Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

A Crypto Investor’s Worst Nightmare: The Science behind Frequency Illusion

Is the Universe Conspiring Against You?

Have you ever felt like you’re stuck in a deja-vu loop where everything feels like a repeat of what you just experienced?

Maybe you have learned a new word or concept and suddenly started seeing it in every newspaper or perhaps you purchase a shiny new red car, only to spot identical models lining every street. It’s as if the universe has conspired to bombard you with the same idea over and over again!

While it may seem like a strange coincidence, the truth is that our brains are wired to notice patterns and make connections. As we become more aware of something, our minds start actively seeking it out, even in situations where it may not necessarily be relevant.

This is called the frequency illusion, also known as the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon.

But what about when this effect spills into the financial realm?

“Are we like moths drawn to the flame of (crypto) trends and narratives, unknowingly dancing towards the FOMO and false promises, while the market burns us with its volatility?”

Let’s explore.

What is Frequency Illusion?

At its core, the frequency illusion is a cognitive bias that causes us to notice things more once we become aware of them. Suddenly, we start seeing it everywhere because we’re noticing it more.

Due to frequency illusion, we might think a particular issue is more widespread or significant than it actually is, simply because we’ve started paying more attention to it. This can lead to misguided actions, misplaced priorities, and missed opportunities.

It’s like you’re wearing a pair of special glasses that can only see what you’re obsessed with. You start seeing the same model car you recently purchased on every street corner, every billboard, and every ad on your phone. You even start noticing the car’s logo on the shirt of your neighbor’s cat.

But where did this phenomenon come from?

Back in 1994, Terry Mullen posted a comment on an online board mentioning that he had recently learnt about the West German terrorist group Baader-Meinhof group for the first time. Suddenly, he started hearing about it everywhere he went.

Readers who had experienced similar situations confirmed the thos occurrence, leading to the creation of the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon — a term that sounds like a plot from a cheesy sci-fi show.

While the Baader-Meinhof moniker may have been catchy, it lacked the rigor and precision demanded by the academic community. After more than a decade, Arnold Swicky, a preeminent linguistics scholar at Stanford University, formalized the concept with the more scientifically accepted term, “the frequency illusion.”

But the question remains, is it a glitch in the Matrix, or is our brain just wired to make connections? Are we just programmed to find patterns, even in situations where they might not exist? Or is it just the universe’s way of messing with us?

So why does it happen?

Our brains are conspiracy theorists!

We’re like the guy who thinks the government is listening to his phone calls because he heard a clicking noise.

We tend to find patterns even when they don’t actually exist. This pattern-spotting talent can be useful for learning, but it can also lead to the frequency illusion.

Our intuition tells us that coincidences are more than mere chance. However, the reality is that coincidences happen more often than we realize; we just tend to underestimate the probability of them occurring.

But mainly, it happens due to two psychological processes: Selective attention and Confirmation bias.

Selective attention

Our brains are constantly filtering out irrelevant information, like background noise such as planes overhead, birds chirping, smells, or any other distraction.(similar to your ex’s social media posts, your boss’s nagging, or your cat’s constant meowing) to help you focus on what’s important.

It is like a bouncer at a club, only letting in the people on the VIP list.

Although selective attention is essential, it’s not infallible. One can easily overlook valuable information that doesn’t align with his preconceptions. This is where the second process, confirmation bias, comes into play.

Confirmation bias

Source:weforum.

We tend to seek out information that confirms our beliefs, and ignore or dismiss that which contradicts them. This tendency is especially pronounced when it comes to emotionally charged topics or beliefs that are central to our identity and beliefs. In the case of the frequency illusion, once we notice a particular thing, our confirmation bias kicks in, and we start seeing it more often, further reinforcing our belief in its prevalence.

How does it apply in crypto investing?

The Selective Attention and Cognitive Dissonance Trap

When it comes to crypto investing, having selective attention means honing in on the news, market trends, and social media buzz that pertain to our chosen assets.

One of the other biases that is related to selective attention is Cognitive dissonance.

As humans, we crave stability and consistency in our lives, but what happens when new information challenges our existing beliefs? The discomfort that arises is known as cognitive dissonance, and it can lead us down a path of irrational actions and missed opportunities.

It is similar to wearing a pair of shoes that are too small but refusing to take them off because they’re your favorite pair. You know they’re hurting your feet, but you don’t want to let go.

Investors often ignore new information that conflicts with their beliefs. For instance, you might sell an asset because you believe it’s going to zero based on a lack of progress on the roadmap. If the asset’s value goes down, you might feel validated. But if new positive information emerges that conflicts with your earlier views, you might ignore it and miss out on potential gains.

“Be willing to take a step back. Being open-minded and adaptable could be the key to success.”

Like the GPS on your road trip, we need to be willing to re-evaluate our route when faced with a detour. We need to challenge our assumptions, examine our beliefs, and decide which one is closer to reality.

The Slippery Slope of Confirmation Bias in Crypto Investing

https://twitter.com/Route2FI/status/1514244570988662803?s=20

In the context of crypto investing, confirmation bias means being drawn to news articles and market analyses that align with our bullish or bearish outlooks, while ignoring those that challenge our assumptions.

The danger of confirmation bias lies in its ability to create an “echo chamber”, a closed-off space where only those who share similar views as yours are heard.

“The frequency illusion can be manipulated by marketers who know that when we notice something frequently, we tend to think it’s more popular or important than it actually is.”

Brushing off any negative data as FUD and assuming that it’s nothing more than a conspiracy to undermine your chosen coin is a form of tunnel vision.

Such bias can be a slippery slope that leads you to make uninformed decisions, leaving you with a bag of worthless tokens and a head full of regret, wondering where it all went wrong.

Combating Cognitive Biases

One can avoid such biases by studying the works of the Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman, who has extensively researched the many biases that affect our decision-making.

Reflecting on our past mistakes can help us identify the biases that have impacted our trading decisions.

Moreover, by creating a checklist, we can ensure that we are aware of any potential flaws in our thinking before making an investment decision.

Developing systems can also be helpful. These systems can be a set of processes and decision-making criteria that help us stay objective and avoid becoming emotional once we’re in the trenches. For instance, knowing when to cut losses or take profits before entering a trade can be an effective way to prevent emotional decision-making.

Final Thoughts

The next time you find yourself nodding along with the crowd, stop and think. Ask yourself — am I really seeing the full picture here? Are my biases clouding my judgment?

In the end, it’s not about being right or wrong, it’s about making the best decision possible with the information available. So broaden your horizons, seek out opposing viewpoints, and embrace the uncertainty that comes with growth.

This article was written by Raviyank Patel on behalf of COMB Finanical

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Analyst: Bitcoin Enters Bull Market Phase as MVRV Ratio Surpasses 1.0 Baseline

    On September 26, crypto analyst Axel Adler Jr. stated that Bitcoin has transitioned from an early bull market to a bull market phase. The adjusted MVRV 30-day/365-day moving average ratio he tracks broke above the 1.0 baseline on September 20 (with the short-term average surpassing the annual average), at which point BTC was priced at $80,691. Previously, this ratio had crossed above the 365-day moving average on August 20, marking the entry into the early bull market when BTC was priced at $71,255; this phase lasted for 31 days, during which Bitcoin rose by 13%. The current ratio stands at 1.018, with BTC priced at $84,156. As long as it remains above 1.0, the structure will maintain a bullish outlook. This marks the sixth such transition since 2012, and in four of the previous five instances, the bull market ended with prices above the entry price, with the only exception being August 2015, when the bull market lasted only 16 days.

  • CFTC Sues Cash FX Over $950 Million Crypto-Related Forex Scam, Investors Lose at Least $406 Million

    On September 26, Cointelegraph reported that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has filed a lawsuit against Cash FX Group and three individuals, involving $950 million and elements of cryptocurrency. The defendants include Cash FX and its CEO Huascar Jose Lopez Castillo (Brazil), The Conversion Pros and its CEO Ronald Pope (Oregon), as well as Justin Halladay (Florida). The CFTC stated that the complaint was submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida on Friday. The agency accuses the defendants of operating a multi-level marketing Ponzi scheme, raising over $950 million under the guise of trading retail forex contracts in a commodity pool, falsely claiming that funds were managed by expert traders, proprietary algorithms, and artificial intelligence, with promises of returns as high as 15% per week. The CFTC pointed out that Cash FX engaged in very little actual forex trading, misappropriating most participants' funds to pay fictitious trading profits with new investments, while funneling millions of dollars to the defendants and providing false accounting statements. Participants have suffered losses of at least $406 million.

  • China and the U.S. Reach Consensus on Eight Key Outcomes

    On September 26, according to CCTV, Chinese President Xi Jinping made a state visit to the United States from September 23 to 25. During this period, the two heads of state engaged in in-depth discussions on building a constructive strategic stable relationship between China and the U.S. and addressing major international and regional issues, reaching a consensus on eight key outcomes, including: 1. Both sides agreed to establish a 'constructive strategic stable relationship based on respect, fairness, and equality.' 2. Both sides agreed to support each other in successfully hosting the informal meeting of APEC leaders and the G20 leaders' summit, with both heads of state intending to attend each other's hosted meetings. 3. The two heads of state agreed that Iran should fulfill its commitment not to develop nuclear weapons, and that no country or organization should impose tolls on international waterways. 4. The two heads of state recalled that China and the U.S. were allies in World War II, fighting side by side to achieve victory. 5. The two heads of state recognized the positive role of the China-U.S. economic and trade consultation mechanism and the outcomes of consultations by both economic and trade teams, including the establishment and promotion of mechanisms such as the Trade Council, reaching a '30 billion USD' reciprocal tariff reduction arrangement, and postponing the results of the Kuala Lumpur economic and trade consultations, and instructed for their implementation. 6. The cooperation between the drug enforcement agencies of China and the U.S. has yielded visible results. Recently, both sides closely collaborated to jointly crack multiple cases involving new psychoactive substances and precursor chemicals, resulting in the arrest of dozens of related criminal suspects in both countries. 7. Both sides agreed to establish a China-U.S. dialogue on artificial intelligence to discuss the associated risks and benefits. The next dialogue will be held in November this year, and both sides agreed to establish a communication channel for AI-related incidents. 8. The U.S. welcomed the loan of a pair of giant pandas from China to the Atlanta Zoo. In addition, the military of both countries agreed to sign a memorandum of understanding to strengthen crisis communication and prevention as soon as possible and to continue cooperating in the search for the remains of U.S. military personnel missing in China.

  • New SEC Guidelines: Staked ETH Receipt Tokens Do Not Constitute Securities, Provided They Are Purely 'Receipts'

    On September 26, according to BeInCrypto, the U.S. SEC's Division of Corporation Finance released new guidelines clarifying that tokens received from staking Ethereum do not constitute securities, provided their function is purely as 'receipts'. The document states that when tokens are backed by 'digital commodities', staked receipt tokens are considered 'digital tools'; the SEC and CFTC listed 16 types of digital commodities in a clarification document on March 17, including Ethereum (ETH). The guidelines set conditions: tokens must not alter the rights associated with the staked ETH or provide additional rewards, and service providers must not lend, stake, or reuse the deposited tokens; this contrasts with Kraken's $30 million fine in 2023 for promoting yield and shutting down its staking services in the U.S. The document also covers buybacks: announcing a buyback when the network is operational does not constitute a commitment that would turn the tokens into securities; however, it may still constitute one if the network is not yet complete.

  • US Lawmakers Propose Bill to Ban Chinese Optical Transceivers in National Security Systems

    On September 26, a bipartisan group in the U.S. Senate proposed a bill on September 25 aimed at prohibiting the federal government from installing Chinese-made components used for data transmission in artificial intelligence data centers within sensitive systems. The bill was jointly initiated by Republican Senators John Cornyn and Mike McCaul, along with Democratic Senators Jon Tester and Alex Padilla, and primarily targets optical transceiver modules produced by Chinese companies such as New H3C Technologies. Currently, Chinese optical transceiver manufacturers dominate this core component market in AI data centers.

  • SEC and CFTC Update Crypto FAQs: Token Buybacks and Network Upgrades Not Necessarily Securities, CFTC Allows On-Chain Record Keeping

    On September 26, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Corporation Finance released an updated FAQ on September 25, clarifying that token buybacks, network upgrades, and marketing statements do not automatically make crypto assets securities. SEC staff noted that announcing a buyback plan for an operational crypto network does not, by itself, make the associated tokens investment contracts; however, if the network is not operational and the issuer promotes the buyback as a source of returns for holders, it may be a different case. The FAQ also clarified that services provided once a crypto system is operational, aimed at securing, maintaining, improving, or enhancing the system or its functions, or promoting network effects, do not constitute managerial efforts under the Howey test. Marketing existing uses of the network typically does not create profit expectations, and statements about future functionalities do not either, provided there is no promotion of profit potential. This update reiterates that conclusions will still heavily depend on specific cases and are based on the SEC's interpretative release regarding the applicability of securities laws to crypto assets issued in March this year. On the same day, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission updated its crypto FAQ, allowing futures firms and clearinghouses to invest customer funds in tokenized versions of previously permitted assets, provided they meet investment and custody requirements. CFTC staff also indicated that regulated companies may use blockchain for record keeping but must still be able to provide records if the blockchain or its block explorer is non-operational. These updates come as the CLARITY Act failed to advance in the Senate, with regulators continuing to push forward with the crypto regulatory framework based on existing laws.

  • BTC Surpasses $84,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $84,000, currently priced at $84,004, with a 24-hour decline of 0.25%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • BTC Falls Below $84,000

    Market data shows that BTC has fallen below $84,000, currently priced at $83,988.06, with a 24-hour increase of 0.52%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • ETH Falls Below $2700

    Market data shows that ETH has fallen below $2700, currently priced at $2699.7, with a 24-hour increase of 1.95%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • BTC Surpasses $85,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $85,000, currently priced at $85,000.02, with a 24-hour increase of 1.72%. The market is highly volatile, so please ensure proper risk management.