Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

OpenSea is Launching A Tool for on-chain Enforcement of Creator Fees for New Collections

Cointime Official

When the NFT standard was created in 2018, creator fees (sometimes referred to as ‘royalties’) did not exist. OpenSea supported them early to invite more creators into the space, and we hoped at the time that they would be durable. But the last few months have proven that off-chain enforcement is too brittle. Notably, on marketplaces where these fees are optional, we’ve watched the voluntary creator fee payment rate dwindle to less than 20%. And on other marketplaces, creator fees are simply not paid at all.

An unfortunate consequence of this ecosystem shift is that the business model used by the vast majority of creators in this industry is now subject to enforcement discretion of marketplaces rather than code. And for new creators entering the space, it can come as a surprise that the fees they set aren’t always enforceable. With many marketplaces choosing to stop enforcing creator fees, to put it bluntly, the last few months haven’t felt WAGMI. 

Given our role in the ecosystem, we know it’s critical for us to take a thoughtful, principled approach to solving this problem, and to lead with solutions. It’s clear that many creators want the ability to enforce fees on-chain; and fundamentally, we believe that the choice should be theirs to make – it shouldn’t be a decision made for them by marketplaces. So we’re looking to balance the scales by putting more power in creators’ hands, equipping them with tools to control their business model.

What we’re doing

To that end, today, we’re launching a tool for on-chain enforcement of creator fees for new collections. This tool is our first version of on-chain enforcement. Starting at 12pm ET on Tuesday, November 8, OpenSea will enforce creator fees only for new collections that use an on-chain enforcement tool such as this one. In the coming months we’ll launch additional tools and improvements for on-chain enforcement, and we will engage with the community to get feedback on them along the way. 

We recognize this is a first step, so we’re committed to engaging with our communities about solutions for existing collections. In deference to how difficult it is to enforce fees on chain for existing collections, we won’t make any changes for existing collections through at least December 8, 2022. To be transparent, the consideration set for what happens after December 8 is wide open – and we’re considering options ranging from continuing to enforce off-chain fees for some subsets of collections, to allowing optional creator fees, to collaborating on other on-chain enforcement options for creators. We recognize not all creators, collections, and communities are the same and we are looking to create a long-term policy that reflects that.

Our On-Chain Enforcement Tool for New Collections

Our initial on-chain tool is a simple code snippet that creators can add to future NFT contracts, as well as existing upgradeable contracts. This code restricts NFT sales to marketplaces that enforce creator fees. Starting at 12pm ET on Tuesday, November 8, OpenSea will check new collections to see if their items are able to be sold on marketplaces that do not enforce creator fees. OpenSea will enforce creator fees for new collections that use an on-chain enforcement tool. OpenSea will not enforce creator fees for new collections that do not implement on-chain enforcement.

To add this code to a new contract or to an upgradeable contract, follow the instructions here. 

Make no mistake, technical decisions like this involve tradeoffs: enforcing creator fees on-chain requires sacrificing some of the censorship-resistance and permissionless nature of NFTs. Nevertheless, we believe creators should have the power to build the collections and communities that they desire, and buyers and sellers should continue to have the freedom to choose which collections they do and don’t engage with.

What should existing collections do?

Our belief, informed by the last few months of observation, is that creator fees without on-chain enforcement methods are not viable. 

Unfortunately, the bitter pill is that, to the best of our knowledge, the only way to achieve on-chain creator fee enforcement for existing collections with non-upgradeable smart contracts is to take drastic measures with their communities, like shifting the canonical collection to a new smart contract. In our opinion, by far the better option is for existing creators to explore new forms of monetization and alternative ways of incentivizing buyers and sellers to pay creator fees, and to ensure that future collections enforce creator fees on-chain.

Why are we doing this?

It’s become clear that the current mechanics of creator fee enforcement are not sustainable—not for the marketplaces who enforce them, and, more importantly, not for creators themselves. 

While we believe creator fees without on-chain enforcement are going away, we strongly believe that creator fees as a broad concept are not. Creator fees are an important innovation of web3 that help creators monetize their work in a more effective way. But marketplaces should not enforce business models for creators, creators should have independent control. We hope that this is a first step in that direction.

We don’t expect that we can drive this ecosystem shift alone, nor do we think that all creators will want to use creator fees as a form of monetization. But by providing on-chain enforcement tools, we hope to lend creators our support so they can choose. We hope this also inspires others looking for solutions to keep creator fees a part of our ecosystem to join us and work collaboratively on even more solutions.

What’s next?

We wanted to share this thinking as soon as possible to give our communities time to process, prepare and ask questions. Over the coming days, we’ll be reaching out to many more creators and collections. If you want to talk about this, we’re here to listen. We’re holding a Twitter Space this evening so you can ask your initial questions, and we will schedule more throughout the week.

We’re committed to building the best destination for NFT creators and collectors. Over the coming months we plan to iterate both on creator fee enforcement and support for new business models. We will share updates as we have them. We appreciate all the feedback shared to-date, and look forward to hearing more.

Note Regarding Our Shared Storefront

New collections created using OpenSea’s shared storefront smart contract (the “Create” button) on or after 12 ET on November 8, 2022 won’t be able to set creator fees. We’re actively working on alternative solutions and will provide more information as it becomes available.

NFT
Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Ethereum Foundation Sells 2,785 ETH Worth Approximately $6.42 Million

    On October 26, according to monitoring by Onchain Lens, the Ethereum Foundation sold 2,785 ETH through CoW Swap for approximately $6.42 million in exchange for USDS.

  • Qatari Mediators Arrive in Tehran to Alleviate Regional Tensions

    According to an official familiar with the situation, Qatari mediators arrived in Tehran on Sunday with the aim of easing regional tensions. Qatar's mediation efforts are being conducted in coordination with the United States.

  • Musk: Future Phones Will Have No Apps or Operating Systems, Just AI Generation

    On October 25, Musk predicted that in the next 5 to 6 years, smartphones may undergo a complete transformation: traditional operating systems and apps will gradually disappear, and phones will become dedicated terminals for running AI. At that time, users will no longer need to download applications or open software; instead, they will simply tell the AI what they want, and the phone's AI will collaborate with cloud AI to generate videos, images, and various interactive content in real-time.

  • Iran: Tehran's Stance Unchanged Despite Potential New U.S. Strikes

    On October 25, Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif stated on Sunday that Iran's position will not change even if a new round of conflict erupts between Israel and the United States. This comes amid escalating tensions between Tehran and Washington. U.S. President Trump had mentioned on Friday that Washington "might come back for another small-scale 'epic fury'" military operation. Zarif remarked, "Recently, some have talked about the possibility of a new war, but I am already considering the post-war situation. Our policies will not change whether or not war occurs. They have tried twice before and have seen the results. If they want to try again, they should understand that the final outcome will be no different from the past." (Golden Ten)

  • Russia Ready to Supply Any Amount of Diesel to the U.S.

    On October 25, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Novak stated that Russia is prepared to supply any amount of diesel to the United States.

  • Egypt's Benchmark Stock Index Declines by 5%

    Egypt's benchmark stock index has expanded its decline to 5%.

  • Yemen Conflict Escalates, Saudi and Egyptian Stock Markets Decline

    On October 25, Sunday, the stock markets in Saudi Arabia and Egypt experienced declines. This followed a statement from the Saudi-led coalition indicating that, amid escalating conflicts with the Yemeni Houthi forces, the coalition intercepted several drones and missiles over Riyadh and southern Saudi Arabia. Under pressure from widespread sell-offs, the Saudi benchmark index (TASI) fell by 2.6%, marking its worst intraday performance since April 2025, with major stock Saudi Aramco dropping by 1.1%. Outside the Gulf region, the Egyptian blue-chip index (EGX30) plummeted by 2.5%, nearing its lowest level in about seven months, with all constituent stocks declining. The Egyptian parliament is expected to vote on October 26 to decide whether to authorize the armed forces to provide support for Saudi Arabia in its conflict with the Houthi forces upon request.

  • SemiAnalysis CEO: Substrates are the 'Biggest Bottleneck'

    On October 25, the CEO of SemiAnalysis stated: 'I believe that in the semiconductor industry, the biggest limiting factor, aside from memory, is substrates. Substrates, PCB materials, and substrate materials are all severely under-invested. Many companies in the supply chain that produce these materials in Japan are relatively conservative and unwilling to make significant investments in capacity. As a result, there is a huge bottleneck. In terms of what can be produced in the next two years, whether it’s accelerators, CPUs, or any other component in the supply chain, I believe substrates are the biggest bottleneck.'

  • Keystone Hardware Wallet Website Hacked, Customer Information Leaked

    On October 25, Hong Kong-based self-custody hardware wallet brand Keystone, known for its full isolation and QR code signing, disclosed that its official website was unauthorizedly accessed on October 20, exposing customer names, contact information, shipping addresses, and order details (including purchased products and prices). The company confirmed on October 23, after verifying API activity with Shopify, that a third party obtained customer shipping information. Keystone emphasized that payment card and bank information, mnemonic phrases, private keys, and wallet passwords were not leaked. The company has blocked access, patched vulnerabilities, initiated an investigation, and notified affected customers via email, warning that scammers may impersonate Keystone to deceive customers under the pretext of refunds or device exchanges. Customers are advised not to click on suspicious links and not to disclose mnemonic phrases and private keys, with plans to release a detailed report within a few days. Other companies in the industry, such as Trezor (which experienced a leak from logistics provider ShipMonk in August) and Ledger (which had a security incident this month involving modified devices stealing mnemonic phrases), have also faced security issues.

  • Goldman Sachs Lowers 12-Month Target for South Korea's KOSPI Index by 25%

    On October 25, strategists at Goldman Sachs Group lowered their target for South Korea's KOSPI index by 25%. Previously, they had raised the target multiple times this year, but with increasing market concerns over AI-related trades, they have now opted for a downgrade. Led by analyst Timothy Moe, the team reduced the 12-month target for the KOSPI index from 12,000 points to 9,000 points. They noted that, given the benchmark index has fallen more than 35% from its peak in June, valuation assumptions need to become more cautious. These strategists believe that the current sell-off has left the South Korean stock market significantly undervalued; even after the target downgrade, the index still has over 60% upside potential.