Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

How to Stay Safe in DeFi: A Simple Guide to Evaluate Project Safety

The collapse of FTX proved the importance of self-custody and risk management.

But it’s so easy to lose money in DeFi if you are not careful with many exploits, rug pulls, contract bugs around.

In this blog I’d like to share how to evaluate safety of DeFi protocols to protect your assets.

It’s great if you’re an experienced smart contract developer and can verify the code yourself. But most of us aren’t.

It leaves us with no other choice, but to evaluate projects based on other data, that involves some degree of trust.

Total Value Lock, ultimate proof of security?

It’s no secret that the majority evaluate DeFi projects by how much value is deposited to the smart contracts. So, TVL is the ultimate proof of trust.

The higher the Total Value Locked, the higher the implied security of a protocol. If a lot of money is deposited, it means ‘someone’ did due diligence, and that protocol is secure.

Unfortunately, it gives a false sense of security. And high TVL protocols are actively targeted by hackers. At the same time, low TVL doesn’t mean a protocol is not secure.

Take a look at the top DeFi protocols by TVL.

  • Do you think that the TVL represents the level of security/safety?
  • Is there any protocol you wouldn’t trust with your money? Why?

There might be biases in you based on what you read online.

Trust, but verify?

‘Don’t trust, verify’ is the reason we have smart contract audits.

If that wasn’t the case, we might not need audits, because code is open source and community could find all the issues in the code. Yet the community might not have the right motivation, incentives or expertise to verify code.

Auditors are supposed to have the right technical expertise, but at the end of the day, we also have to trust them to do the right job.

Remember Twitter backlash against Certik because a few of their audited protocols ended up hacked?

Audit companies are building their reputation too. If the protocols they audit (and evaluated as safe) are exploited, then it shows lack of expertise. In fact, Certik has audited 3,422 projects, so no wonder some of them got hacked or had a bug.

Just having an audit doesn’t mean the protocol is safe. I’ve seen projects proudly announcing ‘Completed audit’, but when you read the audit the safety score is actually low.

The lesson is not to trust the announcements blindly, but verify the result by reading the actual audit.

What if you don’t read the audits?

The majority doesn’t read the audits anyway.

Knowing that Certik has a dashboard with all their audited projects. You can check the ‘Trust Score’ with higher number implying safety.

https://www.certik.com/

Other auditors like Hacken has a similar dashboard, or you could simply read the audit summary. Check the example, of Trader Joe’s audit done by Paladin.

You can see here that Trader Joe fixed high and medium severity issues, but not all low severity issues has been resolved.

https://paladinsec.co/projects/trader-joe-launchpeg/

Audit is just a start.

A lot more is needed to evaluate safety:

  • Adequate testing
  • Bounty campaigns
  • Documentation clarity
  • Admin controls
  • Oracle documentation

and much more… It’s a nightmare to verify it all yourself.

I really like what DefiSafety is doing. Its Process Quality Review verifies protocols and gives them a safety score.

https://www.defisafety.com/app?orderBy=finalScore

According to the PQR results, Liquity Protocol, Synthetix and Angle Protocol are the safest of all verified DeFi protocols.

On DefiSafety you can then check every element and see where the protocol scores the best/worst.

For example, Liquidy still needs Formal Verification.

Additionally, you can start by rating your portfolio safety on Exponential DeFi.

Its ‘Rate my wallet’ feature provides you with a custom risk analysis of your current investments. For example, $4.5M of Tetranode’s assets are deposited into riskier (C rank) protocols.

Elemental DeFi gives a score based on the project evaluation.Assessment takes into account asset risk, code quality and blockchain security to which the assets are deposited.

I like their easy to understand explanation of risks.

For example, take a look at Abracadabra’s MIM. It warns of SPELL being used as collateral which could result in bad debt.

If in doubt, ask!

Finally, I recommend joining the project community groups and ask:

Do they have an insurance fund?

Do they avoid questions?

What are they doing to increase security?

I asked Stargate team if they had an insurance fund in case they get hacked, but it sometimes more difficult to get an answer than I thought, which poses red flags.

But whatever happens, DeFi is still young, so better not to put all your assets into one protocol.

Do you have more useful tips how to evaluate projects and protect your assets?

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Vitalik: Ethereum Foundation is Not the Central Manager of the ETH Ecosystem, Future Development Will Shift to 'Small and Long-term' Approach

    On May 25, Ethereum founder Vitalik shared his views on the future development direction of the Ethereum Foundation in a post on the X platform. He emphasized that this is just his personal opinion. The board does not consist solely of him, and he does not have more special powers than other board members. Aya Miyaguchi is leading most of the execution work for this transformation, while his own involvement is more focused on technical issues. The board is currently expanding, and his influence within the organization will continue to decline in the future, which, frankly, is what he hopes to see. By 2025, the Ethereum Foundation has made significant improvements in its execution capabilities. Many issues have been resolved, and the foundation continues to benefit from greater efficiency and a stronger focus on specific goals. However, as these issues were addressed, he began to care more about another concern: he often sees people saying, 'Vitalik has always talked about Ethereum needing to be decentralized, having privacy, and becoming a shelter technology, but why do the actions of the Ethereum Foundation not reflect these ideals?' Of course, there are those who hold completely different views. Some do not feel there is a crisis at all, but rather believe that the Ethereum Foundation has finally begun to take execution and business development seriously, and the next focus should be to continue along this path faster and stronger. Vitalik believes that this difference essentially reflects varying sensitivities to different types of criticism, and he is more easily hurt by criticisms regarding deviations from values. Vitalik stated that the Ethereum Foundation should not be 'the center of Ethereum,' but rather 'a node with clear responsibilities, existing alongside other nodes.' In the past, they have always said this, but many people in the ecosystem, including some within the foundation, hoped the foundation would become a true center. Now, they are taking concrete actions to ensure the foundation becomes the latter. This is particularly important because the Ethereum Foundation is essentially a resource-limited and organizationally limited entity. The foundation currently holds only about 0.16% of all ETH, which is even lower than many large ETH holders; whereas many other blockchain projects' 'central foundations' typically control 10%-50% of their tokens. The current Ethereum Foundation has decided to use its remaining resources to pursue 'long-term viability' rather than continuous expansion (which also means they will sell less ETH). The foundation will focus on those things that are crucial for Ethereum to become a censorship-resistant, control-resistant, open, private, and secure system, but that no one else would do if the foundation does not. This means they must make difficult choices. Some projects and individuals they highly respect may no longer belong to the foundation's system in the future. In fact, if they want important tasks to attract external capital, it may be necessary to keep some talented individuals, influential public figures, and those who share the mission and CROPS philosophy outside the foundation. This also means that the Ethereum Foundation will take a clearer and more principled stance on a cultural level.

  • ETH Surpasses $2100

    Market data shows that ETH has surpassed $2100, currently priced at $2101.04, with a 24-hour increase of 1.9%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • U.S. Officials: Agreement with Iran Expected Not to Be Signed on Sunday, Some Issues Remain

    On May 24, Axios reported, citing a U.S. official, that Iran's Supreme Leader has approved the overall framework of the agreement. There are some important statements for us and some significant wording for Iran. It is expected that the agreement with Iran will not be signed on Sunday, as there are still some issues that need to be resolved. The current status of the Iranian regime is progressing slowly, and completing the necessary approvals will take a few days.

  • ETH Falls Below $2100

    Market data shows that ETH has fallen below $2100, currently priced at $2096.81, with a 24-hour increase of 2.47%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • PAYS Officially Launches on Nivex, Surges 100% on Debut

    At 15:18 on May 24, 2026, PAYS officially launched on the Nivex exchange and opened for trading globally.

  • U.S. Secretary of State: Announcement on Agreement with Iran Possible Later Sunday

    On May 24, U.S. Secretary of State Rubio stated that an announcement regarding an agreement with Iran may be made later on Sunday.

  • BTC Surpasses $77,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $77,000, currently priced at $77,073.6, with a 24-hour increase of 1.32%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Trump: Calls with Multiple World Leaders, Iran Agreement Nearly Finalized

    On May 24, Trump stated on social media that he had "very good calls" in the Oval Office with leaders from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, Bahrain, and others regarding Iran and a peace memorandum. Trump claimed that the agreement has been largely negotiated and is pending finalization by the U.S., Iran, and other relevant countries. Additionally, his call with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu was also "very smooth." The final details of the agreement are under discussion and will be announced soon. Trump specifically noted that, in addition to several aspects of the agreement, the Strait of Hormuz will be opened.

  • BTC Surpasses $76,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $76,000, currently priced at $76,001.27, with a 24-hour increase of 0.05%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • US and Iran Expected to Announce Final Peace Agreement Within 24 Hours

    On May 24, according to the Washington Times citing sources close to the negotiations, the United States and Iran are expected to announce the finalization of a peace agreement within 24 hours after negotiating representatives approved a draft agreement to end all combat on the front lines. The agreement still awaits final approval from both governments.