Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Can Legal Dangers of DAOs Destroy Your Dreams of Decentralization?

Introduction

Centuries ago, joint stock corporations were prevalent, followed by modern-day corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs). Now, there’s a new breed of entities — decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) — whose supporters deem them not as “companies,” but rather as assemblies of individuals built on principles of decentralization, transparency, and bottom-up control that reflect the digital universe. But as the popularity of DAOs grows, the need for legal clarity becomes increasingly pressing. The law is far from settled, and the path to legal safety remains shrouded in mystery. Ignoring legal dangers of DAOs could be disastrous.

“Before jumping into the DAO fray, it is crucial to seek professional legal advice and navigate the legal labyrinth with caution. Crypto investors must be aware of the legal requirements when investing in DAOs to avoid enforcement actions that may arise due to the ambiguous nature of DAOs.”

What is the purpose of DAO?

The term “DAO” was coined in the 1990s by German computer scientist Werner Dilger. Two decades later, blockchain enthusiasts, notably Ethereum’s Vitalik Buterin, began theorizing about DAOs as entities with automation at the center and humans at the edges.

In its essence, DAO, or Decentralized Autonomous Organization, is a blockchain-based entity that operates directly by its contributors or members, without formal corporate structure. It’s a virtual community with a purpose, enabling people to fundraise for joint projects. DAOs have no physical offices, directors, or employees, and are governed by encoded rules within the blockchain software. This makes them self-executing, with all transactions immutably recorded on the blockchain, ensuring transparency. Only members can propose changes to the purpose or rules of the DAO. The voting procedures in a DAO are done through direct voting, with each member having equal voting rights, but without any legal status.

DAO Legal Showdowns

2016: The DAO

The legality of the concept “Code is Law”, which involves utilizing technology to enforce regulations, is not clear-cut. A prime example of this is the 2016 hack of “The DAO”. A vulnerability in its code allowed a hacker to steal 11,000 investors’ Ether, sparking the question of who the rightful owner was: the contributors or the hacker who interacted with the publicly available code? The “Code is Law” argument would support the latter, but without a legal personality, The DAO was unable to pursue the hacker. White hat hacker Griff Green stepped in and took the risk of retrieving some of the stolen Ether, but his actions resulted in a multitude of legal threats. This raises the question of what constitutes rightful ownership of funds in DAO, and underscores the legal gray area surrounding it.

2017: ConstitutionDAO

ConstitutionDAO raised $47 million in ether for the sole purpose of bidding on an original copy of the U.S. Constitution. A hybrid model featuring legal entities facilitated the DAO’s activities. However, ConstitutionDAO was outbid at the auction and refunded contributors, but most of the raised money was lost due to Ethereum fees. This highlights the legal and financial dangers of getting involved with DAOs, emphasizing the need for careful consideration before participating.

2022: ShapeShift — Making the private corporation public through DAO

ShapeShift, a cryptocurrency trading firm, transformed itself into DAO from a private corporation in July 2022. This move allows anyone to become a token holder, promoting a fluid market, and decentralization. Its CEO intends to reduce his ownership to just 5% of the DAO’s tokens while remaining involved in the company’s ventures. Despite the benefits of the DAO structure, a future investor could still purchase a majority of the tokens, effectively re-centralizing the company.

2022: Ooki DAO

The legal ambiguity surrounding DAOs was again in the spotlight, with Ooki DAO accused of facilitating illegal crypto derivatives trading, resulting in legal action by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) against the founders in September 2022. In an unprecedented move, the CFTC sought to sue the entire DAO, leading to a landmark ruling in January 2023 that recognized Ooki as an “unincorporated association” of Token Holders, enabling it to be sued like a person or corporation. Legal experts are questioning the CFTC’s approach, arguing that a DAO should not be considered a person and that individual token holders should be targeted instead.

2022: Avraham Eisenberg

The delicate balance between technology and the law was once again being put to the test with the case of Avraham Eisenberg. In December 2022, Eisenberg was taken into custody by US authorities on the grounds of having executed a highly lucrative trading scheme that leveraged a smart contract belonging to Mango Markets, a decentralized finance DAO, resulting in a $110 million loss. The FBI regards Eisenberg’s actions as illicit, yet it is ultimately up to the judiciary to decide the fate of his case and the viability of the “code is law” doctrine. These legal battles will prove to be decisive in determining the future course of the relationship between code and law within the DAO ecosystem.

Untangling the Legal Maze of DAOs: Navigating Liability and Corporate Chaos

The emergence of DAOs has been a watershed moment in the world of blockchain technology, with “The DAO” (2016) paving the way as a blueprint for a decentralized organization governed by smart contracts. However, the critical issue in DAO is the absence of legal status, which exposes members to personal liability in case of any legal disputes or breaches of legal requirements. Experts are warning that DAOs may be deemed “General Partnerships” by the courts, potentially exposing all participants to unlimited joint and several liability.

In theory, a DAO can function as a code-based entity, free from the constraints of a physical corporate structure. However, code-based entity still requires essential practical elements such as domain names, web hosting, banking services, and legal representation. For DAOs that seek to engage in contracts involving real estate, intellectual property, or other legalities, it is imperative to establish some form of legal personality.

Can DAOs Retain their Unique Edge with Legalization?

DAOs have been largely unrecognized in most jurisdictions, but some positive developments offer hope. American CryptoFed DAO has been recognized as a legal entity in Wyoming, while dOrg LLC has become the first entity that directly cites blockchain code as its source of governance in Vermont. Australia’s Senate committee has also recommended acknowledging DAOs in a legal capacity.

But some believe that the formal recognition of DAOs as legal entities threatens to undermine the very essence of what makes them special, which is their ability to operate entirely through smart contracts. These experts argue that defining how members will manage the DAO and how disputes will be resolved is antithetical to the core concept of a DAO, as these provisions cannot be fully managed through smart contracts.

Others see DAOs as a new and improved corporate structure, with alternatives such as “Wrapped DAOs” that offers semi-anonymous boards of directors in some jurisdictions, but this feature may not be possible in others.

On the other hand, there are those who view the traditional concept of a corporation as outdated, and believe that DAOs represent a new and improved form of corporate structure. These experts suggest alternatives like foundations in the Cayman Islands, which can act as the service provider for the DAO while retaining legal personality. However, this solution may not meet the standards of the Web3 community as it requires a centralized legal entity.

How Governance Tokens in DAOs Face Securities Law Challenges

The legal complexities surrounding DAOs are a source of concern for many in the crypto space. The fear that governance tokens issued by DAOs may be considered securities under securities legislation has created a legal quagmire, with highly regulated markets such as the U.S. imposing severe fines and jail terms for the sale of unregistered securities to unaccredited investors.

The Howey Test, which is used in the U.S. to determine whether a token is a security, considers factors such as an investment of money into a common enterprise with a reasonable expectation of profit derived from the efforts of others. However, the Howey Test is not universally accepted, with legal systems in the Cayman and British Virgin Islands taking a more favorable view of DAOs. In these jurisdictions, DAOs cannot be considered securities as they are decentralized and therefore not managed by others. With the legal landscape being so complex and costly to navigate, obtaining hundreds of legal opinions on securities law is not a practical solution.

But there is an alternative method of regulating DAOs. The Rochdale Principles, first established in 1844, align closely with the principles of DAOs and could serve as a framework for regulating them as “cooperative associations” as both share common principles such as voluntary and open membership and democratic member control.

Moreover, for DAOs that invest in “securities,” including digital assets, compliance with the Investment Company Act of 1940 may be necessary. As per the Act, DAOs could be categorized as “investment companies” and need SEC registration before publicly offering securities or if they exceed 100 holders, unless in certain circumstances.

Furthermore, antitrust implications surrounding DAOs remain uncertain, as the relevant agencies have yet to provide any guidance. Should a DAO be viewed as a collection of individual members acting together, rather than as a single entity, antitrust issues could arise. This could lead to issues with sharing competitive information and collaboration by individual members, some of whom may be competitors. Criminal liability could result from certain antitrust violations, and mergers involving blockchain-based service providers may undergo review for anti-competitive practices. Even a legally formed DAO must ensure compliance with antitrust and other legal regulations.

Conclusion

DAOs, traditionally focused on digital ventures, have transcended their boundaries in recent times, exemplified by the emergence of Special-purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) that specialize in acquiring physical companies. Such developments have fueled predictions of DAOs becoming a prominent business entity and being dubbed as “the new LLCs.” The recent surge in DAOs provides strong support for these forecasts.

The legal status of a DAO remains a crucial issue for market participants due to the lack of clarity on personal liability and enforcement actions. While DAOs and its members continue to face battle with regulations, crypto investors have also been facing a growing number of scams and rug pulls, making it increasingly difficult to know which projects to trust. During the last Bull Run, COMB was one of the first projects to register as Limited Liability Company (LLC) on 2.25.2022. By becoming an official registered entity, COMB has provided investors with greater confidence in their ethical behavior and commitment to transparency.

This Article was written by Raviyank Patel on behalf of COMB Finanical

DAO
Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Russian authorities plan to impose heavy fines on cryptocurrency miners operating in residential apartments

    Russian authorities have proposed imposing huge fines on cryptocurrency miners suspected of operating in residential properties. The authorities may also consider revising the Code of Administrative Offenses to hold those who abuse electricity accountable.

  • TheoriqAI Completes $6.2 Million Super-Seed Round of Financing, Led by Hack VC

    On May 14th, TheoriqAI, a modular AI agent infrastructure, announced on X platform that it has completed a $6.2 million Super-Seed round of financing. Hack VC led the investment, with participation from Foresight Ventures, HTX Ventures, Figment Capital, HASH CIB, Inception Capital, Antalpha Ventures, NewTribe Capital, Stateless Ventures, Bitscale Capital, Construct Ventures, Hypersphere, IOSG Ventures, LongHash Ventures, HashKey Capital, SNZ Holding, Chainlink.

  • Basel banking regulator delays crypto asset rules for banks until 2026

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's governing body, the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision (GHOS), has delayed the compliance deadline for new rules on bank crypto assets by one year. The latest date for the project has been changed to January 1, 2026.

  • LayerZero CEO: Up to 100,000 addresses have been recognized as witches

    LayerZero CEO Bryan Pellegrino stated on social media that up to 100,000 addresses have been identified as witches. Previously reported on May 4th, LayerZero officials stated that all witch users were given a chance to self-report within the next 14 days and those who did would receive an expected distribution of 15%.

  • Niobium, a fully homomorphic encryption chip provider, completes $5.5 million seed round of financing, led by Fusion Fund

    Niobium, a custom encryption chip provider specializing in zero-trust computing, has announced the completion of a $5.5 million seed round of financing, led by Fusion Fund, with participation from Morgan Creek Capital, Rev1 Ventures, Ohio Innovation Fund, and Hale Capital. It is reported that Niobium is building a fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) accelerator chip and will commercialize it. The new funds will be used to explore the commercial applications of FHE in industries such as healthcare, finance, and blockchain, and also plan to showcase the solution and launch pilot projects in the fourth quarter of this year.

  • RunPod Completes $20 Million Seed Round of Financing, Led by Intel Capital and Others

    According to distributed GPU cloud computing AI training model project RunPod announced the completion of a $20 million seed round of financing, jointly led by Intel Capital and Dell Technologies Capital, with participation from Julien Chaummond, Nat Friedman, Adam Lewis and others. RunPod uses global distributed GPU cloud computing services to train, deploy, and scale AI models, thereby reducing the workload of developers. According to its official website, RunPad accepts cryptocurrency payments, but reminds users to strongly recommend setting up a crypto.com account as part of the risk management process and conducting any necessary KYC checks in advance.

  • Kaiko data: Bitcoin miners’ income has dropped sharply, and they may sell BTC to maintain operations

    The latest data from cryptocurrency research and analysis company Kaiko shows that miners are facing huge selling pressure as Bitcoin mining revenue and transaction fees decline. Bitcoin miners' income mainly comes from two aspects: mining rewards and transaction fees. However, affected by the halving of Bitcoin rewards in April (block rewards dropped from 6.25 BTC to 3.125 BTC), miners have to sell Bitcoin to pay for costs. Kaiko researchers pointed out in the report that the halving event usually prompts miners to sell BTC because the mining process requires a lot of expenses.

  • Brazil's trading volume reaches $6 billion in 4 months

    According to Kaiko Research, the correlation between Bitcoin (BTC) and stocks is increasing. After reaching a multi-year low of 0.01 in March, the 90-day correlation rose to 0.17 last week. Based on the company's research report on May 13th, the 90-day correlation between Bitcoin and stocks rose to 0.17 in the week of May 5th, higher than the multi-year low of 0.01 in March. The correlation between BTC and risk assets is lower than the high of 0.6 during the bull market.

  • Left-Curving DAOs

    For the past twenty one days I have been obsessed with a decentralized project called Higher. If interested in the origin lore you can read more here.

  • DAOs as novelty search engines

    DAOs are collaborative networks which are likely to have a unique role in the future. To determine this role, you need to be able to look beyond what is happening today. Like a toddler taking its first steps, the DAOs of today are immature, unsteady and likely to stumble.