer suitability, leverage and margin controls, asset segregation, disclosure standards, and regulatory intervention authority. This framework applies to licensed Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASP) operating in Dubai.

  • 360 Smart Agent Discovers High-Risk Vulnerability in OpenClaw, Potentially Affecting 170,000 Instances Worldwide

    On March 31, according to Guoshi Direct, it was reported by 360 Digital Security Group that its independently developed 360 multi-agent collaborative vulnerability mining system has discovered a high-risk vulnerability in the OpenClaw platform—specifically, a local file exposure vulnerability due to MEDIA protocol prompt injection bypassing tool permissions. This vulnerability has been officially confirmed by the National Information Security Vulnerability Database (CNNVD) and affects over 50 countries and regions worldwide, with more than 170,000 publicly accessible OpenClaw instances facing security risks. The core risk of this vulnerability lies in the fact that the MEDIA protocol operates at the output post-processing layer, allowing it to completely bypass platform tool policy controls. Even if agents disable all tool calls, attackers can initiate attacks solely based on basic member permissions in group chats, directly stealing sensitive information from servers, which could easily lead to subsequent cyberattacks.

  • Tehran Hit by New Wave of Attacks, Multiple Explosions Reported

    On March 31, according to CCTV News, at 5:51 AM local time on March 31, the Iranian capital Tehran was hit by a new round of airstrikes. Multiple explosions occurred in Tehran.

  • A-shares Trading Volume Exceeds 1 Trillion Yuan

    On March 31, the trading volume of the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets exceeded 1 trillion yuan, a decrease of over 40 billion yuan compared to the same time the previous day.

  • BTC Surpasses $68,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $68,000, currently priced at $68,028, with a 24-hour increase of 2.12%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Spot Gold Rapidly Rises, Surpassing $4,570

    Spot gold has seen a short-term increase, rising by 1.3% and surpassing $4,570 per ounce.

  • Trump Willing to End Iran War Despite Closure of Strait of Hormuz

    On March 31, the Wall Street Journal reported that U.S. government officials revealed President Trump has indicated to his aides that he is willing to end military actions against Iran even if the Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed. This move could extend Tehran's firm control over the waterway and leave the complex task of reopening the strait for later. Recently, Trump and his aides assessed that reopening this crucial passage would push the conflict beyond the four to six-week timeline he has set. Trump has decided that the U.S. should achieve the primary goal of weakening Iran's navy and missile stockpiles while gradually ending current hostilities and applying diplomatic pressure on Iran to restore free trade. Officials stated that if this approach fails, Washington will pressure its European and Gulf allies to lead efforts to reopen the strait. They noted that Trump could also opt for a military solution, but this is not his current priority.

  • US Stock Index Futures Rise as Reports Suggest Trump Willing to End War Without Opening Strait

    On March 31, US media reported that Trump is willing to end the war without opening the strait, leading to a short-term rise of 1% in the three major US stock index futures, with the Nasdaq currently up 0.5%. WTI crude oil quickly erased its intraday gains and turned negative, while gold saw a slight increase, with its gains expanding to 0.7%.