Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

A Framework for Measuring Crypto Risk

Validated Media

The crypto investing industry needs a framework for measuring risk.

By “risk” I don’t mean whether a crypto investment is volatile; I mean whether it could collapse entirely.

For example, most would say bitcoin and Ethereum are less risky than a crypto startup. Most would say Tether and USDC (backed by dollars) are less risky than Dai (backed by crypto).

The question for you: What are the risk factors that make you stay away from a crypto investment?

Is it an anonymous founder? A sketchy business model? Forked code?

Here are my warning flags — I’d love to hear yours.

Building a Crypto Risk Model

What we have in mind is something like our Blockchain Investor Scorecard, which was published back in 2018, and has stood the test of time. It’s the scorecard we use for all our crypto ratings, and it really works.

Every question gets a rating from 1 to 5, then you average them up.

While the scorecard has some questions that measure risk (like the team integrity, above), it really measures the strength of the underlying crypto “company.”

It measures potential reward. But how can we measure potential risk?

Specifically, I’m thinking of the crypto companies that have collapsed this year; you know who they are (that last link is a particularly great read).

Could we have seen this coming? Obviously, most didn’t. But could we get better at spotting Jenga towers before they collapse?

I believe we can. Here are a few questions we might ask of any crypto investment: the first steps toward a rigorous framework of measuring risk.

Team Risk

Is the team anonymous?

Anonymous teams are less accountable.

Does the team have a meaningful track record in crypto (“10,000 hours”)? Experienced teams are less risky than novices.

Is there information asymmetry?

Does the team have information you don’t, or is everything on-chain?

Does the team demonstrate scrupulous honesty and integrity?

Are there red flags, yellow flags, or potential conflicts of interest?

Are the leader(s) self-promoters on Twitter?

Large Twitter presences can signal they’re primarily looking out for themselves.

Regulatory Risk

Are investors buying the token, hoping the price will go up?

Forget any claims of “decentralization”: does it smell like a security?

Is the company headquartered in a jurisdiction without clear crypto regulation?

Small, crypto-friendly countries are better than large, unfriendly ones (U.S., China, etc.)

Does the company lead a specific niche of crypto (stablecoins, lending, etc.)?

Category leaders are more likely to be targeted by regulators, especially in the U.S.

Financial Risk

Is the company well-capitalized?

Do they have enough operating cash on hand, and is it liquid (e.g., stablecoins)?

Can you easily explain the company’s business model?

Do you understand how they make money, and can you describe it to others?

Is there an element of “continually increasing returns”?

Do they promise investors, either implicitly or explicitly, that number go up?

Does the company warn regularly about risks?

Do they make it a practice of pointing out potential downsides?

Have other credible investors raised warning flags?

Have you searched for alternate points of view and investigated their concerns?

Smart Contract Risk

Have their smart contracts been audited by a reputable firm?

Are the results publicly available?

Is there a public forum or repository for reporting bugs or issues?

Can you easily find it from their website or Github?

Has the company demonstrated responsiveness to reported issues?

Do they have a track record of responding decisively, or is it radio silence?

Has the company survived stress tests?

Has it held up during one or more market downturns, hacks, or other crises?

Does it rely on cross-chain bridges?

Historically, bridges between blockchains are honeypots for hackers.

Traction Risk

How many active users does the project have?

There’s some safety in numbers. More users generally = more responsibility.

How many followers do they have on social media (Twitter and/or Reddit)?

The court of public opinion can help with public accountability.

Is the project listed on major crypto exchanges?

Big companies want to protect their investors, which provides further safety.

Financial Metrics

What is the expected return?

What is the standard deviation?

What is the Sharpe Ratio?

These can be compared across crypto projects for benchmarking.

Behavioral Risk

Perhaps the most important question is your own integrity. Just as criminals are likely to hang out with other criminals, shady investors are likely to be attracted to shady investments.

I would put this into a category of its own, but since most people think they’re pretty good — even when their behavior isn’t — I’m not sure how reliable it will be. If nothing else, it’s a reminder that our own karma plays a part, too.

The Blockchain Risk Scorecard

Our plan is to put these questions into a new scorecard — call it the Blockchain Risk Scorecard — that we can use alongside our Blockchain Investor Scorecard.

Since risk and reward go hand in hand, our hope is these two tools will provide our crypto investing community even better confidence in our top picks.

Are there any items you’d add? Remove? Change? Let me know, and I’ll share the best feedback in next week’s column.

Go ahead, message me. There’s no risk.

Get Sir John’s crypto investing column every Friday in our Bitcoin Market Journal investor newsletter.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Nexus Chain & Cointime to Host Industry AMA — Unpacking DeFi’s “Missing Layer”

    Nexus Chain will host a global AMA on December 27, 2025, at 20:00 (UTC+8) — “DeFi AMA|Unpacking the Missing Layer in Layer1.” The session will explore a key question facing the industry: as PoS evolves and liquidity remains fragmented, does DeFi still lack a foundational execution layer?

  • Japanese listed company ANAP Holdings increased its holdings of Bitcoin by 127.73.

    according to market sources, Japanese listed company ANAP Holdings has disclosed an increase in its Bitcoin holdings by 127.73 coins. As of now, the company's total Bitcoin holdings have reached 1,346.58 coins, valued at approximately 118 million USD.

  • Changpeng Zhao: Binance Wallet now supports identifying malicious addresses; you will receive a warning if you transfer funds to them.

    Zhao Changpeng posted on Binance Plaza stating, "The cryptocurrency industry should be able to completely eradicate address poisoning attacks and protect users. All wallets should simply check whether the receiving address is a poisoned address and block the user.This is a blockchain query. Wallets should not even display these junk transactions anywhere. If the value of the transaction is very small, filter it out. Security alliances in the industry should maintain a real-time blacklist of these addresses so that wallets can check before sending transactions. Binance Wallet is already doing this. If a user tries to send to a malicious address, they will receive a warning.

  • Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a total net outflow of $189 million yesterday, marking the fourth consecutive day of net outflows.

     according to SoSoValue data, the total net outflow of Bitcoin spot ETFs is 189 million USD.The Bitcoin spot ETF with the largest single-day net outflow yesterday was Blackrock's ETF IBIT, with a single-day net outflow of 157 million USD. Currently, IBIT's total historical net inflow has reached 62.34 billion USD. The second is Fidelity's ETF FBTC, with a single-day net outflow of 15.2979 million USD. Currently, FBTC's total historical net inflow has reached 12.189 billion USD. As of the time of writing, the total net asset value of Bitcoin spot ETFs is 114.289 billion USD, with the ETF net asset ratio (market value as a proportion of Bitcoin's total market value) reaching 6.53%, and the cumulative historical net inflow has reached 57.076 billion USD.

  • BTC falls below $88,000

     market shows BTC fell below $88,000, currently at $87,997.85, 24-hour decline reaches 0.88%, market volatility is significant, please manage your risk accordingly.

  • The U.S. spot Ethereum ETF saw net inflows of $84.59 million yesterday.

     according to Trader T monitoring, the US spot Ethereum ETF had a net inflow of 84.59 million USD yesterday.

  • ETH breaks $3,000

     the market shows ETH breaking through $3000, currently at $3000.08, with a 24-hour decline of 0.38%. The market is highly volatile, please manage your risk accordingly.

  • Binance Wallet launches "secure auto-signature" service

     according to the official announcement, Binance Wallet has launched the "Secure Auto Sign" (SAS) service: it now supports mnemonic/private key wallets to trade on Binance Wallet (web version).

  • Circle minted 500 million USDC on the Solana network.

    according to Onchain Lens monitoring, Circle has minted 500 million USDC on the Solana network. Since October 11, Circle has issued a total of 18 billion USDC on the Solana network.