Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

The Importance of NFT Royalties: Why Supporting Creators Is Essential for the Survival of the NFT Market

NFTs and digital collectibles have exploded in popularity over the past few years, with many artists and creators using them to sell unique digital assets like art, music, and other digital media. A critical aspect of the NFT market is the use of royalties, which allow the creator of an NFT to earn a percentage of the sales price whenever their NFT is resold.

However, not all NFT marketplaces enforce royalties. Some marketplaces even removed royalties or made them optional. This is a concerning trend, as it undermines the ability of creators to earn a continuous return on their work and could ultimately harm the growth of the NFT market.

One of the main reasons that some marketplaces are removing royalties is that they are scared to lose market share and desperately try to make their platforms more attractive to buyers. Without the added cost of royalties, buyers may presumably be more likely to purchase NFTs on these platforms. However, this approach needs to pay attention to the fact that creators are driving the popularity of NFTs.

Gifted artists should be able to create and share their work and be incentivized to do that in a way that allows them to thrive. NFT marketplaces must enforce royalties to ensure that creators are fairly compensated for their work. Without the ability to earn royalties, creators are less likely to create and sell their work using these technologies, ultimately harming the growth of the NFT market.

99.9% of all the artists disappear. That’s what happens. — Tim Ferris

Enforcing royalties helps to support the overall health of the space by ensuring that creators have a financial incentive to continue creating and supporting their work. NFT projects need fuel to make them run. It doesn’t matter if it’s from a single artist or a company of people with a roadmap who wants to deliver to their community. In either case, there needs to be fuel.

Marketplaces that Neglect Royalties

Marketplaces like sudoswap and X2Y2 are popular among traders specifically because they’re royalty-free. Existing NFT marketplaces have felt pressure to adjust so they won’t lose market share, despite the potentially catastrophic consequences for creators and the NFT market overall.

Magic Eden, the popular NFT marketplace on Solana, recently raised over 150 million dollars. While this influx of capital has its benefits, it also has drawbacks. To succeed, Magic Eden needs to grow at all costs and do everything to remain the most prominent platform on Solana. To maintain its leading position on Solana, Magic Eden decided to make royalties optional, despite anticipating backlash from the community. This decision has been criticized by many in the NFT community, who believe that enforcing royalties is essential for supporting creators and ensuring the growth of the NFT market.

LooksRare, an Ethereum NFT marketplace, recently made it optional for buyers to pay creator royalties when trading NFTs. Despite the pushback from many NFT artists and creators against the race to the bottom of rejecting royalties, LooksRare chose to let buyers opt out of paying royalties. Although they claimed to still “support creators” by sharing protocol fees, this meant that creators only received a 0.5% share of the sales price on secondary sales, paid out in the LOOKS token.

Royalties: Here to Stay?

While we are seeing many NFT marketplaces move to 0% royalties, it doesn’t mean that royalties will be a thing of the past. Many people from the industry have spoken up against these developments. The NFT community seemed to understand that royalties play an essential role in the development of the space. Prominent artists and creators are making their views known.

The NFT ecosystem would be a tiny fraction of what it is today if it weren’t for creator royalties. — Wylie Aronow, Co-Founder of  Yuga Labs

These noises seem to affect how NFT marketplaces look at the situation. Top marketplace OpenSea was saying that it may follow the trend of no longer enforcing creator royalties on secondary sales. Still, after the backlash of these statements, it decided to shift.

Positive Developments in the Royalties Discussion:

  • The new platform Universal Page proposed a standard for NFT 2.0 royalties, allowing creators to enforce royalties only when people sell and profit from their work but not take royalties when they sell at a loss. It also allows multiple receiving addresses to be set with different percentages or fixed amounts.
  • OpenSea launched a tool for on-chain enforcement of creator fees and decided to continue enforcing creator fees for collections.
  • Magic Eden created an open-source Open Creator Protocol to protect royalties. New collections can launch with this protocol to protect royalties.
  • Many NFT marketplaces, like Rarible, Nifty Gateway, MakersPlace, and more, created the Royalty Registry: a smart contract that enables creators to apply on-chain royalty enforcement to their work.

On universal.page each creator can receive different percentages of royalties.

Conclusion

The importance of NFT royalties cannot be overstated. Without the ability to earn royalties, it’s unlikely that creators will continue to create and sell their work using blockchains, ultimately harming the growth of the space. There should be clear royalty standards, and every NFT marketplace must enforce royalties to support the creators who are driving the growth of this exciting new technology.

The removal of NFT royalties by some marketplaces has caused concern among creators. However, the recent developments in the NFT royalties discussion show that there is hope for a brighter future. Many marketplaces are listening to the community and implementing new protocols and standards to protect creators and enforce royalties. This demonstrates that a significant part of the NFT industry is committed to supporting creators and ensuring fair compensation for their work.

NFT
Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Anthropic IPO Filing Warns of Risks from Trump Administration Retaliation

    On October 28, Bloomberg reported that in its IPO filing, Anthropic warned that its public advocacy for AI safety regulation and statements from executives could expose the company to risks such as government pressure and selective scrutiny. The document stated that even if other similarly situated companies are not treated equally, Anthropic could still become a target for specific government agencies, a risk associated with the company's multiple conflicts with the Trump administration: one stemming from disputes over the requirement for the U.S. Department of Defense to set safety limits when using its AI technology, and another related to disagreements over the safety and export controls of the Mythos model. The filing also indicated that future government interventions, export restrictions, and cybersecurity or biosafety incidents triggered by AI models could affect its product deployment, international expansion, and business growth. Furthermore, if the regulatory measures advocated by the company are implemented, compliance costs would rise, product development and release would be restricted, and its growth could slow down. Anthropic publicly submitted its S-1 filing on October 26, intending to list on Nasdaq under the ticker ANT.

  • AI Simulation System Sim Fed Previews October Rate Meeting: Seven Votes, Five for Pause

    On October 28, ahead of the Federal Reserve's upcoming interest rate decision, an AI simulation decision-making system called Sim Fed completed seven simulated votes: five opted to maintain the current interest rate, while two supported a rate hike, aligning closely with the market's mainstream expectation of a pause this week. The system was developed by Tara Sinclair, chair of the economics department at George Washington University, and Sophia Kazinnik, a research scientist at Stanford University's Digital Economy Lab. The two invested approximately a year and a half into the project, with a preliminary research paper set to be published by the end of 2025. Researchers clarified that the aforementioned votes are results of a simulation experiment and do not reflect the Federal Reserve's actual decisions; the real monetary policy decision is expected to be announced at 2 AM Beijing time on October 29.

  • Casap Completes $56 Million Series B Funding Led by Base10 Partners

    On October 28, Fortune reported that financial AI startup Casap announced the completion of $56 million in Series B funding, led by Base10 Partners, with Synchrony and Experian participating as strategic investors. The company's total funding has reached $90 million. Founded in 2023, Casap's AI tools assist banks and credit card companies in handling disputes and chargebacks. The company disclosed that clients using the tool have seen first-party fraud losses reduced by up to 51%, with chargeback win rates increasing to 96%, compared to the industry average of 60%. The average dispute resolution time has been shortened to 8 days, while traditional methods can take up to 90 days. The valuation for this round has not been disclosed.

  • Kalshi Plans to Tighten Deposit Restrictions for Users Under 21

    On October 28, Bloomberg reported that Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour stated that the prediction market platform is discussing increased user protection measures with U.S. regulators due to research showing that most users are in a losing position. Kalshi is willing to accept raising the participation age threshold to 21 years. The specific measures include a monthly deposit limit of $2,500 for users under 21 and the establishment of special accounts to curb high-risk trading. Mansour noted that Kalshi is an exchange regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and does not directly act as a counterparty for user trades, with users' lost funds flowing to other traders. However, he also acknowledged the need for the platform to work with regulators to establish protective rules to address existing regulatory gaps.

  • Thailand's Supreme Court Rules Bitcoin as 'Property' under Criminal Law

    On October 28, Thailand's Supreme Court ruled in case No. 4929/2569 that Bitcoin constitutes 'property' in criminal cases. The case was brought by the Koh Samui Public Prosecutor against a defendant whose victim exchanged $50,000 (approximately 1.878 million Thai Baht) for Bitcoin and transferred it to a criminal gang. The court determined that the elements of property crime were established. The ruling stated that Bitcoin has value according to market conditions, can be exchanged for cash when there are buyers, and can be held by ordinary people, thus it is not an object of no value or intangible. Its value does not disappear simply because it is exchanged for Bitcoin instead of cash. The ruling also pointed out that the Bank of Thailand's position on cryptocurrencies not being legal tender is a separate issue from whether they constitute 'property'. The judgment referenced Article 137 of the Civil and Commercial Code and Sections 309(2), 340(1), and 340(3) of the Criminal Code.

  • Sun Yuchen-Linked Address Transfers $48.76 Million in PEPE in 17 Days, Realizing a Profit of Approximately $9.62 Million

    On October 28, according to on-chain analyst Ai Yi (@ai_9684xtpa), PEPE has surged over 14% in the last 24 hours, with its price returning above $0.000005. A wallet marked by Arkham as associated with Sun Yuchen has transferred a total of $48.76 million in PEPE since October 17, with a cost basis of approximately $0.000004115, currently realizing a profit of about $9.62 million. This batch of PEPE accounts for approximately 2.86% of the total supply, making this address the largest individual holder on-chain.

  • BTC Falls Below $81,000

    Market data shows that BTC has fallen below $81,000, currently priced at $80,990.32, with a 24-hour increase of 1.23%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Anthropic Plans IPO Valuation of Up to $1.5 Trillion, Asian Investors Shift to Crypto Derivatives

    On October 28, Bloomberg reported that AI company Anthropic plans to go public with a valuation that could reach $1.5 trillion, and intends to invest approximately $800 billion in building computing infrastructure, benefiting companies like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Samsung Electronics. Due to strong subscription demand and related restrictions, it is challenging for Asian investors to participate directly, leading them to invest indirectly through crypto derivatives. OKX and Binance have launched perpetual contracts linked to Anthropic's valuation, while contracts on Hyperliquid's EntropyIO platform implied a valuation of about $1.88 trillion at one point. The report also noted that Anthropic's path to profitability remains uncertain, with high AI investment costs and intense industry competition, meaning such proxy investments could also be affected by factors from other industries.

  • Completion of 800 Billion Yuan New Policy Financial Instruments

    According to information from the China Development Bank, Export-Import Bank, and Agricultural Development Bank, as of October 28, the new policy financial instruments for 2026 have all been issued, totaling 800 billion yuan. Among these, the China Development Bank issued 365 billion yuan, the Export-Import Bank issued 120 billion yuan, and the Agricultural Development Bank issued 315 billion yuan. (Xinhua News Agency)

  • Iran: Qatar Has Not Proposed New Plan to End Hostilities with the U.S.

    On October 28, according to Reuters: A senior Iranian official stated that Qatar has not proposed a new plan to end hostilities with the U.S. Several ideas put forward by Qatar are unacceptable to Iran. Iran's uncompromising policy on nuclear issues remains unchanged.