Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Why Do People Buy NFTs? 11 Reasons Ranked

Validated Project

Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) adoption accelerated during the crypto bull market in 2021, alongside criticism from skeptics who dismiss NFTs as simply being expensive and overpriced pictures.

Nevertheless, NFTs are increasingly being accepted as an inevitable development in the digital world. Not only are NFTs popular among crypto holders, with over 75% owning at least one NFT, traditional industries’ brands also have NFT collections.

Today, people buy NFTs for a range of reasons: Out of 11 key factors for consideration, NFT utility is the most important reason for motivating people to buy, while disrupting the status quo is the least important reason, according to a recent study.

Overall, NFT holders appear to consider multiple factors when they make buying decisions, given that all 11 reasons were rated as being important rather than not.

Ranking 11 Reasons for Buying NFTs

Using NFTs for Intended Functions

NFT utility emerged as the top reason that people buy an NFT for. At least 3 out of every 4 NFT holders consider how much utility a collection offers or what benefits they can get from holding it, before buying.

People now want NFTs to have more use cases than just being quirky digital collectibles, which aligns well with its fundamentally broad-based nature. Although NFTs started out with limited utility, primarily functioning as blockchain game items (e.g. CryptoKitties and Axie Infinity) and profile pictures (e.g. CryptoPunks and BAYC), there are increasingly more types of NFTs as projects address new use cases.

Even so, 15.7% of NFT holders indicated that they are neutral about utility and 6.7% felt that it is not important at all. Such NFT holders are perhaps less active and rarely try to use NFTs for their intended functions, or prefer to treat NFTs primarily as a collectible.

Profit in the Long Term

Long-term profits ranked as the second most important reason for buying NFTs, with 3 in 4 NFT holders also intending to sell their NFTs at a higher price later on.

In addition to having specific use cases, NFTs are often seen as a form of art and therefore an alternative asset for long-term investment, especially after some collections rose to prominence as blue chip NFT projects. Even for NFT collections that do not have artistic elements, NFTs are commonly sold to raise seed funding, and holders expect that the project team will create more value in the future.

Another 17.2% of NFT holders indicated that they are neutral about profiting from NFTs, and a 6.7% minority felt that it is not important to earn profits from buying NFTs.

Gain Stake in the Venture or DAO

The third most important reason that people buy NFTs is to participate in the collection as a stakeholder. At least 7 out of every 10 NFT holders are motivated by the opportunity to gain a stake in the venture or decentralized autonomous organization (DAO).

This might be related to the other reasons, whereby people want to be more involved with NFT projects because they enjoy the community or are enthusiastic about certain aspects of it.

Meanwhile, 19.0% of NFT holders are neutral towards active participation and 8.2% find it unimportant.

Enthusiasm for the NFT Collection’s Technology

Personal enthusiasm for the technology of the NFT collection was the fourth most important reason. 7 in 10 NFT holders look out for the NFT’s underlying technology when deciding whether or not to buy in.

As such, NFT collections that are able to introduce technological improvements will stand out. For example, the Azuki team created ERC721A, the gas efficient smart contract that outperformed the ERC721 standard in terms of minting, and contributed to the success of the anime NFT collection.

Another 19.9% are neutral and 9.0% find it unimportant, likely representing those who are less technologically literate.

Becoming Part of the Community

68.8% of NFT holders buy in because they want to join the community of fellow owners and the project team. For blue chip or up-and-coming projects, this could mean becoming part of a prestigious network that can raise holders’ social status or grant access to exclusive resources. Besides these, people might be attracted to NFT communities that have similar interests or values, or where they happen to find new friends.

While community might not be every holder’s reason for buying the NFT, it remains a key factor in the success of NFT collections, such that teams tend to invest heavily in building and maintaining strong communities.

This might explain why it has the second-lowest ‘Not Important’ rating of 7.9%, with NFT holders preferring to take a neutral stance (23.3%) instead of dismissing the value of community altogether.

Enthusiasm for the NFT Collection’s Business or Artwork

Personal enthusiasm for the business model or idea, and personal enthusiasm for the artwork of an NFT collection ranked as equally important reasons to buy in (67.9%). Similar to the technology reason, people might be attracted to buy NFTs that have novel business proposals that they want to support, or artwork designs that catch their eye.

The business and artistic aspects of a collection are unsurprisingly ranked less important than the technology, given that not every NFT collection is trying to create a business or artwork. Plenty of NFT collections are created as memes or jokes, like mfers, or for other purposes.

Profit in the Short Term

Short-term profits came in at the 8th position, with 66.8% of NFT holders buying because of the potential to sell at a higher price, shortly after the purchase. The speculative trading tactic is also known as ‘flipping’ and was more common during the NFT bull run, when there was high liquidity and rising floor prices.

That said, flipping NFTs requires holders to actively monitor and time the market, which might explain why it is a less popular reason than investing in NFTs for the longer term. Short-term profits are rated to be 9.3 percentage points less important than long-term profits, in influencing NFT buying decisions.

2 in 10 NFT holders are neutral towards NFT flipping, while 1 in 10 do not consider the short-term gains when buying NFTs.

Savings

63.0% of holders buy NFTs as a form of savings, ranking it in 9th place and likely representing those who also buy NFTs to profit in the short or long term. However, NFTs are currently less suitable than fiat currency for savings in the traditional sense, given the price volatility and higher risk profile of the asset.

This explains why 23.0% are neutral on savings as a reason for buying NFTs, and 14.0% dismiss it as unimportant.

Social Good

Having a positive social impact was the second least important reason for buying NFTs. Around 6 in 10 NFT holders consider sustainability, philanthropy and similar benefits to society when evaluating a project.

However, this reason is particularly at risk of social desirability bias, and might not reflect how many people will actually buy NFTs for social good.

Most tellingly, a higher proportion of NFT holders were lukewarm about social good, with 17.8% rating it as just ‘Slightly Important’. Social good also had by far the lowest rate of being considered ‘Very Important’ (16.3%), and the highest rate of being outright considered unimportant (14.9%). The remaining 24.5% indicated that they are neutral.

This suggests that NFTs are currently not the best vehicle for altruism.

Disrupting Established Structures or Industries

The least important reason for buying NFTs was to disrupt the establishment. Even so, almost 6 in 10 NFT holders consider disruption important. Like crypto in general, NFTs have brought about innovations in the areas of digital ownership, content creation, identity and more, changing and improving upon past ways of doing things.

On the other hand, 3 in 10 are neutral on disruption and 1 in 10 find it unimportant, possibly representing those with a more conservative view.

Methodology

The study examined 343 responses from the NFT and Crypto Users Survey, jointly conducted by CoinGecko and Blockchain Research Lab from December 2022 to January 2023.

(By Lim Yu Qian)

Read more: https://www.coingecko.com/research/publications/why-people-buy-nfts

NFT
Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Walsh: Federal Reserve Meeting Schedule to Change Next Fall, No Rate Vote in 2027

    On October 29, Federal Reserve Chair Walsh stated that the schedule for the Federal Open Market Committee will begin to change next fall. In 2027, there will be one meeting that will neither conduct a rate vote nor issue a policy statement. It is expected that there will be two FOMC meetings in 2028 that will not conduct a rate vote.

  • BTC Surpasses $81,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $81,000, currently priced at $81,001.26, with a 24-hour increase of 0.54%. The market is highly volatile, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Bank of Canada Raises Interest Rate by 25 Basis Points as Expected

    On October 28, the Bank of Canada raised its benchmark interest rate from 2.25% to 2.50%, marking the first rate hike in over three years and aligning with market expectations.

  • Tether Launches FASE Foundation with 11 Partners

    On October 28, Tether announced the establishment of the FASE (Financial Access and Systemic Empowerment Foundation) in Switzerland, a nonprofit multi-stakeholder foundation focused on four key pillars: financial security, financial freedom and inclusion, connectivity and clean energy, and access to end medical resources, as well as responsible AI and robotics. Founding stakeholders include Anchorage Digital, Bitfury, Bybit, Chainalysis, Fasanara Capital, Kraken, Opera, Pave Bank, Prosper Global (formerly Mercy Corps), Solana Foundation, and Tether, with technical consulting provided by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). The first three projects include: forming a global youth alliance with the social enterprise Goodwall to provide digital education and fraud prevention tools to up to 10 million young people in high-risk areas in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia; piloting stablecoin humanitarian aid with Prosper Global, initially covering up to 1 million people as a template for future crisis response; and expanding cybercrime prevention networks in Africa, Asia, and Central America based on existing collaboration with UNODC, along with partnering with the United Nations Trust Fund for Victims of Trafficking to fund NGOs that assist survivors of human trafficking. Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino stated that the most vulnerable populations have long been overlooked by traditional financial systems. Prior to the official launch, the founding members held a meeting in Lugano, Switzerland, to establish strategic priorities.

  • Morgan Stanley Warns S&P 500 May Drop Another 8%

    On October 28, Mike Wilson, Chief U.S. Equity Strategist at Morgan Stanley, stated in a client report that a combination of AI financing pressures, the U.S. midterm elections on November 3, and tightening financial conditions could push the S&P 500 index down to around 7100 points in the coming weeks, representing a decline of about 8% from recent levels. This would mark the largest adjustment since the market turmoil triggered by the Iran war earlier this year. The firm noted that approximately 60% of the Russell 3000 index components have fallen over 20% from their peaks since early June, and about 96% of semiconductor stocks have also declined by more than 20%. They anticipate that the semiconductor sector may drop an additional 10% to 15% before mid-November. Credit spreads on bonds related to data centers have widened, with CoreWeave's debt entering distressed territory this month. The Federal Reserve raised interest rates to 3.75% to 4.00% in September, leading to rising bond yields. The firm maintains a year-end target of 8000 points for the S&P 500 and a fundamental target of 8300 points over the next 12 months, noting that markets typically perform better after midterm elections, with data from 1950 to 2022 showing an average increase of about 8% in the three months following elections.

  • Israeli Parliamentary Election Vote Counting Completed, Netanyahu's Camp Currently Leads

    On the 28th local time, according to Israeli sources, the vote counting for this round of Israeli parliamentary elections has been completed. The Likud party, led by current Prime Minister Netanyahu, remains in the lead with the highest percentage of valid votes counted so far. The Likud party continues to be the largest party in the parliament. However, there is a deadlock in the allocation of seats between Netanyahu's right-wing camp and the opposition camp led by Esenkot, with no single camp able to directly reach the majority of seats required to form a government.

  • Anthropic IPO Filing Warns of Risks from Trump Administration Retaliation

    On October 28, Bloomberg reported that in its IPO filing, Anthropic warned that its public advocacy for AI safety regulation and statements from executives could expose the company to risks such as government pressure and selective scrutiny. The document stated that even if other similarly situated companies are not treated equally, Anthropic could still become a target for specific government agencies, a risk associated with the company's multiple conflicts with the Trump administration: one stemming from disputes over the requirement for the U.S. Department of Defense to set safety limits when using its AI technology, and another related to disagreements over the safety and export controls of the Mythos model. The filing also indicated that future government interventions, export restrictions, and cybersecurity or biosafety incidents triggered by AI models could affect its product deployment, international expansion, and business growth. Furthermore, if the regulatory measures advocated by the company are implemented, compliance costs would rise, product development and release would be restricted, and its growth could slow down. Anthropic publicly submitted its S-1 filing on October 26, intending to list on Nasdaq under the ticker ANT.

  • AI Simulation System Sim Fed Previews October Rate Meeting: Seven Votes, Five for Pause

    On October 28, ahead of the Federal Reserve's upcoming interest rate decision, an AI simulation decision-making system called Sim Fed completed seven simulated votes: five opted to maintain the current interest rate, while two supported a rate hike, aligning closely with the market's mainstream expectation of a pause this week. The system was developed by Tara Sinclair, chair of the economics department at George Washington University, and Sophia Kazinnik, a research scientist at Stanford University's Digital Economy Lab. The two invested approximately a year and a half into the project, with a preliminary research paper set to be published by the end of 2025. Researchers clarified that the aforementioned votes are results of a simulation experiment and do not reflect the Federal Reserve's actual decisions; the real monetary policy decision is expected to be announced at 2 AM Beijing time on October 29.

  • Casap Completes $56 Million Series B Funding Led by Base10 Partners

    On October 28, Fortune reported that financial AI startup Casap announced the completion of $56 million in Series B funding, led by Base10 Partners, with Synchrony and Experian participating as strategic investors. The company's total funding has reached $90 million. Founded in 2023, Casap's AI tools assist banks and credit card companies in handling disputes and chargebacks. The company disclosed that clients using the tool have seen first-party fraud losses reduced by up to 51%, with chargeback win rates increasing to 96%, compared to the industry average of 60%. The average dispute resolution time has been shortened to 8 days, while traditional methods can take up to 90 days. The valuation for this round has not been disclosed.

  • Kalshi Plans to Tighten Deposit Restrictions for Users Under 21

    On October 28, Bloomberg reported that Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour stated that the prediction market platform is discussing increased user protection measures with U.S. regulators due to research showing that most users are in a losing position. Kalshi is willing to accept raising the participation age threshold to 21 years. The specific measures include a monthly deposit limit of $2,500 for users under 21 and the establishment of special accounts to curb high-risk trading. Mansour noted that Kalshi is an exchange regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and does not directly act as a counterparty for user trades, with users' lost funds flowing to other traders. However, he also acknowledged the need for the platform to work with regulators to establish protective rules to address existing regulatory gaps.