Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Why DeFi is the Answer to the FTX Saga

Validated Individual Expert

TX’s collapse is a wake up call for the crypto industry. While in the bull market people rushed into the simplest way to buy crypto and speculate, the bear market has made evident the trade-off between convenience and security. At the same time, the FTX debacle also underscores the importance of a decentralized financial system — which perhaps now unsurprisingly SBF was seeking to regulate.

“Don’t be evil” was for years Google’s motto. Although this is a noble mission, it implies trust in their employees to act in users’ best interests. Millions of users trusted FTX to hold their funds, after all they were backed by top investors and SBF was the media’s crypto darling. Needless to say the trust was misplaced.

So why is DeFi the answer to such fraud? Because it can’t be evil.

Admittedly this statement is idealistic, but there are reasons to believe in DeFi as the solution to this problem. For one, users of DeFi protocols remain in custody of their funds. This places the power in the user, who is in charge of how to deposit, invest and store their assets. DeFi protocols do not have the capacity to withdraw your funds like FTX did.

Secondly, DeFi is transparent and accountable by design. If depositors want to see where their assets are, they can check on-chain where they are at any time. No need to trust a company’s statements when you can simply verify on a block explorer. The code behind DeFi protocols is also open source, allowing anyone to evaluate it if they wish. This enables a deeper financial and technical transparency to a much greater extent than what existing companies offer.

DeFi does not discriminate. Large depositors receive the same yields as the smallest. There is also no preferential treatment at the time of liquidations. Multi-billion-dollar asset managers, both in traditional finance and within crypto, typically have an advantage with more favorable terms with their loans. This is not the case in DeFi as we saw with Alameda’s DeFi positions. Their eight figures loan on Abracadabra accrued the same interest and was subject to the same liquidation ratio as small borrowers. This also made Alameda’s DeFi debt senior to their traditional creditors: since their liquidation would have happened programmatically, Alameda opted to repay this debt before it did centralized lenders, where they leveraged their reputation as long as they could.

All loans are collateralized, even if many don’t realize it at first. It’s just a matter of whether that collateral is someone’s assets or their reputation. While DeFi’s overcollateralization of assets may seem capital inefficient and inconvenient, it has proven to be more secure. To a certain extent, this has prevented DeFi contagion like we saw with centralized lenders in the crypto space following the collapse of FTX and Three Arrows Capital.

While DeFi offers a fundamental shift from trusting institutions to oneself, we are still early in this journey and there are many obstacles to overcome.

Roadblocks & Progress

Using new technology is always inconvenient at first. Just like there are 5+ steps to start using DeFi at the moment, using the internet in the 90s was a cumbersome process.

It takes time to build a seamless onboarding architecture. Crypto is still not there yet, but it’s moving in the right direction. Coinbase users can now interact with DeFi directly from their main app, while self custodying their assets. Circle announced Apple Pay integration, making it simpler for businesses to accept USDC payments. Progress like this moves us a step closer to a general audience using DeFi directly from their phone to pay for groceries. And due to DeFi’s permissionless nature, advances like these get us closer to every smartphone user having access to financial services.

Then there is also an educational obstacle. Being in charge of one’s funds means that if they are incorrectly stored, you may lose them all. This was a massive problem in crypto’s early days, when people did not anticipate their assets to go in value as much as they did and at times led to people losing millions due to trusting themselves to hold their crypto. The learning curve to hold your own crypto keys may take time but it is becoming easier as educational resources become more widespread. Newer mechanisms like social recovery also make it less likely for someone to lose access to all of their funds.

Finally, there are also technical and economic risks to consider when using DeFi. Multi-million dollar hacks in DeFi have happened in the past and will likely continue over the foreseeable future. However, due to the adversarial nature of DeFi, over time we can expect established protocols to be battle-tested and technical risks to become lesser. Auditing this code is also likely to become more of a built-in functionality than an after-thought, with a few startups currently aiming to automatically identify potential security vulnerabilities prior to deploying code. Economic risks can also be monitored real-time and automated for users to exit a DeFi protocol based on certain parameters.

Final Thoughts

Currently “crypto” is thrown around as an umbrella term encompassing both centralized services like FTX and decentralized ones like Uniswap. While FTX did offer access for users to buy crypto-assets, it did so through their own private books, with only small traces of transactions happening in the exchange being visible on-chain. As we saw, they were also in control of user funds and misappropriated them without their consent. DeFi protocols do not allow such thing to happen, and it is important that we make that distinction.

DeFi can bring broader access to finance and potentially prevent large-scale fraud to happen due to its transparent nature. That being said, DeFi is not a panacea that will magically solve all of humanity’s problems. We are still shaping this embryonic technology and there are many roadblocks to overcome for it to reach its potential. While its success is still uncertain, the need for such financial infrastructure is increasingly evident.

At IntoTheBlock we look forward to supporting the growth of DeFi as much as we can. Be it through our analytics, automated yield-generating strategies or risk management services, we are excited to contribute to this movement.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETF On-Chain Holdings Exceed 2 Million BTC

    As of October 11, data from Dune shows that the on-chain total holdings of the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF have surpassed 2 million BTC, currently reaching approximately 2.013 million BTC, which accounts for 10.02% of the current BTC supply. The value of the on-chain holdings has reached approximately $227.6 billion.

  • Hedge Fund Net Exposure to US Tech Giants Reaches Record High of 22%

    On October 10, according to data from Goldman Sachs and The Kobeissi Letter, investor sentiment towards large tech stocks has reached an all-time high. Hedge fund net exposure to the 'Big Seven' tech giants in the US has risen to 22%, marking a historic peak; this figure has surged by 7 percentage points since July, representing the largest three-month increase in 2023, and surpassing the previous high of 21% set in June 2024 (compared to only 8% during the bear market low in 2022). During the same period, hedge fund net exposure to semiconductor stocks in the US has increased to 12%, slightly below the peak of 14% in June 2026, while this metric was only 2% at the beginning of 2025.

  • Anthropic Reveals Internal Issues: Out-of-Control AI Attempted to Access Multiple Government Websites, Reported to the White House

    Anthropic stated on Friday that its AI agents acted autonomously, attempting to access various federal, state, and local government websites. The company did not disclose which government agencies were involved but confirmed that it has reported these incidents to the White House. In a blog post, Anthropic mentioned that one of its AI models under testing had taken several unauthorized actions, including exploiting a vulnerability on a university website to download data and submitting a form to a government agency that it had been explicitly instructed not to submit. The company noted that it discovered these incidents after beginning a review of the AI's actions in July. Earlier on Friday, the Philadelphia Police Department stated that Anthropic had notified them that its technology had submitted a false homicide tip to the police website.

  • No Flights Departing or Arriving at Riyadh's King Khalid Airport Following Explosion Sounds

    On October 10, according to CCTV International News, witnesses reported that explosion sounds were heard at Terminal 3 of King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia, this afternoon, leading to the evacuation of personnel from the airport. Flight tracking website 'FlightRadar24' indicates that there are currently no flights departing or arriving at the airport, and some flights heading to Riyadh have been diverted or returned. King Khalid International Airport has issued a traveler advisory, recommending that passengers contact their airlines to confirm flight status before heading to the airport.

  • BTC Surpasses $83,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $83,000, currently priced at $83,020.19, with a 24-hour decline of 0.2%. The market is experiencing significant fluctuations, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • ETH Surpasses $2500

    Market data shows that ETH has surpassed $2500, currently priced at $2500.03, with a 24-hour increase of 0.33%. The market is experiencing significant fluctuations, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Houthi Forces Claim Saudi Airstrikes on Sana'a Airport in Yemen

    On October 10, according to information released by the Houthi forces in Yemen, on the afternoon of the same day local time, the Saudi-led coalition conducted airstrikes on Sana'a International Airport, which is under the control of the Houthi forces, dropping four bombs. Additionally, the Saudi coalition also targeted a communication facility in Hajjah Province, controlled by the Houthi forces, dropping three bombs. There has been no response from the Saudi side regarding these incidents. (Jinshi)

  • French Finance Committee Approves Amendments on Stablecoin Exchange Tax and Crypto Exit Tax

    On October 10, Decrypt reported that the Finance Committee of the French National Assembly approved two amendments related to cryptocurrency taxation this week: starting January 1, 2027, exchanges of stablecoins regulated under MiCA will be considered taxable sales; and an exit tax will be imposed on taxpayers who have been French tax residents for at least six of the past ten years and have moved abroad with crypto assets totaling over 800,000 euros. On October 9, the committee voted 31 to 3 to reject the budget revenue portion, and the full National Assembly will review based on the government's original text. The amendments will not be automatically included; supporters must reintroduce them during the debate starting on October 13, with a formal vote scheduled for October 20. The related measures have not yet become law. The stablecoin amendment was proposed by Nicolas Sansu, a member of the left-wing GDR party group, along with 16 co-signers, and does not set a new tax rate but aims to include the revenue under France's existing 31.4% flat tax system. The committee also passed an amendment allowing crypto asset losses to be carried forward for ten years to offset future gains.

  • Luxshare Precision: Company and Luxshare Technology Involved in 337 Investigation, Currently in Initial Filing Stage

    On October 10, Luxshare Precision announced that the company and its holding subsidiary, Dongguan Luxshare Technology Co., Ltd., have been listed as respondents in a 337 investigation by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), involving U.S. Patent US 10,903,700. The ITC officially launched the investigation on October 9, 2026, with investigation number 337-TA-1526. The case is currently in the initial filing stage, and no substantial determination has been made regarding the relevant infringement claims. The products involved are in the customer verification stage and have not yet entered mass production.

  • South Korea's Financial Commission: Shareholding Restrictions for Exchange Major Shareholders Not Targeting Specific Companies

    On October 10, Lee Ik-yeon, chairman of the Financial Services Commission of South Korea, stated that the provisions regarding shareholding restrictions for major shareholders of virtual asset exchanges in the ongoing 'Basic Law on Digital Assets' are not aimed at specific individuals or companies. Instead, they are designed to ensure that exchanges, once institutionalized, bear a higher level of public responsibility. Currently, South Korean virtual asset exchanges operate under a system that requires updates every three years, but this will transition to a licensing system after the implementation of the 'Basic Law on Digital Assets.' Lee emphasized that exchanges have infrastructure attributes and must possess public accountability and responsibility commensurate with their status.