Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

What Is Liquid Staking?

Staking is a way to help secure proof-of-stake blockchain networks like Ethereum. Network participants can run a validator node by putting tokens “at stake,” which can then be “slashed” (taken away as a penalty) if the node commits any malicious actions or is unreliable. While there are many solo node operators, anyone can stake tokens through staking as a service (SaaS) provider—exposing them to the same risks and giving them the opportunity to share in rewards. However, staked tokens cannot be transacted or used as collateral to earn yield across the DeFi ecosystem.

Liquid staking service providers solve this liquidity problem by minting a new token—representing a claim on the underlying staked asset—which can then be traded or deposited in DeFi protocols. For example, a user could deposit ETH to the Lido staking pool and receive stETH (staked ETH) tokens in return, then deposit the stETH to Aave to earn yield. Essentially, liquid staking builds upon existing staking systems by unlocking liquidity for staked tokens.

In this post, we’ll explore exactly what liquid staking is, the opportunities and risks it brings, and how Chainlink underpins the use of liquid staking tokens throughout Web3.

What Is Staking?

Staking is the locking up of cryptocurrency tokens as collateral to help secure a network or smart contract, or to achieve a specific result.

Most broadly, staking is a cryptoeconomic model that incentivizes the correct behavior of network participants using penalties and rewards in order to strengthen its underlying security. It is used by a range of Web3 protocols, including proof-of-stake blockchain networks like Ethereum and individual DeFi applications like MakerDAO.

What Is Liquid Staking?

Liquid staking provides all of the benefits of traditional staking services while unlocking the value of staked assets for use as collateral across the DeFi ecosystem.

Liquid staking providers take user deposits, stake those tokens on behalf of users, and provide them with a receipt in the form of a new token, which is redeemable for the tokens they staked (plus/minus a share of rewards and penalties). This new token can also be traded or used as collateral in DeFi protocols, thereby unlocking the liquidity of the staked assets.

Traditional Staking vs. Liquid Staking

Benefits of Liquid Staking

Unlocked Liquidity

Tokens staked in a network such as Ethereum are locked and cannot be traded or used as collateral. Liquid staking tokens unlock the inherent value that staked tokens hold and enable them to be traded and used as collateral in DeFi protocols.

Composability in DeFi

By representing receipts for staked assets as tokens, they can be used across the DeFi ecosystem in a wide variety of protocols, such as lending pools and prediction markets.

Reward Opportunities

Traditional staking provides users with the opportunity to receive rewards for verifying transactions. Liquid staking enables users to continue receiving these rewards while also earning additional yield across various DeFi protocols.

Outsource Infrastructure Requirements

Liquid staking providers enable anyone to share in the rewards of staking without having to maintain complex staking infrastructure. For example, even if a user doesn’t have the minimum 32 ETH required to be a solo validator in the Ethereum network, liquid staking enables them to still share in block rewards.

Risks and Limitations of Liquid Staking

Slashing

Users of liquid staking services are essentially outsourcing the maintenance of running a validator node. This fully exposes them to having their funds slashed if the service provider acts maliciously or unreliably.

Exploits

Depositing tokens to a liquid staking service provider places those funds at risk if a node operator’s private keys are compromised or the protocol has any smart contract vulnerabilities that lead to an exploit.

Secondary Market Volatility

The price of liquid staking tokens is not pegged to the underlying asset they represent a claim on. While they may trade at the same price or at a very slight discount most of the time, they can drop below the price of the underlying asset during liquidity crunches or when unexpected events occur. Because the trading volume for staked tokens is generally lower than that of the underlying assets, market shocks can also have an outsized impact on the volatility of staked tokens.

Liquid Staking Tokens and Protocols

Overview of a liquid staking protocol that also shows how LSTs can be used in external DeFi projects.

Liquid staking protocols are the service providers and liquid staking tokens (LSTs) are the tokens that represent a claim on the staked assets.

Lido is currently the largest liquid staking protocol, with over $12.7B TVL as of 19 April 2023. Users can stake their tokens and receive daily rewards without having them locked or having to maintain their own infrastructure. It offers stETH (staked ETH) LSTs on Ethereum, stMATIC on Polygon, and stSOL on Solana.

Rocket Pool is another popular liquid staking protocol on Ethereum, with over $1.4B TVL. There is no minimum deposit requirement to access Rocket Pool’s rETH LSTs. However, to operate a minipool validator, users must deposit a minimum of 8 ETH plus 2.4 ETH worth of RPL.

Centralized vs. Decentralized Liquid Staking

Along with decentralized liquid staking protocols like Lido and Rocket Pool, centralized providers such as an exchange can also offer liquid staking services to their customers. The key difference is that decentralized services are non-custodial, while centralized services will be in full control of users’ staked assets. While decentralized services are vulnerable to smart contract exploits, centralized services come with their own risks.

Chainlink Price Feeds Enable Secure DeFi Markets Around LSTs

Chainlink Price Feeds publish highly accurate and reliable data for various LSTs, which enables DeFi protocols to accept them as collateral. For example, there are various stETH/USD and stETH/ETH Price Feeds across Arbitrum, Ethereum, and Optimism. Ultimately this is critical for deepening the liquidity of LSTs and helping secure the protocols they’re traded on, which makes Chainlink critical infrastructure for liquid staking throughout Web3.

Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only and contains a general overview of staking and liquid staking protocols within Web3. There may be other risks not covered in this article, and any use of liquid staking should be done at your own discretion.

Read more: https://blog.chain.link/liquid-staking/

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Astarter locks in the DeFAI liquidation layer, occupying a critical position in emerging categories that remains unfilled by competitors

    With the rapid rise of the DeFAI (Decentralized Finance x Autonomous AI Execution) category in 2026, Astarter has secured the "clearing layer" position within this space, which remains unclaimed by competitors. Astarter is a decentralized AI + DeFi (DeFAI) infrastructure built for Web4, designed to create an economic system executable by AI, enabling autonomous AI agents to independently perform on-chain trading execution, strategy optimization, and real-time data processing. Industry comparative analysis reveals that the first three layers of the AI Agent economic architecture are already occupied by leading projects such as Olas, Virtuals, and Fetch.ai, leaving the "clearing layer" long vacant. Astarter, with its operational DeFi stack of four products since 2021, stands as one of the few publicly recognized projects to claim this position.

  • Central Bank's Open Market Operations Net Withdrawal of 243 Billion Yuan Today

    On May 25, the People's Bank of China conducted a 258 billion yuan 7-day reverse repo operation today, with a bidding amount of 258 billion yuan and a winning amount of 258 billion yuan, at an operation rate of 1.40%, unchanged from before. Due to the maturity of 500 billion yuan in 1-year Medium-term Lending Facility (MLF) and 10 billion yuan in 7-day reverse repos today, there was a net withdrawal of 243 billion yuan.

  • Nikkei 225 Index Surpasses 65,000 Points

    On May 25, the Nikkei 225 index surpassed 65,000 points, setting a new historical high with an intraday increase of 2.64%.

  • Nikkei 225 Index Surpasses 64,000 Points, Sets Historical Record

    The Nikkei 225 Index has surpassed 64,000 points for the first time, setting a historical record, with an intraday increase of over 1%.

  • BTC Surpasses $77,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $77,000, currently priced at $77,012.01, with a 24-hour increase of 0.43%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Iranian Official: Management of the Strait of Hormuz Will Not Return to Pre-War Status

    On May 25, local time May 24, Rezaei, spokesperson for Iran's National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, stated that the management of the Strait of Hormuz will not return to its pre-war status. He also mentioned that the strait is currently under Iranian control, and after the end of the state of war, Iran can facilitate the passage of vessels. Rezaei further stated that Iran has not negotiated with the United States regarding its enriched uranium stockpile and will never back down from its current position; the U.S. has no choice but to accept Iran's conditions.

  • Trump: US-Iran Agreement 'Not Fully Negotiated Yet'

    On May 25, U.S. President Trump stated on the 24th that the agreement between the United States and Iran is 'not fully negotiated yet,' accusing some uninformed individuals of 'unfounded criticism.' Trump posted on social media, saying, 'If I reach an agreement with Iran, it will be a good and appropriate agreement.' 'No one has seen it or knows its contents. It is not fully negotiated yet. So don't listen to those losers who criticize something they don't understand at all.' According to U.S. media reports, although the draft of the agreement has not been made public, some individuals in the U.S. have criticized it fiercely, claiming it actually undermines the goals set by the Trump administration. White House officials told the media that it will take 'a few more days' to finalize the agreement between the U.S. and Iran. (Xinhua News Agency)

  • Vitalik: Ethereum Foundation is Not the Central Manager of the ETH Ecosystem, Future Development Will Shift to 'Small and Long-term' Approach

    On May 25, Ethereum founder Vitalik shared his views on the future development direction of the Ethereum Foundation in a post on the X platform. He emphasized that this is just his personal opinion. The board does not consist solely of him, and he does not have more special powers than other board members. Aya Miyaguchi is leading most of the execution work for this transformation, while his own involvement is more focused on technical issues. The board is currently expanding, and his influence within the organization will continue to decline in the future, which, frankly, is what he hopes to see. By 2025, the Ethereum Foundation has made significant improvements in its execution capabilities. Many issues have been resolved, and the foundation continues to benefit from greater efficiency and a stronger focus on specific goals. However, as these issues were addressed, he began to care more about another concern: he often sees people saying, 'Vitalik has always talked about Ethereum needing to be decentralized, having privacy, and becoming a shelter technology, but why do the actions of the Ethereum Foundation not reflect these ideals?' Of course, there are those who hold completely different views. Some do not feel there is a crisis at all, but rather believe that the Ethereum Foundation has finally begun to take execution and business development seriously, and the next focus should be to continue along this path faster and stronger. Vitalik believes that this difference essentially reflects varying sensitivities to different types of criticism, and he is more easily hurt by criticisms regarding deviations from values. Vitalik stated that the Ethereum Foundation should not be 'the center of Ethereum,' but rather 'a node with clear responsibilities, existing alongside other nodes.' In the past, they have always said this, but many people in the ecosystem, including some within the foundation, hoped the foundation would become a true center. Now, they are taking concrete actions to ensure the foundation becomes the latter. This is particularly important because the Ethereum Foundation is essentially a resource-limited and organizationally limited entity. The foundation currently holds only about 0.16% of all ETH, which is even lower than many large ETH holders; whereas many other blockchain projects' 'central foundations' typically control 10%-50% of their tokens. The current Ethereum Foundation has decided to use its remaining resources to pursue 'long-term viability' rather than continuous expansion (which also means they will sell less ETH). The foundation will focus on those things that are crucial for Ethereum to become a censorship-resistant, control-resistant, open, private, and secure system, but that no one else would do if the foundation does not. This means they must make difficult choices. Some projects and individuals they highly respect may no longer belong to the foundation's system in the future. In fact, if they want important tasks to attract external capital, it may be necessary to keep some talented individuals, influential public figures, and those who share the mission and CROPS philosophy outside the foundation. This also means that the Ethereum Foundation will take a clearer and more principled stance on a cultural level.

  • ETH Surpasses $2100

    Market data shows that ETH has surpassed $2100, currently priced at $2101.04, with a 24-hour increase of 1.9%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • U.S. Officials: Agreement with Iran Expected Not to Be Signed on Sunday, Some Issues Remain

    On May 24, Axios reported, citing a U.S. official, that Iran's Supreme Leader has approved the overall framework of the agreement. There are some important statements for us and some significant wording for Iran. It is expected that the agreement with Iran will not be signed on Sunday, as there are still some issues that need to be resolved. The current status of the Iranian regime is progressing slowly, and completing the necessary approvals will take a few days.